Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Rank #3022 on Comments
Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower
Send mail to summers
Invite summers to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:
Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower
Total Comments Made:
What people say about summers
ART by Z.W. Gu
Take this 600mg...
Some useful websites
When you max out...
Jackie Chan is...
latest user's comments
- Wholesome is the new twist
20h ago on
Chad is a nice guy
- That's just suicidal
- What happens if we just make a new internet?
With Blackjack! And hookers!
More black jack and hookers.
- **summers used "*roll 1, 00-99*"** **summers rolls 41**
dubs and abuse
- Can vouch for the Delta one. It was cheaper to fly from Texas …
This is more accurate than...
- Read the article, it's a rubbery material that makes electrici…
>A fleshlight that charges your phone
Prison jumpsuits that fucking shock you if you move too quickly.
piezoelectrics have been out for a while, I think.
Or impending doom feelings that never go away
There was also a recent breakthrough in printing circuitry that can fit into clothes. With shit like this we could power our phones by walking around with the electro-rubber on the soles of our shoes.
Ir it could be used in contact weaponry.
Maybe it could be used in car tires to save to extend the battery life of electricity powered cars.
So a Piezoelectric material?Those have been around for a while.
Exactly what I was about to say. We've already implemented them in our PicStar Microprocessor.
Make dildos out of it and use thots as a natural source of energy. Get on it scientists.
- She's dead
LA man served 50 years over...
Burn the body?
Why? Because she was abducted by gunpoint, raped twice, and this guy matched the description of the perp, while apparently having no alibi?
- Of course it is, they'll definitely remember humiliation right…
how cars work
- Yeah I read about the yearbook thing just today, I saw it on M…
Beverly's Stepson calling...
His lawyers have already made this point, his accuser is not responding.
The name of the film is the crucible.
Isn't it Taxi Driver?
- The problem arises in the fact that you're basing his innocenc…
Wictor on Moore
we're basing his innocence on Innocent until proven guilty, thats the law in the US. Its not "Guilty until proven innocent". the accusations have no evidence and their statements are impossible to prove, and besides that, it doesn't even matter. If its 30 years ago thats beyond the statute of limitations in Alabama.
The only problem I have with this is the people who are now demanding he be treated as innocent until proof of his guilt is found are the same people who are declaring the numerous celebrities being accused of similar offenses as being guilty despite there being absolutely no proof beyond their word and the words of their accusers. You can't have it both ways. Either he is declared guilty until proven innocent (like the others) or they should all be treated as innocent until proof of guilt is provided. I think the worst part about this is how blind the people here are to this hypocrisy. They go around talking about how dumb and hypocritical liberals are but then they do the same exact shit and act like they are still somehow better.
Weinstein has said he's innocent of rape but has admitted that many of the allegations are true.
Louis CK said "yes that happened and I'm sorry."
Kevin Spacey said "I don't recall but it may have happened so I'm sorry, btw I'm gay and my parent was a neo-nazi."
Moore is saying "this did not happen, these people are making it up"
It isn't "I say this did not happend" vs "I say i did" in any case but Moore's, it's "this happened, or could well have happened, but I'm sorry and nothing worse went on." vs whatever reaction to their admission and apologies the victims choose to take. It isn't really as hypocritical as you claim to assume innocence in the one case and at least partial guilt in the others, all it requires is believing (or at at least humouring) the accused's defence.
Show Comments (6)