Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 26
Date Signed Up:10/09/2010
Last Login:5/10/2015
Content Thumbs: 223 total,  328 ,  105
Comment Thumbs: 587 total,  942 ,  355
Content Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 22 Content: Peasant → Level 23 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 155 Comments: Faptastic → Level 156 Comments: Faptastic
Content Views:7792
Times Content Favorited:24 times
Total Comments Made:464
FJ Points:725
Favorite Tags: Pokemon (3)

latest user's comments

#185 - the problem with what happened is the ******* cop pumped six b…  [+] (8 replies) 08/29/2014 on It only works one way +2
User avatar
#198 - ilikewaterham (08/29/2014) [-]
You do realize that officers are trained to only fire their weapons with the intent to render the threat neutralized, and are trained to fire as many rounds as it takes to have the assailant down and incapable of movement, right?
#199 - tedge (08/29/2014) [-]
i dont know about all that, i know they're trained not to use deadly force where its not necessary and in this situation it was not necessary. if what he did was in any way "by the books" they wouldn't have suspended him.
User avatar
#200 - ilikewaterham (08/29/2014) [-]
If someone is reaching for a cops weapon, they have every right to defend themselves and use lethal force. Unfortunately right now this case is nothing more than a bunch of "he said she said", and we don't know the facts. If he did assault the officer and reach for the gun, then the cop did what he should have done and neutralized the threat. If not, then this is nothing more than a cold blooded murder. I doubt that it was that though. And of course he would be suspended, a white cop killing a black kid from a very black neighborhood isn't good for public image.
#201 - tedge (08/29/2014) [-]
i dont think that what he did warrants six bullets, im telling you, one shot that even grazed the kid would have done the trick. and the point is, if you dont have to kill, you dont kill. plain and simple, maybe it doesnt say that in the police handbook, but it's one of the main principles of being a decent human being. if it were up to me the cop would not still be alive. if the kid didnt die, he should be in jail, what he did was wrong, still doesnt warrant such an excess of force.
User avatar
#203 - ilikewaterham (08/29/2014) [-]
I said it once I'll say it again, if a cop is going to use his weapon he's going to mag dump. They're told to shoot until the threat is neutralized (DEAD). Reaching for a weapon to use against an officer is enough of a reason to put someone down. But hey, if he did just kill the kid for lolz then I'm right there with ya, let him fry. But one last time, when a cop shoots, it's to kill.
#256 - tedge (08/30/2014) [-]
fair enough, i guess my point is that having the right to do something, and it being the right thing to do dont coincide in this case.
User avatar
#188 - amishparadise (08/29/2014) [-]
If I'm shooting someone, I'm not just shooting once and checking, if I have to shoot I'm making damn sure that fucker doesn't get a chance to come at me again
#196 - tedge (08/29/2014) [-]
well any normal citizen would be tried for murder if they continued to fire after the threat was gone, i dont know about you but even one bullet is gonna deter me from reaching again. plus if he hand the gun in his hand the kid shouldnt have been able to get it from him anyways. im not saying the kid was a saint, but one bullet in the leg would have done the trick. or even just backhanding him would have worked. cops are given night sticks for a reason, the kid never seriously posed a threat on his life. the pig should be burned at the stake.
#9 - nice 06/30/2014 on Water pulse 0
#1 - okay, I'll bite. what the hell is handjammin?  [+] (1 reply) 04/08/2014 on YFW you catch your main... +3
#2 - yaboydoubled (04/08/2014) [-]
Jacking off