tazzerz
Rank #1851 on Content
Offline
Send mail to tazzerz Block tazzerz Invite tazzerz to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Facebook Profile: | Fuck that shit |
| Youtube Channel: | Nope |
| Steam Profile: | Yes |
| Consoles Owned: | Xbox360 , PC |
| Video Games Played: | FPS, Strategy, Arma, |
| X-box Gamertag: | Its similar to my username. |
| PSN: | Nope. |
| Interests: | Gaming , Reading , Doing stuff |
| Date Signed Up: | 7/19/2013 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| Location: | Ireland |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #1851 |
| Comment Ranking: | #3249 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #160 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #434 |
| Content Thumbs: | 17321 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 15222 |
| Content Level Progress: | 80.8% (808/1000) Level 215 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Content: Comedic Genius |
| Comment Level Progress: | 20.3% (203/1000) Level 312 Comments: Wizard → Level 313 Comments: Wizard |
| Subscribers: | 1 |
| Content Views: | 889588 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 1144 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 1342 |
| FJ Points: | 28014 |
| Favorite Tags: | 4Chan (3) | Dog (3) | funny (2) | greentext (2) | lol (2) | royal (2) | soldier (2) | terrorists (2) | Wolf (2) |
Hello.
Pictures
- Views: 39278
1286
79
Total: +1207
Comments: 79
Favorites: 91
Uploaded: 08/21/13
Don't want to know. - Views: 47929
1231
84
Total: +1147
Comments: 74
Favorites: 58
Uploaded: 08/19/13
And BANG its gone! - Views: 58517
1166
43
Total: +1123
Comments: 93
Favorites: 50
Uploaded: 09/25/13
Norman, you prick. - Views: 50141
851
45
Total: +806
Comments: 45
Favorites: 30
Uploaded: 09/30/13
Yup, - Views: 44673
798
46
Total: +752
Comments: 62
Favorites: 33
Uploaded: 08/13/13
Rule 34. - Views: 27783
769
36
Total: +733
Comments: 46
Favorites: 73
Uploaded: 09/16/15
These never get old
HD Gifs / WebMs
- Views: 24322
603
16
Total: +587
Comments: 56
Favorites: 35
Uploaded: 12/13/15
One Punch Man McGregor
GIFs
- Views: 30896
898
25
Total: +873
Comments: 75
Favorites: 74
Uploaded: 03/03/15
Thought I'd share this massive wolf - Views: 21909
454
25
Total: +429
Comments: 23
Favorites: 25
Uploaded: 07/25/13
Nice reflexs. - Views: 16596
318
38
Total: +280
Comments: 8
Favorites: 23
Uploaded: 08/09/13
A clean shave. - Views: 11347
194
27
Total: +167
Comments: 8
Favorites: 13
Uploaded: 08/20/13
Filthy. - Views: 9031
158
17
Total: +141
Comments: 14
Favorites: 12
Uploaded: 08/21/13
Internet arguments. - Views: 9802
132
18
Total: +114
Comments: 13
Favorites: 11
Uploaded: 08/12/13
Cordination
user favorites
latest user's comments
| #12 - Tanks are ******* amazing. | 01/09/2016 on War: Armored Warfare | +1 |
| #9 - Ooooh, I have some of these. | 01/06/2016 on Character Art: Armored Up... | +13 |
| #4 - This gave me wood, there, said it. | 01/05/2016 on porn for woodsmen | +28 |
| #2 - Ukraine is a pretty crazy place at the moment. [+] (45 new replies) | 01/03/2016 on Zero fuck squad | +172 |
| Pretty sure an anti-tank rifle isn't particularly effective anymore. Unless you're targeting people behind cover. #89 -
anon (01/04/2016) [-] They're great way of saying "fck that wall and everyone behind it". So yeah...pretty effective. #83 -
anon (01/04/2016) [-] "unless you're targeting people behind cover" So...unless it's like...95% of war? Heavy anti-material rounds have plenty of usage in war to this day. #46 -
heartbleed (01/04/2016) [-] That one looks like an old possibly WWII era ATT rifle so, I doubt it'd do much against let's say a T-72. The thinnest armor on the T-72 is around 80mm (this is without angling included) and I doubt your rifle has more than let's say 50mm of penetration. You say you could mess up the turret hydrolics or the optics and I say you better be a damn good shot and good luck. There's a reason why AT rifles were fazed out to use explosive weapons like RPG's or STINGER missiles. I'm using the T-72 as the example as the man above is Ukranian and the T-72 is a Russian MBT so it makes sense. #100 -
heartbleed (01/05/2016) [-] What the man in the .gif above is using is NOT a an anzio 20mm, it looks like a PTRS-41, which I'd think would be obvious as the Anzio is magazine fed and the weapon above is being breech loaded. At several kilometers range you're rinky dink rifle is going to lose alot of it's velocity and with that penetration, which it ALREADY doesn't have very much of! #103 -
killingpeter (01/05/2016) [-] I commented on general use of anti tank rifles. That a WW2 gun is obsolet 70 years later is kinda obvious. So I dont know why you felt you needed to go in detail between a PTRS-41 vs. T72. It makes absolutley no sense. Because that's what they'd actually be using, and I doubt even your Anzio 20mm could do anything useful against a modern tank. They changed the name from Anti Tank Rifle to Anti Materiel Rifle for a reason, they're useless against modern tanks. #105 -
killingpeter (01/05/2016) [-] As I pointed out they are not useless. What I said is actually pretty much standard sniper training. They even target tank optics and vital mechanics with even smaller rifles. And please read my comment again, I also said that there are more vehicles on a battlefield then tanks which you can use the rifle against. So please read first and then comment. Otherwise you look like an idiot. If you're gonna be taking out tank optics you're gonna pretty much have to be within RPG range anyways, snipers can be proficient at hitting human sized targets at around 1000~ yards or 900~ meters, now we shrink that down to about the size of tank optics (I'd wager around a hockey puck or a dinner plate at best this is also assuming it's not moving.) and I'm gonna at least halve that effective range so around 500~ yards or 450~ meters and you take the RPG-29 which using a FCU and tripod can fire and remain effective up to around ~900 meters. Even using a RPG-7 you can destroy a tank at ranges of 200~ meters Assuming they don't have reactive plate armor. which isn't that much shorter than your 20mm sniper round. I'm surprised no one has said this yet, but if you're targeting a T-72 with an FIM-92 stinger , you're going to be surprised. It's a surface to air missile Now in your defence he could always be shooting at an armored car or truck and in which case I suppose there's some purpose to having one but still... turret hydrolics down=totally fucked up optics down=totally fucked up 1 engine down=totally fucked up (some tanks have twin engines) other neat things to fuck up may include but are not limited to: destroy the guns heat shielding (makes the gun warp in unpredictable ways, making it inaccurate) damage the loading mechanism damage the ammo rack *this one is especially spectacular to fuck up* damage the tracks damage the fuel tanks damage the fire suppression system damage the bogies or tortion bars of the suspension basically there are many fascinating ways to totally fuck up a tank... and most of them dont even include explosions or injuring the crew, simply disabling the vehicle though obviously that`s an option too if you have a big enough gun You need to have some pretty serious balls, because most tanks rely on up to 3 different weapon platforms, normally 2 of those are very heavy weapons, like 50. cal machine gun and a 120mm cannon. And there's like 2 to 3 hatches, and plenty of mirrors usable for spotting. Even if you managed to damage steel tracks, and the suspension, you're in for a world of hurt, because you just catched a beast that can still breathe fire. while that is true, these rifles have ranges of well over 2km (2000 yards), some over 5. I`d imagine it`s pretty easy to stay hidden at that kind of range while firing a single round plus you`re not anchored to the ground, you can simply fuck off after you`ve disabled the enemy, or flank him and fire at the weaker side armor.... so you can target optics and hydraulics 2000 yards away? i dont think so. A tank is far from an indestructible machine, I know this, i served in a danish leopard2 tank squadron. Sand is the number 1 track killer though, not att rifles. I've heard of 1 mobility kill in Afghanistan on a challenger tank, and the crew still managed to get it in reverse after 10 RPG hits, and drive to safety. If I encountered an enemy MBT as part of an infantry company without heavy weapons, I would wait for it to pass instead of engaging and possibly lose. #84 -
anon (01/04/2016) [-] Mobility kills on tanks by infantry is a perfectly legitimate tactic that we are taught even to this day in the U.S. military. #33 -
anon (01/04/2016) [-] And it's totally legal to just go and buy one in the US (it needs a form 4 and the $200 tax stamp, but next to the cost of the rifle, that's nothing). Most of the vehicles used are trucks, BTRs, and BMPs which are all lightly armoured But the Ukranians were fighting the Russians, the Russians have fairly decent tanks, it's not like they're fighting ISIS or something. #87 -
anon (01/04/2016) [-] And shooting tanks is not the only usage or anti-material rounds flying downrange. Have someone shoot anti-material rounds at you for a while and you'll see that not only are they still effective in war, they are some of the MOST effective things infantry can be using in war. Totes yo! If you're legit curious as to why Russia invaded Ukraine look at this: www.ritholtz.com/blog/2014/03/10-reasons-why-russia-invaded-ukraine/ #13 -
ashendashin (01/04/2016) [-] Probably just using whatever weapons they've got lying around. Both weapons shown are pretty old I've actually shot both, I certainly do not recommend if you are a little guy, the PTRS is a 14.5x114 and the PKM is a 7.62x54. But if you are then I recommend putting most of your weight on your front foot for the PTRS and more or less the same for the PKM but fire that in short bursts Unlike you ever did, luciafoxx actually said something interesting. | ||
| #1 - While I can't say I'm a huge fan of Pearl Jam, I love this son… | 01/03/2016 on Wow. | +8 |
| #2 - YES! | 12/13/2015 on UFC and Chill | +31 |
| #1 - ÉIRE | 12/13/2015 on Aldo vs McGregor full fight | +16 |
| #1 - I took a sip from my coke can, and when I looked up it was over. GG. | 12/13/2015 on Real life one punch man | +17 |
| #2 - Dammit beat me to it. | 12/13/2015 on Conor Mcgregor Was Hacking | +1 |
| #20 - Hey, I live in Galway. Thats only 30mins away from me. | 12/07/2015 on Galway Diving Platform | +4 |
user's friends
Anonymous comments allowed.
6 comments displayed.
OP always delivers. Can I count on your vote? (subscribe?)
