Upload
Login or register

tanditsky

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:11/14/2012
Last Login:7/27/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7351
Highest Content Rank:#5558
Highest Comment Rank:#3019
Content Thumbs: 29 total,  60 ,  31
Comment Thumbs: 3180 total,  3984 ,  804
Content Level Progress: 47.45% (28/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 22% (22/100)
Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:7707
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:1080
FJ Points:2541

  • Views: 987
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 11 Total: -3
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 08/25/13
    Pure Class Pure Class

latest user's comments

#24 - Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to type all that, hav…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/26/2016 on The Truth Doesn't Matter +12
#47 - lujan (07/26/2016) [-]
Not to mention, the main rigger of the DNC, Debbie Wassermann Schultz, stepped down from her position and then was almost immediately hired by Clinton.
#10 - They hacked into her email account?  [+] (4 new replies) 07/25/2016 on The Truth Doesn't Matter 0
#16 - anon (07/26/2016) [-]
The DNC(democratic national convention) got hacked, and 19000 emails got leaked. some of these emails detail explicit plans to undermine Sanders campaign during the election, by the comitee itself. It is definite proof that Hillary has actually worked to rig the election, which is why she is now losing former Bernie voters by a landslide.

It is unknown who actually hacked the DNC to acquire these emails, but the DNC themselves claim its a russian ploy to get Trump into the presidency. That said, any article regarding the matter wont state much regarding Hillary's direct involvement.

Sadly, while definitely amoral and outrageous from a supposedly neutral party to actively rig an election, their actions havent been outright illegal as far as I've gathered, since they have limited their interference to either slander, giving Hillary more airtime than other candidates, or posing ambigious questions to opposing candidates.


TLDR; Hillary and the DNC are in cahoots, rigged an election. the DNC got hacked and emails detail the rigging.
User avatar
#24 - tanditsky (07/26/2016) [-]
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to type all that, have a thumb
#47 - lujan (07/26/2016) [-]
Not to mention, the main rigger of the DNC, Debbie Wassermann Schultz, stepped down from her position and then was almost immediately hired by Clinton.
User avatar
#12 - phawsy (07/25/2016) [-]
I think it was emails about trying to put sanders down to make hillary look better
#7 - Wait what's going on  [+] (6 new replies) 07/25/2016 on The Truth Doesn't Matter 0
User avatar
#8 - phawsy (07/25/2016) [-]
wikileaks leaked hillary emails
User avatar
#10 - tanditsky (07/25/2016) [-]
They hacked into her email account?
#16 - anon (07/26/2016) [-]
The DNC(democratic national convention) got hacked, and 19000 emails got leaked. some of these emails detail explicit plans to undermine Sanders campaign during the election, by the comitee itself. It is definite proof that Hillary has actually worked to rig the election, which is why she is now losing former Bernie voters by a landslide.

It is unknown who actually hacked the DNC to acquire these emails, but the DNC themselves claim its a russian ploy to get Trump into the presidency. That said, any article regarding the matter wont state much regarding Hillary's direct involvement.

Sadly, while definitely amoral and outrageous from a supposedly neutral party to actively rig an election, their actions havent been outright illegal as far as I've gathered, since they have limited their interference to either slander, giving Hillary more airtime than other candidates, or posing ambigious questions to opposing candidates.


TLDR; Hillary and the DNC are in cahoots, rigged an election. the DNC got hacked and emails detail the rigging.
User avatar
#24 - tanditsky (07/26/2016) [-]
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to type all that, have a thumb
#47 - lujan (07/26/2016) [-]
Not to mention, the main rigger of the DNC, Debbie Wassermann Schultz, stepped down from her position and then was almost immediately hired by Clinton.
User avatar
#12 - phawsy (07/25/2016) [-]
I think it was emails about trying to put sanders down to make hillary look better
#15 - Yes,i had to watch ************ dubbed version of the raid and… 07/25/2016 on avengers 0
#18 - Yes! I won! 07/20/2016 on YLYL Compilation (pt.5) 0
#80 - But it's just fine, I don't think it's something to get upset …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/19/2016 on "White skin was never... +4
User avatar
#85 - letrollzor (07/19/2016) [-]
The color of their skin doesn't matter to me and had it just been this one time i wouldn't have cared but it's happening everywhere with already established characters and that's what annoys me.
#78 - I don't like harry potter, but she clearly still has a lot of … 07/19/2016 on "White skin was never... +10
#140 - deleted my last comment because I posted too early, I'd o…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/19/2016 on Response to Nice attack 0
User avatar
#143 - tanuith (07/20/2016) [-]
those people as in the bad elements of middle eastern culture. there are good ones that is why I am calling for screening not straight up mass deportation permanently. Perhaps if more of them were good decent people we wouldn't need this however there are quite a few rotten ones that we shouldn't allow in. There are those like my landlord that are very kind hearted people and usually end up leaving the middle east to escape the brutal nature of middle eastern Islam. These same individuals are hunted by the bad ones who basically control life in the middle east for desertion of faith or not following certain rules. Are these people not worth protecting? The idea as I said isn't to stop them from immigrating so much as regulating it so we still get the good people and bar the bad elements.
#142 - tanuith has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#141 - tanuith (07/20/2016) [-]
My apologies for the generic somewhat abstract sourcing and shit yesterday was a little tired and out of it. Despite the fact that the sources are miscellaneous i will list a few that you can link to and one that i cant unfortunately. First up is Sargon of Akkad a moderate liberal who I have gotten most of my news about the dangerous side of liberalism from www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=sargon%20of%20akkad there are also a few channels linked to him I watch such as bearing, undoomed, chrisraygun, harmful opinions, but sargon is the most level headed and has the best discritpions as to why things are bad so I would recommend that one. the next I occasionally visit although I am weary of actual news sites being biased and pushing a narrative and agenda so I probably wont agree with everything on it but it has interesting articles heatst.com/ the other sources are my landlord Saheed a relatively old civil war veteran who lost an eye from Iran who was with the loyalists, and various forums that I do not remember offhand. I realize that this is not much better then just saying various sources but I thought i might as well give you something.
#139 - Comment deleted 07/19/2016 on Response to Nice attack 0
#137 - It's hard to have a serious argument when you say "these …  [+] (6 new replies) 07/19/2016 on Response to Nice attack 0
User avatar
#138 - tanuith (07/19/2016) [-]
well there is not much else we can do to stop this kind of shit from happening. I may not be the best to argue this with but the way that the sjw's would want us to handle this has evidently not worked, the point is we need to see who wants to stay and respect the law. If they fuck shit up then let them deal with the consequences of their actions. While its fine and dandy to think we should just let these people in and go out of our way to protect them, that hasn't worked and we need a different approach. show them that there is consequences and this shit will stop.
User avatar
#140 - tanditsky (07/19/2016) [-]
deleted my last comment because I posted too early, I'd only written like 4 words
So I notice you're still calling "those people", since we've established most of the attacks are from people born in European countries I'm assuming you mean brown people? In which case why do you think anything needs to be done, we've been living peaceful alongside each other for generations now, I don't think race problems are a bad as class problems here. I don't know why sjws are being brought into this, I wouldn't say I'm representing that side. I'm still not exactly sure what you want to do, show them their is consequences? I think the system so far has worked, for the most part, obviously it's not ideal to have a load of refugees not allowed to work with nothing to do all day, but the answer certainly isn't send them to a refugee camp. And don't you think it's only right to try to protect people who are mostly at risk from crazy right wing British cunts? If we let refugees in and give them somewhere to stay, I think we should also protect them against people born here who want to hurt them because of their skin colour
User avatar
#143 - tanuith (07/20/2016) [-]
those people as in the bad elements of middle eastern culture. there are good ones that is why I am calling for screening not straight up mass deportation permanently. Perhaps if more of them were good decent people we wouldn't need this however there are quite a few rotten ones that we shouldn't allow in. There are those like my landlord that are very kind hearted people and usually end up leaving the middle east to escape the brutal nature of middle eastern Islam. These same individuals are hunted by the bad ones who basically control life in the middle east for desertion of faith or not following certain rules. Are these people not worth protecting? The idea as I said isn't to stop them from immigrating so much as regulating it so we still get the good people and bar the bad elements.
#142 - tanuith has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#141 - tanuith (07/20/2016) [-]
My apologies for the generic somewhat abstract sourcing and shit yesterday was a little tired and out of it. Despite the fact that the sources are miscellaneous i will list a few that you can link to and one that i cant unfortunately. First up is Sargon of Akkad a moderate liberal who I have gotten most of my news about the dangerous side of liberalism from www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=sargon%20of%20akkad there are also a few channels linked to him I watch such as bearing, undoomed, chrisraygun, harmful opinions, but sargon is the most level headed and has the best discritpions as to why things are bad so I would recommend that one. the next I occasionally visit although I am weary of actual news sites being biased and pushing a narrative and agenda so I probably wont agree with everything on it but it has interesting articles heatst.com/ the other sources are my landlord Saheed a relatively old civil war veteran who lost an eye from Iran who was with the loyalists, and various forums that I do not remember offhand. I realize that this is not much better then just saying various sources but I thought i might as well give you something.
#139 - tanditsky has deleted their comment.
[ 1069 Total ]