Upload
Login or register

swimmingprodigy

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/17/2010
Last Login:7/25/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1929
Highest Content Rank:#341
Highest Comment Rank:#131
Content Thumbs: 18161 total,  21078 ,  2917
Comment Thumbs: 51414 total,  62820 ,  11406
Content Level Progress: 7.3% (73/1000)
Level 218 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 83.8% (838/1000)
Level 347 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 348 Comments: Sold Soul
Subscribers:22
Content Views:393888
Times Content Favorited:1886 times
Total Comments Made:16376
FJ Points:66874
Favorite Tags: a (3) | Apple (2) | epic (2) | justin (2) | lol (2) | Mario (2) | remi (2)

latest user's comments

#10 - How is someone to know what people's intentions are going to b…  [+] (26 new replies) 04/22/2016 on oooooooh +8
#37 - zenethe has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#11 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
its called a drink for a reason, you drink it
#33 - vozel (04/22/2016) [-]
User avatar
#12 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Well sure; but its up to the person who's drinking to not drive after they drink. There's no babysitting service once you're old enough to drink
User avatar
#13 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
you dont have to drive to die from alcohol, you can die from drinking it, and thats what it is marketed as, a drink
User avatar
#14 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I dont understand your point. In your mind, who is responsible for keeping alcoholics in check? Does everyone need a babysitter? Adults no longer need to take responsibility for themsevles?
User avatar
#17 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
also just so you know i dont think this should happen i am just saying that it has logic, i believe people should be held accountable for there own actions and i think accesory in some cases is stupid but aye thats the way the world goes, cant always win
User avatar
#15 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
if you sell a product that can kill as a drink and tell people they should drink then yes they should be held accountable
User avatar
#16 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Cigarettes can kill. Cars can kill. Motorcycles can kill.
Should Marlboro, Toyota, and Kawasaki be held accountable?


It's the people's choice to drink alcohol. They should be held accountable for themselves
User avatar
#18 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
fuck yes Malabo should be accountable is that a honest question, thats worse the alcohol as for older generations they didnt even know it caused cancer jesus are you even educated? cause that was stupid as for cars companies though no as the car is not designed to kill if you drive it how intended it wont kill you, alcohole and cigs on the other hand are actually dangerious even in small amounts as they are both poisons
User avatar
#56 - ellienyte (04/22/2016) [-]
Do you want bakers held accountable for obesity too? After all they sell things that can make you fat and tell people to eat them.
#38 - zenethe (04/22/2016) [-]
You seem to have 0 stock in the responsibilities of individuals and just want someone else to blame. Alcohol when used the way it is intended will get you drunk, not kill. As for Cigarettes I don't know they give like their on little high or something and reduce stress (albeit caused by wanting a cigarette). But what this guy is saying is the signs are out there, TV commercials, billboards, even on the carton or the bottle letting people know it's a dangerous substance. But there are other benefits you can gain from consuming them, like a good time. It's the responsibility of the people and not the companies to not do dumb ass shit with the product. I drink all the time and haven't gotten myself killed in a drunk driving accident or gotten alcohol poisoning; even if I did why should the company be at fault? I know that can happen and should take personal steps to avoid being a dumbass. My brother smokes to reduce stress, he knows what it's doing to him and he's quitting because of his kid. It's not the company's fault he fucked up his lungs for 9 years, it was his choice to buy the pack.
User avatar
#20 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Ok I'm going to stop here because there's just no getting through to you no matter how many example I try and present.

If there is a box of rat poison on the kitchen counter in your house, and you, knowing that it is poison, eat the rat poison, you can't be mad at the company because they make rat poison. You knew what it does, if you didn't want to die you shouldn't have eaten the rat poison.

Companies are free to produce what they want, that's the business they're in. It's up to the people to decide if they want to use the products. Nobody forces them
User avatar
#21 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
rat poison is not designed for human consumption, actually think about what you are saying b4 you comment please
User avatar
#22 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I've concluded that you must either be very dim or a very good troll. Seeing as your account is very old and you seem to have a decent amount of thumbs, I think that you're just retarded
User avatar
#60 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
He seems drunk....
User avatar
#23 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
or i actually know what im talking about, you are trying to compare something that is marketed as poison not for human consumption to something that is poison marketed for human consumption,. not sure why you dont understand this, one is saying dont take this or it will kill the other is saying take this and it can kill, its pretty much like handing someone a gun and saying kill yourself, even if they say but on drink a little its like saying oh you can shoot yourself but only a little bit and if it kills you well its your fault, if i hand someone a nosse and say kill yourself i get charged with accessory but if companies do it, welp it dont matter cause they are companies
User avatar
#27 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I think I've figured it out; you're that stupid grandma who burned herself with coffee and then sued McDonald's for lik 14 million dollars for not having a warning sign on their coffee saying that it's hot.

Lol moron
User avatar
#29 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
well they should have had a warning sign, oh and you just proved me right as mc donalds was accountable for something she done, but i dont think they should have and thats the part you did not read, im not saying any of this should happen but it could, i do think smoke company's should stop selling their products though
User avatar
#26 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I have given you at least 5 examples yet you dont understand any of them. Just because something exists doesn't mean you have to use it. That's the beauty of freedom of choice. If you give someone a drink they have the choice not to drink it. If you give someone a gun and tell them to shoot themselves they have the choice not to shoot themselves. And if you give someone a noose and tell them to kill yourself they have the choice not to do it.

Are you an /r9k/ robot who needs a babysitter to tell them that drinking is bad and guns r scary? Adults need to grow up and make their own choices and be responsible for themselves, not companies
User avatar
#28 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
and you are correct and i agree with you but unfortunately the problem you are not getting is accessory, its exists its a fucking law but only individuals get charged with it, not corporations, how accessory works: i give you a weapon, you kill someone you get charged with accessory

how it dont work: i give you a weapon to kill someone, you use ya brain and dont use it you dont get charged
User avatar
#31 - mindyourownbusines (04/22/2016) [-]
That's not at all what you were saying, but here's another think sold as a drink that can kill you - water. If you die from drinking too much, do you really think the water company will/should be an "accessory" to your death/suicide?
User avatar
#19 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
same with guns, they are designed to kill, dont even try act like they are not, if they were designed to stop a predator you wouldn't need a 40cal ect
User avatar
#61 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
Guns are designed to fire a projectile. That's all
User avatar
#32 - stringfingerable (04/22/2016) [-]
Wow you are dumb.
#25 - anon (04/22/2016) [-]
Jesus, dude. Just stop and listen to what you're saying.
#8 - I don't agree. No one forces the liquor down their throat, it'…  [+] (28 new replies) 04/22/2016 on oooooooh +13
User avatar
#9 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
well then no one should be charged for accessory then, the world just became a really shitty place
User avatar
#10 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
How is someone to know what people's intentions are going to be before they do something? By that logic should we not allow people to drive because they might crash their cars?
#37 - zenethe has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#11 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
its called a drink for a reason, you drink it
#33 - vozel (04/22/2016) [-]
User avatar
#12 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Well sure; but its up to the person who's drinking to not drive after they drink. There's no babysitting service once you're old enough to drink
User avatar
#13 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
you dont have to drive to die from alcohol, you can die from drinking it, and thats what it is marketed as, a drink
User avatar
#14 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I dont understand your point. In your mind, who is responsible for keeping alcoholics in check? Does everyone need a babysitter? Adults no longer need to take responsibility for themsevles?
User avatar
#17 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
also just so you know i dont think this should happen i am just saying that it has logic, i believe people should be held accountable for there own actions and i think accesory in some cases is stupid but aye thats the way the world goes, cant always win
User avatar
#15 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
if you sell a product that can kill as a drink and tell people they should drink then yes they should be held accountable
User avatar
#16 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Cigarettes can kill. Cars can kill. Motorcycles can kill.
Should Marlboro, Toyota, and Kawasaki be held accountable?


It's the people's choice to drink alcohol. They should be held accountable for themselves
User avatar
#18 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
fuck yes Malabo should be accountable is that a honest question, thats worse the alcohol as for older generations they didnt even know it caused cancer jesus are you even educated? cause that was stupid as for cars companies though no as the car is not designed to kill if you drive it how intended it wont kill you, alcohole and cigs on the other hand are actually dangerious even in small amounts as they are both poisons
User avatar
#56 - ellienyte (04/22/2016) [-]
Do you want bakers held accountable for obesity too? After all they sell things that can make you fat and tell people to eat them.
#38 - zenethe (04/22/2016) [-]
You seem to have 0 stock in the responsibilities of individuals and just want someone else to blame. Alcohol when used the way it is intended will get you drunk, not kill. As for Cigarettes I don't know they give like their on little high or something and reduce stress (albeit caused by wanting a cigarette). But what this guy is saying is the signs are out there, TV commercials, billboards, even on the carton or the bottle letting people know it's a dangerous substance. But there are other benefits you can gain from consuming them, like a good time. It's the responsibility of the people and not the companies to not do dumb ass shit with the product. I drink all the time and haven't gotten myself killed in a drunk driving accident or gotten alcohol poisoning; even if I did why should the company be at fault? I know that can happen and should take personal steps to avoid being a dumbass. My brother smokes to reduce stress, he knows what it's doing to him and he's quitting because of his kid. It's not the company's fault he fucked up his lungs for 9 years, it was his choice to buy the pack.
User avatar
#20 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Ok I'm going to stop here because there's just no getting through to you no matter how many example I try and present.

If there is a box of rat poison on the kitchen counter in your house, and you, knowing that it is poison, eat the rat poison, you can't be mad at the company because they make rat poison. You knew what it does, if you didn't want to die you shouldn't have eaten the rat poison.

Companies are free to produce what they want, that's the business they're in. It's up to the people to decide if they want to use the products. Nobody forces them
User avatar
#21 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
rat poison is not designed for human consumption, actually think about what you are saying b4 you comment please
User avatar
#22 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I've concluded that you must either be very dim or a very good troll. Seeing as your account is very old and you seem to have a decent amount of thumbs, I think that you're just retarded
User avatar
#60 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
He seems drunk....
User avatar
#23 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
or i actually know what im talking about, you are trying to compare something that is marketed as poison not for human consumption to something that is poison marketed for human consumption,. not sure why you dont understand this, one is saying dont take this or it will kill the other is saying take this and it can kill, its pretty much like handing someone a gun and saying kill yourself, even if they say but on drink a little its like saying oh you can shoot yourself but only a little bit and if it kills you well its your fault, if i hand someone a nosse and say kill yourself i get charged with accessory but if companies do it, welp it dont matter cause they are companies
User avatar
#27 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I think I've figured it out; you're that stupid grandma who burned herself with coffee and then sued McDonald's for lik 14 million dollars for not having a warning sign on their coffee saying that it's hot.

Lol moron
User avatar
#29 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
well they should have had a warning sign, oh and you just proved me right as mc donalds was accountable for something she done, but i dont think they should have and thats the part you did not read, im not saying any of this should happen but it could, i do think smoke company's should stop selling their products though
User avatar
#26 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I have given you at least 5 examples yet you dont understand any of them. Just because something exists doesn't mean you have to use it. That's the beauty of freedom of choice. If you give someone a drink they have the choice not to drink it. If you give someone a gun and tell them to shoot themselves they have the choice not to shoot themselves. And if you give someone a noose and tell them to kill yourself they have the choice not to do it.

Are you an /r9k/ robot who needs a babysitter to tell them that drinking is bad and guns r scary? Adults need to grow up and make their own choices and be responsible for themselves, not companies
User avatar
#28 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
and you are correct and i agree with you but unfortunately the problem you are not getting is accessory, its exists its a fucking law but only individuals get charged with it, not corporations, how accessory works: i give you a weapon, you kill someone you get charged with accessory

how it dont work: i give you a weapon to kill someone, you use ya brain and dont use it you dont get charged
User avatar
#31 - mindyourownbusines (04/22/2016) [-]
That's not at all what you were saying, but here's another think sold as a drink that can kill you - water. If you die from drinking too much, do you really think the water company will/should be an "accessory" to your death/suicide?
User avatar
#19 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
same with guns, they are designed to kill, dont even try act like they are not, if they were designed to stop a predator you wouldn't need a 40cal ect
User avatar
#61 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
Guns are designed to fire a projectile. That's all
User avatar
#32 - stringfingerable (04/22/2016) [-]
Wow you are dumb.
#25 - anon (04/22/2016) [-]
Jesus, dude. Just stop and listen to what you're saying.
#256 - More googling reveals that New York City (where I live and am …  [+] (3 new replies) 04/22/2016 on europe 0
User avatar
#263 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
Ah, yes.

NYC is like it's own State.

Always gets confusing for birth certificates and crap...
User avatar
#266 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Huh? What's wrong with their birth certificates?
User avatar
#268 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
You cannot get birth certificates for babies born in New York City from the New York State Vital Records Department!

And if you try to look up anything about it or anything else regarding New York, you get crap for New York City, which will not have anything to do with you if you are from New York, outside of the city...

Such a pain...
#253 - I wouldnt wanna live in alaska. Would go there in the summer t… 04/22/2016 on europe +1
#251 - After a bit of googling I am under the impression that you're …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2016 on europe 0
User avatar
#269 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
When I got my concealed carry permit in NY I just showed them my veterans ID, waited a couple weeks and it came in the mail. Was pretty easy.

Of course, it has been a while... Things may have changed.
#5 - She wants to hold gun manufacturers accountable for people's d…  [+] (31 new replies) 04/22/2016 on oooooooh +33
#59 - anon (04/22/2016) [-]
if it is the manufacturers fault sure they can be
User avatar
#7 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
actually there is logic for jack denials as you are handing someone poison and its known it can kill, its also addictive, this is coming from someone who drinks but im just saying there is logic, if a man hands someone a knife and he knows hes going to kill someone then he also gets charged as an accessory so its not really much different
User avatar
#8 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I don't agree. No one forces the liquor down their throat, it's completely their fault if they CHOOSE to drink and drive. No one other than the person who chooses to drink and drive is responsible. Even if it is addictive poison that inebriates and kills, everyone is well aware of the side effects yet choose to do it anyway. Same with how you can't blame Marlboro for people choosing to smoke.
User avatar
#9 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
well then no one should be charged for accessory then, the world just became a really shitty place
User avatar
#10 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
How is someone to know what people's intentions are going to be before they do something? By that logic should we not allow people to drive because they might crash their cars?
#37 - zenethe has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#11 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
its called a drink for a reason, you drink it
#33 - vozel (04/22/2016) [-]
User avatar
#12 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Well sure; but its up to the person who's drinking to not drive after they drink. There's no babysitting service once you're old enough to drink
User avatar
#13 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
you dont have to drive to die from alcohol, you can die from drinking it, and thats what it is marketed as, a drink
User avatar
#14 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I dont understand your point. In your mind, who is responsible for keeping alcoholics in check? Does everyone need a babysitter? Adults no longer need to take responsibility for themsevles?
User avatar
#17 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
also just so you know i dont think this should happen i am just saying that it has logic, i believe people should be held accountable for there own actions and i think accesory in some cases is stupid but aye thats the way the world goes, cant always win
User avatar
#15 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
if you sell a product that can kill as a drink and tell people they should drink then yes they should be held accountable
User avatar
#16 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Cigarettes can kill. Cars can kill. Motorcycles can kill.
Should Marlboro, Toyota, and Kawasaki be held accountable?


It's the people's choice to drink alcohol. They should be held accountable for themselves
User avatar
#18 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
fuck yes Malabo should be accountable is that a honest question, thats worse the alcohol as for older generations they didnt even know it caused cancer jesus are you even educated? cause that was stupid as for cars companies though no as the car is not designed to kill if you drive it how intended it wont kill you, alcohole and cigs on the other hand are actually dangerious even in small amounts as they are both poisons
User avatar
#56 - ellienyte (04/22/2016) [-]
Do you want bakers held accountable for obesity too? After all they sell things that can make you fat and tell people to eat them.
#38 - zenethe (04/22/2016) [-]
You seem to have 0 stock in the responsibilities of individuals and just want someone else to blame. Alcohol when used the way it is intended will get you drunk, not kill. As for Cigarettes I don't know they give like their on little high or something and reduce stress (albeit caused by wanting a cigarette). But what this guy is saying is the signs are out there, TV commercials, billboards, even on the carton or the bottle letting people know it's a dangerous substance. But there are other benefits you can gain from consuming them, like a good time. It's the responsibility of the people and not the companies to not do dumb ass shit with the product. I drink all the time and haven't gotten myself killed in a drunk driving accident or gotten alcohol poisoning; even if I did why should the company be at fault? I know that can happen and should take personal steps to avoid being a dumbass. My brother smokes to reduce stress, he knows what it's doing to him and he's quitting because of his kid. It's not the company's fault he fucked up his lungs for 9 years, it was his choice to buy the pack.
User avatar
#20 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
Ok I'm going to stop here because there's just no getting through to you no matter how many example I try and present.

If there is a box of rat poison on the kitchen counter in your house, and you, knowing that it is poison, eat the rat poison, you can't be mad at the company because they make rat poison. You knew what it does, if you didn't want to die you shouldn't have eaten the rat poison.

Companies are free to produce what they want, that's the business they're in. It's up to the people to decide if they want to use the products. Nobody forces them
User avatar
#21 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
rat poison is not designed for human consumption, actually think about what you are saying b4 you comment please
User avatar
#22 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I've concluded that you must either be very dim or a very good troll. Seeing as your account is very old and you seem to have a decent amount of thumbs, I think that you're just retarded
User avatar
#60 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
He seems drunk....
User avatar
#23 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
or i actually know what im talking about, you are trying to compare something that is marketed as poison not for human consumption to something that is poison marketed for human consumption,. not sure why you dont understand this, one is saying dont take this or it will kill the other is saying take this and it can kill, its pretty much like handing someone a gun and saying kill yourself, even if they say but on drink a little its like saying oh you can shoot yourself but only a little bit and if it kills you well its your fault, if i hand someone a nosse and say kill yourself i get charged with accessory but if companies do it, welp it dont matter cause they are companies
User avatar
#27 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I think I've figured it out; you're that stupid grandma who burned herself with coffee and then sued McDonald's for lik 14 million dollars for not having a warning sign on their coffee saying that it's hot.

Lol moron
User avatar
#29 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
well they should have had a warning sign, oh and you just proved me right as mc donalds was accountable for something she done, but i dont think they should have and thats the part you did not read, im not saying any of this should happen but it could, i do think smoke company's should stop selling their products though
User avatar
#26 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I have given you at least 5 examples yet you dont understand any of them. Just because something exists doesn't mean you have to use it. That's the beauty of freedom of choice. If you give someone a drink they have the choice not to drink it. If you give someone a gun and tell them to shoot themselves they have the choice not to shoot themselves. And if you give someone a noose and tell them to kill yourself they have the choice not to do it.

Are you an /r9k/ robot who needs a babysitter to tell them that drinking is bad and guns r scary? Adults need to grow up and make their own choices and be responsible for themselves, not companies
User avatar
#28 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
and you are correct and i agree with you but unfortunately the problem you are not getting is accessory, its exists its a fucking law but only individuals get charged with it, not corporations, how accessory works: i give you a weapon, you kill someone you get charged with accessory

how it dont work: i give you a weapon to kill someone, you use ya brain and dont use it you dont get charged
User avatar
#31 - mindyourownbusines (04/22/2016) [-]
That's not at all what you were saying, but here's another think sold as a drink that can kill you - water. If you die from drinking too much, do you really think the water company will/should be an "accessory" to your death/suicide?
User avatar
#19 - ratytang (04/22/2016) [-]
same with guns, they are designed to kill, dont even try act like they are not, if they were designed to stop a predator you wouldn't need a 40cal ect
User avatar
#61 - wootsauce (04/22/2016) [-]
Guns are designed to fire a projectile. That's all
User avatar
#32 - stringfingerable (04/22/2016) [-]
Wow you are dumb.
#25 - anon (04/22/2016) [-]
Jesus, dude. Just stop and listen to what you're saying.
#25 - >Sign receipt "Jane Smith" >never be found 04/21/2016 on Small heist +2
#229 - huh alaska. That's cool. Alaska has the 2nd highest median inc…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/21/2016 on europe +1
User avatar
#250 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
Alaska also has the nation's highest cost of living, worst quality of life, worst air pollution, and has 4 times the amount of convicted child-rapists than any State!
User avatar
#253 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I wouldnt wanna live in alaska. Would go there in the summer to see some nature tho.

Fucking NYC tho
#57 - Because Jackson be racist. He owned dem slaves, automatically … 04/21/2016 on Burger on the new 20$ bill -1
#223 - I have a buddy who lives in northern Cali. He does have guns b…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/21/2016 on europe +1
User avatar
#227 - dingdongpancakes (04/21/2016) [-]
Good luck bro, I'm moving out to Alaska to study in less than half a year. Seems life will get better for both of us
User avatar
#248 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
Alaska is fucking hell, man!

Are you nuts?
User avatar
#252 - dingdongpancakes (04/22/2016) [-]
No, Alaska is a lovely place. I'm not going out into the middle of butt fuck nowhere Alaska like that guy who died and they made a book about.
User avatar
#262 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
Every place in Alaska is the middle-of-nowhere!

And people die ALL THE TIME up there and no one gets caught.

Then there is the nation's highest cost of living, lack of food, highest amount of convicted child-rapists(like 4 times higher than any state!), no police, high cost of utilities, 6 months of night, worst air pollution in America, HORRIBLE people!

What exactly do you find "lovely" about all that?
User avatar
#264 - dingdongpancakes (04/22/2016) [-]
all of it
User avatar
#267 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
You love child-rapists?
User avatar
#229 - swimmingprodigy (04/21/2016) [-]
huh alaska. That's cool. Alaska has the 2nd highest median income in the US, 2nd only to Maryland (fun fact, idk why i remembered that).

Good luck to you too
User avatar
#250 - deutschblut (04/22/2016) [-]
Alaska also has the nation's highest cost of living, worst quality of life, worst air pollution, and has 4 times the amount of convicted child-rapists than any State!
User avatar
#253 - swimmingprodigy (04/22/2016) [-]
I wouldnt wanna live in alaska. Would go there in the summer to see some nature tho.

Fucking NYC tho