Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

slimeywaffles    

Rank #3597 on Comments
slimeywaffles Avatar Level 269 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to slimeywaffles Block slimeywaffles Invite slimeywaffles to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: female
Consoles Owned: ps3
Date Signed Up:3/11/2012
Last Login:7/10/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#3597
Highest Content Rank:#6682
Highest Comment Rank:#479
Content Thumbs: 385 total,  517 ,  132
Comment Thumbs: 7443 total,  8941 ,  1498
Content Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 38 Content: Peasant → Level 39 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 81% (81/100)
Level 269 Comments: Pure Win → Level 270 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:2
Content Views:34282
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:1990
FJ Points:7453
Why are you looking at my profile >.>

latest user's comments

#56 - He looked ******* ********* then. 06/18/2014 on Science +3
#60 - This happened just last week. I was in class and this guy was …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/18/2014 on I can relate to this. 14 +1
#113 - heavyset (06/18/2014) [-]
Picture Source please
#122 - I was visiting family in Bahrain last year. Was very sexually … 06/18/2014 on Porn +1
#131 - Picture 06/18/2014 on how to deal with bitchy... +1
#56 - True but does a mouth feel better than a ****** ?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/17/2014 on Ultimate guide to the... 0
User avatar #77 - CaptainWaffles (06/22/2014) [-]
Through all my experiences, it's more stimulating than sex, which makes it easy to become overstimulated. Overall, I prefer sex.
#45 - Guys: does a blow job feel better than sex?  [+] (3 new replies) 06/17/2014 on Ultimate guide to the... 0
User avatar #54 - mistersandman (06/17/2014) [-]
Entirely dependent on skill of the person giving it
User avatar #56 - slimeywaffles (06/17/2014) [-]
True but does a mouth feel better than a vagina?
User avatar #77 - CaptainWaffles (06/22/2014) [-]
Through all my experiences, it's more stimulating than sex, which makes it easy to become overstimulated. Overall, I prefer sex.
#64 - I agree, more people should vote.  [+] (3 new replies) 06/16/2014 on The Principled Pachyderm 0
User avatar #66 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
indeed. during the presidential election only 60 percent of eligable citizens voted and the average for mid term elections is around 30 percent. more people need to vote and actually vote for their wants not just what they think might make it
User avatar #69 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
More people voting means individual votes are even less important than they are now. More people are easily swayed by the media and fear mongering and everything.
Keep in mind that so many people don't pay attention to what goes on in the country and uninformed people would just screw everything up for the rest of us.
User avatar #88 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
i kinda hate to use this but a good team is always better than a bunch of good individuals
#61 - Well there's like a green party but they're only successful in…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/16/2014 on The Principled Pachyderm 0
User avatar #62 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
libertarians actually had a candidate on the ballot. past success should mean nothing. when you go to vote you should vote for who you want to win. not who you think has the best chance of winning but who you think should be leading this country. if every person in the us actually did that wed have a much different election. i live in alaska so who i vote for doesnt matter much in the national view but i still do it becauseits my chance to tell the government how i want it to be run. if candidates actually feared for their jobs i bet theyd do them better
User avatar #68 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained Sorry to burst your bubble but our voting system cannot handle that. A party could win with only 25% of the votes even though a majority would rather someone else win.
The reason we have a two party system is due to decades worth of compromising.
User avatar #64 - slimeywaffles (06/16/2014) [-]
I agree, more people should vote.
User avatar #66 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
indeed. during the presidential election only 60 percent of eligable citizens voted and the average for mid term elections is around 30 percent. more people need to vote and actually vote for their wants not just what they think might make it
User avatar #69 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
More people voting means individual votes are even less important than they are now. More people are easily swayed by the media and fear mongering and everything.
Keep in mind that so many people don't pay attention to what goes on in the country and uninformed people would just screw everything up for the rest of us.
User avatar #88 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
i kinda hate to use this but a good team is always better than a bunch of good individuals
#15 - Man, I feel bad now. 06/16/2014 on Fucking seriously +1
#31 - We only have two damn parties and they both suck.  [+] (14 new replies) 06/16/2014 on The Principled Pachyderm +1
User avatar #60 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
there are far more than two parties and its the mindless belief that there are only two that keeps puting them in power
User avatar #63 - syrenthra (06/16/2014) [-]
2 main parties that matter. People rarely share the same views as just one party on ever situation.
User avatar #65 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
but if we didnt have this ledder of two evils mindset wed actually put the right people in office.
User avatar #67 - syrenthra (06/16/2014) [-]
Oh we won't put the right people into office until people stop voting for the guy who shares the most common lifestyles and doesn't do anything that they consider distasteful. People need to ignore lifestyles and vote for the person with the best track record and who will do the best compromising solution
User avatar #61 - slimeywaffles (06/16/2014) [-]
Well there's like a green party but they're only successful in smaller elections. Not presidential. It needs to be expanded a lot more than that.
User avatar #62 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
libertarians actually had a candidate on the ballot. past success should mean nothing. when you go to vote you should vote for who you want to win. not who you think has the best chance of winning but who you think should be leading this country. if every person in the us actually did that wed have a much different election. i live in alaska so who i vote for doesnt matter much in the national view but i still do it becauseits my chance to tell the government how i want it to be run. if candidates actually feared for their jobs i bet theyd do them better
User avatar #68 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained Sorry to burst your bubble but our voting system cannot handle that. A party could win with only 25% of the votes even though a majority would rather someone else win.
The reason we have a two party system is due to decades worth of compromising.
User avatar #64 - slimeywaffles (06/16/2014) [-]
I agree, more people should vote.
User avatar #66 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
indeed. during the presidential election only 60 percent of eligable citizens voted and the average for mid term elections is around 30 percent. more people need to vote and actually vote for their wants not just what they think might make it
User avatar #69 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
More people voting means individual votes are even less important than they are now. More people are easily swayed by the media and fear mongering and everything.
Keep in mind that so many people don't pay attention to what goes on in the country and uninformed people would just screw everything up for the rest of us.
User avatar #88 - sketchE (06/16/2014) [-]
i kinda hate to use this but a good team is always better than a bunch of good individuals
#35 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
There is actually a very strong divided in the republican party right now.
User avatar #73 - reginleif (06/16/2014) [-]
They're actually not that divided, Conservatives in general just don't compromise well. It turns small divisions into large ones. The TEA is basically the same as the Republican party, they're just "really going to do it" as opposed to the Republican party just "going to do it".

inb4 thumb rape from butthurt righties.... the problem with the left is that they're way too fucking different (pro-homo, pro-abortion, feminazis, environmentalists, vs the nitty-gritty labor, anti racism people and economic justice lefties) , but the reason they win elections is that they're willing to overlook serious defects and work to put their own in office.

So in a nutshell we have two types of politicians in our party, stubborn asses... and panders who will change their opinions more often than they change their underwear.
User avatar #43 - thetowelboy (06/16/2014) [-]
The fact that your name is economic freedom amplifies your comment haha. Libertarian reporting in.
#8 - sauce of this? 06/16/2014 on Jennifer 0
#114 - Picture 06/16/2014 on Accidental extra yellow card +10
#121 - Have fun. 06/16/2014 on Bye everybody 0
#75 - Reminds me of the Patriots from Metal Gear. 06/16/2014 on Idiotic conspiracy theories 0
#81 - Comment deleted 06/13/2014 on 2spooky4me 0
#66 - Both people scare me. 06/12/2014 on don't be a pleb +1
#161 - Picture 06/12/2014 on how to be a fucking cringy... 0
#63 - Best ******* OC ever  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on Shame On Me +2
#65 - itsthetie (06/12/2014) [-]
thank you, I'm flattered you think so buddy
#90 - Picture 06/12/2014 on Sorry +1
#46 - Picture 06/12/2014 on Low Budget Pixar Movie +9
#185 - If you think this small group of extremists have any effect in…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2014 on Effect of Feminism 95 0
User avatar #202 - teranin (06/08/2014) [-]
did... did you read what I wrote there? The gradual increase of radicalism in feminism will never end, perpetuation of their "struggle" must be maintained, and as such they will continue to slide, as a whole, to a more and more extreme position. That's the problem with constructing an ideology out of a revolution but instead of running counter to the government having the revolution seed into the government and receive funding from it. They still operate on the 3 step position of all revolutionary movements (oppression, then struggle, then liberation) but because they are so intertwined into western government they have nothing of substance to struggle against so they will keep pushing the view that women are oppressed while moving the goalposts on what constitutes equality to ensure they never achieve the funding and power killing state of liberation.

I'm not worried about the small group of extremists, I'm worried about the enormous group of mainstreamers.
#165 - Your argument is the equivalent to claiming all Muslims are ex…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/08/2014 on Effect of Feminism 95 -1
#177 - teranin (06/08/2014) [-]
I didn't just say that all of feminism promotes the mass extermination of men. What I did say is that feminism's view of men as an oppressor class dubbed the "patriarchy" and their promotion of that view has convinced Big Red of it's validity, and such a standpoint of separation, that being "us" (women) and the "other" (men under the banner of patriarchy) allows the human psyche to dehumanize the "other" and rationalize such grandiose violence. We have seen this dialectic play out quite often, historically, to a minor degree in every military conflict when humans had to kill other humans, we call those other humans "the enemy" and use that separation to rationalize killing them, because so long as they are compartmentalized to being "the enemy" they aren't "someone's father" or "someone's son". This has also played out many times on a larger, political scale, in Nazi Germany the Jew was presented as the "other", the cause of all German misfortune, and I think we both know what that ended up "justifying". We've seen it with the Chinese, during their switch to communism "imperialists" were rounded up, tortured, brainwashed, murdered, and propagandized so they were not "comrades" and fellow Chinese citizens, but rather the enemy of all Chinese and cause of all their problems. With the soviets, in their initial revolution they slaughtered thousands of "bourgeois" who they had cleanly separated from the "proletariat" because they were convinced that they were the cause of their problems.

There are so many examples of this, and then you see feminism, which is an ideological remastering of marxism applied to the cultural rather than the economic, and in the 1970s they attached a name to their "other" that was not as human and easily sympathized with as simply "men". Thus "Patriarchy" became a catch-all word for all of the ills, real or imagined, suffered by women (the "us" for feminism) in society. The same groundwork has been laid, and extremists in that movment have long pushed ideas like reducing the male population down to 10% of the earth's total (and let's not forget the incredibly popular SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas). As things stand now, these people remain extremists in the feminism movement, and I'm sure we all hope they stay that way, BUT the justification for their dehumanized attitude of men is a product of the ideology of feminism as a whole. Further, feminism is an ideology that can never reach a net victory as there are far too many careers and there is far too much money pumped into it for that to be abandoned, so feminism will continuously push for more and more privileges and rights for women, and there is no endgame, no point at which feminism can say "enough, we've made it, we have achieved what we sought so pack it up." Since this cannot happen, and since feminism ONLY aims to increase female power, you will see continued justifications for greater female privilege, things like the recently coined "substantive equality" to replace "equality" since they can't justify something that so blatantly gives women more rights than men by calling it equality, or they would fail. www.iwraw-ap.org/convention/equality.htm This is their explanation for substantive equality. They sure do use a lot of pretty terms to present "enforced inequality of treatment" in a way that's palatable, don't they.

So no, your analogy is not representative of my statement or my position.
User avatar #185 - slimeywaffles (06/08/2014) [-]
If you think this small group of extremists have any effect in your life, you're wrong. Calm down.
User avatar #202 - teranin (06/08/2014) [-]
did... did you read what I wrote there? The gradual increase of radicalism in feminism will never end, perpetuation of their "struggle" must be maintained, and as such they will continue to slide, as a whole, to a more and more extreme position. That's the problem with constructing an ideology out of a revolution but instead of running counter to the government having the revolution seed into the government and receive funding from it. They still operate on the 3 step position of all revolutionary movements (oppression, then struggle, then liberation) but because they are so intertwined into western government they have nothing of substance to struggle against so they will keep pushing the view that women are oppressed while moving the goalposts on what constitutes equality to ensure they never achieve the funding and power killing state of liberation.

I'm not worried about the small group of extremists, I'm worried about the enormous group of mainstreamers.
#133 - That sums it up in the best way I could have ever thought. I g…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/06/2014 on Effect of Feminism 92 0
User avatar #135 - chrisel (06/06/2014) [-]
Yeah, that's a good way to see it, Good bye fine person.
#129 - I've never seen that anywhere else but the internet.  [+] (3 new replies) 06/06/2014 on Effect of Feminism 92 0
User avatar #132 - chrisel (06/06/2014) [-]
They are individuals, on the internet it is easy to be heard and people that stand out like for example an Feminazi (Let's call it like that) even though I myself have never seen one myself but if you go online you not only get news from you surroundings but also of the entire world, every (feminism) blog is available for everyone with an internet connection. By far most real feminists are actually equalists who want equal rights between man and woman, but you don't notice that because you don't notice normal people that much except when those normal people are in your surroundings while people who are extremists are noticed quickly because they are different compared to the rest and therefor easily spotted, at least that is my theory.
User avatar #133 - slimeywaffles (06/06/2014) [-]
That sums it up in the best way I could have ever thought. I guess it's just like Muslim extremists, ye?
User avatar #135 - chrisel (06/06/2014) [-]
Yeah, that's a good way to see it, Good bye fine person.
#9 - Came across your username. I love it.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/06/2014 on daddycool's profile 0
#10 - daddycool (06/06/2014) [-]
Thanks, I like it, too.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #23 - alphagex (01/25/2014) [-]
I know this gonna sound weird and random but i was checking people who thumb my comment up (cuz it give me more internet bonner)

then i saw ure profile username and ure name slimmywaffle remind me of my ex gf ****** cuz she kept calling her vagine slimy and waffles..could be a slang for ***** so yeah idk why iam even telling u this

huge plot twist u are her,if ure real name start with the letter v u might be her
User avatar #24 to #23 - slimeywaffles (01/25/2014) [-]
I only figured out that waffles was slang for ****** about a year after I made my account. I purely had in mind syrup and waffles when I made it, haha
User avatar #25 to #24 - alphagex (01/26/2014) [-]
lol u iz canadien like me? and the only good thing my ex every made for me was showing me this site that about it
User avatar #26 to #25 - slimeywaffles (01/26/2014) [-]
Lol. Nah, I'm American.
User avatar #27 to #26 - alphagex (01/26/2014) [-]
Americana! just kidding iam candian, i got a question what the point of view of canada from .. like for u guys what are we canadian my history teacher said american think of canada as there little bro or something was wondering
User avatar #28 to #27 - slimeywaffles (01/26/2014) [-]
Lol. Well, I think I'd rather live in Canada than America. All the great government benefits of Europe like healthcare without really being in Europe. (Americans also tend to think Canada is wimpy).
User avatar #29 to #28 - alphagex (01/26/2014) [-]
okay i clear a big mis understaning our healthcare i say the words of my teacher our healthcare is not free u pay it throught taxe.. the taxe rate in here is higher i heard in usa is lower..so u pay for ure taxe to get the healthcare so yeah is true that when u enter a hospital u show ure medic card and is free

but i once ate a bread with sesame oil aka thalin and iam allergic to that and i could not breaht and saliva keep comming out of my mouth so we rushed to the hospital my mum is like iam choking i have hard time breathing guess what the wonderful canadien hospital did?

they said please wait..sombody is almost dying out of an allergic but u know **** that iam not emegency enough oh and about the time i fracture my thumb i waited about 7 hours so is not that great but on the good side we dont got guns...and **** and polution like usa so yeah
User avatar #30 to #29 - slimeywaffles (01/27/2014) [-]
I know it comes from tax money but at least it goes back to the people which is what I mean by free. I don't get what it is with waiting in Canada. I think Europe does Healthcare better than anywhere else I guess.
User avatar #31 to #30 - alphagex (01/27/2014) [-]
if it comes from ure tax money is not free cuz u paid for it, free would be free service without paying for it, i hate people making the assumtion is free, and it doesn rly go back to u, u pay for it,.,taxe dont come back to u if u payed for it unless if u payed more then u earn that about it

and usa may not be free but at least there if u pay it is faster service
User avatar #32 to #31 - slimeywaffles (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, I lean towards social programs since I live in Europe at the moment. I think its just handled way better here. Like, for instance, French citizens can get a maid service paid from taxes. A friggin nanny. And everyone's taxes really benefit them more than going towards the military or whatever like in the States.
User avatar #33 to #32 - alphagex (01/27/2014) [-]
i still don't get it why the **** america atacked irak? from what i can tell is... usa was mad at arabs so there like u blow our tower we blow ure city...is that about it? then there like oh there is oil we take that while where here...

then there like '''we killed bin laden'' oh what that u want proof? nope just assume we did , is not like we can control the media or anything nope we killed bin laden no proof just take our words for it..do us usa goverment ever lied to its citizens?

like honeslty it has the maturity of 12 year old and i ****** hate some usa citizen who think so high and mighty about usa.. russian has equal if not stronger military and if all countrys unite they can kill usa...and if all trade is cut with usa..they wont survive on their own so just cuz u create famous company doesnt mean ure number 1... most crime and stuff happens in the usa

iam so sick of people being like oh iam american iam higher then god itself and **** like that, is not patriotism is over cockiness
User avatar #34 to #33 - slimeywaffles (01/27/2014) [-]
Yeah, America pretty much goes into wars to profit by selling more artillery. Plus the middle east has oil. It's seriously ****** up. Iraqis have never harmed a single US citizen until they were attacked. Bush could have stopped 9/11. He was getting forms of notice about Al Qaeda but ******* nope, didn't do a thing about it. It's like he was waiting for a reason to attack any middle eastern country. It should have been Afghanistan. And Americans think their soldiers are giving freedom n **** .
User avatar #35 to #34 - alphagex (01/27/2014) [-]
honeslty it pains me to see soldiers who are ready to die for their country, like how their life is thrown to waste i feel like there puppets..and i tought cuz iraq did this but nope is just out of revenge my teacher also said after 9/11 instead of praying or something bush said shop..keep shoping...so yeah and the theorys of 9/11 being a conspirecy..it kinda make sense cuz i saw on the documentry..george bush day dining with the osama family....before 9 /11 and just before 9/11 alot of planes quiting the country and the military was gone for training that day it is also a possibelity

and if u gonnna make the claim sayinf u killed bin laden least thing u could do is show his body on the tv and movies we see **** ton of gore and where like meh.but apperently a shot in the head is too much in wow everybody was lik they killed bin laden

seriously where the proof or the body? controling media is thing the military and the usa goverment can do...so yeah and i know usa only cares for profit well any other country does but i think capitalism is stronger in the usa i wont lie i love someu sa companies and product but i still think their attitude of being and thinking their #1 is kina ******** they have **** loat of debts...if ure number 1 ure richest country so yeah and other stuff 2
User avatar #36 to #35 - slimeywaffles (01/27/2014) [-]
I find the possibility of 9/11 being a conspiracy really high too. I mean, when the building went down, it was more like a demolition. And each story from the top just exploded one after the other. There are two ways to control people: to frighten and demoralize. That's exactly what Bush did so he'd get reelected, saying all that **** about "They hate us for our freedom." Doesn't even make sense. Americans have been fooled. It's so easy to control them.
User avatar #37 to #36 - alphagex (01/27/2014) [-]
well the planes went into the building..it did not went somwhere else... so idk about ure demolision theory maybed the payed their family to crush the planes idk but it does seem fishy, for example why were the bush family dining with the bin ladens? before 9 11 sound suspecious if u ask me
User avatar #38 to #37 - slimeywaffles (01/27/2014) [-]
It's especially weird how just hours after it happened, on the news they immediately announced the ones who crashed the plane. Shouldn't it have taken way more investigation to find that out? And i don't know about that dining, they just wanna make their relation seem close or something.
User avatar #15 - joshlol (01/15/2014) [-]
Hi! Few things to start off with =]
1. Yes I added you because you're a female funnyjunker, 'tis an awesome thing to see!
2. I'm Josh.
3. Don't be intimidated, but I'm not a stereotypical guy. If anything, I'll be the one in the kitchen =D.
User avatar #16 to #15 - slimeywaffles (01/15/2014) [-]
Why, hello, there, fellow funnyjunker.
User avatar #19 to #16 - caet ONLINE (01/15/2014) [-]
will you be posting tits?
User avatar #17 to #16 - joshlol (01/15/2014) [-]
will you be posting tits?
User avatar #18 to #17 - slimeywaffles (01/15/2014) [-]
Wow, for some reason I wasn't expecting that. You're not the first to ask. And no. Christ, there are so many tits on the internet, anyways.
User avatar #20 to #18 - joshlol (01/15/2014) [-]
are there? I've never seen any
User avatar #21 to #20 - slimeywaffles (01/15/2014) [-]
You're funny. And so is your friend, over there. Nice talking
User avatar #22 to #21 - joshlol (01/15/2014) [-]
thanks
User avatar #11 - nomps (09/03/2013) [-]
Thanks, I thumbed most of the stuff I saw he had voted down for you too.
So out of interest, what was the comment me and you thumbed down?
User avatar #13 to #12 - nomps (09/03/2013) [-]
Hah, he got waaay too upset about some silly little red thumb icons on his random ass comment.
#14 to #13 - slimeywaffles (09/03/2013) [-]
Yep. I mean, especially since now we can see whose's thumbs, it was pretty pointless to do that...
Yep. I mean, especially since now we can see whose's thumbs, it was pretty pointless to do that...
User avatar #7 - heartlessrobot (08/26/2013) [-]
I'm just being realistic, considering goats are treated better than women in the middle east.
#8 to #7 - slimeywaffles (08/26/2013) [-]
True...true
True...true
User avatar #9 to #8 - heartlessrobot (08/26/2013) [-]
Your username disturbs and intrigues me at the same time.
User avatar #10 to #9 - slimeywaffles (08/26/2013) [-]
You are not the first...
User avatar #2 - masterboll (08/26/2013) [-]
will you be posting tits?
User avatar #3 to #2 - slimeywaffles (08/26/2013) [-]
I'm flattered you'd like to see them, but no, sorry.
#5 to #4 - slimeywaffles (08/26/2013) [-]
The only chance is if you were to somehow run into me on Omegle, man.   
Terribly sorry, I'd just rather not save a pic of my tits on my computer
The only chance is if you were to somehow run into me on Omegle, man.
Terribly sorry, I'd just rather not save a pic of my tits on my computer
#6 to #5 - masterboll (08/26/2013) [-]
if Omegle is the only place you would show your tits then i think ill pass   
   
that site is practically a sausage fest
if Omegle is the only place you would show your tits then i think ill pass

that site is practically a sausage fest
User avatar #1 - helpmeplz (08/05/2013) [-]
You seem to have some FJ points, which are used in the FJ collecting game and nothing else,
if you're willing to give them away just click this link: www.funnyjunk.com/items/4236130#4236130
and click the (T) next to my name. Send them using the arrow next to the points.
Note that they will not affect your thumbs in anyway.
 Friends (0)