Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sorrowofdaedalus

Rank #58534 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8585 total,  12497 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5697
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9103

latest user's comments

#20 - I may or may not. I'm not really a fan of the show, so I don't… 08/22/2012 on Don't cry +2
#18 - Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal 0
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#2 - All in good time, little anon. First you must cripple her, so …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/22/2012 on Skyrim 0
#3 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Right-o, thank you kind sir sorrowofdaedalus
#16 - Yeah, that's about what I've thought. You have no reasonable r…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal -4
#17 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
lol, ok dude, keep bitching, you can't un-butthurt yourself
I'll keep smoking my "tar-infested" weed, I mean even though it's never killed one person- oh wait you're rightt about everything my bad what am i thinking
#104 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
Do more research stonertard. People are always dying because of it.
#18 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you can't keep yourself from snide remarks and petty insults.

Also, you go ahead and do that, I think it's your right to smoke weed. I don't see how you can say its NEVER killed a person. Weed directly has never killed a person, but indirectly it definitely has. Cancer, trade disputes, and a thousand other things have caused death over weed.

Lastly, I haven't the faintest clue what you're thinking. I'm not sure how much of it you actually do. Your sour mood COULD have to do with you not being high, seeing as smoking weed ALSO will cause the brain to stop producing endorphins.
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#14 - Let ME inform you of something. First of all, s…  [+] (24 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal -3
User avatar #232 - mutilatedjello (08/23/2012) [-]
Marijuana does not cause any of the things cigarettes cancer, emphysema, etc. It only affects the lungs for a couple of hours during and after you are high. Just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #286 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/25/2012) [-]
No really, please, read the whole conversation before you post. Until you do, shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #35 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Whoever said you had to SMOKE it? You can also take THC in pill form, or you can make baked (hehe) goods with it. Also, it only risks damage to the brain while the brain is still developing. The reason that cigarettes and alcohol are only legal starting between about 19 and 21 is because that is when the brain has stopped forming, and has become much less easy to damage with substances.

Also, weed was made illegal in north America because it posed a threat to the forestry industry because it was cheaper, easier and faster to make into pulp/paper. Its narcotic effects were a tool that the lobbyists used to get the under-educated general populace into their corner.
User avatar #38 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No one did, it's just the most common way that people do it, because it gets in to your system much faster.

Second of all, I don't recall saying that it did any damage to your brain. If you're referring to what I was saying about him being whiny and bitchy, that was a joke.

Lastly, that's all well and good, but the fact of the matter is it's just one more unhealthy thing you DON'T need people smoking on a consistent basis.
#41 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
You... don't... need... to... smoke... it.
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, one more thing you don't need people DOING on a regular basis. I also want to point out that while I don't believe it would be good for the nation as a whole to start smoking Pot, I also think people have a right to abuse it as much as any other substance. The only thing I was against is that he talked about the drug as if it weren't bad for you at all, which is just not true. It's unhealthy for you, just like alcohol, cigarettes, and any other similar substances. It's one thing to say it should be legal, it's another thing to say it's not unhealthy when it clear is.
User avatar #45 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Show me a source - a scientific, peer-reviewed, published source - that lists a single negative property of THC (the ONLY active chemical in marijuana).
User avatar #47 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
If I may ask-Why? What is it that would drive me to do research on this, AT ALL? Because you asked me to? I'm not fighting about its legality, I'm simply saying it has negative effects, which really can't be denied. You already know all the facts because it is CLEAR that this means a lot to you, for whatever reason. You know how it can harm you and I know you've already got prepared answers for everything, so in the end, what is the point of that? It's bad for you, clearly so, in the same way that any other drug is bad for you. It causes a lowering of inhibitions and changes the way the mind works, putting you in an irregular state.
#50 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Okay; it's official. Nice troll. 10/10 for getting me this far into it.
#51 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You'd think my posting reaction pics of the JOKER in EVERY SINGLE reaction post before this would've given it away sooner.
#52 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; that only registered, like, 3 minutes ago. It's been a really, really long day.

Oh, well; least I got the dank!
#53 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Good job. Lord knows OrganicGlory wouldn't of caught it if it were screwing his mother.
User avatar #55 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; I kind of got that impression when I reread his stuff. Good lols were had.

... Also, these Joker .gifs are definitely gonna be useful. Thanks for the dump.
#56 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No problem at all. Have another, on me.
#15 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
I can't even comprehend how stupid you are, man. Just shut the fuck up...
#16 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, that's about what I've thought. You have no reasonable response so like the foolish person you are, you continue to fall back on mindless insults that are unproven and follow no previous evidence to show that they are true. Much like your argument regarding pot itself. Believe it or not 'I think you're dumb' is not an argument.
#17 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
lol, ok dude, keep bitching, you can't un-butthurt yourself
I'll keep smoking my "tar-infested" weed, I mean even though it's never killed one person- oh wait you're rightt about everything my bad what am i thinking
#104 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
Do more research stonertard. People are always dying because of it.
#18 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you can't keep yourself from snide remarks and petty insults.

Also, you go ahead and do that, I think it's your right to smoke weed. I don't see how you can say its NEVER killed a person. Weed directly has never killed a person, but indirectly it definitely has. Cancer, trade disputes, and a thousand other things have caused death over weed.

Lastly, I haven't the faintest clue what you're thinking. I'm not sure how much of it you actually do. Your sour mood COULD have to do with you not being high, seeing as smoking weed ALSO will cause the brain to stop producing endorphins.
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#12 - You've yet to show me evidence that I'm wrong. I'm far from a …  [+] (26 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal -1
#13 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
Ok, man. Let me tell you a story, freshman year of high school i got arrested for possesion of cannabis (its marijuana, just in case you're too stupid to realize that)
But since it was my first time getting arrested as a minor, I could do peer jury. I had to write a 3 page paper about the effects of cannabis on the brain as one of my punishments by law. Doing research, not only did I find NO long term effects that marijuana has on you, but the only things I could fin were symptoms of when you were baked. It does nothing bad to you, my point?
You're fucking stupid, as fuck.
#14 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Let ME inform you of something.


First of all, supposing I didn't know that cannabis and Marijuana were one and the same, it wouldn't make me any less or more 'stupid' simply for not knowing the information. Intelligence has to do with the ability to discern, not the ability to absorb, information.

Second all, that's bullshit. I've done plenty of research of my own and honestly, to even ATTEMPT to say that it has no long-term effects is completely ridiculous. Like all other inhaled substances, it causes substantial lung damage and has a greater risk of causing cancer than cigarettes do. This might not 'count' for you because it has nothing to do with the brain, nor the effects of Weed itself, but it is a result of smoking the substance.

Also, before you say it has no effects on the brain, look at how incredibly whiny and illogically insulting you are.
User avatar #232 - mutilatedjello (08/23/2012) [-]
Marijuana does not cause any of the things cigarettes cancer, emphysema, etc. It only affects the lungs for a couple of hours during and after you are high. Just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #286 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/25/2012) [-]
No really, please, read the whole conversation before you post. Until you do, shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #35 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Whoever said you had to SMOKE it? You can also take THC in pill form, or you can make baked (hehe) goods with it. Also, it only risks damage to the brain while the brain is still developing. The reason that cigarettes and alcohol are only legal starting between about 19 and 21 is because that is when the brain has stopped forming, and has become much less easy to damage with substances.

Also, weed was made illegal in north America because it posed a threat to the forestry industry because it was cheaper, easier and faster to make into pulp/paper. Its narcotic effects were a tool that the lobbyists used to get the under-educated general populace into their corner.
User avatar #38 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No one did, it's just the most common way that people do it, because it gets in to your system much faster.

Second of all, I don't recall saying that it did any damage to your brain. If you're referring to what I was saying about him being whiny and bitchy, that was a joke.

Lastly, that's all well and good, but the fact of the matter is it's just one more unhealthy thing you DON'T need people smoking on a consistent basis.
#41 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
You... don't... need... to... smoke... it.
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, one more thing you don't need people DOING on a regular basis. I also want to point out that while I don't believe it would be good for the nation as a whole to start smoking Pot, I also think people have a right to abuse it as much as any other substance. The only thing I was against is that he talked about the drug as if it weren't bad for you at all, which is just not true. It's unhealthy for you, just like alcohol, cigarettes, and any other similar substances. It's one thing to say it should be legal, it's another thing to say it's not unhealthy when it clear is.
User avatar #45 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Show me a source - a scientific, peer-reviewed, published source - that lists a single negative property of THC (the ONLY active chemical in marijuana).
User avatar #47 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
If I may ask-Why? What is it that would drive me to do research on this, AT ALL? Because you asked me to? I'm not fighting about its legality, I'm simply saying it has negative effects, which really can't be denied. You already know all the facts because it is CLEAR that this means a lot to you, for whatever reason. You know how it can harm you and I know you've already got prepared answers for everything, so in the end, what is the point of that? It's bad for you, clearly so, in the same way that any other drug is bad for you. It causes a lowering of inhibitions and changes the way the mind works, putting you in an irregular state.
#50 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Okay; it's official. Nice troll. 10/10 for getting me this far into it.
#51 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You'd think my posting reaction pics of the JOKER in EVERY SINGLE reaction post before this would've given it away sooner.
#52 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; that only registered, like, 3 minutes ago. It's been a really, really long day.

Oh, well; least I got the dank!
#53 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Good job. Lord knows OrganicGlory wouldn't of caught it if it were screwing his mother.
User avatar #55 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; I kind of got that impression when I reread his stuff. Good lols were had.

... Also, these Joker .gifs are definitely gonna be useful. Thanks for the dump.
#56 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No problem at all. Have another, on me.
#15 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
I can't even comprehend how stupid you are, man. Just shut the fuck up...
#16 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, that's about what I've thought. You have no reasonable response so like the foolish person you are, you continue to fall back on mindless insults that are unproven and follow no previous evidence to show that they are true. Much like your argument regarding pot itself. Believe it or not 'I think you're dumb' is not an argument.
#17 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
lol, ok dude, keep bitching, you can't un-butthurt yourself
I'll keep smoking my "tar-infested" weed, I mean even though it's never killed one person- oh wait you're rightt about everything my bad what am i thinking
#104 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
Do more research stonertard. People are always dying because of it.
#18 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you can't keep yourself from snide remarks and petty insults.

Also, you go ahead and do that, I think it's your right to smoke weed. I don't see how you can say its NEVER killed a person. Weed directly has never killed a person, but indirectly it definitely has. Cancer, trade disputes, and a thousand other things have caused death over weed.

Lastly, I haven't the faintest clue what you're thinking. I'm not sure how much of it you actually do. Your sour mood COULD have to do with you not being high, seeing as smoking weed ALSO will cause the brain to stop producing endorphins.
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#9 - No, no I'm not; facts are facts and claiming otherwise doesn't…  [+] (29 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal -3
#11 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
You, sir. Are a fucking retard.
#21 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
burning any substance will produce carbon monoxide and carcinogens, no matter how many, so to say it's harmless is a lie and there has been extensive research into the psychological aspects of the drug and how it changers the way your mind works, it is proven to give you paranoid-schizophrenia, which is a very dangerous mental disorder
#12 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You've yet to show me evidence that I'm wrong. I'm far from a retard, and you're claiming otherwise won't change that.
#13 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
Ok, man. Let me tell you a story, freshman year of high school i got arrested for possesion of cannabis (its marijuana, just in case you're too stupid to realize that)
But since it was my first time getting arrested as a minor, I could do peer jury. I had to write a 3 page paper about the effects of cannabis on the brain as one of my punishments by law. Doing research, not only did I find NO long term effects that marijuana has on you, but the only things I could fin were symptoms of when you were baked. It does nothing bad to you, my point?
You're fucking stupid, as fuck.
#14 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Let ME inform you of something.


First of all, supposing I didn't know that cannabis and Marijuana were one and the same, it wouldn't make me any less or more 'stupid' simply for not knowing the information. Intelligence has to do with the ability to discern, not the ability to absorb, information.

Second all, that's bullshit. I've done plenty of research of my own and honestly, to even ATTEMPT to say that it has no long-term effects is completely ridiculous. Like all other inhaled substances, it causes substantial lung damage and has a greater risk of causing cancer than cigarettes do. This might not 'count' for you because it has nothing to do with the brain, nor the effects of Weed itself, but it is a result of smoking the substance.

Also, before you say it has no effects on the brain, look at how incredibly whiny and illogically insulting you are.
User avatar #232 - mutilatedjello (08/23/2012) [-]
Marijuana does not cause any of the things cigarettes cancer, emphysema, etc. It only affects the lungs for a couple of hours during and after you are high. Just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #286 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/25/2012) [-]
No really, please, read the whole conversation before you post. Until you do, shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #35 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Whoever said you had to SMOKE it? You can also take THC in pill form, or you can make baked (hehe) goods with it. Also, it only risks damage to the brain while the brain is still developing. The reason that cigarettes and alcohol are only legal starting between about 19 and 21 is because that is when the brain has stopped forming, and has become much less easy to damage with substances.

Also, weed was made illegal in north America because it posed a threat to the forestry industry because it was cheaper, easier and faster to make into pulp/paper. Its narcotic effects were a tool that the lobbyists used to get the under-educated general populace into their corner.
User avatar #38 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No one did, it's just the most common way that people do it, because it gets in to your system much faster.

Second of all, I don't recall saying that it did any damage to your brain. If you're referring to what I was saying about him being whiny and bitchy, that was a joke.

Lastly, that's all well and good, but the fact of the matter is it's just one more unhealthy thing you DON'T need people smoking on a consistent basis.
#41 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
You... don't... need... to... smoke... it.
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, one more thing you don't need people DOING on a regular basis. I also want to point out that while I don't believe it would be good for the nation as a whole to start smoking Pot, I also think people have a right to abuse it as much as any other substance. The only thing I was against is that he talked about the drug as if it weren't bad for you at all, which is just not true. It's unhealthy for you, just like alcohol, cigarettes, and any other similar substances. It's one thing to say it should be legal, it's another thing to say it's not unhealthy when it clear is.
User avatar #45 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Show me a source - a scientific, peer-reviewed, published source - that lists a single negative property of THC (the ONLY active chemical in marijuana).
User avatar #47 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
If I may ask-Why? What is it that would drive me to do research on this, AT ALL? Because you asked me to? I'm not fighting about its legality, I'm simply saying it has negative effects, which really can't be denied. You already know all the facts because it is CLEAR that this means a lot to you, for whatever reason. You know how it can harm you and I know you've already got prepared answers for everything, so in the end, what is the point of that? It's bad for you, clearly so, in the same way that any other drug is bad for you. It causes a lowering of inhibitions and changes the way the mind works, putting you in an irregular state.
#50 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Okay; it's official. Nice troll. 10/10 for getting me this far into it.
#51 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You'd think my posting reaction pics of the JOKER in EVERY SINGLE reaction post before this would've given it away sooner.
#52 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; that only registered, like, 3 minutes ago. It's been a really, really long day.

Oh, well; least I got the dank!
#53 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Good job. Lord knows OrganicGlory wouldn't of caught it if it were screwing his mother.
User avatar #55 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; I kind of got that impression when I reread his stuff. Good lols were had.

... Also, these Joker .gifs are definitely gonna be useful. Thanks for the dump.
#56 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No problem at all. Have another, on me.
#15 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
I can't even comprehend how stupid you are, man. Just shut the fuck up...
#16 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, that's about what I've thought. You have no reasonable response so like the foolish person you are, you continue to fall back on mindless insults that are unproven and follow no previous evidence to show that they are true. Much like your argument regarding pot itself. Believe it or not 'I think you're dumb' is not an argument.
#17 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
lol, ok dude, keep bitching, you can't un-butthurt yourself
I'll keep smoking my "tar-infested" weed, I mean even though it's never killed one person- oh wait you're rightt about everything my bad what am i thinking
#104 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
Do more research stonertard. People are always dying because of it.
#18 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you can't keep yourself from snide remarks and petty insults.

Also, you go ahead and do that, I think it's your right to smoke weed. I don't see how you can say its NEVER killed a person. Weed directly has never killed a person, but indirectly it definitely has. Cancer, trade disputes, and a thousand other things have caused death over weed.

Lastly, I haven't the faintest clue what you're thinking. I'm not sure how much of it you actually do. Your sour mood COULD have to do with you not being high, seeing as smoking weed ALSO will cause the brain to stop producing endorphins.
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#209 - Have a good say, sir. 08/22/2012 on Still good people left in... 0
#18 - I have no clue, but I'd like to. Will a kindly Brony please ex…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/22/2012 on Don't cry +2
User avatar #19 - sonni (08/22/2012) [-]
It's a letter Rainbow Dash wrote in a fanfic called My little Dashie. If you decide to read it be warned, it's full of feels.
User avatar #20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I may or may not. I'm not really a fan of the show, so I don't know too much about it. I just know I like the characters and all the neat songs the fans make.
#6 - ....Okay, but can you imagine how kick-ass that would have bee… 08/22/2012 on Flying Leap +2
#2 - ...Well, I sit on my porch and talk on the home phone all the time.  [+] (2 new replies) 08/22/2012 on I carry my home phone... 0
User avatar #3 - analleakage (08/22/2012) [-]
... you're still home
User avatar #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, but I'm outside. It doesn't say when I'm not home, it just say 'I carry my home phone while I'm outside'.
#9 - Aah, Yanderes, you gotta love 'em. 08/22/2012 on Stalker status x1,000,000 +2
#8 - Picture 08/22/2012 on Title +4
#6 - I believe that would be the bible and carbon dating proving je…  [+] (47 new replies) 08/22/2012 on religion -15
User avatar #7 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
The bible is no more reliable a source than Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings.
So why don't we go around crusading for the glory of Gondor?

Carbon dating? Of what?

" I don't see why you can't believe in a religion even without undeniable proof of it."
Of course you can. It just so happens that you literally fulfill the definition of insanity in doing so.
User avatar #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Except many events in the bible actually happened, such as Exodus, and the Pyramids are proof of that. Or there is always the fucking thousands of accounts and pictures and paintings and remarks from all sorts of places about Jesus passing through.

Carbon Dating of various things, one of which includes a burial wrap that appears to be the Shroud of Turon.

It isn't insanity to believe in something, just because you don't have proof of it. You've no proof of evolution that is concrete, only what appears to be the truth based on the perceptions of change you've seen.
#9 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
There is neither proof nor evidence anything happened like the bible describes.
It could be the script of someone seeing those things and afterwards making up a story in order to try and explain them and we would have no way to tell the difference. Actually, if you think on a grand scale, that's exactly what it is.

Shroud of Turon is dated 13th or 14th century. You're off by more than a millennium.

Definition of insanity, source: merriam-webster online dictionary.
It is absolutely insane to believe in and make decisions based on something there is no proof for.
If there is one thing however we do have proof for, it is the mechanism of evolution through the means of natural or whatever else selection. Just because you do not understand it does not mean it is not real.
User avatar #14 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
It's so unbelievably sad that there are uneducated and just pitifully stupid people like yourself, in the world. Your partial attitude is based off of the so called "no proof" of God. We also have to take into account that no human being, not even modern science can prove against God. While it is true that some of the stories in the Bible are fictional (I don't deny that), if you're reading it like a fucking story-book and fairy tale, then you are just an unbelievably unintelligent human being. Oh, and as far as the Shroud of Turin? You might want to check your source before you bullshit your facts. It dates between 1300-3000 years old. So the next time you want to make an ignorant comment, why don't you get off your fucking ass and learn something instead of calling 90% of the world "insane." It's stupid assholes like you who should be removed from the earth.
User avatar #59 - Accidentalninja (08/23/2012) [-]
90% of world probably is insane to be fair.
#25 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
>Calls yourself a Christian
>Calls the other, intelligent man an uneducated, pitifully stupid person

Don't make me laugh
#15 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Yes, start off with a baseless insult, you imbecilic cocksuck. Now we're even.
Off course it's based on "no proof of God", why wouldn't I when it's the single most perfect reason one could list against believing in some madness? Settling for unreason is your business after all.

"We also have to take into account that no human being, not even modern science can prove against God."
With that single line you've disqualified yourself from a dialogue of intelligent educated men already. There is just so much wrong with listing it as an argument. From "You cannot prove a negative." to the basic understanding of how empirical evidence works, you have just shown the world you understand not a single fucking thing about logic and reason.

Well done, you did all my work of calling out your bullshit by that point already.
Your needlessly aggressive tone is just an excellent indicator of how truly butthurt you must be. I'm enjoying this way too much, haha.

Also, the shroud.
"The Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth commonly associated with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus Christ, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating, in an attempt to determine the relic's authenticity. In 1988, scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of 1260–1390CE.[1]"
source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_14_dating_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin
Sucks for you, but C14 does not lie.

So you think it's your right and job to decide who deserves to live and who doesn't?
People like you are the plague this world suffers from the most, no matter if religiously deluded or not.
User avatar #16 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
I love a good laugh and quality comedy. I need only to make one single point: Wiki-fucking-pedia. Well done good sir. You have indeed just officially made yourself a queer-fag moron. Let me present you with a RELIABLE source:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4210369.stm

This proves that the carbon dating was fake. Yet again, typical ignorant-dismiss-God retard, "you did all of my work of calling out your bullshit," how? No, no, I won't need another one of your wikipedia links to present me with some whack scientist who doesn't know a single fuck about anything to tell me God doesn't exist. I applaud your ignorance and your arrogance. It far surpasses mine and it is something that is actually quite sad.

Get your thumb out of your ass and stop jacking-off. It's never too late to admit you're wrong.


#17 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
BBC? The very broadcaster that apologized to all "true psychic mediums/media" after they did a story on a racketeer? You've got to be fucking kidding me.

Now, if you actually had the ability to properly read coupled with ANY sort of education, you'd have scrolled down and looked at the external sources in that wiki article. That's how a fucking encyclopedia works and has for centuries, you hopeless idiot.

Doing that would have revealed a shitton of sources, among them these two links I provide you with now because you are just too thick to find them on your own: xoomer.virgilio.it/bachm/VHAELST6.PDF
http://freeinquiry.com/skeptic/shroud/articles/rogers-ta-response.htm

The second one is a specific answer to that madman's nonsensical drivel BBC had the nerve to pass off as scientific in order to get a nice headline.
Read them yourself in order to see what ungodly things they do to your "proof" before you go and bury it.

"It's never too late to admit you're wrong. "
It's time for you t put a stop your cranky hormonal teenager-attitude and take your own advice.
#18 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
Well done my friend. All you do is insult and regress to your sad pathetic arrogant ways. You are a fucking coward. Atheists, which I presume you are, you're too blind to see that you are wrong, and too ignorant to change your ways. I understand it's difficult for you to actually have a Christian argue with you, as I believe atheists are the smallest populated, but have to loudest voice. I don't need to argue any further, as I did not expect you to actually agree on anything. It just bothers me when assholes like you fucking call everyone else insane who believes in God and has faith. Just because you don't agree, doesn't mean that you have to be disrespectful for fuck's sake. Even though I hate people who don't believe in God, it's your choice, whatever you do in life.

God bless you.
#80 - NolanNasty (08/23/2012) [-]
I didn''t think christians were supposed to hate? Didn't Jesus preach about love towards everyone? even the gays I bet you have also worn chlothes made by two or more different fabrics...havent you? that's a sin you know But luckily god loves you enough to award you with an eternity in hell for it =)
User avatar #82 - maddoctor (08/23/2012) [-]
Believe it or not, just because Jesus taught Christians to love everyone, doesn't mean we're all hippies. I'm not afraid to voice my opinion to ignorant assholes. Yes, I understand most Christians probably saw not only my comments, but ignorant comments like yours and did nothing about it. I myself am done with the immaturity on this page and all the comments that have been posted. So before you make stupid judgments and pitifully stupid remarks, why don't you actually learn something about another's religion, instead of being so arrogant and making disrespectful judgments. I'm done with this fucking post and all these motherfucking blind people. I will pray for all of you.
#105 - NolanNasty (08/24/2012) [-]
I am actually well educated on the christian religion as i find certain aspects quite facinating, however you are the worst kind of christian, angry and butthurt also, you can hardly call me arrogant, just look at your comment #18 why don't you try to look at things with an open mind?

May you be touched by his noodly appendage.
#44 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
dude, what the fuck?? you call yourself a Christian,yet you say you hate people who don't believe in God? Aren't Christians supposed to respect other peoples opinions? You know,that whole "what you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me" sort of thing?
User avatar #58 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
I like you, anon. You bring out the best out of even that insane shitpile that is christianity.
#24 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Would you believe I actually forgot to upload the eightstar? I did.
User avatar #23 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
"All you do is insult and regress to your sad pathetic arrogant ways."
The hypocrisy is strong is you. At least as strong as the butthurt.
I don't need this verbal sparring with you ignorant prick, as you fail to produce anything worth even properly reflecting.
EVERYTHING you have listed is or contains a logical fallacy, and that my friend, is a fucking achievement in and of itself.

As far as I can tell, I'm not wrong. There is nothing that would lead to that conclusion. There is no reason that would make me think so, and to think of it without reason is the very fallacy I belittled you for.
You, on the other hand, believe in something you cannot see, hear, feel or in any other way quantifiable way sense or experience. You believe in something that's existence can neither be observed nor inferred.

You base your decisions and choices in life on something you have no reason to think even exists.
You are insane, in the very definition of the word, as is everyone else committing to unreason and irrationality. 90% of mankind you say? Yeah, probably true. Fucking shame if you think about it..

And I am as disrespectful as I fucking want to be.
Especially in your case, you deserved every last ounce of disrespect I gave you back.

"Even though I hate people who don't believe in God"
You should be fucking ashamed of yourself even thinking that, much more actually voicing it.

May you find sanity, lost sheep.
User avatar #30 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
I feel no shame in voicing my hatred towards fuckers like yourself. You're mad because your used to everyone liking your status's about hating God, then when someone actually steps up and challenges you, you become so enraged it's just... just.. "insane." Your arrogance and ignorance is actually hilarious at this point. How blind can you be?
#37 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Nothing of what you said holds any truth. Of course, you don't believe me, and I wouldn't expect you to with your impressive track record of dismissing reality and evidence and only believing what you want to, but for me your flawed and biased perceptions are nothing short of grotesquely comical to the point of enjoyable amusement.

You did step up to nothing. You stumbled around at best.
Your deluded stammering, stuttering, spluttering is not even nearly enough to enrage me. It's just like bland cookie dough around the delicious chocolate chips that are your hilarious logical flaws and mistakes. Mhmmmm. :)

How blind can I be? The question is how deluded can YOU be to think you see something that cannot be seen?
#21 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
You stupid fucks give religion a bad name. You act like a super controlling soccer mom by adding God Bless You at the end, as if trying to shove it down his throat. Atheist scientists have done more for our community in the last 100 years than Christians have in the last 4000. Hundreds of you dumbfucks eat fried chicken to fight homosexuality, too, while atheists continue to advance our society.

What the fuck have you done lately?

#27 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
"While atheists continue to advance our society." Well done, perhaps the funniest statement I've heard all day. Let's give him a hand folks! I don't fight homosexuality. You like dick in your ass that's fine. That's just not what God intended for us to do. You my friend aren't worth the argument.
#32 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
What argument?
The one you couldn't uphold for the love of the heavens just a few inches of screen upwards? You mean that one? lol.

Also the arrogance of how you presume to know what "god" wants.
How could you ever grasp and conceive such an absolute entity, were it real?

You're just full of shit, every inch of you.
User avatar #36 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
Knowing what God wants is not arrogance it's in the Bible, something you probably have never touched in your life. I didn't need to "uphold" the argument. There is no argument with you. It was you being ignorant and bashing people because they have faith, and me bashing you for not having faith. Then I realized, I don't need to argue with you, I could just pray for you, so it was pointless to continue. To call it an argument would be an overstatement.
User avatar #50 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
"the Bible, something you probably have never touched in your life."

Read it from one end to another. Held strong faith even when I was ridiculed by my peers for it.
You have not the slightest idea who the man you're talking to actually is.
You just do not know me.
User avatar #48 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
The bible is a book written by humans and therefore inherently flawed, even by your idiotic theological logic. In my eyes it's nothing but instrumentalised, cannibalized and forged drivel, I'll be honest, but even your madly arrogant "faith" never states he allows you any amount of divining and understanding what your supposed "god" is or is like.
Even being the organised mental sickness that all religion is, yours fails at being a properly interesting one.

" I didn't need to "uphold" the argument. There is no argument with you. It was you being ignorant and bashing people because they have faith, and me bashing you for not having faith. Then I realized, I don't need to argue with you, I could just pray for you, so it was pointless to continue."

You called me a coward. No. You are a coward, fleeing from me, from reality, from your own mind, logic and self. What a waste of human potential you are.

From the innermost place of my heart, I pity you.
User avatar #73 - maddoctor (08/23/2012) [-]
My friend, it is you who needs pitying. It's true, I was unfair to judge you, "judge not lest you be judged," but to tell me that I'm not logical and that I'm insane because I believe in the person who created me and made me the way I am? No, I'm so far from the perfect human being, but so is everybody else. It's true, I don't know who you are, so if it is true that you read the entire Bible, it's even more upsetting that it turned you away. Especially when you say things like: "The bible is no more reliable a source than Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings." It was unjust as a Christian to attack you as I did; however, I don't agree at all with your beliefs, but I respect them. For you to tell me that I'm a waste of human life is awful. I don't give a fuck who you are or what you believe in but that is just sick and twisted. You don't know me either, you don't know the things that I've been through or seen. All you need to remember is that God always forgives us and I will keep you in my prayers so that one day you may believe in Him also.
User avatar #77 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
I said what I had to say, I meant every single word of it and I stand by it until reality itself proves me wrong.
So have your false god and blind faith, shut your mind from the true wonders of existence in this universe. You limit only yourself.
Your loss means nothing to me.

There's nothing more to say.
#29 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
Have you ever gotten your hair cut? Ever worn a shirt with 2 different colors or fabrics on them? Ever lied? Apparently, your "God" didn't intend for that, either. Hmm, maybe I'll sell my daughter into slavery, then beat my neighbor to death for growing two different plants side by side. After all, God gave me permission.

You're a fucking hypocrite, lurk moar before trying to shove your, "religious logic" in my face.
User avatar #33 - maddoctor (08/22/2012) [-]
Err, what? Obviously you've never read the Bible or know two fucks about religion so anything you say is immediately discredited. There's forgiveness for a reason. And, yes, God gave you permission to do whatever you want. If you want to abuse that then you will pay once at judgment day. It's not even religious logic, it's common sense.
User avatar #42 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
"so anything you say is immediately discredited."
Is that what you'd like to believe? I'm sure you'd love that to be true. Would fit right into your bigoted, overly simplified little ideological worldview.
Even a completely uneducated and illiterate retard can say things that are absolutely and indubitably true. No offense to you here, moonseye, not implying anything in any way, just stating a technical point.

"And, yes, God gave you permission to do whatever you want."
He did not. He did not even give us consciousness nor free will and punished us with death when we took it, according to your little fairytale.
A tyrant, nothing else.
User avatar #49 - moonseye (08/23/2012) [-]
Haha, no worries. Even if I were an uneducated, illiterate retard, I'd still be smarter than that Christian zealot.
User avatar #51 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
Yeah. Nothing worse than a mind as clogged with unreason as a highway restaurant's toilet is with shit.

In other news, Hellsing is fucking awesome. :)
#52 - moonseye (08/23/2012) [-]
Haha, true.

And yes, Hellsing is possibly the best anime ever. (The intro song is so classy, too :D)
User avatar #56 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
I'm not huge on anime, but Hellsing is an exceptional piece. Story, characters, storytelling, animation, any way you look at it it's excellent.

Haven't watched it in ages, though.
#60 - moonseye (08/23/2012) [-]
And the dub is amazing, better than any other in my opinion.

I don't watch too much anymore, but I do watch YouTube clips or AMV's when I'm bored.
#38 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
So, it's common sense to beg for forgiveness from some malevolent deity? Just for being human? Sorry, I'd rather trust the guys in labcoats making life better for everyone. Unlike your useless religious organizations, forcing people to make up to some nonexistent bastard, lest they burn forever.

Pfft, fuck off, and may your asslicking king bless you for being a huge cockmonger.
#26 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Oh, don't be so harsh on them, they prayed for Japan when that tsunami hit.
#28 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
Oh, That changes everything! *sarcasm*

Since when has praying ever actually done anything? Haha.
User avatar #34 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Unlike those petty and useless donations, God's will and benevolence would have truly helped them, surely.
I mean, it's what protected them from such catastrophes in the first place, wasn't it?

[/sarcasm] I'm having too much fun with this. Too much, I tell you
#35 - moonseye (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, since when has science and money ever made someone's day better? Pfft, I better say a few useless words and hope by chance everything's okay.

This is great, I'm glad I stumbled upon this thread.
#39 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
This whole conversation is just too rich.
I don't know what that guy's deal is, but whatever problem he has, it's a big one.

Have a good one, mate.
#40 - moonseye (08/23/2012) [-]
I hope he's trolling, no man with any sanity would senselessly create a shitty, desperate argument like the one he's throwing out.

Same to you, my good man.
#53 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
....trolling?

I feel so dumb right now a facepalm doesn't even cut it. Me falling THAT hard for a troll.
The very thought of it...
User avatar #55 - moonseye (08/23/2012) [-]
Don't worry, if he were a troll, he'd either post as Anonymous, or he'd do something along the lines of zlamous, which is waiting till he can be unbanned through sorcery or something before trolling. But zlamous was a good troll, this guy can't come close.
User avatar #11 - themodsaresleeping (08/22/2012) [-]
>Assume God may exist
>Apply the thought experiment concept of Schrodinger's cat, wherein only observation of an event or object may dictate its course of actuality
>Therefore, until God is observed, he is both existent and nonexistent at the same time, as per quantum theory.
>God exists
>God doesn't exist
>Simultaneously
>Backing by modern science
>Religiousfags and atheistfags are confus
User avatar #13 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
Schrödinger's cat is a paradox designed to show the flaw of a certain approach of quantum mechanics, not a functional theorem of its own.

You just abused it horribly and to no sensible end.
User avatar #10 - techketzer (08/22/2012) [-]
*shroud of Turin

Sorry for adopting that spelling mistake.
#5 - You know, who's side your on is rather unclear when you don't …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/22/2012 on religion 0
User avatar #79 - techketzer (08/23/2012) [-]
You shouldn't even be thinking about sides. That's faulty logic right there already.

The proper way to do this is to look at reality, observe what is observable and make your own conclusions. At no point do you ever even need to ask yourself what others think.
That's utterly irrelevant until you start comparing your findings and invite them to find any logical flaws in the view you have developed; your own scientific theory.
#7 - Peas and Corn. Makes Porn. Get it?  [+] (1 new reply) 08/22/2012 on Porn +3
#9 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Keys?
#173 - Well, I can't understand any of what you're trying to say, so,… 08/22/2012 on Still good people left in... 0
#6 - Most of this post is ******** . Marijuana has been…  [+] (45 new replies) 08/22/2012 on why weeds illegal -10
User avatar #69 - XxJACKISHERExX (08/23/2012) [-]
deaths per year caused by weed - usually 0
By cigs - 500000+
User avatar #71 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/23/2012) [-]
Read the following conversation below.
|
|
|
|
V
#40 - elamosupremo (08/22/2012) [-]
marijuana is illegal because the hemp made a direct competition against the paper industry(and others)
#94 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
And here we have a dumb ass that believes other dumb asses theories.
User avatar #27 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Tar is a cigarette >additive<, and is not found naturally in ANY plant. Know why? It's an oil product. If it's in marijuana, it means someone put it there. It also means you need to switch dealers.
User avatar #34 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Well, I suppose that also brings up the point that you have no fucking clue whats actually in the pot you get, nor where it was stored. Either way, I do know what I know, and I know what I've read.
#83 - thepenname (08/23/2012) [-]
What's put into pot is relative to the regulations for its productions. Currently what few legal growers there are must adhere to stringent government regulations. If it did become fully legalized and was marketed the same way alcohol or tobacco is, we could run into the problem of companies cutting corners by stuffing pot with additives to save costs. Organic tobacco isn't nearly as bad as it is after being churned out through the industrial machine. However, those problems don't seem to pervade the beer industry as much, as far as I know. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) I suppose it depends on what companies get their hands on pot first.
User avatar #102 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/23/2012) [-]
Read the following conversation below. Specifically comments #50 and #51.

|
|
|
V
User avatar #37 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Another good reason to decriminalize it so people can just buy the seeds and grow it themselves. Eliminates the whole risk.
User avatar #39 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Or, you know, just not do it, seeing as it is bad for you either way. Consistent use can also cause the brain to stop producing endorphins naturally, seeing as weed is replacing the need. The result being a lack of the ability to feel true elation or happiness, unless you're smoking weed.

We have more than enough stupid people on this planet and in this nation to say that we don't need more lazy ones as well.
User avatar #43 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
"There is a chemical called dopamine in the brain. When it reaches certain receptors in the body, it makes the body feel euphoric. It has many other purposes, such as heightening blood pressure, behavior and cognition, voluntary movement, motivation, punishment and reward, inhibition of prolactin production (involved in lactation and sexual gratification), sleep, mood, attention, working memory, and learning.
Seretonin also gives euphoria, but isn't addictive. Seretonin is more "I'm high on life" kinda hromone. This is released with anti-depressants
Our body releases dopamine during sex, food/eating, falling in love, making friends, fullfilling accomplishments etc. This way we are programmed to like sex, food, making friends and dopamine is a sort of "reward" for our behavior.
Our brain is told "any process that releases dopamine is beneficial for survival"
Cocaine, Heroin, and Meth all release dopamine.
Excstacy(MDMA, MDA) release seretonin. For some reason we do not know is addictive
LSD, Shrooms, 2c-B, mescaline release seretonin, and are all not addictive
Alchohol is completely different

Weed does not release any dopamine. It might release seretonin, but we are not sure.

Addictions are not defined by cravings, but by withdrawal symptoms.
people can't sleep, eat or function withrawl symptoms in play. They might even die

Weed has none. Cravings, maybe, but not withdrawl symptoms"

Sauce: http://forum.grasscity.com/seasoned-tokers/565088-why-weed-isnt-addictive.html
User avatar #44 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
So? I never said anything about withdrawl symptoms, I know that weed isn't an addictive substance, I didn't say it was. What I said is that it causes the brain to STOP producing the chemicals that cause you to enjoy those things, because it replaces the chemicals, so the brain doesn't detect a NEED for them to be produced.
User avatar #46 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Read the post again, slowly. THC releases serotonin, which is NOT addictive. If it released dopamine, that would be a different matter altogether.
User avatar #49 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I've already read it. The chemical effect still occurs, whether it is seratonin or dopamine released.
#7 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
#9 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No, no I'm not; facts are facts and claiming otherwise doesn't change it. Neither do memes, however hard they may try.
#11 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
You, sir. Are a fucking retard.
#21 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
burning any substance will produce carbon monoxide and carcinogens, no matter how many, so to say it's harmless is a lie and there has been extensive research into the psychological aspects of the drug and how it changers the way your mind works, it is proven to give you paranoid-schizophrenia, which is a very dangerous mental disorder
#12 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You've yet to show me evidence that I'm wrong. I'm far from a retard, and you're claiming otherwise won't change that.
#13 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
Ok, man. Let me tell you a story, freshman year of high school i got arrested for possesion of cannabis (its marijuana, just in case you're too stupid to realize that)
But since it was my first time getting arrested as a minor, I could do peer jury. I had to write a 3 page paper about the effects of cannabis on the brain as one of my punishments by law. Doing research, not only did I find NO long term effects that marijuana has on you, but the only things I could fin were symptoms of when you were baked. It does nothing bad to you, my point?
You're fucking stupid, as fuck.
#14 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Let ME inform you of something.


First of all, supposing I didn't know that cannabis and Marijuana were one and the same, it wouldn't make me any less or more 'stupid' simply for not knowing the information. Intelligence has to do with the ability to discern, not the ability to absorb, information.

Second all, that's bullshit. I've done plenty of research of my own and honestly, to even ATTEMPT to say that it has no long-term effects is completely ridiculous. Like all other inhaled substances, it causes substantial lung damage and has a greater risk of causing cancer than cigarettes do. This might not 'count' for you because it has nothing to do with the brain, nor the effects of Weed itself, but it is a result of smoking the substance.

Also, before you say it has no effects on the brain, look at how incredibly whiny and illogically insulting you are.
User avatar #232 - mutilatedjello (08/23/2012) [-]
Marijuana does not cause any of the things cigarettes cancer, emphysema, etc. It only affects the lungs for a couple of hours during and after you are high. Just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #286 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/25/2012) [-]
No really, please, read the whole conversation before you post. Until you do, shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #35 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Whoever said you had to SMOKE it? You can also take THC in pill form, or you can make baked (hehe) goods with it. Also, it only risks damage to the brain while the brain is still developing. The reason that cigarettes and alcohol are only legal starting between about 19 and 21 is because that is when the brain has stopped forming, and has become much less easy to damage with substances.

Also, weed was made illegal in north America because it posed a threat to the forestry industry because it was cheaper, easier and faster to make into pulp/paper. Its narcotic effects were a tool that the lobbyists used to get the under-educated general populace into their corner.
User avatar #38 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No one did, it's just the most common way that people do it, because it gets in to your system much faster.

Second of all, I don't recall saying that it did any damage to your brain. If you're referring to what I was saying about him being whiny and bitchy, that was a joke.

Lastly, that's all well and good, but the fact of the matter is it's just one more unhealthy thing you DON'T need people smoking on a consistent basis.
#41 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
You... don't... need... to... smoke... it.
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, one more thing you don't need people DOING on a regular basis. I also want to point out that while I don't believe it would be good for the nation as a whole to start smoking Pot, I also think people have a right to abuse it as much as any other substance. The only thing I was against is that he talked about the drug as if it weren't bad for you at all, which is just not true. It's unhealthy for you, just like alcohol, cigarettes, and any other similar substances. It's one thing to say it should be legal, it's another thing to say it's not unhealthy when it clear is.
User avatar #45 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Show me a source - a scientific, peer-reviewed, published source - that lists a single negative property of THC (the ONLY active chemical in marijuana).
User avatar #47 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
If I may ask-Why? What is it that would drive me to do research on this, AT ALL? Because you asked me to? I'm not fighting about its legality, I'm simply saying it has negative effects, which really can't be denied. You already know all the facts because it is CLEAR that this means a lot to you, for whatever reason. You know how it can harm you and I know you've already got prepared answers for everything, so in the end, what is the point of that? It's bad for you, clearly so, in the same way that any other drug is bad for you. It causes a lowering of inhibitions and changes the way the mind works, putting you in an irregular state.
#50 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Okay; it's official. Nice troll. 10/10 for getting me this far into it.
#51 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You'd think my posting reaction pics of the JOKER in EVERY SINGLE reaction post before this would've given it away sooner.
#52 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; that only registered, like, 3 minutes ago. It's been a really, really long day.

Oh, well; least I got the dank!
#53 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Good job. Lord knows OrganicGlory wouldn't of caught it if it were screwing his mother.
User avatar #55 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah; I kind of got that impression when I reread his stuff. Good lols were had.

... Also, these Joker .gifs are definitely gonna be useful. Thanks for the dump.
#56 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
No problem at all. Have another, on me.
#15 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
I can't even comprehend how stupid you are, man. Just shut the fuck up...
#16 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, that's about what I've thought. You have no reasonable response so like the foolish person you are, you continue to fall back on mindless insults that are unproven and follow no previous evidence to show that they are true. Much like your argument regarding pot itself. Believe it or not 'I think you're dumb' is not an argument.
#17 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
lol, ok dude, keep bitching, you can't un-butthurt yourself
I'll keep smoking my "tar-infested" weed, I mean even though it's never killed one person- oh wait you're rightt about everything my bad what am i thinking
#104 - anonymous (08/23/2012) [-]
Do more research stonertard. People are always dying because of it.
#18 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Honestly I'd say you're the one who's 'butthurt' seeing as you can't keep yourself from snide remarks and petty insults.

Also, you go ahead and do that, I think it's your right to smoke weed. I don't see how you can say its NEVER killed a person. Weed directly has never killed a person, but indirectly it definitely has. Cancer, trade disputes, and a thousand other things have caused death over weed.

Lastly, I haven't the faintest clue what you're thinking. I'm not sure how much of it you actually do. Your sour mood COULD have to do with you not being high, seeing as smoking weed ALSO will cause the brain to stop producing endorphins.
#26 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
Watch the documentary "The Union" then proceed to stfu.
#23 - anonymous (08/22/2012) [-]
can you give links to the evidence that backs up your claim?
#19 - organicglory (08/22/2012) [-]
didnt even read your comment due
#20 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
The first stage of coping with defeat is always denial.
#31 - roninneko (08/22/2012) [-]
#7 - A BIG. BEAUTIFUL. TREE. 08/22/2012 on I wanna be a tree 0
#18 - Meh, I'm a Batman fan anyways. 08/22/2012 on Melon Lord & Daredevil +2
#168 - You use 'Kid' as an attempt to make me seem foolish and more c…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/22/2012 on Still good people left in... 0
User avatar #171 - dnf (08/22/2012) [-]
wake up?
we are animals you fool, and yeah I used "kid" what if you pointed it out? no shit I think your a fool, pointing out common expressions and ways people talk doesn't change the meaning of its purpose, and umm all thouse people where american citizens you derp normal people like you and me that got fucked in the ass cause shit got too real and no one knew how to deal with it. its happen once and itll happen again
#173 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Well, I can't understand any of what you're trying to say, so, have a nice day!
#31 - I admit, there are some good arguments against Christianity, b… 08/22/2012 on Logic for Christians +1
#165 - Yeah, just saying "Supreme Court, that is all" isn't…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/22/2012 on Still good people left in... 0
User avatar #169 - dnf (08/22/2012) [-]
putting it easier, as long as your not in there shit list, i guess you have some what rights. I mean whats left of them, since every one seems to think the illusion of safety is more important than freedom.
User avatar #166 - dnf (08/22/2012) [-]
kid are you retarded?
if you've done any reading at all you would know, in supreme court. NO ONE gives two shits about your rights, hollywood 10 and all them japs that where forced into camps, any of this ring a bell? they bend the constitution to there will, they can put any one in prison that they want as long as they control the media o.0
User avatar #168 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
You use 'Kid' as an attempt to make me seem foolish and more childish than yourself, which really just seems to be doing the opposite and making YOU seem the fool here.

Secondly, the Supreme Court deals with various issues, and if you've done any reading at all, rights are given to American Citizens, not criminals of war who are a different matter entirely. You are making arguments so far out of left field it's not even funny.


Lastly, I really suggest you stop reading the tabloids and wake up.
User avatar #171 - dnf (08/22/2012) [-]
wake up?
we are animals you fool, and yeah I used "kid" what if you pointed it out? no shit I think your a fool, pointing out common expressions and ways people talk doesn't change the meaning of its purpose, and umm all thouse people where american citizens you derp normal people like you and me that got fucked in the ass cause shit got too real and no one knew how to deal with it. its happen once and itll happen again
#173 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
Well, I can't understand any of what you're trying to say, so, have a nice day!
#6 - Kozmos, there are a variety of interesting and arguable points…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/22/2012 on Title +12
#7 - kozmos (08/22/2012) [-]
mfw i read that comment
#8 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/22/2012) [-]
#4 - Every day for those two months: "Heeey Derp, I was really…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/22/2012 on Grounded +17
User avatar #10 - ScottP (08/22/2012) [-]
Bad Luck Brian?


Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - anonymous (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - anonymous (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)