Upload
Login or register

supername

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/24/2012
Last Login:7/27/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1546
Highest Content Rank:#11432
Highest Comment Rank:#348
Content Thumbs: 16 total,  58 ,  42
Comment Thumbs: 19227 total,  21763 ,  2536
Content Level Progress: 33.89% (20/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 43.2% (432/1000)
Level 317 Comments: Wizard → Level 318 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:0
Content Views:8535
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:5490
FJ Points:9237
the pie

latest user's comments

#22 - Dude, same didn't remember her at all she must have been a les…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/22/2016 on ducktales reboot +1
#25 - woodoo (07/22/2016) [-]
She had entire episodes dedicated to her and was one of the main characters of the ducktales movie(she was the one who actually owned the lamp the genie of the movie came from), and she was literally only there to cater to the female audience. She wasn't a minor part, she was just absolutely awful(actually she was almost okay in the movie).
User avatar
#33 - supername (07/22/2016) [-]
You know it's weird I really did watch ducktales as a kid but I just can't seem to really remember her that much she sounds vaguely familiar but that's it. Maybe I'm just losing my memory but I really only remember daffy scrooge and the three ducklings.
#17 - So do you know if it works out for them or is this the end of …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/22/2016 on that growl 0
User avatar
#25 - MuahahaOfLore (07/22/2016) [-]
You want Spoilers cuz I read the Light Novel?

They fall in love
They Fuck
They get killed during the war
but, Ainz revives them together later
User avatar
#26 - supername (07/22/2016) [-]
started good got better then sadness but boy am I glad you you split the spoilers into 4 parts was worried for a second.
#4 - just to be clear OP isn't telling you to go f yourself if you … 07/22/2016 on Learning Arabic +2
#23 - While I usually agree with your statement I'd just like to say… 07/22/2016 on Every Anime Ever +2
#54 - Where are you from If I may ask? 07/22/2016 on Tomo-chan wa Onnanoko! Extras 0
#212 - I neither went after his wife nor did I go after him. If you r… 07/21/2016 on It Will Never Happen 0
#206 - "It's almost like there are only so many combinations of …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/21/2016 on It Will Never Happen -1
User avatar
#207 - unladenswallow (07/21/2016) [-]
Can you point to a place where I actually said "This is not plagiarism"? No, you can't. I'm saying that when you try to convey a specific point there are only so many ways to do it without getting a thesaurus involved and thus making everyone listening get a thesaurus involved as well. But again, if we're going to go after brainless trophy wives who read scripted speeches then perhaps we should be screaming about the various actual politicians who have also plagiarized speeches, or the actual presidential candidates that blatantly lied to the FBI and the American people, destroyed evidence, but walked. But hey. Let's go after the dumb model that read a scripted speech, amiright?
User avatar
#212 - supername (07/21/2016) [-]
I neither went after his wife nor did I go after him. If you read my original comment all I said was where does all of this play into his plan which was a reference to the content. My only purpose when asking that question was to question this trump is infalliable mentality. But you instantly felt offended and instead replied with a sarcastic comment in defence. Furthermore when you say there are only so many combinations of words to get a specific point across it means that it is just coincidental that it was word for word, so it simply can't be people just say these kinds of things in these circumstances she flat out plagerized. Also you are assuming it was a writer and not her we don't know that. And finally re-read the first sentence of this reply because I want to re-iterate that if you read my original comment it had nothing to do with going after trump or his wife. And as for your point about there isn't a single politician in DC who hasn't plagiarized. So you are saying just because others have done something wrong it's ok to do it? Plenty of previous politicians have kept secret email servers so I guess when Hillary Clinton does it it should be alright since there is a precedent, amiright?

Also because this conversation is becoming more and more hateful and less and less productive this is my last reply, say what you need to need to say peace.
#194 - Dude, come on you can say "it's not even …  [+] (4 new replies) 07/21/2016 on It Will Never Happen +1
User avatar
#203 - unladenswallow (07/21/2016) [-]
I didn't deny it you dense idiot. I'm saying that this is one of those "everybody says this kind of thing in these circumstances" situations. Some writer had to put together a speech and ended up plagiarizing a different speech. There's not a person in DC who didn't plagiarize some previous politician at some point. But when it's the dumb model wife of a candidate it becomes a problem.
User avatar
#206 - supername (07/21/2016) [-]
"It's almost like there are only so many combinations of words to get a specific point across....Amazing" - unladenswallow
you were definitely saying that and now you are trying to damage control, peace.
User avatar
#207 - unladenswallow (07/21/2016) [-]
Can you point to a place where I actually said "This is not plagiarism"? No, you can't. I'm saying that when you try to convey a specific point there are only so many ways to do it without getting a thesaurus involved and thus making everyone listening get a thesaurus involved as well. But again, if we're going to go after brainless trophy wives who read scripted speeches then perhaps we should be screaming about the various actual politicians who have also plagiarized speeches, or the actual presidential candidates that blatantly lied to the FBI and the American people, destroyed evidence, but walked. But hey. Let's go after the dumb model that read a scripted speech, amiright?
User avatar
#212 - supername (07/21/2016) [-]
I neither went after his wife nor did I go after him. If you read my original comment all I said was where does all of this play into his plan which was a reference to the content. My only purpose when asking that question was to question this trump is infalliable mentality. But you instantly felt offended and instead replied with a sarcastic comment in defence. Furthermore when you say there are only so many combinations of words to get a specific point across it means that it is just coincidental that it was word for word, so it simply can't be people just say these kinds of things in these circumstances she flat out plagerized. Also you are assuming it was a writer and not her we don't know that. And finally re-read the first sentence of this reply because I want to re-iterate that if you read my original comment it had nothing to do with going after trump or his wife. And as for your point about there isn't a single politician in DC who hasn't plagiarized. So you are saying just because others have done something wrong it's ok to do it? Plenty of previous politicians have kept secret email servers so I guess when Hillary Clinton does it it should be alright since there is a precedent, amiright?

Also because this conversation is becoming more and more hateful and less and less productive this is my last reply, say what you need to need to say peace.
#182 - well I can say the opposite it reflects that he has poor judge… 07/21/2016 on It Will Never Happen -1
#181 - well he's not wrong I'm not sure what your views are on the su…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/21/2016 on It Will Never Happen +3
User avatar
#183 - ilcecchino (07/21/2016) [-]
yeah, good teachers are good teachers and i do believe common core is a better method of math than not, but it was implemented wrong, i do agree with you there. but i don't think we should remove it all together