Upload
Login or register

tankeruber

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/21/2012
Last Login:7/24/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4747
Highest Content Rank:#4921
Highest Comment Rank:#531
Content Thumbs: 49 total,  294 ,  245
Comment Thumbs: 9452 total,  14160 ,  4708
Content Level Progress: 84.74% (50/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 36% (36/100)
Level 289 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 290 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:1
Content Views:17138
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:6578
FJ Points:4127
Favorite Tags: are (2) | fuck (2) | Holy (2) | the (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#46 - This helps. 04/17/2016 on pls stop +1
#127 - t. casul 04/16/2016 on G.G. 0
#110 - Where comes the benefit from changing your basic biological cl…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/16/2016 on Based Curry 0
User avatar
#111 - Ruspanic (04/16/2016) [-]
My point about public opinion is not that the masses are always right.
My point is that we humans clearly can overcome what you call "basic biological cues", and it's not even that hard.

" I will continue """"slut-shaming"""" and laughing at virgins, and you can't stop me. "
Just because you're an asshole doesn't mean everyone else should be.

Interracial relationships, homosexuality and transgenderism are not immoral and I've yet to see any good reason why they should be considered so. Especially since the latter two aren't even conscious decisions, they're ways that people are. You might as well say being tall is immoral.

Your links are all very obviously ideological websites. Either you didn't read them or you don't care about impartiality. The second one in particular is full of subjective bullshit so I'll ignore it. The other two are marginally better, but still contain some retarded arguments, like "anal and oral sex are bad" and "gay people do drugs".

The best arguments you've got here are 1. gay sex spreads disease, and 2. validating homosexual relationships harms family stability overall. Here are my responses:
1. STDs are a risk carried by all sex, not just gay sex. They can mostly be prevented by being responsible in your sexual practices, e.g. using protection. The fact that some gay people behave irresponsibly doesn’t make homosexuality itself wrong. The cause of disease is not the fact that the sex partners are of the same gender.
2. Gay people aren’t responsible for rising divorce rates. Legalized same-sex marriage might be a symptom of the same increasingly liberal attitudes toward love and marriage, which definitely produce some negative effects, but that doesn’t mean ALL the effects of such social liberalism are negative.

Lastly, it’s telling that you consider Eastern European countries to be “based”. They tend to be backwards, impoverished shitholes compared to Western Europe. I should know, I’m from Russia originally. The main exception is Finland, which has high living standards and legalized gay marriage recently.
To say that competition in general is a good thing is a gross oversimplification. There’s no reason men and women should compete as if we were on opposite teams. We don’t actually have different interests. And there’s no reason why such pointless competition would create any gain. Life isn’t a zero-sum game: your wins do not have to be other people's losses.

Yes, given freedom some people make bad decisions, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be allowed freedom. It's none of your business if some people fail. Individual freedom is a natural right regardless.
#149 - Sodium - literally explodes when powdered and near an oxidiser… 04/15/2016 on anger. +5
#106 - >> #105 , while meant for the cuck down under, addresse…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/15/2016 on Based Curry 0
User avatar
#107 - Ruspanic (04/15/2016) [-]
Obviously I don't think we should forcibly brainwash or mind-control people into changing their social values, no shit. Here's what I don't understand about your stance: "doing it partially isn't an option"
Why not?
If I, a human with some degree of biologically-ingrained instinct, can stop myself from negatively judging male virgins or moderately promiscuous women, then why can't you? Why can't most people? Even if we can never convince everyone, why shouldn't we try?
After all, widely-held societal attitudes have been changed before, and in a relatively short span of time. Look at Western attitudes toward homosexuality, transgender people, divorce, premarital sex, interracial relationships, atheism, and all of these things that used to be shunned or at least looked-down upon. With homosexuality alone, just a few decades ago barely 1 in 10 Americans supported same-sex marriage being legal. Now it's over half. No microchips needed.
www.norc.org/NewsEventsPublications/PressReleases/Pages/american-acceptance-of-homosexuality-gss-report.aspx

More on topic, American attitudes toward sex can and have changed very dramatically and quite rapidly in recent decades, which weakens your point quite a bit.
journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/changes-americans-attitudes-sex-reviewing-40-years-data
Americans have become far more accepting of nearly every form of sex except extramarital affairs. Casual sex among young adults has become much more common and therefore presumably more acceptable.

I like to think humans are too smart to be ruled by simple instinct, don't you?
User avatar
#110 - tankeruber (04/16/2016) [-]
Where comes the benefit from changing your basic biological classifications?
Why can't I? Because I don't care enough to. Simple as that. I will continue """"slut-shaming"""" and laughing at virgins, and you can't stop me.
What the majority of Americans think doesn't interest me in the slightest. The majority of Americans voted for fucking Obama, if anything the majority of Americans thinking one way comes from media trying to push propaganda.

And Interracial relationships, homosexuality and transgender "people" are still, thankfully, told to fuck off in Europe in the based places like Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland etc by the majority of the population.
The fact that our moral code is decaying "dramatically and quite rapidly" is a bit disheartening, as that's the exact shit that happened to Rome.
If or not the majority does something, is irrelevant on discussing if it is a needed change or even an unwanted change.

Your source doesn't refute that people are unwilling to relearn basic biological cue's.
Young people are gullied into thinking being a gay is fine, despite there being tons of evidence for the negative effects multiple sexual partners, homosexuality and transgenderism, the number older people who kept traditional views keep dying off. It doesn't describe if people have changed their opinion, it shows how opinions have changed based on the 3 described age-groups, Boomers, GenX and Millenials. Just because a person believes in something, doesn't mean he is right, if I'm going to be the last person parroting research done on fags, so be it. It hasn't been disproven yet, so until that moment I'm relying on it.

www.battlefortruth.org/articlesdetail.asp?id=235
conservativepapers.com/news/2014/02/16/homosexuality-and-its-negative-effects-on-society/
homosexualityandscience.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/7-scientific-facts-about-homosexuality-and-its-adverse-effects-on-society/

First results on google.

The current system creates competitiveness between males and females, competitiveness increases general gain. Your system would encourage failures along with victors, no competitiveness, no gain.

Cultural Individualism is cancer, and has given birth to abominations such as 3rd wave feminism, the entire SJW movement and so forth.

Economic Individualism within a strict culture is much better. AnCap, Minarchist, Identitarian Anarchist is loads better.

This shit isn't structured right but I think you get my point, it's 3:55 AM, I'm gone.
User avatar
#111 - Ruspanic (04/16/2016) [-]
My point about public opinion is not that the masses are always right.
My point is that we humans clearly can overcome what you call "basic biological cues", and it's not even that hard.

" I will continue """"slut-shaming"""" and laughing at virgins, and you can't stop me. "
Just because you're an asshole doesn't mean everyone else should be.

Interracial relationships, homosexuality and transgenderism are not immoral and I've yet to see any good reason why they should be considered so. Especially since the latter two aren't even conscious decisions, they're ways that people are. You might as well say being tall is immoral.

Your links are all very obviously ideological websites. Either you didn't read them or you don't care about impartiality. The second one in particular is full of subjective bullshit so I'll ignore it. The other two are marginally better, but still contain some retarded arguments, like "anal and oral sex are bad" and "gay people do drugs".

The best arguments you've got here are 1. gay sex spreads disease, and 2. validating homosexual relationships harms family stability overall. Here are my responses:
1. STDs are a risk carried by all sex, not just gay sex. They can mostly be prevented by being responsible in your sexual practices, e.g. using protection. The fact that some gay people behave irresponsibly doesn’t make homosexuality itself wrong. The cause of disease is not the fact that the sex partners are of the same gender.
2. Gay people aren’t responsible for rising divorce rates. Legalized same-sex marriage might be a symptom of the same increasingly liberal attitudes toward love and marriage, which definitely produce some negative effects, but that doesn’t mean ALL the effects of such social liberalism are negative.

Lastly, it’s telling that you consider Eastern European countries to be “based”. They tend to be backwards, impoverished shitholes compared to Western Europe. I should know, I’m from Russia originally. The main exception is Finland, which has high living standards and legalized gay marriage recently.
To say that competition in general is a good thing is a gross oversimplification. There’s no reason men and women should compete as if we were on opposite teams. We don’t actually have different interests. And there’s no reason why such pointless competition would create any gain. Life isn’t a zero-sum game: your wins do not have to be other people's losses.

Yes, given freedom some people make bad decisions, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be allowed freedom. It's none of your business if some people fail. Individual freedom is a natural right regardless.
#105 - >"System" used unironically You're breaking *… 04/15/2016 on Based Curry 0
#60 - "FJ is a single entity" meme. Are you even trying at…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/15/2016 on Based Curry -3
User avatar
#62 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
"We have a lot of weeb-niggers, cucks, Bernie supporters and otherwise undesirables here"

you're one of those undesirables. just so you know.
and god forbid anyone go against the "system"
if you want to talk about what is and is not natural, computers sure as fuck are not
we didn't evolve with computers
so we should do away with it because it's not the way it's always been.
User avatar
#105 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
>"System" used unironically
You're breaking shitposting limits, plz stop.

It isn't about "It has been like this for X, it needs to stay X".
Computers filled a hole that we had, we didn't have to re-learn something to accept computers.
Removing all computers and forcing people to use things with a simillar concept but wildly diffrent usage, functions, calling them "The New Computers", is what you are doing.
You aren't filling a hole with changing how society percieves virgin males and virgin females/ men and women with many sexual partners, you're changing it for a negligible benefit.
#57 - Irrelevant, our biological programming clearly shows that it h…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/15/2016 on Based Curry -2
User avatar
#59 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
and funny, fj hates when men are called out for being virgins
both are wrong.
it fucks with people big time.
men lie about fucking, women feel ashamed of their sexuality.
live and fucking let live.
User avatar
#60 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
"FJ is a single entity" meme. Are you even trying at this point? We have a lot of weeb-niggers, cucks, Bernie supporters and otherwise undesirables here, sure, who dislike banter about them, but it's the cold fucking truth.
You don't put in effort to preserve your genes? Fuck you.
But since men and women have diffrent roles to play in generating offsprings, their method of gene preservation differs. For males, it's fuck as much as you can, hope some females are fertile enough to bring your offspring to life. If 80% of your offspring die, because you have shit genetics, you're still fine, the other 20% carry your genes. But you just ruined the lives of 80% of females. How do females avoid being fucked over by men with shit genetics? They are careful in considering their mates.

A man who doesn't try and a woman who let's everyone have a go, directly clash with this system, it also explains why most women seek the top% of men, and why there's such a high amount of men who haven't had sex compared to females. I'm going to bed.
User avatar
#62 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
"We have a lot of weeb-niggers, cucks, Bernie supporters and otherwise undesirables here"

you're one of those undesirables. just so you know.
and god forbid anyone go against the "system"
if you want to talk about what is and is not natural, computers sure as fuck are not
we didn't evolve with computers
so we should do away with it because it's not the way it's always been.
User avatar
#105 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
>"System" used unironically
You're breaking shitposting limits, plz stop.

It isn't about "It has been like this for X, it needs to stay X".
Computers filled a hole that we had, we didn't have to re-learn something to accept computers.
Removing all computers and forcing people to use things with a simillar concept but wildly diffrent usage, functions, calling them "The New Computers", is what you are doing.
You aren't filling a hole with changing how society percieves virgin males and virgin females/ men and women with many sexual partners, you're changing it for a negligible benefit.
#52 - "CURRENT YEAR MEME" used unironically. Get …  [+] (6 new replies) 04/15/2016 on Based Curry -2
User avatar
#55 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
condoms are very different now than they were then
and like I said, birth control and plan B
User avatar
#57 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
Irrelevant, our biological programming clearly shows that it hasn't been impacted by those tools, thus the old biological reflex of Alpha males and Virgin Females being good, but Sluts and Virgin Males being bad, persists.
You wouldn't be having this conversation if it hadn't had persisted or had been reversed, somehow.



User avatar
#59 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
and funny, fj hates when men are called out for being virgins
both are wrong.
it fucks with people big time.
men lie about fucking, women feel ashamed of their sexuality.
live and fucking let live.
User avatar
#60 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
"FJ is a single entity" meme. Are you even trying at this point? We have a lot of weeb-niggers, cucks, Bernie supporters and otherwise undesirables here, sure, who dislike banter about them, but it's the cold fucking truth.
You don't put in effort to preserve your genes? Fuck you.
But since men and women have diffrent roles to play in generating offsprings, their method of gene preservation differs. For males, it's fuck as much as you can, hope some females are fertile enough to bring your offspring to life. If 80% of your offspring die, because you have shit genetics, you're still fine, the other 20% carry your genes. But you just ruined the lives of 80% of females. How do females avoid being fucked over by men with shit genetics? They are careful in considering their mates.

A man who doesn't try and a woman who let's everyone have a go, directly clash with this system, it also explains why most women seek the top% of men, and why there's such a high amount of men who haven't had sex compared to females. I'm going to bed.
User avatar
#62 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
"We have a lot of weeb-niggers, cucks, Bernie supporters and otherwise undesirables here"

you're one of those undesirables. just so you know.
and god forbid anyone go against the "system"
if you want to talk about what is and is not natural, computers sure as fuck are not
we didn't evolve with computers
so we should do away with it because it's not the way it's always been.
User avatar
#105 - tankeruber (04/15/2016) [-]
>"System" used unironically
You're breaking shitposting limits, plz stop.

It isn't about "It has been like this for X, it needs to stay X".
Computers filled a hole that we had, we didn't have to re-learn something to accept computers.
Removing all computers and forcing people to use things with a simillar concept but wildly diffrent usage, functions, calling them "The New Computers", is what you are doing.
You aren't filling a hole with changing how society percieves virgin males and virgin females/ men and women with many sexual partners, you're changing it for a negligible benefit.
#47 - READ MY ******* POSTS YOU RETARD, DO SOME READING ON THE SUBJE…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/15/2016 on Based Curry 0
User avatar
#96 - Ruspanic (04/15/2016) [-]
your posts all basically amount to an "appeal to nature" fallacy.
User avatar
#75 - phanact (04/15/2016) [-]
chill bro
User avatar
#74 - peanutsaurusrex (04/15/2016) [-]
reading

is

for losers
User avatar
#51 - therealfell (04/15/2016) [-]
ouch, you're one of those all caps people
calm down, damn