Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

silvet    

Rank #22220 on Subscribers
silvet Avatar Level 202 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to silvet Block silvet Invite silvet to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:2/14/2011
Last Login:8/03/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 3428 total,  3872 ,  444
Comment Thumbs: 1023 total,  1593 ,  570
Content Level Progress: 29% (29/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 202 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 203 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:3
Content Views:140609
Times Content Favorited:118 times
Total Comments Made:1233
FJ Points:4467
Favorite Tags: fuck (2) | Mario (2) | tumblr (2)

latest user's comments

#2842 - **** THIS ****** 02/26/2013 on Childhood Nostalgia Forum 0
#2836 - Toa Lewa ftw 02/26/2013 on Childhood Nostalgia Forum +1
#2832 - MY FRIEND ALWAYS HAD THIS AND I WAS SO ****** JEALOUS 02/26/2013 on Childhood Nostalgia Forum +2
#111 - YEHA BUT HE REPRESENT ANARCY ADN GRAFFETI FREDOM AN STUFF. HE … 02/26/2013 on who is the rebel now? +4
#13 - I lol'd cuz of dingus 02/25/2013 on Alligators immune system +1
#15 - So does Nintendo 02/25/2013 on DLC 0
#184 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/23/2013 on ok i'll jus-nooooo what nooo +3
User avatar #188 - Warzonebeta (02/23/2013) [-]
Nope....I was at a birthday party and the kids mom invited Prof. Safari a guy who brought in animals to show the rest went;
P. Safari: And this is Bella a Golith Bird Eating spide....oh umm anyone seen my spider?
*CHOMP*
Me:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
P. Safari: ...oh umm hey kids there she is on...HEY LOOK A BABY ALLIGATOR!

Bella was fine i spent a night throwing up my guts in a never ending panic attack.
#183 - I want this captioned with "Onward human! My people need … 02/23/2013 on ok i'll jus-nooooo what nooo 0
#124 - the ladies love it too 02/13/2013 on think you're having a bad day? -2
#121 - you mean there's people that don't like sport oriented cars? 02/13/2013 on think you're having a bad day? 0
#17 - Russia wtf  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2013 on I hope this is fake 0
User avatar #37 - ponyfcker (02/03/2013) [-]
Его, потому что их язык
#123 - I forgot to put that it wasn't my OC. I just stumbled on it an…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/01/2013 on Has science gone too far? 0
User avatar #126 - UberAndrew (02/01/2013) [-]
My question still stands to whoever made this.
#8 - it's funny cuz laz-weapons 01/24/2013 on Imperial Guard +1
#24 - you evil son of a bitch! 01/19/2013 on Hue Hue +1
#716 - But people who are untrained, and also have volatile tendencie… 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#585 - But that's what I'm saying! Back then the local milita and the…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama +1
User avatar #636 - durkadurka (01/18/2013) [-]
The national guard is not the same thing as the people owning firearms. They serve the government, something the militias were designed to protect against. The endgame here is that private citizens must own the weapons because they (collectively) will follow the people's best interest. The government, by its nature, will not and needs to be forced to.
User avatar #716 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
But people who are untrained, and also have volatile tendencies, are not safe with weaponry. Just because someone understands the concept of shooting a gun, does not make them qualified to wield one. Also the people do not collectively fight for one interest, people who are armed with guns will feel that they have the power to impose their own personal interests on others. And weather the tactic be fear or disillusion of power, they will gain followers. Frankly they problem with this country right now is that we as a collective mass aren't trying to find ways to better the country, and frankly the only way to do that is through a compromise. That is what this entire bill is about. A compromise. They are not taking away ALL firearms, they are just taking away the ones that have proven to be most dangerous to the general masses.
#576 - The idea of a military back then was a local militia. Implyin… 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama +1
#551 - k then watch this 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#548 - I used that gun as an example. But even if that gun can only u… 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#545 - This is true but there will never be a bill passed in this cou… 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#543 - The AK-47 was designed for the purpose of military use correct…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
User avatar #575 - durkadurka (01/18/2013) [-]
The right of the people shall not be infringed. If the intent was to give the right to the states, the amendment would have said so.

Besides, if the people still ran the militias and privately owned the weapons used by the militias that would be one thing. But the national guards are run by the state, and serve the states' and federal governments interests.
User avatar #585 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
But that's what I'm saying! Back then the local milita and the citizens were the same thing, and they did keep the weapons in their own homes back in the days of 1886. The reason the local militia grew into the national guard was to train them specifically for the purpose of the people's protection, and that involved a more powerful form of weaponry. The national guard was not existent back then but it is now, to serve as protection for the states, with military grade power. The people can choose to join the national guard have that opportunity to use those guns, but some people don't want to be part of that. My view is that if you don't want to put the effort into being efficiently trained, you shouldn't have the tool.
User avatar #636 - durkadurka (01/18/2013) [-]
The national guard is not the same thing as the people owning firearms. They serve the government, something the militias were designed to protect against. The endgame here is that private citizens must own the weapons because they (collectively) will follow the people's best interest. The government, by its nature, will not and needs to be forced to.
User avatar #716 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
But people who are untrained, and also have volatile tendencies, are not safe with weaponry. Just because someone understands the concept of shooting a gun, does not make them qualified to wield one. Also the people do not collectively fight for one interest, people who are armed with guns will feel that they have the power to impose their own personal interests on others. And weather the tactic be fear or disillusion of power, they will gain followers. Frankly they problem with this country right now is that we as a collective mass aren't trying to find ways to better the country, and frankly the only way to do that is through a compromise. That is what this entire bill is about. A compromise. They are not taking away ALL firearms, they are just taking away the ones that have proven to be most dangerous to the general masses.
User avatar #553 - rexthedino (01/18/2013) [-]
Actually that whole danger lurked everywhere is false. There is more crime now then there was back then. Go figure. Albeit there was more wildlife and Indians lol.

Funny I own a semi-automatic AK-47 made in the same factory as the military fully automatic ak-47's. If it wasn't meant for civilians it would not have been designed that way.

Last I am glad you brought up the Constitution. Our founding fathers just finished a war with a tyrannical government that tried to take away their guns and freedom. We put that amendment in so no one could ever take away our guns and yet here we are.

Also before the well you can own a musket argument, At the time flintlock rifles were state of the art weaponry and the civilians had the same firepower as the military and it was meant to stay that way. How are you going to fight of a government(which was the intended last resort purpose of the 2nd amendment) if you have less firepower than them?
User avatar #576 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
The idea of a military back then was a local militia. Implying that things were "meant to stay that way" is basically saying we should hand out fully automatic weapons to the neighbor hood watch. The US Army during the Revolutionary War was not an organized faction, like how it is now. You are not a soldier, you are not fighting for anything. And another point, the government nowadays COULDN'T be a tyranny, there are too many representatives from different points of view that disagree of almost everything, that we barely get anything done. And also, they didn't try to take away their guns, what the British Regime tried to do was feed off the colonies income, resources, and land in the name of British Monarchy. The US people revolted because of the unfair prices of imported goods, and also the fact that they didn't feel it was fair that a ruler halfway around the world was in control of their own country. That's why people fought. For that freedom to rule their own place. But again, the military was the civilians back then. They were simply militia. It was not a profession, it was something else entirely. Now you can make being a soldier your profession. Times have changed, as should the rules and regulations of our laws. The bill of rights needs to be subjective to this day and age. Also you can STILL purchase a gun under this ban, you can still protect yourself.
#520 - The ban was placed in 1994. That's where I got my facts mixed …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
User avatar #557 - durkadurka (01/18/2013) [-]
Opps, now it's my turn to correct myself. You're right about VT. The shooter still used the 10 round mags though. All of these shooting (except Aurora), including Fort Hood, were done in gun free zones. The attacks were well planned and almost exclusively done by the mentally ill. Why take things away from the millions of people who own and maintain these guns safely?
#508 - Here, watch this emo kid get hurt for an hour. it'll help.  [+] (2 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#511 - pseudobob (01/18/2013) [-]
That looks really fake.
#551 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
k then watch this
#507 - I suppose you could say that. I mean we do sell Desert Eagles… 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama +1
#503 - Define what you mean by crazy? Like do you have the urge to go…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama 0
#505 - pseudobob (01/18/2013) [-]
**pseudobob rolled a random image posted in comment #2786410 at MLP Friendly Board ** I'll let funnyjunk answer for me.
User avatar #506 - pseudobob (01/18/2013) [-]
Yes. I do.
#508 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
Here, watch this emo kid get hurt for an hour. it'll help.
#511 - pseudobob (01/18/2013) [-]
That looks really fake.
#551 - silvet (01/18/2013) [-]
k then watch this

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#9 - miia ONLINE (04/17/2014) [-]
#10 to #9 - silvet (04/29/2014) [-]
you.. ok?
you.. ok?
#11 to #10 - miia ONLINE (04/29/2014) [-]
You were gone for a long time!
User avatar #12 to #11 - silvet (04/29/2014) [-]
Haha.. I guess so huh.. It's been a crazy year.. So I decided why not relax my mind by venturing back onto FJ. Sorry I was away ^^;
#13 to #12 - miia ONLINE (04/29/2014) [-]
User avatar #14 to #13 - silvet (04/29/2014) [-]
You run both profiles?
User avatar #15 to #14 - miia ONLINE (04/29/2014) [-]
i own them both but i dont use them anymore
#16 to #15 - silvet (04/30/2014) [-]
ooohh well anyway, whats up?
User avatar #17 to #16 - miia ONLINE (04/30/2014) [-]
im up now
#6 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [-]
lololololololololol
#1 - marauder (01/31/2012) [-]
I ROLLED YOUZZ
User avatar #2 to #1 - silvet (02/01/2012) [-]
Oh god what did you roll
 Friends (0)