| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
sorrowofdaedalus
| Rank #3280 on Comments Offline Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar |
|
latest user's comments
| #21 - The Shady Leech | 04/09/2013 on name for strange conniver's... | 0 |
| #15 - Well, Deadpool would be pretty happy, since he's fucking Death… | 04/09/2013 on The Notebook: Dedpoel n Hurlee | 0 |
| #105 - I wouldn't call Deadpool a rip-off so much as an intentional parody. | 04/09/2013 on Fucking Hawkeye | +25 |
| #181 - Personally I believe otherwise; I'll be cordial to anyone, but… | 04/08/2013 on win | 0 |
| #27 - If it looks like it's satirical, it defeats the whole purpose … | 04/08/2013 on Joe Rogan | -1 |
| #22 - sat·ire /ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/ Noun The use … [+] (2 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on Joe Rogan | -2 |
| If it looks like it's satirical, it defeats the whole purpose of satire. | ||
| #52 - I didn't ask for forgiveness. I asked if it made you feel less bad. | 04/08/2013 on Beez in the trap | 0 |
| #14 - Yes. That is EXACTLY how I feel. Thank you Disney, for conveyi… | 04/08/2013 on MFW i find the right porn... | +1 |
| #141 - Character is defined by one's actions. Arguably, he d… [+] (2 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on win | -2 |
| Personally I believe otherwise; I'll be cordial to anyone, but I'll only respect people who show me through some means or another that they do indeed deserve it. | ||
| #48 - Wow, I didn't even see that. My bad. Is it… [+] (2 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on Beez in the trap | 0 |
| I didn't ask for forgiveness. I asked if it made you feel less bad. | ||
| #136 - Regardless of him being a jerk that hates kids, if he has a te… [+] (4 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on win | -2 |
| Character is defined by one's actions. Arguably, he does deserve respect. He might not have been a good man, but he was a great one. He did incredible things, even if they were horrible as well. You'd do well to respect the fact that he was capable of not only committing inhumane acts, but convincing teams of scientists and armies to do them as well. Not to mention, he sort of fixed the stabilized the European economy, so there is that too. Personally I believe otherwise; I'll be cordial to anyone, but I'll only respect people who show me through some means or another that they do indeed deserve it. | ||
| #46 - I'm actually pretty serious about that. I've DONE stuff worse … [+] (4 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on Beez in the trap | 0 |
| Wow, I didn't even see that. My bad. Is it any consolation to know that I've spent the last three days awake writing/storyboarding for a VN? I didn't ask for forgiveness. I asked if it made you feel less bad. | ||
| #11 - What's your point, though? He's an adult, even if an irrespons… [+] (4 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on Joe Rogan | -1 |
| sat·ire /ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/ Noun The use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, If it looks like it's satirical, it defeats the whole purpose of satire. | ||
| #195 - Picture | 04/08/2013 on McButthurt Comp #1 | 0 |
| #30 - I'm more upset by the fact that he spelled bestiality correctl… [+] (6 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on Beez in the trap | 0 |
| I'm actually pretty serious about that. I've DONE stuff worse than beeXwoman porn. Wow, I didn't even see that. My bad. Is it any consolation to know that I've spent the last three days awake writing/storyboarding for a VN? I didn't ask for forgiveness. I asked if it made you feel less bad. | ||
| #114 - Respect is not given, it is earned. In a teaching position, th… [+] (6 new replies) | 04/08/2013 on win | +7 |
| Regardless of him being a jerk that hates kids, if he has a teaching degree, and he's an adult, you've established that he has been accepted by the community(Not people your age, but the school board) that he is capable of teaching you. If you hold respect for society(not facebook faggots, but actual society), you'll trust that that kid-hating asswipe will be able to teach you shit, and you have a duty to shut up and listen while he chews you out and educates your previously ignorant ass. To be honest, jerks that hate kids have been my -favorite- teachers throughout school, because they don't put up with annoying bullshit. Character is defined by one's actions. Arguably, he does deserve respect. He might not have been a good man, but he was a great one. He did incredible things, even if they were horrible as well. You'd do well to respect the fact that he was capable of not only committing inhumane acts, but convincing teams of scientists and armies to do them as well. Not to mention, he sort of fixed the stabilized the European economy, so there is that too. Personally I believe otherwise; I'll be cordial to anyone, but I'll only respect people who show me through some means or another that they do indeed deserve it. | ||
| #12 - "Yeah, I know. I'm wearing her god damn skull on my face.… | 04/04/2013 on Good Guy Mewtwo | 0 |
| #16 - Didn't you read it? They went to therapy. Obviously they talke… [+] (8 new replies) | 04/04/2013 on Cheater | +25 |
| #59 -
jakeattack (04/05/2013) [-] fucking whores im sick of their bullshit, god dammit are all women like this? things seemed to work out better when they knew their place and would have gotten slapped the shit out of wooh there buddy i mean i get the whole antifeminine thing but they do deaserve rights. but saddly ... i know all u girls out there are gonna say im wrong and thumb me down but yes ima say about 80-100% of women are like thisfor me its 100% .... and trust me iv dated all different sorts of girls the only reason they break up is either she likes someone else more then u or ur smoothering her and even still shell be on some other guys dick in a week and just for an example iv dated a girl who never had a boyfreind for around 6 months i never kissed her she always said she wasnt ready so i respected that and around then she broke up with me because i was christian with is a bullshit excuse but i said whatever, maybe 2 weeks later she starts going out with this steam punk, stricked atheist( i wasnt best freinds with him but we'd talked before about that kinda shit) and is fking pdaing all over the fking school i kinda felt she did it just to make me sad, it worked... #69 -
jakeattack (04/05/2013) [-] nawh man i dont think they should have no rights they need to have rights. okkay honestly no we shouldnt be slapping them im just pissed, but i do think when men had control things like this didnt happen. that doesnt mean we should descriminate or anything like that. but still, this shouldnt happen, i feel like the only way to survive in a world were it does happen is to simply not let them even mean anything. idk man seems like the guys who nail and bail dont get hurt, when the ones looking for a real relationship get hearbroken :/ its true after my last relationship iv just desided not to go after girls any more id almost rather live and die alone then to subject my self to them anymore but this ideal will mostly change and ur right but when guys had more control there was alot less of this but thats not BECAUSE we were in control its was because back then poeple had higher morals swag wasn't a thing, in stead people went with the trend of elegance #113 -
jakeattack (04/05/2013) [-] sigh man, ive dated a girl who tortured me basically being on off, saying it was all her working out her problems and went with another guy. then when i called her a whore she called cops which apparently is enough to get me in trouble. fuckk man why cant we go back to that? #336 -
hockeycrazysteve (04/05/2013) [-] and above me you'll see a bunch of faggots who cant keep their woman incheck #363 -
jakeattack (04/09/2013) [-] what the hell do you expect us to do, i suggest smacking the shit out of them n thats not a good idea to you faggots. if they go insane theres nothing else to control them with other than force | ||
| #175 - That's Tantalus, and actually rather than Tartarus, he was cha… [+] (1 new reply) | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| #155 - No,Tartarus was for human criminals who did unspeakable crimes… [+] (3 new replies) | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| That's Tantalus, and actually rather than Tartarus, he was chained to a tree and a lake of refreshing, cool water rose up to his chin, but every time he lowered his head to drink it would recede. A bunch of delicious looking apples were hanging overhead, and every time he reached up to take one, the branches would swing away. | ||
| #143 - No, the River Styx is the barrier between the Land of the Livi… | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| #140 - No, because it exists in a different realm entirely. The only … | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| #132 - Nope, there is a difference. At the Isle of Creation, the Gods… | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| #129 - There's also a placed called the Isle of Heroes where anyone w… [+] (9 new replies) | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | 0 |
| I dont believe tartarus was for humans, only the titans and gods/demigods like zeus's son, and you are forgetting the fields of punishment, elysian fields, and... whatever the fuck the neutral was. the meadows of whatnot or something. And to my memory it was the isle of the blessed not the isle of heroes. No,Tartarus was for human criminals who did unspeakable crimes as well, such as particularly gruesome murder, cannibalism, the rape and killing of a child, etc. Arsonists we're said to go there too. Like I said ,there's all kinds. There wasn't actually one specific field for punishment, rather, many different places. The neutral are the fields of aphsodel. That's Tantalus, and actually rather than Tartarus, he was chained to a tree and a lake of refreshing, cool water rose up to his chin, but every time he lowered his head to drink it would recede. A bunch of delicious looking apples were hanging overhead, and every time he reached up to take one, the branches would swing away. No, because it exists in a different realm entirely. The only way to reach Mount Olympus is if you were made in to a God upon death, but that can't be called an afterlife so much as a rebirth. Is there a difference between the Isle of Heroes and the Elysian Fields? I thought they were one and the same. Nope, there is a difference. At the Isle of Creation, the Gods will actually occasionally come to feast with the residents there. It's the only place in the afterlife you're capable of going where you can actually meet the gods of the Pantheon. | ||
| #121 - One afterlife, several places. The underworld is like a contin… [+] (14 new replies) | 04/04/2013 on Right in the Feels | +1 |
| According to the story of.... christ i cant remember fucing on of them. It is accesable to the living though once you go under and into the underworld, you are cut off by the river styx, which if you fall in you die, and you must take a boat ride over. Its more like a giant ass desolate cavern. No, the River Styx is the barrier between the Land of the Living and the land of the Dead, and there's two more rivers after that. Crossing the Styx takes you to the Underworld from a place known as the Fringe, which is a place where souls who can not pay for passage across must wait for Charon to select them for passage instead. It is kind of like purgatory. Either way, you can't reach Olympus via the Styx, or crossing them. Sorry didn't see your, "more than three," what were the others? There's also a placed called the Isle of Heroes where anyone who has done something incredible, regardless of faith, or if they had simply been well-liked by the gods, go to. You also forgot Tartarus which is a place in the Underworld where all of the most horrible criminals go, as well as being the prison of the titans. There's likely even more than that, since there's a lot of information missing on the Greek Faith. I dont believe tartarus was for humans, only the titans and gods/demigods like zeus's son, and you are forgetting the fields of punishment, elysian fields, and... whatever the fuck the neutral was. the meadows of whatnot or something. And to my memory it was the isle of the blessed not the isle of heroes. No,Tartarus was for human criminals who did unspeakable crimes as well, such as particularly gruesome murder, cannibalism, the rape and killing of a child, etc. Arsonists we're said to go there too. Like I said ,there's all kinds. There wasn't actually one specific field for punishment, rather, many different places. The neutral are the fields of aphsodel. That's Tantalus, and actually rather than Tartarus, he was chained to a tree and a lake of refreshing, cool water rose up to his chin, but every time he lowered his head to drink it would recede. A bunch of delicious looking apples were hanging overhead, and every time he reached up to take one, the branches would swing away. No, because it exists in a different realm entirely. The only way to reach Mount Olympus is if you were made in to a God upon death, but that can't be called an afterlife so much as a rebirth. Is there a difference between the Isle of Heroes and the Elysian Fields? I thought they were one and the same. Nope, there is a difference. At the Isle of Creation, the Gods will actually occasionally come to feast with the residents there. It's the only place in the afterlife you're capable of going where you can actually meet the gods of the Pantheon. Okay, not three separate after lives, but rather three places where you could end up: The Underworld, The Elysian Fields, or the Fields of Asphodel. Or were there more in Greek mythology? | ||
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
items
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more shit about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?

