**dankrolls used "*roll picture*"**
**dankrolls rolled image**Definition of natural from www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/natural

"Existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind"

So by definition anything we humans do is not natural

Then build a physical fence around the yard, which will also prevent small kids from escaping. 2 birds with 1 stone.

You still didn't answer my question. Why don't we put them on kids who might run away and run under a car?

Then build a physical fence around the yard, which will also prevent small kids from escaping. 2 birds with 1 stone.

Well, technically all humans are pink, but different shades of pink.

That's animal abuse. Why don't children have those to stop them from escaping, if animals do?

You still didn't answer my question. Why don't we put them on kids who might run away and run under a car?

Then build a physical fence around the yard, which will also prevent small kids from escaping. 2 birds with 1 stone.

Why are they separate?

Well, technically all humans are pink, but different shades of pink.

See aforementioned mini-rant about the Feminazi/Meninist circlejerk. I mean, fuck's sake you'd think people would just shut the hell up and look out of their window for two seconds and see the real problems, but like you said, those Feminazi's went ham on the one woman.

As for why the children's shelters aren't segregated? Dunno, have theories though. It's already proven that women's shelters get more govt. funding than regular shelters, on top of what they're given from the public.

My theory is that the children's shelters already get a decent amount of funding(as much as can be considered decent given the organisations we're talking about) so they don't need to play the gender/race game to try to earn more to scrape by. That's my theory anyway.

Children's shelters, and the foster care system, has its own nightmares however, and that's a whole other kettle of fish.

But, just like with most of the SJWs, so many middle to upper class people argue over topics but don't look down to see who the topics are affecting.

Ahh, but now I sound some rambling preacher, and all I meant to do was say that the spike plan is stupid. Ah well, it's good points for people to think about I suppose.

An I wholly agree with you, the homeless can't be choosers, but due to whatever rhetoric about women needing to be protected and the like, and the other rhetoric of the 'macho man' it really does screw over the homeless more than people think.

I see the sexism circlejerks on here all the time, but the people having them aren't really affected too much by the general views expressed. The homeless, however, do.

There are countless shelters for battered and abused wives, for female rape victims and just females in general, and having shelter for them is not a bad thing. The bad thing is to be so focussed on them that we lose sight of everyone else suffering because of it.

Further more, because of the Feminazi/Meninist circle jerks, any attempts to have shelters for men only, for the above stated reasons, are thrown out immediately under the guise of the aforementioned circlejerk, rather than being seen as a legitimate attempt to help them.

TL;DR: Gender stereotypes are screwing over the homeless male populace because people can't be arsed to pull their heads out of their rectums.

Keep in mind that I haven't touched on children only shelters because children are a different case, but if we look at family only shelters(homeless parents with one or more child) it is not unheard of for the shelters to tell homeless fathers that their wives or children can stay, but they have to find other arrangements and come back in the morning for their family, though in fairness, there are not that many fathers homeless with their children, and their are a multitude of programmes to keep parents and their kids off the streets so that it doesn't have to become a problem.

Sure. But then why aren't children only shelters segregated by race and gender, if the adult ones are? Also, a woman tried to found over 3 male domestic violence victim shelters in UK, but feminazis started sending her death threats and threatening her. They shot her dog to death with a gun and so she had to jump country to escape from them. The reason for this? "Only males can do domestic violence, so they don't deserve shelters".

See aforementioned mini-rant about the Feminazi/Meninist circlejerk. I mean, fuck's sake you'd think people would just shut the hell up and look out of their window for two seconds and see the real problems, but like you said, those Feminazi's went ham on the one woman.

As for why the children's shelters aren't segregated? Dunno, have theories though. It's already proven that women's shelters get more govt. funding than regular shelters, on top of what they're given from the public.

My theory is that the children's shelters already get a decent amount of funding(as much as can be considered decent given the organisations we're talking about) so they don't need to play the gender/race game to try to earn more to scrape by. That's my theory anyway.

Children's shelters, and the foster care system, has its own nightmares however, and that's a whole other kettle of fish.

But, just like with most of the SJWs, so many middle to upper class people argue over topics but don't look down to see who the topics are affecting.

Ahh, but now I sound some rambling preacher, and all I meant to do was say that the spike plan is stupid. Ah well, it's good points for people to think about I suppose.

Yeah, but I mean. Where's: black, yellow, brown, red etc?

Why are they separate?

Well, technically all humans are pink, but different shades of pink.

i'm pretty sure Elysium was
1. thought up after Hades
2. a place where only REALLY GOD DAMN OUTSTANDING people went
and if you dont count either of those, then it's a religion where a distinction was made, thus making the argument void in this case

I think you're maybe thinking of Prometheus, who was punished of giving the gift of fire to humans and taught them to stand upright and generally not be shit. Lucifer can be seen as a kind of tragic hero depending on how he's depicted (pushed Adam & Eve to eat from the Tree of Knowledge for example) but that's only if you twist the stories to paint him that way.

Not that God wasn't a dick in the old testament, I mean just ask Job, but Satan's a true red rocket.

The Tree of Knowledge event was his only good thing ever done.

**lordofhell used "*roll picture*"**
**lordofhell rolled image**Wow dude you really think I'm the pretty.

**lordofhell used "*roll picture*"**
**lordofhell rolled image**What I ever do to you.

Im pretty sure you head is full of disease

There never is a clear distinction between, what we consider, weak and strong. Strenght is relative. Even the strongest human... is still only human.

"Sometimes, we all need a little help." Charles Xavier.

Forests are full of disease.

Im pretty sure you head is full of disease

To be honest, mattresses and boards aren't unheard of answers. I've even seen people wedge themselves between the bigger 'spikes' and sleep there.

To be honest, 'spiking' areas is literally trying to sweep the dust under the rug and then claim the room is clean. It's not, you haven't fixed the problem at all in that case.

And inb4 we get the Feminazi fiestas going, I'll lay it out straight.

Getting into shelters usually means you need to fit a specific schedule, racial profile and gender profile.

Women get into unisex shelters more than men do, there are more women' only shelters than there are men only shelters(in fact I don't believe that many even exist), there are also more shelters geared for minorities in the states that can exclude the caucasian community.

Why do you think the standard trope for 'homeless people' is a bedraggled older white guy with a nasty beard and ragged clothes? Because that's who you always see on the streets and the like.

Between daft 'pick and choose' tactics, and putting more work into forcing the homeless out of certain areas or spending tax payers money fining them exorbitant amounts of money for being homeless we waste a lot of what could be used to actually help these people to begin with.

How come there are female only shelters, when 70% of homeless are men? Females have more options as homeless than men. There should only be unisex and unirace shelters. Homeless can't be choosers.

An I wholly agree with you, the homeless can't be choosers, but due to whatever rhetoric about women needing to be protected and the like, and the other rhetoric of the 'macho man' it really does screw over the homeless more than people think.

I see the sexism circlejerks on here all the time, but the people having them aren't really affected too much by the general views expressed. The homeless, however, do.

There are countless shelters for battered and abused wives, for female rape victims and just females in general, and having shelter for them is not a bad thing. The bad thing is to be so focussed on them that we lose sight of everyone else suffering because of it.

Further more, because of the Feminazi/Meninist circle jerks, any attempts to have shelters for men only, for the above stated reasons, are thrown out immediately under the guise of the aforementioned circlejerk, rather than being seen as a legitimate attempt to help them.

TL;DR: Gender stereotypes are screwing over the homeless male populace because people can't be arsed to pull their heads out of their rectums.

Keep in mind that I haven't touched on children only shelters because children are a different case, but if we look at family only shelters(homeless parents with one or more child) it is not unheard of for the shelters to tell homeless fathers that their wives or children can stay, but they have to find other arrangements and come back in the morning for their family, though in fairness, there are not that many fathers homeless with their children, and their are a multitude of programmes to keep parents and their kids off the streets so that it doesn't have to become a problem.

Sure. But then why aren't children only shelters segregated by race and gender, if the adult ones are? Also, a woman tried to found over 3 male domestic violence victim shelters in UK, but feminazis started sending her death threats and threatening her. They shot her dog to death with a gun and so she had to jump country to escape from them. The reason for this? "Only males can do domestic violence, so they don't deserve shelters".

See aforementioned mini-rant about the Feminazi/Meninist circlejerk. I mean, fuck's sake you'd think people would just shut the hell up and look out of their window for two seconds and see the real problems, but like you said, those Feminazi's went ham on the one woman.

As for why the children's shelters aren't segregated? Dunno, have theories though. It's already proven that women's shelters get more govt. funding than regular shelters, on top of what they're given from the public.

My theory is that the children's shelters already get a decent amount of funding(as much as can be considered decent given the organisations we're talking about) so they don't need to play the gender/race game to try to earn more to scrape by. That's my theory anyway.

Children's shelters, and the foster care system, has its own nightmares however, and that's a whole other kettle of fish.

But, just like with most of the SJWs, so many middle to upper class people argue over topics but don't look down to see who the topics are affecting.

Ahh, but now I sound some rambling preacher, and all I meant to do was say that the spike plan is stupid. Ah well, it's good points for people to think about I suppose.