Upload
Login or register

sonjaynooy

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:11/14/2009
Last Login:7/22/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4868
Highest Content Rank:#6619
Highest Comment Rank:#3689
Content Thumbs: 202 total,  266 ,  64
Comment Thumbs: 4735 total,  5240 ,  505
Content Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 20 Content: Peasant → Level 21 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 87% (87/100)
Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:20913
Times Content Favorited:10 times
Total Comments Made:1584
FJ Points:4438

latest user's comments

#23 - It's right here 05/25/2016 on tracer dacer +3
#17 - well technically rosa parks didn't need to sit at the front of…  [+] (47 new replies) 05/25/2016 on Rights 0
User avatar
#20 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
You seriously gonna go and try to compare gun legislation to institutionalized racism? I called the person responsible for the content an idiot, I can do the same for you. It's about all I can say to that kind of argument.
User avatar
#24 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
Technically you're only covering your ass, both are actions of the federal government. And racism is only socially unacceptable because that's the world you live in. In fact racism would be a virtually nonexistent word if you were taught you were superior to other races.
#21 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
rights are rights, whether you agree with them or not
User avatar
#23 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
Universal human rights are a slightly different category than local property laws. Idiot.
#33 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
So first of all I'm neither for or against gun legislature I'm just pointing out how biased you are. Second, calling people idiots for disagreeing with you kind of makes you the idiot. Third, just because something develops socially doesn't make it universally correct, there are male dominated cultures where it is the norm that women need to be monitored by males at any point in the day that doesn't make it correct, however it's part of their culture meaning the definition of what's important is fluid based on the culture you take the standards from.
User avatar
#48 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
I don't see where I'm biased. I have my opinion and merely stand by it. I only call people idiots when they come up with idiotic arguments and comparing gun control to racism is pretty fucking idiotic if you ask me. But US is part of the western cultural group. In the western cultural group we put rights of human beings on an international level beyond the power of any government. Unlike the rights to purchase and own weapons. I couldn't give less shit what americans do with their gun laws, but comparing them to human rights is idiotic. The right to own a rifle is NOT the same as the right to life.
User avatar
#143 - wootsauce (05/25/2016) [-]
Yes it is...
User avatar
#150 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
I'm sorry, but what? Are you actually saying that the right not to be persecuted, the right not to be enslaved, the right to be equal before law, are you saying that these are on the same level as the right to own a piece of property you don't need? Did you even think about that before you wrote it?
User avatar
#166 - wootsauce (05/26/2016) [-]
Absolutely. It's MORE important actually. It can prevent those things from happening
User avatar
#168 - cptsweatpants (05/26/2016) [-]
What prevents those things from happening is the democratic society you live in. Or are you convinced that Obama can just walk up to the cameras tommorow and announce he's bringing back slavery?
User avatar
#169 - wootsauce (05/26/2016) [-]
We don't live in a democracy....

User avatar
#170 - cptsweatpants (05/26/2016) [-]
Yeah, okay. My bad. But we need to pretend like we do, or our alien overlords will notice and try to silence us.
#53 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
maybe it's because your country was created after the 1990s where any sort of fights would incite the world superpowers so you had no choice but to go for a peaceful separation, but not all countries were created equally so if you could stop comparing your peaceful creation as if it were the global standard
User avatar
#67 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
Fuck you. You're trying to speak about something you know absolutely nothing of and you're insulting the memory of thousands of good people who died or suffered in prisons, camps and on the streets. Go fuck yourself, we have nothing to talk about.
#76 - autumnanubis has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#75 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
"You don't understand me!" Because that's a valid reason for your correctness. I guess he struck a nerve. Grow up.
#73 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
Too fucking long ago? A different time? let me tell you a story about a country who wants independence but can't get it because the russians were still in power.

The US and Russia fought in Korea just to 'overthrow' the communism that only took you a few prison sentences to throw off. over 130,000 dead to throw off this mantle of communism that you took a peaceful resolution to. So don't even try to pretend that you had any sort of real hardship getting rid of communism, the Korean conflict still goes on today.
#71 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
no Fuck You. Prison sentence is bullshit to the deaths of tens of thousands of deaths that the US had to have to get our independence, don't even pretend that some prison sentence or measly sum of deaths even amounts to the amount of suffering that shit that the US had to get through just to gain their independence
#69 - sonjaynooy has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#26 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
You only have those rights because the Constitution grants them to you.
User avatar
#30 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
I have those rights because I am a human being regardless of some fucking constitution. Basic human rights are globally recognized and aggreed upon. Countries uphold them, not create them.
#43 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
people aren't born with a list of human rights, they were artificially created by developed countries to give others a moral compass to grow
User avatar
#54 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
The declaration was put in place exactly to say that you are entitled to your basic human rights from the moment you are born. If you live in a country that is part of this deal and international community, such as the US, you have these rights from the moment you first opened your eyes. Your government has no power over that, and if you feel any of your rights are being violated you can sue them at an international court.
#55 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
cool in America we also have our own additional rights and one of them is to bear arms. The declaration was put in place exactly to say that you are entitled to your constitutional rights from the moment you are born. If you live in the US, you have these rights from the moment you first opened your eyes. Your government has no power over that, and if you feel any of your rights are being violated you can sue them in court.
User avatar
#37 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
And Germany really gave a shit about human rights when they were torching the Jews didn't they?
User avatar
#42 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
It's not like it was the work of a lunatic dictator and his fanatical followers who were who were later hunted and hanged for their crimes against humanity amirite?
User avatar
#46 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
You're trying to look at it from an objective observers standpoint, but it simply isn't possible for you apparently. If Germany had won the war, what then? You aren't in a vacuum, nothing is. Expand your mind a bit and perhaps you'll understand everything a bit better.
#45 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
so what about north korea, or congo whats happening about their human rights
User avatar
#47 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
cptsweatpants doesn't understand that in war it doesn't matter who is right, only who is left. And that hindsight is 20/20.
#50 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
hes from a faggy lib country so he still lives in that dreamlike world where nobody wants to hurt each other and muh feelings are important
#60 - autumnanubis has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#52 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
Not the same as "a faggy lib country"
User avatar
#51 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
His people have only had a pseudo democratic state for about 25 years.
#59 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
gotta look where czechs situated though, he believes that they were able to have their own countries through their own merit, not due to the fall of the soviet union or anything much larger than them
User avatar
#63 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
I know, I noted that in a separate reply
User avatar
#68 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
>>#67,

And the same goes to you. The ignorance of you two cunts knows no bounds.
User avatar
#32 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
O really, non government organization really give a shit about "muh human rights" don't they. Because "terrorists"(I'll use the term lightly so you don't go ape) haven't been kidnapping and murdering people for years right?
User avatar
#39 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
That's kind of the reason they are called terrorists, genius. What kind of a retarded argument even is that?
User avatar
#44 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
You're failing to ackowledge that the only reason you have rights is because your governments provides them to you. The Velvet Revolution, as I'm sure you were referencing, was effective because it wasn't an isolated event. In case you didn't know, there was a lot going on in soviet Germany at the time, and pretty much everywhere in Europe. The Soviets were losing traction already.
User avatar
#56 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
Are you really so arrogant as to attempt to lecture me on my own history?

My governement does not "provide" me these rights. My government merely ensures they are upheld. If I feel they are violated by any individual, group or even the government I can defend myself at an international court.
#70 - zenethe (05/25/2016) [-]
HAHA yea what an arrogant asshole. I was just thinking about how nobody could teach me 1 thing about the country I grew up in, I know everything about it. Also all my opinions about it are correct and anyone who disagrees with my opinions is wrong.
User avatar
#74 - shaddyz (05/25/2016) [-]
(1) Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar. Sie zu achten und zu schützen ist Verpflichtung aller staatlichen Gewalt.
User avatar
#171 - cptsweatpants (05/26/2016) [-]
(1) Česká republika je svrchovaný, jednotný a demokratický právní stát založený na úctě k právům a svobodám člověka a občana.

Indeed.
User avatar
#58 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
If you lack something entirely, what evidence is there that it ever truly existed.
User avatar
#57 - autumnanubis (05/25/2016) [-]
Imma make this real clear for you.


IF THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT THERE ARE NO RIGHTS
User avatar
#64 - cptsweatpants (05/25/2016) [-]
Basic human rights are no artificial concept, the declaration merely puts it on paper. Every person has the instinct to live free and safe and every person takes steps to ensure it is so. One of those steps for our civilization was to create governments.
User avatar
#94 - obviousmanperson (05/25/2016) [-]
And God enforces those rights
#24 - lrn 2 dodge  [+] (5 new replies) 05/25/2016 on BRB 0
User avatar
#28 - grumpygrandpa (05/25/2016) [-]
same could be said about the suicide move
#29 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
tru
User avatar
#30 - grumpygrandpa (05/25/2016) [-]
All I'm saying is, why aim at pushing them off the edge when you can pin them against a wall and fuck 'em up without dying?
#50 - anon (05/25/2016) [-]
I think he was aiming for the edge of that first wall. Either that or he mistook breakable stuff for a real wall, which is understandable tbh
#32 - sonjaynooy (05/25/2016) [-]
oh dva isn't a 1hit kill tho and i think this one just wasn't paying attention to where he was
#58 - I think they mean "Five Things Asian People Hear That Oth… 05/25/2016 on Yes. As a white male I am... 0
#1700 - **sonjaynooy used "*roll picture*"** **sonjaynooy rolled image ** 05/12/2016 on All winners chosen 0
#604 - **sonjaynooy used "*roll picture*"** **sonjaynooy rolled image ** 05/12/2016 on All winners decided 0
#16 - so which door do you go through?  [+] (2 new replies) 04/21/2016 on clever +1
User avatar
#21 - browdon (04/21/2016) [-]
from there you know who is telling the truth or not
#27 - justmadethisaccoun (04/21/2016) [-]
But they haven't said which one was safe. Just one tells the truth and one tells a lie.
#122 - Energy recycling is the energy recovery process of utilizing e…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/22/2016 on kinda neat, i think 0
#124 - dudulli (03/22/2016) [-]
There is no energyrecovering process at hand, though.

What you mean would apply to - just using something silly because I'm not creative - heating up a room with the heat that gets generated at the backside of a fridge.

This is the first step of getting energy from an unusable source (gravitation/kinetic). Basically like a windmill.

#1 - did you mean to say the most appropriate song?  [+] (1 new reply) 03/20/2016 on alheimers +1
User avatar
#2 - helgheimftw (03/20/2016) [-]
Well its more fitting than appropiate
#11 - so they're not 'generating' electricity as much as recycling it  [+] (15 new replies) 03/20/2016 on kinda neat, i think +17
#67 - anon (03/20/2016) [-]
well , you can't just create energy , you can only transform it
#17 - anon (03/20/2016) [-]
technically all energy is "recycled"
#126 - dudulli (03/22/2016) [-]
It's a bad way to word things.
It's like the culinary definition of fruit vs the botanical one.
Or the term "theory" in every day usage vs scientific use.

Recycling only applies to using energy that is generated as a byproduct and would otherwise be wasted.

Tl;dr
You are technically right, but practically not.
#15 - kanedam (03/20/2016) [-]
#12 - dudulli (03/20/2016) [-]
... Your wording confuses me.
They generate electricity like a watermill can. I wouldn't call that recycling
#122 - sonjaynooy (03/22/2016) [-]
Energy recycling is the energy recovery process of utilizing energy that would normally be wasted, usually by converting it into electricity or thermal energy.
#124 - dudulli (03/22/2016) [-]
There is no energyrecovering process at hand, though.

What you mean would apply to - just using something silly because I'm not creative - heating up a room with the heat that gets generated at the backside of a fridge.

This is the first step of getting energy from an unusable source (gravitation/kinetic). Basically like a windmill.

#38 - fcrocker (03/20/2016) [-]
He means to say that energy must have been used to get the water moving in the first place, most likely from electric pumps. So what these are doing is turning electricity, to kinetic energy, and back to electricity. In other words; a whole load of fuck all.

These things are probably used where there is sufficient gravity to push the water along, or they would be pointless.
#125 - dudulli (03/22/2016) [-]
Well, if that is what they assumed then yes. It's not recycling, it's wasting energy
User avatar
#62 - thevaulthunter (03/20/2016) [-]
Well, the water would be moved regardless, so I suppose in the long run, it saves a bit.
#63 - fcrocker (03/20/2016) [-]
Well, no.
I'm pretty sure you lack even the most fundamental understanding of how the universe works.

These turbines in the water don't just rotate without affecting the flow of water at all, cause that would be getting free energy. You can't just create energy, obviously, that would be fucking retarded.

If you install these turbines, they will slow down the flow of water, then you will need to put more energy in to moving the water.

Like I said, the only time it would actually make sense to use this is in an abundance of energy provided by gravity.
User avatar
#123 - thevaulthunter (03/22/2016) [-]
I didn't realize it would affect the flow that much.
#71 - anon (03/20/2016) [-]
If you could be a bit more derogatory when explaining something he may understand what you're saying better, and you may have more friends because you'd be even more likeable.
#105 - fcrocker (03/21/2016) [-]
Gee that's some nice sarcasm there anon.

All I said was he 'lacks a fundamental understanding of how the universe works'. Which from his comment, was clearly true. If someone says some retarded shit, I'm gonna call them out for being retarded.

And you and I both know I'd have zero friends either way.

#41 - dudulli (03/20/2016) [-]
Yeah, the first thing would be stupid - that would only result in a loss of energy but the last paragraph makes sense... Though, I still would not call it recycling but just "transformation" (I don't know the right English term) of energy