Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

simplescience

Rank #9262 on Subscribers
simplescience Avatar Level 305 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Offline
Send mail to simplescience Block simplescience Invite simplescience to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Consoles Owned: PS3, DS, Wii
Video Games Played: God of War, Jak and Daxter, Portal 2, Soul Calibur V, SSBM
PSN: Head_of_the_FBI
Date Signed Up:3/31/2011
Last Login:11/15/2014
Location:College
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#26028
Highest Content Rank:#871
Highest Comment Rank:#180
Content Thumbs: 5878 total,  6735 ,  857
Comment Thumbs: 10587 total,  11939 ,  1352
Content Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 158 Content: Faptastic → Level 159 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 305 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 306 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:8
Content Views:76613
Times Content Favorited:532 times
Total Comments Made:2015
FJ Points:16937
Favorite Tags: the other game (8) | como (7) | jefe (7) | UN (7) | battles (5) | epic (5) | Rap (5) | ERBOH (4) | the (3) | cuteness (2) | game (2) | kindness (2) | other (2) | Portal (2)
Hi there. My name is Simplescience, my real first name being Matt. I came to funnyjunk in the hopes of making it a little better than when I found it. Optimistic, cheerful, and a logical thinker, I do my best to make other people feel better if they are down.









My profile picture is of Mr. Game and Watch using the move Judgement: 9. This move has a 1/10 chance of bringing up a 9. If a 9 comes up and it connects with an opponent, it is a One-Hit Knock Out.

latest user's comments

#42 - Pittsburgh Steelers Fan, reporting in. Yeah we're suc… 11/12/2013 on What's a Superbowl? +1
#282 - Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelmi… 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
#272 - <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first… 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
#267 - Hold the **** up man. How exactly am I supposed t…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
#279 - anonymous (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar #282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
#263 - Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/12/2013 on Scumbag Feminist 0
User avatar #266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar #272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar #267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anonymous (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar #282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
#88 - Here's his response to her first video: Here's …  [+] (10 new replies) 11/11/2013 on Scumbag Feminist -3
User avatar #104 - teoberry (11/11/2013) [-]
That's it without the tinyurl moneygrubbing bullshit
User avatar #263 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought it would be easier on the eyes than the long youtube url?

The fuck's your problem, man?
User avatar #266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar #272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar #267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anonymous (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar #282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
User avatar #93 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
I thoroughly agree with him as well.
User avatar #89 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
thanks
#81 - I have to agree with The Amazing Atheist's perspective on this…  [+] (13 new replies) 11/11/2013 on Scumbag Feminist +19
#179 - rockerforlife (11/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #86 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
link Amazing Atheist's video please? I'd like to watch it.
User avatar #88 - simplescience (11/11/2013) [-]
Here's his response to her first video:


Here's his response to her second video:

User avatar #104 - teoberry (11/11/2013) [-]
That's it without the tinyurl moneygrubbing bullshit
User avatar #263 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Wtf? Moneygrubbing? I put it in Tinyurl form because I thought it would be easier on the eyes than the long youtube url?

The fuck's your problem, man?
User avatar #266 - teoberry (11/12/2013) [-]
Really? The youtube one is maybe twice the size. Don't give me this fucking BS
User avatar #272 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkS9YS_T0k&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=4 <--- Here was the link I had from doing that for the first video response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0&list=PLhZOzU5WE3iHiR-4XYE58HQxtwpAfrnyX&index=11 <--- Here's the link I obtained from copying the link address from the second video response.

Still think I'm making some BS up? I don't even fucking know how I could make money from a tinyurl, and I don't fucking want to know either.

So before you make bullshit claims about what I'm doing, perhaps you should get your facts straight first.
User avatar #267 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Hold the fuck up man. How exactly am I supposed to make money from posting a tinyurl?

The link that I used was because I went to the video listing, and right-clicked "Copy Link Address" instead of going to the video itself because I wanted to respond ASAP. The link was quite long, and I thought a TinyUrl would be easier. Yeah, in retrospect I should've just clicked the movie link itself.

Seriously though, tell me how the fuck I'm making money off this, because I would certainly like to know if there was some kind of income I wasn't aware of?
#279 - anonymous (11/12/2013) [-]
Nice bullshit excuses right there. No one is buying it.
User avatar #282 - simplescience (11/12/2013) [-]
Prove that I'm making money off of it? Show me this overwhelming evidence you have that I've made 1 cent off these links? Oh wait.

I showed the links, I explained the truth, and if you don't believe me, it's your loss for not accepting the truth. My conscience is clear, I revealed the truth behind the links usage, and I don't care if you believe me or not. It's your loss for being close-minded enough to not accept the truth being told to you and instead choose to tar me with the same brush as others who tricked you before.

Good day, sir/madam.
User avatar #93 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
I thoroughly agree with him as well.
User avatar #89 - xboxonerules (11/11/2013) [-]
thanks
#18 - I was thinking that Slyveon should use Barrier if it were goin… 11/11/2013 on Sylveon 0
#546 - 1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then th… 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
#389 - First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfa…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar #418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar #546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#300 - I am disappointed that, despite my points and metaphor, you gi…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar #305 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
I addressed this problem already.

It's not fair, but that is mammalian nature. Our society weighs the importance of children greatly, and if a man does not want children, his ONLY option is to find a method that would prevent him from getting a woman pregnant. It's not fair, you're right. Maybe it's a slippery slope, but what other decision is there besides giving people the ability to force someone else to abort their unborn child/fetus?
User avatar #389 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfair now and a clear and viable option is not immediately present, that we should just act like that injustice is acceptable and cannot be solved.

Second off, I can think of a few ideas. Granted, they aren't perfect, as there are several details that would need to be worked out.

1) Perhaps something akin to trial by jury. If the couple cannot come to an agreement on what to do with the child (Ex. Man wants the child, but the woman does not), perhaps have a group of their peers decide on what action should be taken. True that men can't carry the child, but that doesn't change the fact that he still contributed to making the child.

2) Change the law so that if a man wants the baby and the woman does not, then the man will financially compensate the female for carrying the child once its born (before you call it unfair, it took two of them to make that baby and (assuming they both consented and agreed to no protection beforehand) if the man wants that baby and is willing to reimburse the female for what she went through, wouldn't that be, if not a fair decision, at least more fair then how it is now?).

I realize of course that the woman went through a whole bunch of trouble and effort to have the childbirth, and that's not something that could easily have a price tag be put on it, if at all. At the same time, it takes two to do the deed, why should a man not be allowed to pay a price if he is willing?

As you can see, I have provided two alternate solutions to the current situation. Are they perfect? Of course not. Neither is the current situation, and in our society (in America at least) where we put a huge emphasis on fairness and justice, the current situation should not be allowed to stand.

My point is that there could be alternatives that give men decisions before the childs birth that lets the woman keep her say as well.
User avatar #418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar #546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#246 - What you are saying here is a double-edged sword, and I'll exp…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar #260 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
You seemed t have missed the part where I said that the father absolutely does have rights in regards to that baby.
User avatar #300 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
I am disappointed that, despite my points and metaphor, you give me a single sentence reply when others got far more substance to their inquiries.

That aside, I never said he didn't have rights to the baby in the first place. I know that a man does have rights. What I am referring to is the fact that, from conception to birth, a man has 0 say in the decision of that babies life, and putting full deciding power in one sides hands is, as I said, a slippery slope.

While the mother several decisions she is allowed to make regarding the child before its born, a man has 0. Which means that during that time, if the man decides he doesn't want the child, but the mom keeps it, she would be within her rights to sue for child support, and most times, it will be awarded. Men have no outs when it comes to the potential life of a child.

You seemed to have missed the part where I pointed out that your logic is completely unfair, and that it can lead to potential devastating consequences down the road because of the logic you are advocating at this point in the potential child's life.
User avatar #305 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
I addressed this problem already.

It's not fair, but that is mammalian nature. Our society weighs the importance of children greatly, and if a man does not want children, his ONLY option is to find a method that would prevent him from getting a woman pregnant. It's not fair, you're right. Maybe it's a slippery slope, but what other decision is there besides giving people the ability to force someone else to abort their unborn child/fetus?
User avatar #389 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
First off, I'd like to think that just because things are unfair now and a clear and viable option is not immediately present, that we should just act like that injustice is acceptable and cannot be solved.

Second off, I can think of a few ideas. Granted, they aren't perfect, as there are several details that would need to be worked out.

1) Perhaps something akin to trial by jury. If the couple cannot come to an agreement on what to do with the child (Ex. Man wants the child, but the woman does not), perhaps have a group of their peers decide on what action should be taken. True that men can't carry the child, but that doesn't change the fact that he still contributed to making the child.

2) Change the law so that if a man wants the baby and the woman does not, then the man will financially compensate the female for carrying the child once its born (before you call it unfair, it took two of them to make that baby and (assuming they both consented and agreed to no protection beforehand) if the man wants that baby and is willing to reimburse the female for what she went through, wouldn't that be, if not a fair decision, at least more fair then how it is now?).

I realize of course that the woman went through a whole bunch of trouble and effort to have the childbirth, and that's not something that could easily have a price tag be put on it, if at all. At the same time, it takes two to do the deed, why should a man not be allowed to pay a price if he is willing?

As you can see, I have provided two alternate solutions to the current situation. Are they perfect? Of course not. Neither is the current situation, and in our society (in America at least) where we put a huge emphasis on fairness and justice, the current situation should not be allowed to stand.

My point is that there could be alternatives that give men decisions before the childs birth that lets the woman keep her say as well.
User avatar #418 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I have a lot of problems with that first solution. Mainly, the whole "forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want" thing. We did that for a long time by just having abortion be illegal. It didn't work very well. Women want the choice to choose, and frankly, why should we be able to stop them?

The second solution is also wrought with issues. What if the partner can't afford to compensate the woman? Then he's shit out of luck and we're back to "too bad, life ain't fair." It'd be fine if the non-carrying party has a lot of disposable money to spend, but that's usually not the case.
User avatar #546 - simplescience (11/08/2013) [-]
1) Excluding rape and if they agreed to no protection, then the woman knew exactly what she was getting herself into. If she didn't want to run the risk of having a child, then protection should've been used, or she could've been on the pill etc. Why should only men be faced with the "well, sucks to be you" saddle?

Simply put, if the man has to pay for the consequences of his actions and pay child support for a child he did not want, then is it not only fair that the woman should have to pay for the consequences if the man wants the child (and of course excluding rape and assuming consensual sex from all involved parties).

I am not saying women shouldn't have the right to choose. I'm all for that. At the same time, I think men should have the right to choose as well. Why should we stop men from having the right to choose (beyond the use of a condom)? If he has as much of a claim to the child as the woman, then he should get more than one option just like the woman does.

2) Like I clearly stated, the solution isn't perfect, but perhaps the person could pay in installments or on a payment plan? Perhaps the man could opt to have part of his paycheck if he works automatically go to her. There's a wide variety of options. Paying all at once would indeed only be for the richer, but obviously wouldn't be mandatory.

It may be mammalian nature, sure, but we also have a population of about 7.2 billion. Our species going extinct is no longer an issue, so why should only women get a say in reproductive rights? You talk about how it would be a great crime to force a childbirth upon a woman, but I contend that denying rights and options to someone based on their gender for a mistake they might not have made while in their right mind, and forcing them to live with the outcome, should not be shoved into the background, nor treated as though it's an irreparable situation.
#202 - And if the father does or does not want to keep the child, …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar #205 - azumeow (11/08/2013) [-]
Refer to below for my response.
#1668 - For example, I posted one on here, but I worded it in such a w… 11/07/2013 on What's your secret that... 0
#1657 - That's why people should be very careful how they word their c…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/07/2013 on What's your secret that... 0
User avatar #1660 - scorpidea (11/07/2013) [-]
indeed
User avatar #1668 - simplescience (11/07/2013) [-]
For example, I posted one on here, but I worded it in such a way that if anyone I know ever found out the post was by me, it still would do them no good as it is worded vaguely.
#37 - Need a moment? 10/14/2013 on fucking get out +4
#8 - In my personal opinion, the snooze button is if you plan on ta… 10/13/2013 on A Solution for Oversleeping 0
#10 - Could've --> Could of Would've --> would of MFW 10/13/2013 on anus ailment post 0
#132 - And I'm just sitting here waiting.  [+] (2 new replies) 10/11/2013 on Nintendo's Prank +3
#145 - subtard (10/11/2013) [-]
Those graphics...
#144 - tailsx (10/11/2013) [-]
I want it!
#3 - "The denizens of Olympus learned that the hard way." 10/01/2013 on The fuck you lookin fo' +20
#24 - Personally, I have a hard time siding with modern Feminism, at…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/26/2013 on Feminism +2
User avatar #103 - gormless (09/26/2013) [-]
I completely agree with you as a "hardcore" feminist. This isn't the fucking 70s anymore, if we want equality then we'll fight for both genders in equal effort.
#54 - pachecodos (09/26/2013) [-]
Well, as I understand it, feminism is about women's empowering. That's why feminism should be, mostly, women's work. And that means not so much through institutions (like passing laws) but getting women to unite and fight back.

There are a lot of injustices for men. And men should empower themselves. We should fight as men for being able to cry and do things that are labelled as feminine.

For example women's groups. This are group's of women, men are not allowed, that work on things that affect women. There has been a lot of discussion on the left about this kind of thing. People talking about how patriarchy affects also men. But the thing is, there were no men's groups. Now there are appearing men's groups through different places were men talk about their feelings and their problems. From here there can appear an antipatriarchy that adresses both male and female problems.

But feminism was originally about women. About empowering them.
#385 - Erections do not equal consent (just like a female getting &qu… 09/26/2013 on Dang it feels..Keep it... +1
#7 - >Wanted to train Gohan. Took Gohan and trained him after he…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/17/2013 on truth +42
User avatar #13 - sweetdickwilly (09/18/2013) [-]
^ Some of the reasons why Piccolo is the best character.
#7 - >Be born with a power level of 10000. >Able to withs…  [+] (9 new replies) 09/17/2013 on Half dead friends, lend me... +78
#22 - Siphus (09/17/2013) [-]
For some reason I always thought that Goku punched him in the same place that he was stabbed when he was a kid, and thats the only reason he got beat.

Its probably not true but its a good way to cope with the fact that my favorite (and arguably the most powerful) character in the series got killed like a bitch.
User avatar #32 - vegeta (09/18/2013) [-]
he was too powerful a villain to fit in just one feature length movie
they kinda bit off more than they could chew.
now if this were canon... my god.
so many people would be dead, and majin buu would have seemed like a cakewalk.
User avatar #35 - brobathehutt (09/18/2013) [-]
Nah, Brolys a cooler villain than Buu but he's not as powerful. If Cell had Broly's cells he probably would be stronger than Buu.
#28 - thegoldenjet (09/17/2013) [-]
What about Broly's Second Coming?

He came back, and was strong enough to take on two super saiyans and a super saiyan 2 head on, and only lost when he was distracted long enough for them to charge a Kamehameha into the sun.
User avatar #23 - Mudkip (09/17/2013) [-]
That actually sounds really fucking plausible.
User avatar #24 - saiyajinwarrior (09/17/2013) [-]
Found a new victim for you, mudkipfucker.
User avatar #21 - azmal (09/17/2013) [-]
Not going to lie, hated how that fight ended. Also my favourite DBZ movie
User avatar #52 - fartknuckles (09/18/2013) [-]
yeah and the themes kicked ass as well
#17 - taye (09/17/2013) [-]
fuck me, right? I mean he is arguably the strongest non-fused character in the series..
#76 - By the time the sun starts "dying", either the earth… 09/17/2013 on KEVIN! +1

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #59 - flingwing (09/07/2013) [-]
all the reasons you posted still pale in comparison to what happens to women in third world countries. my point is that men and women in OUR society have equal problems, but outside of privileged first world countries, women are literally trash.

lets just say, inside the USA i am a human rights activist, but outside the USA i am a human rights activists focused mainly on feminism.

yes its terrible about all those thing that happen to men and honestly sometimes i feel like women get a slightly better deal because if we have an issue we arent taught to suppress it and bury it like men are. i have multiple male friends who have been raped, and they have not been able to talk to people or have their problems sorted out or have the rapist brought to justice. but even that, doesnt not compare to how the gang raping of women is literally used as a mode of warfare in sudan.
User avatar #60 to #59 - simplescience (09/07/2013) [-]
I think some clarification is in order here (and before you think I'm saying this in a "you're wrong and let me to tell you why" manner, I implore you to read on and wait until the end).

I never said Feminism is not needed. Feminism is indeed very much needed in third world countries. I happen to know that exceptionally well since I am the Research Officer of an anti-human trafficking group on my campus. Those countries need to give women the tools they need to succeed where they clearly are not apparent in any form.

What I have a problem with is not that women need to be empowered in countries where they are treated more as property than people, it's how Feminism aims to go about this. I implore you to provide evidence if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that Feminism aims to empower women in a way that could also be a long-term detriment to men. Before you say that they need to have some of their power curbed (which is true), let me explain myself.

Take America for example, Feminism has gained many rights for women, but look at the cost to men. Boys are never really encouraged to be proud of themselves as boys; they are rarely given the kind of support that girls get for being proud of their gender. This is just one example. I could go on.

My problem with Feminism is that in its mission to push for equality, it seems like it doesn't even let boys sit at the discussion table and often dismiss males input.

Then, the movement justifies this unfair exclusion by basically saying "Females in other countries are treated ****** , so your problems of how men are treated in this country don't matter and won't be addressed "(I have talked with a handful of Feminists who have said or implied that my opinion of Feminism is invalid because I'm a male).

To be blunt, what happens to women in other nations is completely irrelevant as to why Feminism rarely if ever addresses the problems men face in America. Yes, women being gang-raped in Sudan is terrible, and action should be taken to stop that. However, that does not give Feminism a free pass to push young boys and men to the side.

Feminism wants to have its cake and eat it too in America. It wants to make the bold declaration of seeking equality for both genders, and then wants to justify the unfair treatment of males by saying that horrible things happen to women in other nations, effectively saying that because of other countries problems, Feminism is allowed to push boys to the side.

By doing that, Feminism thus acts in the same behavior as the patriarchy they condemn, I.E. "Sit down, shut up, you're not allowed to speak".

To sum it all up, yes, the problems I listed do pale in comparison to problems face in other countries, but that does not justify the blatant disregard for concerns of mens rights in America. That would be like me going to a college professor and saying "Due to homework I had in another class, I did not remember to do the 3 week project you assigned 2 1/2 weeks ago". That excuse wouldn't fly in that situation, and it should not (and in my mind, does not) fly when Feminism uses it.
User avatar #61 to #60 - flingwing (09/07/2013) [-]
first of all, you seriously need to learn how to not say so much because i really really do not care enough about this situation to read all that.

and yes american feminism implies that it is for the rights of women and only women, i agree with you. which is why i focus more on equal rights than womens rights.

but dude for reals chill it with the blah blah
User avatar #62 to #61 - simplescience (09/07/2013) [-]
You're the one that opened the door for this kind of response by calling male rights activists trivial and then implying mens rights concerns aren't important because of gang-raping in Sudan.

Besides, would you prefer that I give you a lengthy response that shows I actually know what I'm talking about and gives insight into my point, or would you prefer a short response where I pretty much just say you're wrong and call you names?
User avatar #63 to #62 - flingwing (09/07/2013) [-]
i was saying male rights activists are as trivial as first world feminism, which is, sometimes but not always. because some male activists whine about dumb trash like friendzoning, much like some first world feminists whine about dumb trash like girls getting killed in videogames being supposedly rape. other mens rights activists strive for equality like male custody rights or help for male rape victims, much like other first world feminists strive for equality such as trans womens oversexualization in the porn industry or sexism in the workplace. i wasnt saying mens rights were trvial, i said they were only as trvial as the problems women have in a first world society. basically what im saying is we should stop worrying about equality in our own country because most of the problems we have with equality are social issues that for the most part can only be worked out with awareness campaigns instead of legal action, and instead worry about the equality in other countries
User avatar #56 - bulbakip (05/05/2013) [-]
Yay friends! I'm going into the US Navy to learn Applied Sciences. Advanced Electronics specifically.
User avatar #57 to #56 - simplescience (05/05/2013) [-]
That sounds very intriguing. May I ask why?
User avatar #58 to #57 - bulbakip (05/05/2013) [-]
To study advanced electronics! :D and get a career in science going, for free. getting paid to workout and learn and travel, sounds good to me.
User avatar #28 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
Hi.
User avatar #55 to #28 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
It seems I cannot reply to your reply to my comment on the part of you that is unattractive, so I am bringing this back up here. I have this to say about whatever it is you have done to your arm: If a man is going to turn you away because he doesn't understand the torment you went through earlier in your life, then that asswipe is not worth your time, but there will be someone that will be willing to help with that pain and will assure you, much better than I can, that you are not an ugly or terrible person.
User avatar #29 to #28 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
Hello there.
User avatar #30 to #29 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
What's up?
User avatar #31 to #30 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
Nothing much. I'm just browsing the web until I feel tired enough to go to bed. What's up with you?
User avatar #32 to #31 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I just got dumped. :)
So I'm feeling preeeeeeeeetttttttty ****** .
..Yup...
User avatar #33 to #32 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
I'm sorry you had to deal with such a painful experience. Is there something I can do to help?
User avatar #34 to #33 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
Just chatting I suppose.
I think I saw your comment yesterday, about never having a girlfriend and whatever else. All I'm going to say is, Don't bother. You honestly aren't missing out on much...
User avatar #35 to #34 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
Why do you say that, may I ask?
User avatar #36 to #35 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I'm young, I've attempted to be in relationships. Now, because of my physical appearance, I can only seem to woo the attention of guys on the internet. Now, not only that, I have only ever gotten into one relationship in which I'd call it serious. That's the one I was just in, of course, he just decided to **** me over, like everyone else has. From what I've experienced, getting into a relationship seems to only harm, and rarely does any real good.

Anyway...I think that maybe we should stay on a topic which is much lighter than the terms of my past relationships. How are you this evening, dear sir? And what are you planning on doing for the rest of the evening? :D
User avatar #37 to #36 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
On the note of relationships, I would just like to share a bit of my own personal experiences. Now, I've never had a relationship, but I've had several friends tell me about their breakups and they tell me how they will never get into another one. I know we've just began conversing, but I would like to tell you what I tell my other friends. I will not deny the pain behind a breakup, but I ask that you not condemn an entire gender or shut out a potential relationship due to the actions of a few slime-balls.

I am actually doing quite well this evening. I am doing quite well. I've talked to a few friends and played some pokemon as well. As for the rest of the evening, I plan on listening to music and playing some more Pokemon Black 2. How about you?
User avatar #38 to #37 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
Well, it's sunday, 5:21 pm here...Planning on just doing some homework, before messing around with my ears, and their piercings. Maybe even playing some xbox. I'm looking for some new friends for skype though...
User avatar #41 to #38 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
I haven't used Skype in forever, mostly because I'm usually bogged down by schoolwork (due to being a Chemistry major in college).

By the way, you mentioned you said you can only woo men over the internet due to your physical appearance? What does that entail exactly? I ask since you don't sound like that bad of a person, and I don't exactly think looks alone determine how attractive someone is.
User avatar #42 to #41 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
My skype is amissingmouse if you wanna add me.

I'm just ugly. That's it.
User avatar #43 to #42 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
This may sound cliche and corny, but physical appearance alone does not determine how attractive you are. You shouldn't put yourself down so harshly. Even if you're not what most define as physically attractive, that does not mean you're doomed to no relationship like I am. Quite the opposite actually. In my experience, personality can make one forego the looks of a potential dating partner, and on that note:

I may have been without a relationship my entire life, I did fall in love with a woman in New York that one would probably not be considered attractive by societal norms, but she was sweet and intelligent. When I would talk to her, I didn't care for one moment what she looked like. I was just happy talk to her. I know you will find someone that will love you for who you are.

A favored quote that I tell my friends who are down is that life is like a jump rope. Things may be down now, but they will get better.
User avatar #44 to #43 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I wish they would get better.
You're talking to someone who just doesn't give a **** , and has already given up.
User avatar #45 to #44 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
I apologize in advance if anything I say in this reply offends you.

I ask you that not unfairly condemn and dismiss guys. I ask that you not give up and surrender. You are not a bad person, and you're not the ugly or unattractive person you tell me you are. How could I say this after only talking to you for a few replies? I'll tell you.

Talking to you, I've found that you have a genuinely friendly personality. You, to some extent, enjoy conversation and making friends. Speaking from my own wants, I know I like someone who is willing to converse with me, and I'm betting several other people do as well. When it comes to making friends, while I can't speak for the entirety of the male gender, I know that I (and probably other guys out there) would much rather have a friendly and pleasant woman that enjoys conversation who might not have what might be considered physically beautiful over some gorgeous woman who has an ego the size of the Hindenburg and talks down to people.

To quote one of my favorite songs by Blue October: "Don't lose yourself, or your hope. Life's like a jump rope....it (life) will get hard, but remember life's like a jump rope". There might come a person who will just find you to be the most amazing woman on the planet, and you definitely deserve someone like that. Should someone like that come along, don't let that person escape because of the douchebag actions of people in your past. Those assholes from the past may not be worth your time, but someone out there will think you're amazing, and if you're willing to be a little patient and not let some slime-balls keep you down, then I believe that person will come along.

Don't dismiss yourself, or any part thereof. Don't give up on love and happiness just because of some player asshole that wouldn't wouldn't know how to be a good man even if someone came up and gave him detailed instructions.

I know from talking to my other friends, and from rejections that I face, that hearing what I'm saying can be hard to believe, hard to listen to, or hard to accept. I'm not saying immediately take in what I say and throw away your pain and sadness because I know the sting of a breakup can last, and sometimes (like with the woman in New York I mentioned earlier), that sting can last for years.

What I am saying is that if the pain ever subsides, that you don't close yourself off forever, because you are worth more than you seem to be giving yourself credit for, and you deserve more than being alone for the rest of your life.
#46 to #45 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I honestly would never just say that all guys are douche bags, but, I seem to have met too many of them to be able to justify my views so that it goes any other way. It's kinda sad to be honest, because the more I think about it, the more I realise, that all of the guys I've met are pretty much douche bags, and i think I'm beginning to think of the rest of the male kind to be douche bags.

Until I find someone who really cares, like this guy pretended to do, I don't know what I'll do. Possibly just friendzone everyone who comes within a foot of me. That seems like a plausible answer. Not only that, I could also just stay single for the rest of my life and have a dog. Dogs are better than people from what I've experienced. They don't judge looks, or appearance, and they'll always be there for you when you need them the most. :3

As well as that, unless you can introduce me to some non-douchey guys, I honestly don't think I'm going to meet any.

Thanks for trying to be kind. Pic related, it's me. :) I look terrible, I know...
User avatar #49 to #46 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
I also noticed a split-second too late after I pressed "reply" that I did not address your picture. I would like to actually comment on it if I may.

1) I really like your hair, but then again, I really like long hair.

2) Also, none of your facial features are anywhere near as bad as you've been making them out to be. I'm betting that if you smiled, your face would light up and look even more gorgeous.

3) You don't look terrible. I know how cliche that must sound, and I realize how much of a "standard" response that sounds like, so I'm going to go a bit more in-depth. Based on the picture you have provided, you are nowhere near as ugly and terrible looking as you keep telling me. When I heard you talk about yourself like that, I had a mental image far worse than what I'm seeing, yet at the same time, I thought that there was no way someone who is as friendly as you have shown yourself to be. To sum it up, I could tell just from talking to you, that there was no way you look as bad as you say, and this picture confirms my thoughts.
User avatar #50 to #49 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
T-thank you I suppose. I've never really had people really compliment me, and it's only been recently that I've been able to accept any compliments (after the bullying..I just...no..) So thank you, I appreciate your compliment. :3
However, there is a certain part of me, which is not attractive at all, it's ugly, hideous, and something I'm going to have to live with for the rest of my life.
User avatar #51 to #50 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
Then to that, I say that, at some time, there will come a guy that will love you enough that will be able to look past this part of you that you deem unattractive, and will love you regardless.
User avatar #52 to #51 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I don't think so..It's on my arm, no one can ever look at me the same, after seeing what damage I've caused to my arm. :c
User avatar #47 to #46 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
You say "introduce some non-douchey guys". Let me ask you something. Do you honestly believe that in the time you've talked to me that I am some douchebag guy that is judging you and thinking you're some ugly woman who will be alone forever? Do you honestly get the impression that I am some dickhead that just wants to use you? If you do believe that, then I follow up with asking how I've managed to do that?

As to your thoughts on friendzoning people, let me ask you: What if some really sweet nice guy comes along and wants to make you happy, and you let him slip away because he's been friendzoned? That's not entirely fair to guys at all. Why should all men be tarred with the same brush just because a few have wronged you? That's like saying "I had a bad plate of french fries when I went to that restaurant a few times, therefore all restaurants are going to serve me bad fries."

As I've said, I'm not saying completely turn yourself around due to my words, but at the same time, don't hold a long-standing grudge against all men and think they are all ********* . Give us guys a chance, eh? We're not all douchebags, just like any guy who dismisses all women is being unfair by thinking women are all mind-game playing bitches (forgive my language).
User avatar #48 to #47 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I suppose that is true...I don't know...
You seem kind, and not douchey. I'm a bit tired, so my responses are a bit shorter.
I honestly just wanna meet someone nice :c I put so much time and effort in, only to get hurt. :c
User avatar #53 to #48 - simplescience (02/24/2013) [-]
If you're tired, then maybe lie down and take a rest, eh? I apologize for keeping you up this late with my walls of text, and I'll let you get some sleep.
User avatar #54 to #53 - amissingmouse (02/24/2013) [-]
I'm not tired, just, my eyes hurt a bit. I want to talk to someone on skype because of this .But, eh, no one is willing to talk to me on it.
#27 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
#25 - mangioluingi ONLINE (09/20/2011) [-]
guess why I'm here?

hint: I love you bro
User avatar #26 to #26 - simplescience (09/20/2011) [-]
Thank you very much. This really helped me out. I hadn't been feeling 100% lately. :)
#21 - omegasoul (09/19/2011) [-]
I LIKE YOU,BUT YOU REPOSTED YOU OWN CONTENT TRY TO NOT DO THAT IN THE FUTURE
User avatar #22 to #22 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
It was only reposted because I wanted people to know to get the game that I was talking about in my content. I didn't want people who like portal to go without. I knew it would vanish after 24 hours, so I reposted it so people would know even after it expired the first time.
User avatar #23 to #23 - omegasoul (09/19/2011) [-]
...HMMM,OK
#18 - theapocalipz (09/19/2011) [-]
You're an awesome person!
User avatar #20 to #19 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you very much. So are you and so is the b.rony community. :)
#8 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you very much for this. I definitely was not expecting this. xD

It's inspired me to maybe upload some more stuff. Thanks a bunch. :)
#16 to #8 - kesolukt (09/19/2011) [-]
Always a pleasure to make others smile.
User avatar #17 to #17 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Well you have succeeded. Admirably. :) Thank you very much. ^_^
#7 - kesolukt (09/19/2011) [-]
Love ya
User avatar #15 to #7 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you very much. For everything. :)
#5 - SuperSixONE (09/19/2011) [-]
CONGRATS!
User avatar #19 to #5 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you very much, whether you're referring to being chosen by the b.rony community or on my getting to the front page. I'm grateful for both. :)
User avatar #12 to #4 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
This was very nice of all you guys. Thank you very much. :)
User avatar #3 - leed (09/19/2011) [-]
You!
Yes you!
You are awesome and you should feel awesome!
User avatar #11 to #3 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you. This whole thing has made my day. :)
User avatar #2 - Bluecoolman (09/19/2011) [-]
I love you! You're FJer of the day
User avatar #9 to #2 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you very much. :)
#1 - mazzyrazzy (09/19/2011) [-]
Hey :) You've been choosen randomly to receive the benefit of a new b.rony program, Helping Hooves, a program where a few of us pick a user at random and thumb up all their content and comments.
User avatar #10 to #1 - simplescience (09/19/2011) [-]
Thank you for this. I know my name just came up as a random roll, but still, this was very kind. :)
User avatar #13 to #10 - mazzyrazzy (09/19/2011) [-]
Our pleasure :P

We like to do nice stuff every once in a while.
 Friends (0)