You're mistaken.

Honestly, I just mostly pick whatever is the most offensive. Especially since I usually play this game with some borderline SJWs, so that makes it all the funnier.

How does that work?

What do you mean? How do I avoid pissing them off, to the point that they dont wanna speak with me, you mean?

How can you play CaH when worried about offending people

Well, I'm not. As I said, I deliberately try to offend people. Its not that hard to play CaH without being over-the-top offensive, which is what my SJW-ey friends are doing.

I think I get it, I always try the darkest combinations I can, so it's kinda difficult to imagine an SJW answer
What's the Smell? Auschwitz
How did I lose my virginity? Police brutality

Its actually a lot of fun. I find, that offensive jokes becomes a bit funnier, if somebody recognises how offensive they are.
My friends are enough into social justice, that they sorta hold a bunch of the beliefs, but aren't really all that rightous about it, especially towards me, since I've known them for several years. They get this look on their faces of contradicting emotional states, where they know they should be offended due to their faith, but cant really bring themselves to get into a hissy fit at a friend, especially not when its just a game. Its a blast.

No one looks at their cards

believe it or not, south koreans are even higher on the list for highest suicide rate.

Nah, Japan are so bad at it that they need to practise.

I agree with you entirely.

you can also just anything2mp3.com any song

flac snob master race.

ye, if you don't mind 128kbps (I don't) and tagging the tracks yourself (I actually enjoy doing this)

Don't HD videos on youtube (720p+) now play at 256 KB/s unless an uploader has audio forced to something lower? Also if one were to ever check a person's computer for pirated music, wouldn't they simply search for audio file bit rates of 128kb/s and 256kb/s?

I'm glad I found this post.

I dunno if I agree with that second part, I have tons of pirated music at 320kbps, mp3 v0, and even some FLAC stuff.

Was just an idea. My music taste is ponies mainly, so I don't need to worry about that piracy stuff.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytKvgLuy7ng
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVtvrG9VOPs
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfyeltLH5-E
www.youtube.com/watch?v=94Zop1dRHOU
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAQSNn4jX04
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tyS2z-IoDE

To name a few...

As long as the artist doesn't set a minimum, you don't have to pay. But I think they're only allowed a certain amount of free downloads, though I could be wrong on that.

That's not true, in regards to the max number of free downloads, but I think the artist can set a max number of free downloads.

Looks like it's a monthly thing. They refill to 200 every month, with more being added as sales rise.

blog.bandcamp.com/2010/09/09/free-downloads-power-ups/

Oh, well, I was wrong.
I think I was thinking of max number of times a non-free album can be streamed in a 24 hour period.

Oh, no. Streaming is unlimited.

I just remember trying to download an album and not being able to because there were no more free downloads remaining.

Nah, I once listened to an album on the bandcamp page 3 times in a row, and it said I could no longer stream the album for free.

Weird. I wonder why they'd limit that when you could have just pulled the file by using the network activity function of your browser and listened to it with no limits.

Yeah, idk, I actually try to buy music from bandcamp, I like that you can technically listen to all the music for free, and download a lot of it without paying, so I try to give money to the artists (and the site gets a cut I assume) for their general leniency

I didn't even mean to do anything.

The problem with Synths is that they are more dangerous on a conceptual level than any nuclear bomb or military superweapon. The Institute is dangerous not because they are some evil, hidden new world order bent on taking control of the world, but because they are simply and purely dedicated to the advancement of science without any regard for the consequences.

The destruction of the Synths, of all Synths is vital simply because of the risk that someone might be able to replicate the Institute's advanced level of technology and this individual, or organization may have more nefarious ideals in mind than the simple unadulterated advancement of science.

Are Synths truly people? I'd say yes. Completely. Which is, among other reasons why they need to be purged as quickly as possible. It was never the Brotherhood's goal to commit genocide. It's simply a means to an end, and that end being the ensured and continued survival of humanity, and what remains of human civilization after the Great War. The quicker this unsavoury task is committed, the less unsavoury it is.

The Brotherhood has always been about one thing, and one thing only. The preservation of mankind by limiting their access to harmful technologies. That's why they've committed every resource they have to scouring the Commonwealth for Synths. Why Elder Maxson would wage war against them despite knowing full well that his own faction will take heavy losses in this war.

I'll be honest, I don't think I'm going to change your opinion on the matter. In truth, I don't really want to. I just want to give a clearer picture of what people on the other side think. That's one of the things about Fallout. Every faction, every group, they all have their reasons to do what they do. Be that the Master and his Super Mutants, the Enclave, the Legion, hell, even the Institute. It's all justifiable. Maybe not to you, maybe not to me, but to someone out there it is. That's the beauty of the Fallout Games. Nobody's ever completely in the right, and nobody's ever completely in the wrong. At the end of the day, it all falls to personal preference. Even if you can't choose that faction in-game, you can (and people do) always root for them out of game.

For one, there's nothing to suggest synths would be responsible for the downfall of humanity any more than anyone else. If the institute is destroyed, it is borderline impossible to emulate anything they created. The sheer complexity and miraculous scientific achievement, is simply not something you can do in just any meth lab. And synths aren't terminators, and they never will be as long as we treat them like the sentient beings they are.

The ends justify the means? What justifies the ends? There have never been good people who did evil things in the name of good, those were just more evil people.

Yeah but emotion usually produces the opposite of wisdom.

>>#29

Not true. To lead exclusively logical lives is to live like a robot, our emotions is what makes us human, being human is what makes our lives worth living. Understanding our emotions, and embracing their existence is the only way you can understand yourself, and understand others.

To abandon emotion from wisdom, would be to abandon concepts that are critical to wisdom. Things like compassion, happiness, love, action. Without emotion we would not care for wisdom, each other, or what wisdom means to us as humans.

Our brains have emotion for a reason, our lives live to satisfy our emotions above all. But logic is important so we don't lose ourselves to our emotions. To be emotional is to master your life, to be logical is to master your mind, to be wise is to master everything.

Whatever dude.