Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sorrowofdaedalus    

Rank #57810 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8584 total,  12496 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5630
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9102

latest user's comments

#49 - My suggestion would be this. The aggressors who made…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/16/2013 on Louis 0
User avatar #50 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ahh, that's another way. Didnt think of that at all.. Then the sentence is also broken up in three parts, instead of two, which works better
You're nitpicking more than any of my english teachers ever have, because I'm in danish 9th grade, and the teachers aren't used to fixing the kind of things i'd like them to..
#52 - There was not. It never got a true end. 04/16/2013 on Cartoon Network Revisted 0
#45 - Well then you chose very odd word placement, because even if y…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/16/2013 on Louis 0
User avatar #47 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ah, i see your point. I could also have used some of the fancy fj text thingies to list the word and still have it a sentence. Or simply mark them otherwise in a simple manner. I like aesthetics, and i by habit always want to have the reasoning behind anything i state, and both stating them and having the reasoning afterwards would ruin the simplicity.
Overthinking much
The -aggressors- who made the -leaders- decide that it was necessary, and all -the people- who decides to show up to the dahm war.
User avatar #49 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
My suggestion would be this.

The aggressors who made the leaders decide it was necessary, the leaders themselves, and the people who decide to show up to the damn war in the first place.

Words are more about the way they sound when you read them, than the way it looks. That rolls off the tongue much better, sounds more complete, and makes clear each of the three examples set.
User avatar #50 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ahh, that's another way. Didnt think of that at all.. Then the sentence is also broken up in three parts, instead of two, which works better
You're nitpicking more than any of my english teachers ever have, because I'm in danish 9th grade, and the teachers aren't used to fixing the kind of things i'd like them to..
#42 - Well, here's the thing. It might be the most logical conclusio…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/16/2013 on Louis 0
User avatar #44 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
I thought of it as a list in a sentence, starting from the aggressors, to the leaders who made it happen and then the people who showed up.
I often derp, but thats usually some weird shit with total wrong word just randomly replacing another, but in this kind of comment i proof read
User avatar #45 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
Well then you chose very odd word placement, because even if you're restating a previously mentioned group, it's sort of silly not to mention the third group as BEING the third group just because they have something to do with a previous group.

It's sort of like, if I said this;

I have three things with me.

A cupful of Jello and a Spoon.




"But what about the third thing? "


The cup the jello was in.




It's just sort of aggravating and unclear at first. You read it like this and you go "well that's obvious! " but without this explanation or the predetermined context you were prepared to read it in, it would've thrown you offguard I bet.
User avatar #47 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ah, i see your point. I could also have used some of the fancy fj text thingies to list the word and still have it a sentence. Or simply mark them otherwise in a simple manner. I like aesthetics, and i by habit always want to have the reasoning behind anything i state, and both stating them and having the reasoning afterwards would ruin the simplicity.
Overthinking much
The -aggressors- who made the -leaders- decide that it was necessary, and all -the people- who decides to show up to the dahm war.
User avatar #49 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
My suggestion would be this.

The aggressors who made the leaders decide it was necessary, the leaders themselves, and the people who decide to show up to the damn war in the first place.

Words are more about the way they sound when you read them, than the way it looks. That rolls off the tongue much better, sounds more complete, and makes clear each of the three examples set.
User avatar #50 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ahh, that's another way. Didnt think of that at all.. Then the sentence is also broken up in three parts, instead of two, which works better
You're nitpicking more than any of my english teachers ever have, because I'm in danish 9th grade, and the teachers aren't used to fixing the kind of things i'd like them to..
#120 - Not to mention, he get's so much pussy they should call him Ca… 04/16/2013 on The Powerpuff Girls on... +1
#114 - Actually, he's regarded as a Metahuman. He's trained …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/16/2013 on The Powerpuff Girls on... +3
#115 - wakingeyes (04/16/2013) [-]
a valid point
#120 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
Not to mention, he get's so much pussy they should call him Catman.


Pic unrelated, Deadpool married her and got divorced again in the same issue.
#141 - Hi. 04/16/2013 on english motherfucker!! 0
#39 - i r best obsrvatory skullz. 04/15/2013 on Louis 0
#130 - **sorrowofdaedalus rolled a random image posted in comment #… 04/15/2013 on Periods. 0
#420 - White Straight Male. You're just angry because … 04/15/2013 on There is no equality... -4
#35 - That was the most inspiring novel I've ever read. 04/15/2013 on Norwegians 0
#174 - They shouldn't need to go to school in the first place. Their … 04/15/2013 on Hypocracy 0
#166 - I agree, but I don't think handing these single mothers money …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/15/2013 on Hypocracy 0
User avatar #167 - youarenotspecial (04/15/2013) [-]
How are single mothers supposed to hold down a job, go to school, and take care of their kids? If they don't have somone to watch them, it's literally impossible.

Yeah, that's a great idea if the economy didn't suck. Everyone I know who went to college off student loans couldn't find work in their field, and are now working jobs they could have gotten without a degree while paying off these huge loans. I mean, I plan on taking classes, but team that with not knowing what the fuck I want to do, it's going to be a much harder and complicated climb than that. Not that I want government support. I'm just saying it's not that easy.
User avatar #174 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/15/2013) [-]
They shouldn't need to go to school in the first place. Their refraining from being self-reliant in the first place is a problem. If they have a degree, they shouldn't have to return to school. My suggestion would be friends or parents to watch the children, or even use a program called "latchkey" that watches kids after school until high school so you can go to work AND pick up your kids, and take classes in the PM if that's something you neglected to do when you were younger.


Where did they look? The field they joined may have jobs in a place other than where they live, and if they aren't willing to uproot their lives for their work, they clearly didn't pick the right field I suppose.

My personal suggestion is to take community college courses and work part-time until you know what you want to do, and start college then. There's no point in going to college early and with inexperience just because everyone else does it.
#32 - How are those better? Those are really long and awkward to say.  [+] (1 new reply) 04/15/2013 on Don't touch ems. 0
#51 - Spikeydeath (04/15/2013) [-]
Its a joke thats what oil checky thingy stick
#21 - One problem with that. You only said two places.  [+] (9 new replies) 04/15/2013 on Louis +6
User avatar #40 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
I thought i didnt need to explain that the leaders who decided it was necessary is the third post, but i suppose it's not all that obvious
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
Well, here's the thing. It might be the most logical conclusion to draw, but nothing in your post implied that, so I'm assuming you just derped.


It's okay, we all do it.
User avatar #44 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
I thought of it as a list in a sentence, starting from the aggressors, to the leaders who made it happen and then the people who showed up.
I often derp, but thats usually some weird shit with total wrong word just randomly replacing another, but in this kind of comment i proof read
User avatar #45 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
Well then you chose very odd word placement, because even if you're restating a previously mentioned group, it's sort of silly not to mention the third group as BEING the third group just because they have something to do with a previous group.

It's sort of like, if I said this;

I have three things with me.

A cupful of Jello and a Spoon.




"But what about the third thing? "


The cup the jello was in.




It's just sort of aggravating and unclear at first. You read it like this and you go "well that's obvious! " but without this explanation or the predetermined context you were prepared to read it in, it would've thrown you offguard I bet.
User avatar #47 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ah, i see your point. I could also have used some of the fancy fj text thingies to list the word and still have it a sentence. Or simply mark them otherwise in a simple manner. I like aesthetics, and i by habit always want to have the reasoning behind anything i state, and both stating them and having the reasoning afterwards would ruin the simplicity.
Overthinking much
The -aggressors- who made the -leaders- decide that it was necessary, and all -the people- who decides to show up to the dahm war.
User avatar #49 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/16/2013) [-]
My suggestion would be this.

The aggressors who made the leaders decide it was necessary, the leaders themselves, and the people who decide to show up to the damn war in the first place.

Words are more about the way they sound when you read them, than the way it looks. That rolls off the tongue much better, sounds more complete, and makes clear each of the three examples set.
User avatar #50 - daentraya (04/16/2013) [-]
Ahh, that's another way. Didnt think of that at all.. Then the sentence is also broken up in three parts, instead of two, which works better
You're nitpicking more than any of my english teachers ever have, because I'm in danish 9th grade, and the teachers aren't used to fixing the kind of things i'd like them to..
#33 - frysandaburger (04/15/2013) [-]
No one else commented on this... really? I is ashame FJ.
User avatar #39 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/15/2013) [-]
i r best obsrvatory skullz.
#139 - There's a difference between the two. The gover…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/15/2013 on Hypocracy +2
#171 - jazzytheferret (04/15/2013) [-]
Generalization has always irked me. I will admit I received assistance. I received food assistance and FAFSA through school. I worked a job to pay for my books and gas to get back and forth. Maybe went to 2 parties a year and was extremely frugal.

Not everyone is a dick, not everyone is leeching off of society. Add stress to your life if you want to, personally I'm going to say fuck it and just do for me now.
User avatar #165 - youarenotspecial (04/15/2013) [-]
Well certain benefits do make sense- like if someone lost their job, or it's a single mom who really is trying her hardest to make life better for her and her kids. It is REALLY hard to get out of poverty if your parents brought you in to it. Personally, I think extremely poor people shouldn't be able to have kids, or have so many. I know I'd be a lot less fucked if my parents weren't so horribly poor.
User avatar #166 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/15/2013) [-]
I agree, but I don't think handing these single mothers money is the way to go about getting them back on their feet.


As for being born in to it; not really. If you try hard enough, with student loans you can get in to a decent, cheap college, get a good job, and at least eek out a living at a middle-class rate.
User avatar #167 - youarenotspecial (04/15/2013) [-]
How are single mothers supposed to hold down a job, go to school, and take care of their kids? If they don't have somone to watch them, it's literally impossible.

Yeah, that's a great idea if the economy didn't suck. Everyone I know who went to college off student loans couldn't find work in their field, and are now working jobs they could have gotten without a degree while paying off these huge loans. I mean, I plan on taking classes, but team that with not knowing what the fuck I want to do, it's going to be a much harder and complicated climb than that. Not that I want government support. I'm just saying it's not that easy.
User avatar #174 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/15/2013) [-]
They shouldn't need to go to school in the first place. Their refraining from being self-reliant in the first place is a problem. If they have a degree, they shouldn't have to return to school. My suggestion would be friends or parents to watch the children, or even use a program called "latchkey" that watches kids after school until high school so you can go to work AND pick up your kids, and take classes in the PM if that's something you neglected to do when you were younger.


Where did they look? The field they joined may have jobs in a place other than where they live, and if they aren't willing to uproot their lives for their work, they clearly didn't pick the right field I suppose.

My personal suggestion is to take community college courses and work part-time until you know what you want to do, and start college then. There's no point in going to college early and with inexperience just because everyone else does it.
#61 - It did for me too. It's just sort of romantic. Like watching a… 04/15/2013 on Fallout IRL +11
#165 - They are sort of like the EA of Funnyjunk. 04/15/2013 on FJ nowadays 0
#34 - 8, because 2 got away! Wahahahahaha. 04/15/2013 on Boom +13
#14 - So THAT'S why.....  [+] (1 new reply) 04/12/2013 on Why Ep. 3 will never happen -2
#15 - Savlonade (04/12/2013) [-]
tad redundant.
#121 - Wahahahahahaaha. 04/11/2013 on Can't decide +1
#117 - Christopher Walken: "Branden did a clever thing that day.…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/11/2013 on Can't decide +2
#120 - bronybrandongunn has deleted their comment.
User avatar #121 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/11/2013) [-]
Wahahahahahaaha.
#389 - "The Roll of Life. " 04/11/2013 on Gold And Silver Pawn 0
#78 - Steel Magnolias with Nicolas Cage? Yes. Avatar? Yes. … 04/11/2013 on The world loves Cage +1
#99 - I wouldn't expect any proper princess to do such a thing on t…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/11/2013 on so much win +1
User avatar #100 - argonianmaidohonor (04/11/2013) [-]
Well then we will be doing just fine.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - mr skeltal (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - mr skeltal (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)