sptnfouroneseven

Rank #3017 on Comments
sptnfouroneseven Avatar Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to sptnfouroneseven Block sptnfouroneseven Invite sptnfouroneseven to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:1/28/2012
Last Login:1/30/2015
Location:Depths of hell
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7671
Comment Ranking:#3017
Highest Content Rank:#7672
Highest Comment Rank:#2796
Content Thumbs: 44 total,  81 ,  37
Comment Thumbs: 2675 total,  3078 ,  403
Content Level Progress: 69.49% (41/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 14% (14/100)
Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:10663
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:1208
FJ Points:2155
Im probably not funny, don't care I most likely have more OC then half of FunnyJunk

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#8 - Killing droids isn't ******* murder.  [+] (1 new reply) 4 hours ago on So I drew something for a... 0
#9 - slayzo (2 hours ago) [-]
What about the jedi they killed? Order 66, hmm?
#58 - I've never been told of any sort of stacking rules, and I don'…  [+] (1 new reply) 6 hours ago on The Player's alignments 0
#59 - iqequalzero (5 hours ago) [-]
Quote from [url deleted]

"The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don't generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source."

Worn armor and Bracers of Armor both grant an Armor Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work. Thats why Bracers of Armor are so much cheaper than things like Natural Armor and Deflecion bonuses, because it doesnt stack with worn armor.

Tower shield and the Shield Graft both grant a Shield Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work.

This is also why stacking stat manuals doesnt work, they all grant an Inherent bonus, so once you get a better one it just overwrites the existing one.
#56 - I was wrong about the CMD, but still. You'…  [+] (3 new replies) 15 hours ago on The Player's alignments 0
#57 - iqequalzero (8 hours ago) [-]
Min maxing or not, I just found the statements doubtful.

Just because im a huge rules faggot, I gotta ask a few questions about the character.

1: STR. He is a 42 Str Halfling. WIth an 18 into Str, hes looking at a start of 16, +5 from level ups, then +6 from item, and +5 from manual. That only amounts to 32. Since your manual is written as "+1 - +5" I suspect you have added each of the manual types together for a +15 total, but manuals dont stack.

2: AC. Your character is wearing bracers of armor with a full plate, which dont stack. An Armored Kilt also has no effect on heavy armor.

The armor entry on AC is set to 28. Removing the Bracers of Armor bonus puts it at 20. A +5 Full Plate offers 14 AC. The Armor Graft adds another +3 for a total of 17. Not sure where the last 3 AC in the entry is coming from.

Not sure why you have the Shield Graft on your armor, since it doesnt stack with a regular shield (And you dont have it factored in your AC). I guess its for utility to always have a shield handy?

The bonuses on the sheet only amount to 60 AC.

Im ready to be wrong, but from looking at the sheet, the character would actually have and AC of:

10 + 17 (+5 Full Plate with +3 Armor Graft) + 2 (Dex) + 11 (+5 Tower Shield with +2 from feats (Shield Specialization doesnt grant AC)) +5 (Natural) +3 (Dodge, Size, Misc)

For a total of 48 AC


-----


If the answer to these things is "Well our DM lets this stuff stack", it kinda invalidates any "achivement" in being able to take on the assorted enemies. Its like using cheats in a video game.
User avatar #58 - sptnfouroneseven (6 hours ago) [-]
I've never been told of any sort of stacking rules, and I don't see how they wouldn't, honestly. The shield graft factors in with shield, and I have shield specializations, which with our DM were allowed to add +1 AC since we weren't doing crit confirms. And bracers of armor are a wondrous item, which means you can wear that stuff either under, or on, armor, so yes those would 'stack'
#59 - iqequalzero (5 hours ago) [-]
Quote from [url deleted]

"The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don't generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source."

Worn armor and Bracers of Armor both grant an Armor Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work. Thats why Bracers of Armor are so much cheaper than things like Natural Armor and Deflecion bonuses, because it doesnt stack with worn armor.

Tower shield and the Shield Graft both grant a Shield Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work.

This is also why stacking stat manuals doesnt work, they all grant an Inherent bonus, so once you get a better one it just overwrites the existing one.
#15 - ******* nature man  [+] (3 new replies) 01/29/2015 on elefunt is best animal +66
#17 - jasonseagull (01/29/2015) [-]
User avatar #16 - kciwtsob (01/29/2015) [-]
Its truly a horrible thing
#20 - anonymous (01/29/2015) [-]
I thought it was very enteresting
#13 - And apparently pretty large tits. 01/29/2015 on Tara Strong as Harley Quinn 0
#11 - Congrats. THat's common knowledge. Along with voicing a pletho…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/29/2015 on Tara Strong as Harley Quinn +4
#22 - penetractor (01/29/2015) [-]
sure, commonly known if you're a nerd
#12 - ultimatebuttercup (01/29/2015) [-]
Oh yes, she is an awesome voice actor, but thought I would give my two bits.
#13 - I did at first as well, but it struck me when I realized natur… 01/29/2015 on elefunt is best animal 0
#11 - Elephant is giving birth, Hyena trying for an easy meal.  [+] (13 new replies) 01/29/2015 on elefunt is best animal -1
User avatar #14 - kciwtsob (01/29/2015) [-]
Actually its a little more gross than that. The elephant is dead and the hyena is trying to eat its anus

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaH4za2yoFs
#50 - lokkeduen (19 hours ago) [-]
oh god, the sound
#45 - qun (20 hours ago) [-]
i really didn't need to see that, why did i click
#41 - anonymous (20 hours ago) [-]
Its the easiest spot to go through and puncture. The video even states an elephants skin is over an inch thick. Many human cultures eat all parts of an animal including the rectum/intestines.
#39 - vlademitrius (21 hours ago) [-]
Nature teaches humans how to eat each other out.
User avatar #29 - alstorp (22 hours ago) [-]
Jesus fuck
#24 - skelebones (01/29/2015) [-]
eh what the hell i got nothing better to do today... lets watch
User avatar #15 - sptnfouroneseven (01/29/2015) [-]
Fucking nature man
#17 - jasonseagull (01/29/2015) [-]
User avatar #16 - kciwtsob (01/29/2015) [-]
Its truly a horrible thing
#20 - anonymous (01/29/2015) [-]
I thought it was very enteresting
User avatar #12 - brokentrucker (01/29/2015) [-]
I thought I was looking at some kind of butt bubble thing.
User avatar #13 - sptnfouroneseven (01/29/2015) [-]
I did at first as well, but it struck me when I realized nature is a giant asshole.
#46 - When I say "Can take" I mean in an actual 'fight' wi…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/28/2015 on The Player's alignments 0
#55 - iqequalzero (01/29/2015) [-]
You can always hit on a 20 though.

Im hard pressed to see how Big T cant grapple the character. Assuming 30 str, 20 dex and a +5 deflection bonus, you are looking at a CMD of 50. Big T has a CMB of +57 to grapple, so even assuming an additional 9 CMD from stuff like dodge bonuses, Big T still only fails on a 1, which would auto fail anyway. Repeated swallowing, each inflicting atleast one round of stomach damage + the bite damage going down, would hurt pretty badly, pretty quickly. Getting out will likely also be problematic, since the character likely isnt using a light weapon as his main weapon, meaning the first time he gets swallowed he will have to get only one attack while drawing his weapon on the first round, maybe even none if he sheaths his main weapon first (Instead of dropping it inside the stomach and possibly losing it.

Big Ts CMD is also so high, escaping before the swallow is unlikely (a 30 str fighter would be looking at +30 before any specific CMB assists, and I doubt those would be able to gap the last 36 CMD.

As for discounting spell casting for dukes of hell, thats like discounting your characters gear. As a basic beatstick, their challenge ration would be much lower, and not really that much of a fear to kill.

All this is assuming that your characters gear is around the suggest wealth for his level and that none of it grossly breaks the rules for item power.
User avatar #56 - sptnfouroneseven (15 hours ago) [-]
www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=1080097



I was wrong about the CMD, but still. You're assuming I didn't min-max the absolute fuck out of this guy. And not always, some DMs make it so natural 20s and natural 1s don't automatically mean failure/success
#57 - iqequalzero (8 hours ago) [-]
Min maxing or not, I just found the statements doubtful.

Just because im a huge rules faggot, I gotta ask a few questions about the character.

1: STR. He is a 42 Str Halfling. WIth an 18 into Str, hes looking at a start of 16, +5 from level ups, then +6 from item, and +5 from manual. That only amounts to 32. Since your manual is written as "+1 - +5" I suspect you have added each of the manual types together for a +15 total, but manuals dont stack.

2: AC. Your character is wearing bracers of armor with a full plate, which dont stack. An Armored Kilt also has no effect on heavy armor.

The armor entry on AC is set to 28. Removing the Bracers of Armor bonus puts it at 20. A +5 Full Plate offers 14 AC. The Armor Graft adds another +3 for a total of 17. Not sure where the last 3 AC in the entry is coming from.

Not sure why you have the Shield Graft on your armor, since it doesnt stack with a regular shield (And you dont have it factored in your AC). I guess its for utility to always have a shield handy?

The bonuses on the sheet only amount to 60 AC.

Im ready to be wrong, but from looking at the sheet, the character would actually have and AC of:

10 + 17 (+5 Full Plate with +3 Armor Graft) + 2 (Dex) + 11 (+5 Tower Shield with +2 from feats (Shield Specialization doesnt grant AC)) +5 (Natural) +3 (Dodge, Size, Misc)

For a total of 48 AC


-----


If the answer to these things is "Well our DM lets this stuff stack", it kinda invalidates any "achivement" in being able to take on the assorted enemies. Its like using cheats in a video game.
User avatar #58 - sptnfouroneseven (6 hours ago) [-]
I've never been told of any sort of stacking rules, and I don't see how they wouldn't, honestly. The shield graft factors in with shield, and I have shield specializations, which with our DM were allowed to add +1 AC since we weren't doing crit confirms. And bracers of armor are a wondrous item, which means you can wear that stuff either under, or on, armor, so yes those would 'stack'
#59 - iqequalzero (5 hours ago) [-]
Quote from [url deleted]

"The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don't generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source."

Worn armor and Bracers of Armor both grant an Armor Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work. Thats why Bracers of Armor are so much cheaper than things like Natural Armor and Deflecion bonuses, because it doesnt stack with worn armor.

Tower shield and the Shield Graft both grant a Shield Bonus to AC, thus, only the better of the two work.

This is also why stacking stat manuals doesnt work, they all grant an Inherent bonus, so once you get a better one it just overwrites the existing one.
#22 - Should've made a witch. Misfortune makes people reroll all d20s  [+] (1 new reply) 01/28/2015 on The Player's alignments 0
User avatar #23 - bigshanner (01/28/2015) [-]
Meh first time playing so I'm learning maybe next go around.

user's channels

Join Subscribe dungeons-n-drags
Join Subscribe the-hunger-games
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1450

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - cryoticshell (12/28/2013) [-]
Content was deleted apparently. Basically what I said was there's no way anyone can REALLY say that Chief didn't love Cortana, no matter what augmentations he went through. They both loved each other, despite Chief not being allowed to and Cortana being an AI.

I then continued to say that Cortana has no real way to return since she was fragmented beyond repair in the Didact's ship and her chip was destroyed as well. But, at the same time, the Forerunners were officially labled as extinct by Bungie, but 343 undid that too by having the Didact still in his Cryptum.

Now, there's a CHANCE that the Didact returned to his Cryptum, the writer of the Cryptum trilogy hasn't done the 3rd book though. So he could die to the absolute extinct of what death really is, not just what the Forerunners could save (though they don't resurrect themselves or anything) and so there was a chance that the Didact could actually not have a chance of being in the current part of the storyline. Now, the Didact has to return to his Cryptum at some point in the trilogy.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sptnfouroneseven (12/28/2013) [-]
Oh no I didn't say that John wasn't allowed, he literally does not have the ability to love someone. None of the Spartans did, especially Spartan IIs. They were bred for two purposes, war and moral.

And I don't follow any of the new Halo lore, they ****** it up by saying that Ancient Humans rivaled the Forerunners in technology and were at war with them when the first Flood outbreak occurred. And it would be impossible for Cortana to come back either way because she was a Smart AI, they turn rampant after several years and destroy themselves from within, essentially eating all their data.
User avatar #3 to #2 - cryoticshell (12/28/2013) [-]
Sorry, didn't mean that you said he wasn't allowed, i meant that through the augmentations and whatnot he wasn't allowed. But, to me, it definitely appeared that John loved Cortana, despite the augs. Also, Chief (very certainly sure) wasn't bred for the Spartan II program, he was chosen like the rest. I think it was Contact Harvest that Keys and Halsey went to where he was and found him playing King of the Hill with the rest of the kids there, winning obviously.

And as for the Ancient Humans part goes, why is that so had to believe? One species had the best technology in the galaxy, another species at the time can use it, why can't they (my theory) reverse engineer it? That would mean they're close, but the Forerunners are still more advanced because the Humans aren't creating their own.

Also, the cause of the Human/Forerunner war was the Flood outbreak (not sure exactly what you were saying with it). The humans were running from the Flood, and because of that it seemed like they were trying to expand over the galaxy for greedy purposes (point of view of the Forerunners) and so they (Fore's) attacked the humans, causing the Flood to gain the advantage in the galaxy.
User avatar #4 to #3 - sptnfouroneseven (12/28/2013) [-]
When I said "Bred for" I meant with the augments and training. Literally breeding something for a certain aspect takes generations. But It was a fairly poor choice of words I suppose. The book was also Fall of Reach by the way.

And my thing about the Ancient Humans part is that where's the evidence on Earth? Where's the previous ship wreckage? Destroyed buildings? So on and so forth. They were just as technologicaly advanced as the Forerunners at the time, why isn't it there now?

And as I said, I don't follow it, only new book I picked up was Glasslands and it seemed too dry for me to read through, sadly given it follows Kurt and the Spartan 3s more on Onyx, which was my favorite book by far.
User avatar #5 to #4 - cryoticshell (12/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, you've got a point with the no remains part. Though, the Ark Portal was burried, could be the same with everything else. Honestly it's kind of a hole, but it can kinda be filled, circle is big enough for the square to fit kind of thing.

Also, I don't follow the books all that much either, I just periodically google it to stay somewhat informed.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sptnfouroneseven (12/28/2013) [-]
The Arc portal makes sense with Origin though, with the Flood infestation in the universe the Forerunners took samples from all the planets and made 'saves' to speak to pick up from for each species. Could've been a simple portal from back then.

This is from the anime movies, Origin pt1 and pt2 where it's Cavemen and not super advanced humans.
User avatar #7 to #6 - cryoticshell (12/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, the Ark Portal was left over, but it's still an ancient ruin that was left over, and it wasn't discovered because it was buried, possibly like anything else.

As far as the cavemen part goes, it could have been a coincedence that he looked like one, but the data for humans could have just been the genetic buildup, not an exact copy of the species at the time, meaning that the humans that were re-seeded didn't have the knowledge that the Ancients had. Kind of like babies, except already grown up a bit.

And now I'm leaving for lunch, but when I get back I'll respond to whatever you have. Just letting you know it could b a while.
 Friends (0)