Upload
Login or register

simplescience

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:3/31/2011
Last Login:1/22/2016
Location:College
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 5869 total,  6749 ,  880
Comment Thumbs: 10588 total,  11940 ,  1352
Content Level Progress: 72% (72/100)
Level 158 Content: Faptastic → Level 159 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 305 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 306 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:8
Content Views:86680
Times Content Favorited:530 times
Total Comments Made:2017
FJ Points:16932
Favorite Tags: the other game (8) | como (7) | jefe (7) | UN (7) | battles (5) | epic (5) | Rap (5) | ERBOH (4) | the (3) | cuteness (2) | game (2) | games (2) | kindness (2) | ori and the blin (2) | other (2) | Portal (2) | youtube (2)
Hi there. My name is Simplescience, my real first name being Matt. I came to funnyjunk in the hopes of making it a little better than when I found it. Optimistic, cheerful, and a logical thinker, I do my best to make other people feel better if they are down.









My profile picture is of Mr. Game and Watch using the move Judgement: 9. This move has a 1/10 chance of bringing up a 9. If a 9 comes up and it connects with an opponent, it is a One-Hit Knock Out.

latest user's comments

#267 - Hold the **** up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money …  [+] (2 new replies) 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
#279 - anon (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar
#282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
#263 - Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
User avatar
#266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar
#272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar
#267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anon (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar
#282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
#88 - Here's his response to her first video: Here's …  [+] (10 new replies) 11/11/2013 on Scumbag Feminist -3
User avatar
#104 - teoberry (11/11/2013) [-]
That's it without the tinyurl moneygrubbing bullshit
User avatar
#263 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought it would be easier on the eyes than the long youtube url?

The fuck's your problem, man?
User avatar
#266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar
#272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar
#267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anon (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar
#282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
User avatar
#93 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
I thoroughly agree with him as well.
User avatar
#89 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
thanks
#81 - I have to agree with The Amazing Atheist's perspective on this…  [+] (13 new replies) 11/11/2013 on Scumbag Feminist +19
#179 - rockerforlife (11/12/2013) [-]
User avatar
#86 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
link Amazing Atheist's video please? I'd like to watch it.
User avatar
#88 - simplescience (11/11/2013) [-]
Here's his response to her first video:


Here's his response to her second video:

User avatar
#104 - teoberry (11/11/2013) [-]
That's it without the tinyurl moneygrubbing bullshit
User avatar
#263 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought it would be easier on the eyes than the long youtube url?

The fuck's your problem, man?
User avatar
#266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar
#272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar
#267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anon (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar
#282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
User avatar
#93 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
I thoroughly agree with him as well.
User avatar
#89 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
thanks
#18 - I was thinking that Slyveon should use Barrier if it were goin… 11/11/2013 on Sylveon 0
#546 - 1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then th… 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
#389 - First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfa…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar
#418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar
#546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#300 - I am disappointed that, despite my points and metaphor, you gi…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar
#305 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
I addressed this problem already.

It's not fair, but that is mammalian nature. Our society weighs the importance of children greatly, and if a man does not want children, his ONLY option is to find a method that would prevent him from getting a woman pregnant. It's not fair, you're right. Maybe it's a slippery slope, but what other decision is there besides giving people the ability to force someone else to abort their unborn child/fetus?
User avatar
#389 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfair now and a clear and viable option is not immediately present, that we should just act like that injustice is acceptable and cannot be solved.

Second off, I can think of a few ideas. Granted, they aren't perfect, as there are several details that would need to be worked out.

1) Perhaps something akin to trial by jury. If the couple cannot come to an agreement on what to do with the child (Ex. Man wants the child, but the woman does not), perhaps have a group of their peers decide on what action should be taken. True that men can't carry the child, but that doesn't change the fact that he still contributed to making the child.

2) Change the law so that if a man wants the baby and the woman does not, then the man will financially compensate the female for carrying the child once its born (before you call it unfair, it took two of them to make that baby and (assuming they both consented and agreed to no protection beforehand) if the man wants that baby and is willing to reimburse the female for what she went through, wouldn't that be, if not a fair decision, at least more fair then how it is now?).

I realize of course that the woman went through a whole bunch of trouble and effort to have the childbirth, and that's not something that could easily have a price tag be put on it, if at all. At the same time, it takes two to do the deed, why should a man not be allowed to pay a price if he is willing?

As you can see, I have provided two alternate solutions to the current situation. Are they perfect? Of course not. Neither is the current situation, and in our society (in America at least) where we put a huge emphasis on fairness and justice, the current situation should not be allowed to stand.

My point is that there could be alternatives that give men decisions before the childs birth that lets the woman keep her say as well.
User avatar
#418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar
#546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#246 - What you are saying here is a double-edged sword, and I'll exp…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar
#260 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
You seemed t have missed the part where I said that the father absolutely does have rights in regards to that baby.
User avatar
#300 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
I am disappointed that, despite my points and metaphor, you give me a single sentence reply when others got far more substance to their inquiries.

That aside, I never said he didn't have rights to the baby in the first place. I know that a man does have rights. What I am referring to is the fact that, from conception to birth, a man has 0 say in the decision of that babies life, and putting full deciding power in one sides hands is, as I said, a slippery slope.

While the mother several decisions she is allowed to make regarding the child before its born, a man has 0. Which means that during that time, if the man decides he doesn't want the child, but the mom keeps it, she would be within her rights to sue for child support, and most times, it will be awarded. Men have no outs when it comes to the potential life of a child.

You seemed to have missed the part where I pointed out that your logic is completely unfair, and that it can lead to potential devastating consequences down the road because of the logic you are advocating at this point in the potential child's life.
User avatar
#305 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
I addressed this problem already.

It's not fair, but that is mammalian nature. Our society weighs the importance of children greatly, and if a man does not want children, his ONLY option is to find a method that would prevent him from getting a woman pregnant. It's not fair, you're right. Maybe it's a slippery slope, but what other decision is there besides giving people the ability to force someone else to abort their unborn child/fetus?
User avatar
#389 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfair now and a clear and viable option is not immediately present, that we should just act like that injustice is acceptable and cannot be solved.

Second off, I can think of a few ideas. Granted, they aren't perfect, as there are several details that would need to be worked out.

1) Perhaps something akin to trial by jury. If the couple cannot come to an agreement on what to do with the child (Ex. Man wants the child, but the woman does not), perhaps have a group of their peers decide on what action should be taken. True that men can't carry the child, but that doesn't change the fact that he still contributed to making the child.

2) Change the law so that if a man wants the baby and the woman does not, then the man will financially compensate the female for carrying the child once its born (before you call it unfair, it took two of them to make that baby and (assuming they both consented and agreed to no protection beforehand) if the man wants that baby and is willing to reimburse the female for what she went through, wouldn't that be, if not a fair decision, at least more fair then how it is now?).

I realize of course that the woman went through a whole bunch of trouble and effort to have the childbirth, and that's not something that could easily have a price tag be put on it, if at all. At the same time, it takes two to do the deed, why should a man not be allowed to pay a price if he is willing?

As you can see, I have provided two alternate solutions to the current situation. Are they perfect? Of course not. Neither is the current situation, and in our society (in America at least) where we put a huge emphasis on fairness and justice, the current situation should not be allowed to stand.

My point is that there could be alternatives that give men decisions before the childs birth that lets the woman keep her say as well.
User avatar
#418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar
#546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#202 - And if the father does or does not want to keep the child, ***…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar
#205 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Refer to below for my response.