Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

subaqueousreach

Rank #1672 on Comments
subaqueousreach Avatar Level 300 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Offline
Send mail to subaqueousreach Block subaqueousreach Invite subaqueousreach to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Steam Profile: subaqueousReach
Consoles Owned: NES, SNES, Sega Genesis, GBA, DS , Wii, Wii U, Xbox, Xbox 360, PS2, PS3
Interests: Music, Video Games, Architechture
Date Signed Up:3/19/2012
Location:Canada
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12666
Comment Ranking:#1672
Highest Content Rank:#3471
Highest Comment Rank:#786
Content Thumbs: 3283 total,  3857 ,  574
Comment Thumbs: 10915 total,  13634 ,  2719
Content Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 133 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 62% (62/100)
Level 300 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 301 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:2
Content Views:130070
Times Content Favorited:82 times
Total Comments Made:4374
FJ Points:13526
Favorite Tags: facebook (3) | People (2)

latest user's comments

#30 - Oh it's not that I condone censoring in any way, I was just po…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2014 on That last comment tho -1
#31 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
They're only sensitive when other people point out the short-comings of their government/education etc. Lol!

They love to claim they are a superpower, but they lag behind so much of the rest of the Western world in so many aspects. I don't have a problem with Americans in general at all, but if you're hostile to constructive criticism then that speaks volumes.
#28 - It says quite a bit, also considering that a study was done a …  [+] (3 new replies) 11/16/2014 on That last comment tho -1
#29 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
I hear you, but censoring things is not the way to an informed perspective. Germany is obviously well known for the two world wars, but now acting in away that 'pretends' in some sense that it never happened is not how knowledge is going to be garnered. Many Western countries still try to control and censor information, but thanks to the internet, these restrictions are hollow and real truth can be obtained.
User avatar #30 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
Oh it's not that I condone censoring in any way, I was just pointing out that while America seems silly in that they change their film titles for a simpler audience (because how many other ways are people going to come up with to throw away those university degrees), other countries are guilty of the same kind of premise.

It was an attempt to try and not be too hard on Americans. They're a sensitive bunch.
#31 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
They're only sensitive when other people point out the short-comings of their government/education etc. Lol!

They love to claim they are a superpower, but they lag behind so much of the rest of the Western world in so many aspects. I don't have a problem with Americans in general at all, but if you're hostile to constructive criticism then that speaks volumes.
#26 - It's because roughly 70% of the people in those countries coul…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/16/2014 on That last comment tho -1
#32 - sonofposeidon (11/16/2014) [-]
I might be lost here, but I think it's because most Americans consider a philosopher a student of philosophy, like Plato or Voltaire, rather that being an alchemist as Nicholas Flamel was. Sorcerer was a more fitting title.
#27 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
True...but what does that say about American education if a word such as 'philosopher' is so bewildering? We know that education in the other countries I mentioned is sub par when compared to the West.
User avatar #28 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
It says quite a bit, also considering that a study was done a few years back (not sure if it still holds up) but about 60-80% of US college students surveyed were unable to locate Canada on a map of North America.

Though every country has their oddities when it comes to national media. Here in Canada we had to change the names of the shows Beast Wars and Planet Wars to Beasties and Shadow Raiders because we're not allowed to have the word war in a title of something intended for youth audiences. Or like in Germany how anything related to Nazis is edited out of films, novels and video games if they're not banned all together.
#29 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
I hear you, but censoring things is not the way to an informed perspective. Germany is obviously well known for the two world wars, but now acting in away that 'pretends' in some sense that it never happened is not how knowledge is going to be garnered. Many Western countries still try to control and censor information, but thanks to the internet, these restrictions are hollow and real truth can be obtained.
User avatar #30 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
Oh it's not that I condone censoring in any way, I was just pointing out that while America seems silly in that they change their film titles for a simpler audience (because how many other ways are people going to come up with to throw away those university degrees), other countries are guilty of the same kind of premise.

It was an attempt to try and not be too hard on Americans. They're a sensitive bunch.
#31 - popeflatus (11/16/2014) [-]
They're only sensitive when other people point out the short-comings of their government/education etc. Lol!

They love to claim they are a superpower, but they lag behind so much of the rest of the Western world in so many aspects. I don't have a problem with Americans in general at all, but if you're hostile to constructive criticism then that speaks volumes.
#61 - The idea is he forgot his air pump.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2014 on Lifehack -1
User avatar #62 - SoulCaster (11/16/2014) [-]
Oh...well...colour me embarrassed
#60 - Me and some friends went camping after graduation and my buddy…  [+] (8 new replies) 11/16/2014 on Lifehack -1
User avatar #91 - areancoconut (11/16/2014) [-]
>Lake
>Currents

I didn't know there were lakes with currents strong enough to be a valid reason for that.
User avatar #105 - subaqueousreach (11/17/2014) [-]
>and being tired and shit

The reason I put "something about currents and being tired and shit" is this was about 5 years ago, I can't remember the exact conversation, but apparently they had trouble keeping the mattress going in one direction and eventually gave up.
#99 - Valid (11/16/2014) [-]
Hello, and thank you for summoning.
Lake currents are never really strong, but they can be annoying.
Just like the trouble I had fitting my penis into your anus last night
#98 - Valid has deleted their comment.
User avatar #70 - shunkahawolf (11/16/2014) [-]
cant swim. go floating out in the deep part of a lake. genius.
User avatar #71 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
Nowhere in the story did I imply my brother was intelligent.
User avatar #72 - shunkahawolf (11/16/2014) [-]
i know, i just like being a sarcastic ass.
#100 - Valid (11/16/2014) [-]
you're handsome
#29 - You know where trees aren't really needed? Cities. Yo…  [+] (21 new replies) 11/16/2014 on Irony -6
#53 - anonymous (11/16/2014) [-]
I just want to say that tree keep cities air nice and cool outside.
User avatar #57 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
>random trees

This is what people are missing I think. Random solitary trees, in an empty lot or back alley way, are not something we should be getting our panties in a twist about.
User avatar #43 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
right because everything has to be just a bunch of fuck ugly buildings

nature is prettier man....id rather have a random undeveloped lot with some fucking trees then looking at fucking buildings everywhere or asshole billboards promoting "buy more bullshit"
User avatar #44 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
If you look very carefully, you'll see me giving zero fucks.

I do agree that nature is pretty though. The difference is that you don't seem to realize that it is human nature to advance and develop. Therefore, all of those "fuck ugly" buildings are actually in a way a part of nature as they are a part of our development as a species.

And before the obvious retort "buildings aren't natural!", would you consider a gopher's hole not a part of nature?

An ant hill is just an underground hotel if you think about it.
User avatar #46 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
gopher: simple hole in the ground with dirt put elsewhere, if structure falls apart...digs new one

human: tears the shit out of land to get the materials for stone and cement....destroys another part of land where they want the building, if building falls apart or is simply torn down, materials are disposed off, mostly not reused, more nature is torn to shit to get new materials

plus hmmm a gopher hole is underground so its not fucking up the land above
User avatar #47 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
Wow you are easily the hippiest person I've ever talked to.

So because our process is more complicated our structures are not natural?

Pray tell, what's your view on selective clear cutting?
#49 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
right
because wanting occasional green areas makes me a total hippy

you just want a planet covered in buildings and industry dont you
cant have any of that uncivilized green shit anywhere can we
User avatar #51 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
I was calling you "the hippiest" because you were spouting "nature good, industry bad" which is usually hippie speak. I have no problem with greenery in cities, but random trees in empty lots and alley ways? There's no need for it and the space could be better used. They could have even cleared it out and made it suitable as a small park with even more trees and a playground for kids and shit.

To assume I want an entire planet of buildings and industry is pretty presumptuous, and only furthers my belief that you are a hippie. No where did I state we should cut down all the trees on the planet, I simply said random trees in cities aren't necessary. They can even be hazardous to nearby roads, structures and underground cables/piping, and can be a major fire hazard as most random vegetation is not watched or tended.

And if you're curious about my question about selective clear cutting, it's something we do in BC as a natural fire break in case there is a forest fire. It makes it so the fire cannot spread easily to populated areas and can sometimes prevent forest fires entirely. It's not done because we hate trees.
User avatar #55 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
right because not wanting nature torn up just so some asshole can put a few more useless billboards up, is a bad thing
much better to fuck nature so some greedy business and tell people to buy shit

youre the one supporting "fuck nature, trees only belong where man decides to put them" like everything has to be man-made planned out

they COULD have redesigned it as a park...they didnt..they could have left the tree there and had their shitboards advertising tuff...they didnt....they just HAD to fuck it up flattening it and making it a lifeless area

you know...it is possible to prune hazardous branches off a tree and keep the tree there, plus youre just playing 'maybe this maybe that
take a look at the tree....its got what...at least 10-15 yards distance around the tree profile to nearby objects...even if a branch fell unless thers high force winds...those branches wont fall onto anything
User avatar #56 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
1. Nowhere did I state the words "fuck nature" or anything even remotely along those lines. If you were paying any attention to any of my comments you'd realize that.

2. If you think that by "structural damage to roads, buildings, and underground cables/piping" I was referring to the branches on the tree falling, then you obviously have no idea what you're talking about and should probably re-educate yourself.
User avatar #58 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
well little kid, you do come across as wanting the world in your sim city style of "unless its part of a park or landscape design then it has no place in the city" aka unless its part of a man-made or at least shaped to be included as a specific decoration area, then its not supposed to be there

and again....for ones like that tree..unless theres high winds to carry falling braches over 15 feet to the side...then they wont hit anything and AGAIN. they can be trimed back without the whole tree removed....and in case you didnt notice, if its a natural area like that its unlikely to have cables or pipes under it, or at least close enough to th surface to be damaged, so yorue kinda making shit up to justify removing it

User avatar #60 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
Ah yes, here we go, I must be a child because I insulted your intelligence. Because clearly the one who has constantly been swearing and blowing things out of proportion couldn't be the immature one in this scenario.

Again, not once did I say I hate nature. So I like things to be orderly, what's wrong with that? I'm not saying cut down the forests and pave over them with cement. I'm saying one random tree in a city doesn't matter than much.

Also, you're still talking about branches damaging things which I was not referring to at all in my comments. However, as far as this particular tree is concerned, you're correct, there is probably little chance of it causing any structural damage via it's roots, but I was talking about random vegetation in general, not just this specific instance. (You know, bringing in a more globalized idea of the subject we were discussing. Facts to support my thesis so to speak.)

In the end, the only point I was trying to make is that it's a random tree, in an empty lot in the middle of a commercial area. It was going to be torn down eventually for something and it's honestly not the end of the world that it was.

There are actually a few trees still in the lot with the billboards and there are even more across the street. Was that one specific tree so meaningful to you that to see it torn down completely shattered your innermost soul?
User avatar #61 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
im sorry who's the one who fired the first shot saying nature has to bend to how you think it should be....no trees unless in pre-planned specific areas YOU feel they should be in?
destroy actual nature and replace it with man-made "nature".....?

plus making up pure hypothetical situations to justify cutting down a tree and replacing it with shitboards and claiming any voice of opposition is wrong?

you like things orderly? ahem sim city

plus the bigger tree is more capable of sustaining birdlife, thicker branches- safer for nests.....more shelter for anyone who just wanted to hang out without being under the sun...plus better looking that the smaller trees


User avatar #62 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
You know, you're doing a very poor job of convincing me that you're not a hippie.
User avatar #63 - konradkurze (11/16/2014) [-]
right keep taking a steaming shit over nature in favor of sim city

no convincing kids like you to stop steamrolling the world
#36 - noschool (11/16/2014) [-]
but there really isn't a need to cut down this tree, it's just a waste of money and resources. i can understand if a city needs to cut down a tree to put up a building but there is no good reason to go cut down all the trees spotted throughout a city for no reason, it's just not economical.
User avatar #37 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
The government pays the contractors to dig up the site and level it out so they can put up some signs that advertisers will pay to promote their product to consumers who will then go out and buy the products, thus cycling the money through the economy as it should be.

How is that not economical? The phrase "You have to spend money to make money" comes to mind.

And I'm not saying "Hurr durr let's cut down every lone tree we see in a city" I'm just saying people don't need to get their panties in a twist because someone cut down a single tree in an empty lot to put up some billboards.

And to anyone curious, yes, I got the joke in the content. I just didn't think it was that good.
#40 - noschool (11/16/2014) [-]
i get your point but saying "there's no need for random trees in cities." kinda makes it sound like you think there should be no trees in the city.
User avatar #42 - subaqueousreach (11/16/2014) [-]
>Unless it's a park or specifically part of a landscape's design.

A cherry tree in someone's yard, a grove outside of the library or at the local park, a row of small trees bordering a market street. All fine, I have no issue with these.

Random old tree in a back alley? Couldn't care less if it's cut down for construction or renovation.

Not to mention untended vegetation can cause structural damage to nearby roads, buildings, and even underground piping and wiring. It can also be a fire risk.
#48 - noschool (11/16/2014) [-]
well i wouldn't really consider a building or a billboard, or any man made structure "landscape" i mean i thought the definition of landscape was that it was a natural thing or at least consisted of natural objects like trees, grass and rocks. like i said i see your point i think you just phased it poorly.
#52 - >Clone Engineer >Galactic Civil War I think…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2014 on Forces of the Empire: Part 6 -1
#53 - tankerdude (11/16/2014) [-]
#107 - At my house we called that room the library. We had a couple c…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/16/2014 on Remember? 0
#111 - amuzen (11/16/2014) [-]
we had something like that as well except it was just 1 computer, about 600-800 books, about 50-100 VHS tapes, five filing cabinets, a big ass desk, about 60-100 CDs, and we called it - or at least I called it - the red room because the only area that was really walkable was covered with a huge red old Persian rug.
#54 - Tell that to Bruce Campbell. I'd provide an ima… 11/15/2014 on Dual Wield 0
#60 - That's kind of a stupid question. Who are you referring to by …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2014 on Hilarious Cringe Comp 0
#63 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Wasn't there some idiot who sued God or something?
I could be second idiot.
#37 - I fully agree with you, unfortunately the way North American g…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Hilarious Cringe Comp -1
#40 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Can I sue them for aging? There wasn't such warning label when I was born.
User avatar #60 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
That's kind of a stupid question. Who are you referring to by "them"? Which corporation is responsible for you aging?

The only people I could think of that you could sue would be your own parents because they are the ones that gave you a life in which you aged in the first place. So if you wanna try and sue your parents go ahead.
#63 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Wasn't there some idiot who sued God or something?
I could be second idiot.
#35 - Without people like this, warning labels wouldn't exist to pro…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Hilarious Cringe Comp +1
#36 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Some warning labels are required, but something like "Peanut butter might contain peanuts" is completely unnecessary, let those retards die. Along with "Do not climb into washing machine".
User avatar #37 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
I fully agree with you, unfortunately the way North American governments work nowadays, if there's not something there to tell you not to do it, you have a good chance of successfully suing whatever company made the product should something bad happen to you.
#40 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Can I sue them for aging? There wasn't such warning label when I was born.
User avatar #60 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
That's kind of a stupid question. Who are you referring to by "them"? Which corporation is responsible for you aging?

The only people I could think of that you could sue would be your own parents because they are the ones that gave you a life in which you aged in the first place. So if you wanna try and sue your parents go ahead.
#63 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Wasn't there some idiot who sued God or something?
I could be second idiot.
#8 - I'm the same way. My last girlfriend loved the **** … 11/13/2014 on Cat 34 +1
#11 - Didn't someone embezzle all of their corporations money that w…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2014 on not like other MMOs +15
User avatar #28 - linkeron (11/13/2014) [-]
Precisely because shit happens. As long as no real world damage is done, you can do pretty much anything you want. ISK doubling scams are rampant in Jita. Seriously.
#7 - It's okay serterazi, I got your reference.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/13/2014 on Cat 29 0
User avatar #14 - serterazi (11/13/2014) [-]
I'm a happy man
#30 - I feel like we'd probably find you on that list of people. … 11/13/2014 on Hilarious Cringe Comp +6
#29 - I think you have that backwards.  [+] (7 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Hilarious Cringe Comp +1
#33 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Without warning labels they'd just kill themselves in a bunch of stupid accidents.
User avatar #35 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
Without people like this, warning labels wouldn't exist to protect them in the first place.

This is a terrifying loop.
#36 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Some warning labels are required, but something like "Peanut butter might contain peanuts" is completely unnecessary, let those retards die. Along with "Do not climb into washing machine".
User avatar #37 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
I fully agree with you, unfortunately the way North American governments work nowadays, if there's not something there to tell you not to do it, you have a good chance of successfully suing whatever company made the product should something bad happen to you.
#40 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Can I sue them for aging? There wasn't such warning label when I was born.
User avatar #60 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
That's kind of a stupid question. Who are you referring to by "them"? Which corporation is responsible for you aging?

The only people I could think of that you could sue would be your own parents because they are the ones that gave you a life in which you aged in the first place. So if you wanna try and sue your parents go ahead.
#63 - animesource (11/13/2014) [-]
Wasn't there some idiot who sued God or something?
I could be second idiot.
#13 - two different people. Though still pretty neat. 11/13/2014 on Not feline like it -1
#21 - *forest moon of Endor 11/13/2014 on Forces of the Empire: Part 2 +2
#1771 - I'm 24(tomorrow), I work as a security dispatcher for a univer… 11/13/2014 on Open up to your family 0
#77 - I might have missed that, I usually had it on in the backgroun… 11/13/2014 on Forces of the Empire: Part 1 0
#72 - I'm really glad Lucas can't touch these films anymore. …  [+] (2 new replies) 11/13/2014 on Forces of the Empire: Part 1 0
#74 - anonymous (11/13/2014) [-]
Don't they say in the series that that's how the Mandalorians used to be but they changed? The whole thing with Death Watch was a sect of Mandalorians that wanted to return to the old way. Anyway, the series is canon now and none of the extended universe stuff is anymore, just the six movies and the two tv series, so all of that is thrown out, if the series said someone was how it was then that's how it was, doesn't matter if there's some extended universe comic or book that came out before it that contradicts it.
User avatar #77 - subaqueousreach (11/13/2014) [-]
I might have missed that, I usually had it on in the background while doing other things.

But regardless, a large portion of comics and books that bought the rights to make their stories were generally accepted as canon. Then suddenly everything has to change because Lucas didn't like how that turned out? I think that's stupid.

Han Solo's considered a badass outlaw? He was never meant to be a badass!
Everyone loves Boba Fett? Not on my watch, kill that asshole forever!

Basically his mentality on the situation. It's gotten to the point where most fans don't really count the movies as canon any longer because they've changed so many times from the originals.
#71 - They look a little too Tron-ish now in my opinion. If that is … 11/13/2014 on Forces of the Empire: Part 1 0
#45 - Oh I'm fully aware of why she does it, but it doesn't make it … 11/13/2014 on Only anti gg women get... 0
#178 - Not to mention an EMP can already kill somebody, I think I rea… 11/12/2014 on Much Better 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1050

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 - kolpster (11/11/2013) [-]
My most unrelated image.

I will marry you
#11 - SnacksJr (07/11/2013) [-]






You and your Hawkeye.
#10 - anonymous (03/19/2013) [-]
do trolls even grow beards??

is that possible

someone should edit the troll's sprites to have beards

BEARDSTUCK
#9 - pinesol (11/27/2012) [-]
I like your avatar
#7 - thegreatgp (09/28/2012) [-]
'SuP Bro?
'SuP Bro?
User avatar #8 to #7 - subaqueousreach (09/28/2012) [-]
Not a lot bud, just finished working graveyard shift and browsin' the web before I pass out.

Yourself?
User avatar #1 - xxelmarcocfcxx (06/05/2012) [-]
Hey sorry for that asshole that replied to you on the feels channel. I had commented back before I checked his page and realised his account got banned in a sea of red thumbs, hah.
User avatar #2 to #1 - subaqueousreach (06/05/2012) [-]
Oh, I don't really remember the assholes I bump into on Funnyjunk. Mind linking me the specific comment so I might thank you properly? =P
User avatar #4 to #2 - xxelmarcocfcxx (06/05/2012) [-]
Disregard that entire thing, here it is:
/channel/feels/feels/yXzTGlK/
User avatar #5 to #4 - subaqueousreach (06/06/2012) [-]
Oh I remember that now, yeah thanks a bunch for standing up for me ^_^

I'm glad he got banned, we definitely need less people like that on the internet (and the world) in general, let alone Funnyjunk.
User avatar #3 to #2 - xxelmarcocfcxx (06/05/2012) [-]
All right, I can't find the exact link, but it was on the feels channel on a mother post, and you were explaining how your mother sent you and yoour brothers out to a back alley everytime you went somewhere, and he said it was too bad you were a brony. I replied to him saying just because he's a brony his emotional hardship doesn't matter, **** you. Something like that. Anyway that was before I clicked on his channel and found out he had been banned.
 Friends (0)