Level 147 Comments: Faptastic
OfflineSend mail to spacemasterfive Block spacemasterfive Invite spacemasterfive to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||8/08/2013|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Comment Thumbs:||474 total, 540 , 66|
|Content Level Progress:|| 6.77% (4/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 60% (6/10) |
Level 147 Comments: Faptastic → Level 148 Comments: Faptastic
|Total Comments Made:||116|
latest user's comments
|#71 - thats a man whose not afraid to commit||12/02/2013 on Shit||0|
|#86 - sardine oil is a natural anti-depressant. but its nasty as ****||11/26/2013 on The Hand||0|
|#148 - you must need a lot of penicillin if she's your type [+] (1 new reply)||11/26/2013 on The story of Natalie||+1|
|#145 - here be stories of trashy losers and their related adventures||11/26/2013 on The story of Natalie||0|
|#72 - political orientation doesnt make you more or less of an idiot [+] (3 new replies)||11/26/2013 on (untitiled)||0|
|#96 - why are there separate Sports AND Soccer sections?||11/26/2013 on It has begun....||-1|
|#251 - im pretty sure that the rules contained in Leviticus were real… [+] (6 new replies)||11/25/2013 on Sums it up pretty well...||+1|
#306 - tyrson (11/25/2013) [-]
Yes and no. Leviticus contained rules for the population, as well as rules for the priests. The rules mentioned above are for the general populace, IIRC.
That's why orthodox jews often have curly strands of hair at the sides of their heads... there's a verse about that. And why they don't eat pork, and test the fibers of their clothes.
#303 - tyrson (11/25/2013) [-]
Can you cite your source? This would be interesting information to have.
I was under the impression that most of these rules were listed in the OT, specifically the first few books (Torah? there's a name for them.). NT references are usually about people following the old laws or repeating them... not usually god repeating the rules for good measure.
Hell, in a few situations he goes in and specifically counteracts his previous rules... such as the dream in which he told Peter (Paul?) that pigs were now an acceptable source of protein.
#308 - robinwilliamson (11/25/2013) [-]
Here's one up front, Timothy 1:9 (funny how it's like right in the very beginning of a popular one)
"We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality"
#325 - tyrson (11/25/2013) [-]
I like to play the devil's advocate, and so looked up Timothy chapter 1, thinking that it was likely that the selected portion took some information out of context (as happens with bible verses more often than it should).
However, I feel I should concede the point. Your verse, and the verses preceding it, do seem to imply that the writer (Paul) views homosexuality as an offense alongside the others.
Thank you for this reference, it may come in handy someday.
(And for whatever it might be worth, I clicked the little thumb button. Still not sure what that's about.)
|#1 - its Wayne Static before he became a musician||11/18/2013 on ORIGINAL Pretty Boy Swagg||0|
|#136 - i thought it was cute [+] (1 new reply)||11/18/2013 on Pretty boy||+4|
#159 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
|#20 - i can make something real dorfy out of that [+] (3 new replies)||11/17/2013 on Bismuth Crystals||+1|