Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.


Rank #24051 on Comments
solvikaaber Avatar Level 121 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Send mail to solvikaaber Block solvikaaber Invite solvikaaber to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/13/2011
Last Login:8/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#24051
Highest Content Rank:#4610
Highest Comment Rank:#10866
Content Thumbs: 399 total,  457 ,  58
Comment Thumbs: 239 total,  366 ,  127
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 40 Content: Sammich eater → Level 41 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/5)
Level 121 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 122 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Content Views:30021
Times Content Favorited:28 times
Total Comments Made:101
FJ Points:624
Favorite Tags: tags (3)

Sort by:

funny pictures

  • Views: 13612
    Thumbs Up 301 Thumbs Down 17 Total: +284
    Comments: 29
    Favorites: 16
    Uploaded: 11/01/13
    Tags Tags
  • Views: 8483
    Thumbs Up 80 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +65
    Comments: 29
    Favorites: 7
    Uploaded: 05/05/13
    Possibly a new champion Possibly a new champion
  • Views: 516
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +5
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/13/11
    The Yellow Ones The Yellow Ones
  • Views: 741
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 12 Total: -6
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/01/13
    How the League of LegendsWiki looks like How the League of LegendsWiki...
Sort by:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#46 - Bæ is icelandic for bye...... 08/18/2014 on made me laugh 0
#72 - thank mr skeltal 08/15/2014 on Joints in Motion +1
#22 - thank mr skeltal 08/13/2014 on /v/ 0
#114 - thank mr skeltal 08/08/2014 on sad but true +1
#195 - thank mr skeltal 08/04/2014 on Calcium +5
#1237 - Comment deleted 07/18/2014 on 10,000 comments and addy... +2
#14 - Illumarti?  [+] (1 new reply) 07/02/2014 on bruin mannetje 0
#17 - joshiboy (07/02/2014) [-]
Ilumartini shakken not sthird, uknow
#2990 - **solvikaaber rolls 644,775,599** do i win? 07/02/2014 on highest roll gets yellow... 0
#105 - Where did Funnyjunk's **** go?  [+] (1 new reply) 04/26/2014 on Best Feature 0
User avatar #110 - moetron (04/26/2014) [-]
Click 'Prefs' on the top bar of the site, then go to the account and privacy tab and scroll down then check enable NSFW.
#47 - One question. why is U.S.A. defending Isreal?  [+] (19 new replies) 04/21/2014 on Is Polandball still a thing? 0
User avatar #51 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
I'm not well versed on that. In my personal opinion, the UK split up that piece of land fairly, giving Israel a small sliver and Jordan a large chunk. And in my opinion, I think that the Palestinians are being greedy trying to take more from Israel. I think they should move to Jordan/ another country, or stay in Israel and not complain.

There are people in Poland who live in an area that used to be mostly German. You don't see them shooting rockets at the Polish government trying to get them to make it German again. I see Israel as having the moral high ground because they've given back all the lands they've taken (almost all) whereas if the Islamic countries took over Israel there's no way in hell they'd give the land back. The USA sees this and helps the Isralis out so they don't get annihilated.

All in my opinion.
User avatar #60 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
i take offence with your assertion that the reason there are people in poverty is capitalism. capitalism is pulling people OUT of poverty. when done correctly capitalism makes it so everyone earns more money across the board. as far as economic systems are concerned there simply has not been an alternative to free markets that produces so much wealth across so many aspects of society, from the poor to the rich everyone makes more (admittedly the rich have and gain more wealth but that is acceptable as long as standards of living for the poor are improved along with the wealth generated).
User avatar #63 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
You cannot look me in the eye (or whatever variant you would do over the internet) and say that Capitalism helps the poor better than Socialism. Socialism's whole standpoint is to help the poor, while Capitalism's whole standpoint is to help the skilled. I never said that Capitalism is a bad system, but it leads to people getting left in the dust.
User avatar #65 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
i will agree that ethically, the ideal of socialism is superior but the problem is that socialism has failed to improve the poor's condition in every instance where it has been instituted. sure it sounds nice, but really it doesn't make anyone better off. socialism makes income equal but the reality is that it makes everyone equally poor as well. socialism fundamentally can not produce as much wealth as capitalism and when wealth stagnates everyone gets poorer. income inequality is acceptable as long as one condition is met:
1. the poor do not get poorer
the way it is in the us absolute income, adjusted for inflation, has increased in every economic level every year. i'm fine with someone making more money than anyone could ever dream of as long as his ultra poor counterpart also does better every year.
socialism has great intentions, but we can't forget that many times the road to hell is paved with them.
User avatar #67 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
I didn't mean what the USSR had implemented. I meant modern day Socialism used by Scandinavian countries for one, and varying degrees of it are used in virtually every economy on earth.
User avatar #68 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
scandanavian "socialism" only works because of the very low level of market interference that those countries have. the only way they fund those extensive social welfare programs is by allowing the markets to produce wealth as markets are wont to do. high taxes are only paid because the free market makes it so many people can pay them and still survive. you also have to take into account that the scandanavian countries also have MUCH smaller populations than major capitalist countries like the us and even then their per capita gdp is lower than the us. you can hold that region up as an example of how well socialism works but the reality is that they simply aren't socialists by any stretch of the imagination, excluding the social programs which, again, are only functioning because of how well the market works.
User avatar #72 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
Also I'm loving that somebody made a new account just to thumb me down.
User avatar #70 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
What I'm getting out of this is that you're saying socalism doesn't work except where it works. Scandinavian countries have higher per capita GDPs than the USA. Actually one of the very few places that do. I'm not touting Socialism as some high and mighty religion, but I'm saying it can work, and where it does work the poor are much better off.
User avatar #74 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
the problem is that scandanavian countries don't practice socialism, in fact its the opposite. they have some of the freest markets in the world. i'm not saying that public welfare programs are bad, just that where true socialism (government control over business) is concerned, it always ends badly for all parties involved. social welfare is fine as long as you don't put undue burdens on the private sector. also i want to make clear that i am not advocating complete market noninterference. there has to be some regulation to make it fair but that can be done without the government having to take control and overtax businesses. also i did not thumb you down.
User avatar #80 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
I was just saying that somebody had made a new account to thumb me down. Not saying you did. Also I'm not trying to argue in favor of socialism. The socialist stance of public welfare programs leads to the income gap being less than in capitalist countries. That's all I'm trying to say.
User avatar #81 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
and i agree that that is true. what i'm trying to say is that income gaps aren't inherently evil.
User avatar #82 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
I don't think they are either. They give people something to strive for.
User avatar #84 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
cool. then what's the issue here? i dont understand why we've been going in circles like this.
User avatar #85 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
That was what I've been trying to say. The first guy said Germany has less of an income gap and I said that's because they're socialist and the USA is Capitalist in nature.
User avatar #86 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
ok, i was just mad because you said capitalism is why there are americans in poverty not that capitalism is why there is an income gap. those two statements don't mean the same thing
User avatar #91 - pheonixinstinct (04/21/2014) [-]
i loved watching you two argue so nicely with each other. have a good day
User avatar #88 - meganinja (04/21/2014) [-]
Because I didn't feel like typing shit out because it wasn't one of my major points.
User avatar #89 - zeusx (04/21/2014) [-]
fine then. i guess its over then. good luck with whatever the fuck else you do later
[ 101 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe lol-channel

user's friends

User avatar alexusapi    
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1400

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - mrsnowballs Comment deleted by solvikaaber [-]
 Friends (0)