supersonicman

supersonicman Avatar Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to supersonicman Block supersonicman Invite supersonicman to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:10/31/2013
Last Login:1/19/2015
Location:The United States
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 2918 total,  3343 ,  425
Comment Thumbs: 393 total,  501 ,  108
Content Level Progress: 90% (90/100)
Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 125 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 136 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:198545
Times Content Favorited:161 times
Total Comments Made:562
FJ Points:2847
Favorite Tags: america (3) | africa (2) | african (2) | after (2) | before (2) | democracy (2) | Religion (2) | skyrim (2) | Spiderman (2) | usa (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 43313
    Thumbs Up 1019 Thumbs Down 75 Total: +944
    Comments: 237
    Favorites: 95
    Uploaded: 12/06/13
    Before and after Before and after
  • Views: 30275
    Thumbs Up 549 Thumbs Down 55 Total: +494
    Comments: 264
    Favorites: 13
    Uploaded: 11/15/13
    Lip Plates Lip Plates
  • Views: 18678
    Thumbs Up 424 Thumbs Down 52 Total: +372
    Comments: 104
    Favorites: 14
    Uploaded: 03/08/14
    The United States of America The United States of America
  • Views: 13713
    Thumbs Up 242 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +227
    Comments: 41
    Favorites: 9
    Uploaded: 08/28/14
    Crime is no laughing matter! Crime is no laughing matter!
  • Views: 15967
    Thumbs Up 254 Thumbs Down 31 Total: +223
    Comments: 59
    Favorites: 9
    Uploaded: 12/04/13
    Hair Hair
  • Views: 12311
    Thumbs Up 186 Thumbs Down 21 Total: +165
    Comments: 27
    Favorites: 6
    Uploaded: 05/12/14
    This was hundreds of years ago!!! This was hundreds of years ago!!!
1 2 3 4 5 6 > [ 32 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#11 - Yes, because those thousands of years with fire power was horr… 08/28/2014 on Top of the food chain 0
#18 - Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether … 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
#16 - Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking f…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#14 - For starters, important conversations to me are usually with f…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#12 - I don't re-read all my comments on one page and no offense to …  [+] (6 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #13 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Then why have it at all?

There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but if you can't be bothered to spend 5 seconds to make sure you're not talking out of your ass, then why bother talking at all? Just to waste time on both our parts?
User avatar #14 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
For starters, important conversations to me are usually with friends and family, it isn't because of the topic we are talking about. If I approached everything with if it's unimportant ignore it, I wouldn't talk to anyone. Secondly, are you reading the entire comment chain?
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#10 - In the comments, not the post. I can name several reasons both…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #11 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
I never said that you *did* say it in the content.

All I said was that IF you actually believe this, you're the one guilty of being a blind fanboy. You were the one who offered your own opinion, and are now trying to backpedal and state that you didn't. I know it's been three weeks, but there's no reason to forget how a conversation went when the transcript is right in front of you.
User avatar #12 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I don't re-read all my comments on one page and no offense to you, but this conversation isn't so important i'll remember everything.
User avatar #13 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Then why have it at all?

There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but if you can't be bothered to spend 5 seconds to make sure you're not talking out of your ass, then why bother talking at all? Just to waste time on both our parts?
User avatar #14 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
For starters, important conversations to me are usually with friends and family, it isn't because of the topic we are talking about. If I approached everything with if it's unimportant ignore it, I wouldn't talk to anyone. Secondly, are you reading the entire comment chain?
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#8 - I did put Spider-man fans and batman fans, never said it was m…  [+] (10 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #9 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Quoth you: "I honestly think spiderman would win because of the above mentioned."

So, yes, you did DIRECTLY state your opinion on the amtter.
User avatar #10 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
In the comments, not the post. I can name several reasons both sides are powerful, but I never stated my opinion in the content.
User avatar #11 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
I never said that you *did* say it in the content.

All I said was that IF you actually believe this, you're the one guilty of being a blind fanboy. You were the one who offered your own opinion, and are now trying to backpedal and state that you didn't. I know it's been three weeks, but there's no reason to forget how a conversation went when the transcript is right in front of you.
User avatar #12 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I don't re-read all my comments on one page and no offense to you, but this conversation isn't so important i'll remember everything.
User avatar #13 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Then why have it at all?

There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but if you can't be bothered to spend 5 seconds to make sure you're not talking out of your ass, then why bother talking at all? Just to waste time on both our parts?
User avatar #14 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
For starters, important conversations to me are usually with friends and family, it isn't because of the topic we are talking about. If I approached everything with if it's unimportant ignore it, I wouldn't talk to anyone. Secondly, are you reading the entire comment chain?
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#197 - And is it not possible to hide all of that. Accents change and… 08/28/2014 on (untitled) 0
#6 - I'm not making my own opinion on the matter, I'm just repeatin…  [+] (12 new replies) 08/28/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #7 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Except you didn't say 'Wow, batman fans are bad at arguing' you said 'Wow, Batman doesn't actually have redeeming qualities besides 'he's batman.'' The first would be repeating what you heard, the second is forming your own opinion based on it. You must be watching five-year-olds argue, because comic book fans will write you NOVELS on why one character could beat another.

Your name is also either very deceiving or very ironic, since you're responding to this three weeks after the fact.
User avatar #8 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I did put Spider-man fans and batman fans, never said it was me. And I had company for quite some time.
User avatar #9 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Quoth you: "I honestly think spiderman would win because of the above mentioned."

So, yes, you did DIRECTLY state your opinion on the amtter.
User avatar #10 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
In the comments, not the post. I can name several reasons both sides are powerful, but I never stated my opinion in the content.
User avatar #11 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
I never said that you *did* say it in the content.

All I said was that IF you actually believe this, you're the one guilty of being a blind fanboy. You were the one who offered your own opinion, and are now trying to backpedal and state that you didn't. I know it's been three weeks, but there's no reason to forget how a conversation went when the transcript is right in front of you.
User avatar #12 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I don't re-read all my comments on one page and no offense to you, but this conversation isn't so important i'll remember everything.
User avatar #13 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Then why have it at all?

There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but if you can't be bothered to spend 5 seconds to make sure you're not talking out of your ass, then why bother talking at all? Just to waste time on both our parts?
User avatar #14 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
For starters, important conversations to me are usually with friends and family, it isn't because of the topic we are talking about. If I approached everything with if it's unimportant ignore it, I wouldn't talk to anyone. Secondly, are you reading the entire comment chain?
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.
#4 - I'm more of a spider-man fan, but even if I wasn't, I honestly…  [+] (14 new replies) 08/09/2014 on Spider-man vs Batman 0
User avatar #5 - penileburglar (08/09/2014) [-]
Saying that Spiderman is better is a reasonable opinion.

Saying that batman has no redeeming qualities whatsoever is being an annoying fanboy.
User avatar #6 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I'm not making my own opinion on the matter, I'm just repeating what i've heard. In Spider-man vs Batman discussions, the majority of arguments for Batman is that he's essentially Batman. I'm not making my own opinion on this.
User avatar #7 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Except you didn't say 'Wow, batman fans are bad at arguing' you said 'Wow, Batman doesn't actually have redeeming qualities besides 'he's batman.'' The first would be repeating what you heard, the second is forming your own opinion based on it. You must be watching five-year-olds argue, because comic book fans will write you NOVELS on why one character could beat another.

Your name is also either very deceiving or very ironic, since you're responding to this three weeks after the fact.
User avatar #8 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I did put Spider-man fans and batman fans, never said it was me. And I had company for quite some time.
User avatar #9 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Quoth you: "I honestly think spiderman would win because of the above mentioned."

So, yes, you did DIRECTLY state your opinion on the amtter.
User avatar #10 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
In the comments, not the post. I can name several reasons both sides are powerful, but I never stated my opinion in the content.
User avatar #11 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
I never said that you *did* say it in the content.

All I said was that IF you actually believe this, you're the one guilty of being a blind fanboy. You were the one who offered your own opinion, and are now trying to backpedal and state that you didn't. I know it's been three weeks, but there's no reason to forget how a conversation went when the transcript is right in front of you.
User avatar #12 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
I don't re-read all my comments on one page and no offense to you, but this conversation isn't so important i'll remember everything.
User avatar #13 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Then why have it at all?

There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but if you can't be bothered to spend 5 seconds to make sure you're not talking out of your ass, then why bother talking at all? Just to waste time on both our parts?
User avatar #14 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
For starters, important conversations to me are usually with friends and family, it isn't because of the topic we are talking about. If I approached everything with if it's unimportant ignore it, I wouldn't talk to anyone. Secondly, are you reading the entire comment chain?
User avatar #15 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
Actively reading it? No. Did I skim it once since it's three weeks old to see what it was about? Yes.
User avatar #16 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Than there's our difference. You skim it, and if i'm looking for anything specific, I'll look for it.
User avatar #17 - penileburglar (08/28/2014) [-]
No. Our difference is that I wouldn't resume a three-week old conversation with absolutely no idea what I was talking about, especially if I was going to argue about whether or not I *SAID* something when the proof is two lines above me on the very same screen. No one said you had to go back and read a novel, we're talking about a literal two or three seconds of effort to fact-check your statement--you've expended a hundred times that by now just arguing with me over whether or not you should have been bothered to do so.

I mean, really, you were literally arguing about whether or not you said something on the very same page that you said it on. At this point, you're either trolling or you're just incredibly stubborn and will say anything to avoid admitting to a mistake, and neither one are worth any more time from me, so have a good one.
User avatar #18 - supersonicman (08/28/2014) [-]
Not knowing what i'm talking about, It was one thing, whether I stated my opinion or not. That's about it. You couldn't even be bothered to read the content to see I was talking about fans and rather than admit your mistake, you go and make an excuse. And this is my post, I can comment to what ever I want on my post, so don't tell me what I can and can't do. This conversation is going no where, comment back if you want, but at this point it's just a back in forth on who is more stubborn.

user's channels

Join Subscribe civilization
Join Subscribe fallout

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)