mines like 2.5 inches and still raspy. god i hate this month

my beard feels like sandpaper. and now i rub my chin on people's arms or other bare parts and scream "SANDMAN HAS STRUCK AGAIN"

Mine has already gone soft and curly... almost like pubes, but shorter. The wife says it feels like a teddy bear.

mines like 2.5 inches and still raspy. god i hate this month

Well, my reason for speaking the way I did against school lunches is simple really, at the High school I was at, before the healthy alternatives were introduced, the school lunches were basically just fast food, chips (fries), burgers, chicken nuggets, pizza, that sort of thing, and very very little vegetables.
It was like eating at a less tasty Macdonalds. Now, my point is that, fast food is nice to have now and then, but every day it's not a good idea, and it isn't healthy.

And what confused me about your points was, before the healthier meals were introduced, parents weren't happy about how their kids were eating at school, and they were pleased when healthy meals were enforced on schools, even though for a while their kids weren't that impressed.

That said, I am all for parents having their own prerogative about how their children are raised, and sure, the Government shouldn't be allowed to act on their own, but when I posted I naturally assumed that PTA comities, school comities, ETC, would have been involved in it.

On the parental side- no, the PTA has no involvement whatsoever. They shut us down every time. It's to the point now where we are linking together and we will provide sack lunches for the less fortunate kids, with parents permission, because we all feel that our kids are not getting the best they need.

Just what I needed. I love food.

Finally I got something right.

Congratulations. Now here is a pie.

Just what I needed. I love food.

I'm pretty fat man.

Well congratulations, overweight. It would appear your profile name is correct.

Finally I got something right.

Congratulations. Now here is a pie.

Just what I needed. I love food.

From everything you said there it sounds like you should be agreeing with what I said in my first comment, type 1 and 2 diabetes are also present in one side of my family, so I'm extremely interested in keeping healthy.

As far as the BMI goes, I'm considered overweight too for my age, being 6'3" and 13.6 stone (190 lbs) but I'm only 9.2 on body fat percentage. When I said 'overweight people' before, I really meant 'fat people'.

And we have the same problem in the UK with benefits given to obese people claiming to be disabled, and one way to lower that is to make kids eat healthier meals in school, this will get them used to eating healthy meals in general, even if their parents don't enforce it.

I'm glad your daughter is healthy and athletic, but I really don't get why you were arguing with me earlier, you sound like healthy eating for your family is important to you.

My argument stems from my conflicting views on who should raise children. Parents should raise their children, the parents should dictate what their child has eaten, parents decided how much of what food their child eats. Not the first lady, not the government, not anyone else. I had the opportunity to sit down with my little girl for lunch once, and I was appalled at the amount of food that was thrown away because the kids didn't want it. My girl is taught to clean her plate. Food is a gift, and should not be wasted. Even though she eats what she is given, she is still not fat. She eats her school lunch with gusto, but still not overweight. Kids get fat when they get home- It's the parent's fault for fluffing up their kid. You attacked school lunches, which are not the problem. It's parents having trouble telling their kids "no" that is the problem in America. So culling student lunches solves nothing, it is just another propaganda tactic for the kim jongistration (gov't, not school) to seem like they have our best interests in mind. My girl comes home hungry, but she eats, does schoolwork if she has any, we check it together, and then she does her chores and follows me with mine. Other people are fucking with how I raise my child, pardon me, but that is what pisses me off. Perhaps my anger is misdirected at you, but there are many factors that are seemingly never brought into consideration- when the life and health of a child are brought up, ignorance is hardly acceptable. My apologies for snipping at you, stranger.

Well, my reason for speaking the way I did against school lunches is simple really, at the High school I was at, before the healthy alternatives were introduced, the school lunches were basically just fast food, chips (fries), burgers, chicken nuggets, pizza, that sort of thing, and very very little vegetables.
It was like eating at a less tasty Macdonalds. Now, my point is that, fast food is nice to have now and then, but every day it's not a good idea, and it isn't healthy.

And what confused me about your points was, before the healthier meals were introduced, parents weren't happy about how their kids were eating at school, and they were pleased when healthy meals were enforced on schools, even though for a while their kids weren't that impressed.

That said, I am all for parents having their own prerogative about how their children are raised, and sure, the Government shouldn't be allowed to act on their own, but when I posted I naturally assumed that PTA comities, school comities, ETC, would have been involved in it.

On the parental side- no, the PTA has no involvement whatsoever. They shut us down every time. It's to the point now where we are linking together and we will provide sack lunches for the less fortunate kids, with parents permission, because we all feel that our kids are not getting the best they need.

Your BMI says I'm overweight.

And are you a disgusting fatbody? Probably not.

I'm pretty fat man.

Well congratulations, overweight. It would appear your profile name is correct.

Finally I got something right.

Congratulations. Now here is a pie.

Just what I needed. I love food.

I'm 20 years old, of course I do not have children, I never once stated that the lunch in the content is the "average american school meal", I merely stated that healthier meals are a step forward, and believe it or not, cutting down a huge fatty meal into a smaller, less fatty meal, makes it much healthier.

Your opinion is also stupid, for example, because I'm British, you have decided that I'm not a human who has the exact same nutritional needs as any American human of my age.

I actually have a very good understanding in the nutritional needs of children and teenagers, so just because I don't have my own children, doesn't mean I don't know what they need in terms of nutrition.
I also used to be a child, and judging by the condescending tone with which you're using to speak to me, I was a child much more recently than you were.

I never questioned your parenting, though I knew the parent of a fat child would read what I wrote as such. But fat children have a high risk of suffering from heart failure, which will kill your child, so maybe you should listen to other people for a change, you may learn something.

So let me get this straight. You're a twenty year old guy so you don't go to school and do not order lunches there. You have no kids so you don't know what they are getting for lunch at their schools. You're going to tell me how the lunches are at school? Have you ever even tried to find out what the new lunches are like?

I don't live in America, how the fuck am I meant to know what the school meals are like there?

Then why do you repeatedly assume our lunches were a good idea when you don't even live here?

All right "guvnuh", I'll fill you in.

Yup, I'm American. I am 23 years old. I have a 5 year old daughter and another on the way. I am 6'4" and hovering around 215 pounds, and while the BMI says I'm overweight, I'm not a blimp. Where I live is southern Indiana. We are mostly small farming communities, full of nice, decent people- not too many disgustingly obese people. I can almost agree with you- fat people piss me off, but for a different reason. I pay for them to get fatter. They're too fat to work, so our government takes money out of my check to pay for their disability and food stamps. That's getting off topic though. My daughter is not at all fat, she has expressed interest in going to gymnastics, and I support it wholeheartedly. She isn't fat because she is at my side when I'm working around the house. She is adept at learning, and she refuses to lose or give up- even when I check my trail cameras, she tags along and I tell her all about wildlife- I show her what berries you can eat in the woods, we go mushroom hunting, and she is generally a remarkably healthy little girl. Heart disease and diabetes are high on both sides of my family, so I am quite aware of what extra weight means. My children are my weight goal- I don't ever want to miss a day with them because of being fat. I carefully limit what they eat as snacks and what we eat as a family because they don't need to be eating trash. Snacks are fruit, nuts, and sometimes vegemite. If she is really good, she may get a nutella and peanut butter sandwich. She is no Honey Boo-boo, I can attest to that. You are jut as human as I am- however, I'm sure British food and American food are quite different nutritionally because there are different government funded groups maintaining it. We have a small garden, and the neighbors also gave us any extra vegetables as well because they have a surplus of crop. Apparently I've run out of characters, so I'll end my rant here.

From everything you said there it sounds like you should be agreeing with what I said in my first comment, type 1 and 2 diabetes are also present in one side of my family, so I'm extremely interested in keeping healthy.

As far as the BMI goes, I'm considered overweight too for my age, being 6'3" and 13.6 stone (190 lbs) but I'm only 9.2 on body fat percentage. When I said 'overweight people' before, I really meant 'fat people'.

And we have the same problem in the UK with benefits given to obese people claiming to be disabled, and one way to lower that is to make kids eat healthier meals in school, this will get them used to eating healthy meals in general, even if their parents don't enforce it.

I'm glad your daughter is healthy and athletic, but I really don't get why you were arguing with me earlier, you sound like healthy eating for your family is important to you.

My argument stems from my conflicting views on who should raise children. Parents should raise their children, the parents should dictate what their child has eaten, parents decided how much of what food their child eats. Not the first lady, not the government, not anyone else. I had the opportunity to sit down with my little girl for lunch once, and I was appalled at the amount of food that was thrown away because the kids didn't want it. My girl is taught to clean her plate. Food is a gift, and should not be wasted. Even though she eats what she is given, she is still not fat. She eats her school lunch with gusto, but still not overweight. Kids get fat when they get home- It's the parent's fault for fluffing up their kid. You attacked school lunches, which are not the problem. It's parents having trouble telling their kids "no" that is the problem in America. So culling student lunches solves nothing, it is just another propaganda tactic for the kim jongistration (gov't, not school) to seem like they have our best interests in mind. My girl comes home hungry, but she eats, does schoolwork if she has any, we check it together, and then she does her chores and follows me with mine. Other people are fucking with how I raise my child, pardon me, but that is what pisses me off. Perhaps my anger is misdirected at you, but there are many factors that are seemingly never brought into consideration- when the life and health of a child are brought up, ignorance is hardly acceptable. My apologies for snipping at you, stranger.

Well, my reason for speaking the way I did against school lunches is simple really, at the High school I was at, before the healthy alternatives were introduced, the school lunches were basically just fast food, chips (fries), burgers, chicken nuggets, pizza, that sort of thing, and very very little vegetables.
It was like eating at a less tasty Macdonalds. Now, my point is that, fast food is nice to have now and then, but every day it's not a good idea, and it isn't healthy.

And what confused me about your points was, before the healthier meals were introduced, parents weren't happy about how their kids were eating at school, and they were pleased when healthy meals were enforced on schools, even though for a while their kids weren't that impressed.

That said, I am all for parents having their own prerogative about how their children are raised, and sure, the Government shouldn't be allowed to act on their own, but when I posted I naturally assumed that PTA comities, school comities, ETC, would have been involved in it.

On the parental side- no, the PTA has no involvement whatsoever. They shut us down every time. It's to the point now where we are linking together and we will provide sack lunches for the less fortunate kids, with parents permission, because we all feel that our kids are not getting the best they need.

Your BMI says I'm overweight.

And are you a disgusting fatbody? Probably not.

I'm pretty fat man.

Well congratulations, overweight. It would appear your profile name is correct.

Finally I got something right.

Congratulations. Now here is a pie.

Just what I needed. I love food.

So we Brits have different nutritional needs than you Americans?
The UK has an obesity problem too, it's not like I'm from a starving country in Africa telling you that you should stop eating so much and send food to me.

And if you're a fat parent, who thinks it's okay to let your children get fat, you're a moron.
My kids will never get fat as long as they live under my roof, I'm an athletic person who holds a good diet, I like being healthy, I want my children to be healthy, you should too.

You do not have kids who are in school, I assume. You also have no basis for argument, in my opinion, because you can't possibly think you know this content is a good example of "US HIGH SCHOOL LUNCHES". I'm not going to even bother replying to your second part of your reply, because you simply do not know. If you don't have kids, your opinion of my parenting also means nothing to me.

I'm 20 years old, of course I do not have children, I never once stated that the lunch in the content is the "average american school meal", I merely stated that healthier meals are a step forward, and believe it or not, cutting down a huge fatty meal into a smaller, less fatty meal, makes it much healthier.

Your opinion is also stupid, for example, because I'm British, you have decided that I'm not a human who has the exact same nutritional needs as any American human of my age.

I actually have a very good understanding in the nutritional needs of children and teenagers, so just because I don't have my own children, doesn't mean I don't know what they need in terms of nutrition.
I also used to be a child, and judging by the condescending tone with which you're using to speak to me, I was a child much more recently than you were.

I never questioned your parenting, though I knew the parent of a fat child would read what I wrote as such. But fat children have a high risk of suffering from heart failure, which will kill your child, so maybe you should listen to other people for a change, you may learn something.

So let me get this straight. You're a twenty year old guy so you don't go to school and do not order lunches there. You have no kids so you don't know what they are getting for lunch at their schools. You're going to tell me how the lunches are at school? Have you ever even tried to find out what the new lunches are like?

I don't live in America, how the fuck am I meant to know what the school meals are like there?

Then why do you repeatedly assume our lunches were a good idea when you don't even live here?

All right "guvnuh", I'll fill you in.

Yup, I'm American. I am 23 years old. I have a 5 year old daughter and another on the way. I am 6'4" and hovering around 215 pounds, and while the BMI says I'm overweight, I'm not a blimp. Where I live is southern Indiana. We are mostly small farming communities, full of nice, decent people- not too many disgustingly obese people. I can almost agree with you- fat people piss me off, but for a different reason. I pay for them to get fatter. They're too fat to work, so our government takes money out of my check to pay for their disability and food stamps. That's getting off topic though. My daughter is not at all fat, she has expressed interest in going to gymnastics, and I support it wholeheartedly. She isn't fat because she is at my side when I'm working around the house. She is adept at learning, and she refuses to lose or give up- even when I check my trail cameras, she tags along and I tell her all about wildlife- I show her what berries you can eat in the woods, we go mushroom hunting, and she is generally a remarkably healthy little girl. Heart disease and diabetes are high on both sides of my family, so I am quite aware of what extra weight means. My children are my weight goal- I don't ever want to miss a day with them because of being fat. I carefully limit what they eat as snacks and what we eat as a family because they don't need to be eating trash. Snacks are fruit, nuts, and sometimes vegemite. If she is really good, she may get a nutella and peanut butter sandwich. She is no Honey Boo-boo, I can attest to that. You are jut as human as I am- however, I'm sure British food and American food are quite different nutritionally because there are different government funded groups maintaining it. We have a small garden, and the neighbors also gave us any extra vegetables as well because they have a surplus of crop. Apparently I've run out of characters, so I'll end my rant here.

From everything you said there it sounds like you should be agreeing with what I said in my first comment, type 1 and 2 diabetes are also present in one side of my family, so I'm extremely interested in keeping healthy.

As far as the BMI goes, I'm considered overweight too for my age, being 6'3" and 13.6 stone (190 lbs) but I'm only 9.2 on body fat percentage. When I said 'overweight people' before, I really meant 'fat people'.

And we have the same problem in the UK with benefits given to obese people claiming to be disabled, and one way to lower that is to make kids eat healthier meals in school, this will get them used to eating healthy meals in general, even if their parents don't enforce it.

I'm glad your daughter is healthy and athletic, but I really don't get why you were arguing with me earlier, you sound like healthy eating for your family is important to you.

My argument stems from my conflicting views on who should raise children. Parents should raise their children, the parents should dictate what their child has eaten, parents decided how much of what food their child eats. Not the first lady, not the government, not anyone else. I had the opportunity to sit down with my little girl for lunch once, and I was appalled at the amount of food that was thrown away because the kids didn't want it. My girl is taught to clean her plate. Food is a gift, and should not be wasted. Even though she eats what she is given, she is still not fat. She eats her school lunch with gusto, but still not overweight. Kids get fat when they get home- It's the parent's fault for fluffing up their kid. You attacked school lunches, which are not the problem. It's parents having trouble telling their kids "no" that is the problem in America. So culling student lunches solves nothing, it is just another propaganda tactic for the kim jongistration (gov't, not school) to seem like they have our best interests in mind. My girl comes home hungry, but she eats, does schoolwork if she has any, we check it together, and then she does her chores and follows me with mine. Other people are fucking with how I raise my child, pardon me, but that is what pisses me off. Perhaps my anger is misdirected at you, but there are many factors that are seemingly never brought into consideration- when the life and health of a child are brought up, ignorance is hardly acceptable. My apologies for snipping at you, stranger.

Well, my reason for speaking the way I did against school lunches is simple really, at the High school I was at, before the healthy alternatives were introduced, the school lunches were basically just fast food, chips (fries), burgers, chicken nuggets, pizza, that sort of thing, and very very little vegetables.
It was like eating at a less tasty Macdonalds. Now, my point is that, fast food is nice to have now and then, but every day it's not a good idea, and it isn't healthy.

And what confused me about your points was, before the healthier meals were introduced, parents weren't happy about how their kids were eating at school, and they were pleased when healthy meals were enforced on schools, even though for a while their kids weren't that impressed.

That said, I am all for parents having their own prerogative about how their children are raised, and sure, the Government shouldn't be allowed to act on their own, but when I posted I naturally assumed that PTA comities, school comities, ETC, would have been involved in it.

On the parental side- no, the PTA has no involvement whatsoever. They shut us down every time. It's to the point now where we are linking together and we will provide sack lunches for the less fortunate kids, with parents permission, because we all feel that our kids are not getting the best they need.

Your BMI says I'm overweight.

And are you a disgusting fatbody? Probably not.

I'm pretty fat man.

Well congratulations, overweight. It would appear your profile name is correct.

Finally I got something right.

Congratulations. Now here is a pie.

Just what I needed. I love food.

Henry does sound like a drug addicts name, im just saying...

That's what makes it the best name to use.

Every henry I know is an addict.

Pic related.
somehow.

We? You do understand that makes you sound like you're talking on behalf of the whole Funnyjunk? The chances that there are more people who haven't seen something are bigger than the chances that are more people who have. New people join this site on a daily basis, and there are people amongst them who have not explored some of the darker corners of the internet, and thus haven't seen some pictures other people have. All I am saying is that reposting is not bad, assuming that you provide people with the proper source and giving credit to the original creator. I didn't do that, so you're right to scold me on that, but requesting fresh and new OC all the time is damn near being an impossibility, considering that on the internet, hardly anything is new anymore. I do not wish to discuss this any further, since we cannot come up with a compromise that is pleasing for both of us. We're both right and wrong on this.

I'm sorry. But piss off. You lost me at the "lawsuit" bullshit. Yeah, that happened. But noone is going to sue over a picture of a god damn book. Get the fuck over yourself. I haven't seen this. I laughed. So I thumbed it right the fuck up. And i'm going to do the exact opposite to you.

What the fuck? I said I found this while stumbling, I don't know who made this originally. I'm starting to understand this picture has been on the internet longer than I thought, so I'm going to assume the original creator was not the guy who posted it on StumbleUpon. I can see your issue with this, but the thumbs are there for two reasons, people press the green one if they found the picture funny, and the red one of they didn't. Given that, you're right on that I should've posted the a link or something that'll go to the site where I originally found, however it's almost impossible to say WHO was the person to originally create the picture in the first place. Oh and the OatMeal and Cyanide and Happiness? They're completely different cases, because that stuff is copyrighted. Posting copyrighted stuff and claiming you made it is ILLEGAL. However, can you see anything that would point out who the original creator is? If so, please, point it to me, and I will delete the content. Oh and one more thing. Did I say at any point that this was made by me? No. You were quick to assume that my sole purpose was simply post this and gather all the green thumbs, regardless of whether I found it funny myself. People can choose themselves which way to thumb it.

pinterest.com/emmadelfosse/this-makes-me-giggle/ <Pintrest poster

weknowmemes.com/2012/05/the-popup-book-of-phobias/ <The original, unedited picture

covalentnews.com/1098/pop-up-book-of-phobias-i-see-no-way-this-could-ever-go-wrong/ <Article about the exact picture you posted

And that is just the first page of google. I'm not going to hunt down every lead, but at least put some effort into looking up a source. We haven't seen everything- I won't refute that- but chances are, it has been seen before. You save yourself time by cross checking these things. Yes, C+H and Oatmeal is copyrighted, however their content that was submitted without thumbing was not cited for removal.

Pic related-ish, mostly about 4chan but some is relevant to my rebuttal.

We? You do understand that makes you sound like you're talking on behalf of the whole Funnyjunk? The chances that there are more people who haven't seen something are bigger than the chances that are more people who have. New people join this site on a daily basis, and there are people amongst them who have not explored some of the darker corners of the internet, and thus haven't seen some pictures other people have. All I am saying is that reposting is not bad, assuming that you provide people with the proper source and giving credit to the original creator. I didn't do that, so you're right to scold me on that, but requesting fresh and new OC all the time is damn near being an impossibility, considering that on the internet, hardly anything is new anymore. I do not wish to discuss this any further, since we cannot come up with a compromise that is pleasing for both of us. We're both right and wrong on this.

Oh and apologies on the grammar, still getting used to fast-typing with this Ipad.

damn it man. you made me break no fap november. twice

I had to choose what to give up on when November came- shaving or fapping. With a decent beard, I feel I made the right choice.

my beard feels like sandpaper. and now i rub my chin on people's arms or other bare parts and scream "SANDMAN HAS STRUCK AGAIN"

Mine has already gone soft and curly... almost like pubes, but shorter. The wife says it feels like a teddy bear.

mines like 2.5 inches and still raspy. god i hate this month

MFW you skip

What? Because I didn't disable thumbs, I'm taking credit for it? I'll have you know I found this while stumbling, and tried to search a little and see if it had been posted before. I couldn't find it so I figured I'd post it. My intentions were not to spread this around as something I had created. I just figured it hadn't been posted before, but I was wrong. Not surprising though.

You are posting content that does not belong to you. You also do not give credit to the original creator. And since the community has a ranking system based on thumbs, you are taking profit from someone else's effort. For a moment, lets think- of all the internet humor, how much of it has been on FJ? I mean, the site has been around for years... and since 4chan and FJ are semi-linked, there is a distinct possibility it actually has been on here before. The basis of my argument is this- if you just want to share, disable thumbing. Because if you get no benefit, there is no reason for the creator to be offended. You may or may not remember the lawsuit with TheOatmeal, or Cyanide And Happiness comics either, but they dealt with the same issue. You are benefiting from it, because the content is posted on your profile, and your rank is achieved by green thumbs. That you earned.. how? By browsing the web? Since when was that funny/honorable?

I'm sorry. But piss off. You lost me at the "lawsuit" bullshit. Yeah, that happened. But noone is going to sue over a picture of a god damn book. Get the fuck over yourself. I haven't seen this. I laughed. So I thumbed it right the fuck up. And i'm going to do the exact opposite to you.

What the fuck? I said I found this while stumbling, I don't know who made this originally. I'm starting to understand this picture has been on the internet longer than I thought, so I'm going to assume the original creator was not the guy who posted it on StumbleUpon. I can see your issue with this, but the thumbs are there for two reasons, people press the green one if they found the picture funny, and the red one of they didn't. Given that, you're right on that I should've posted the a link or something that'll go to the site where I originally found, however it's almost impossible to say WHO was the person to originally create the picture in the first place. Oh and the OatMeal and Cyanide and Happiness? They're completely different cases, because that stuff is copyrighted. Posting copyrighted stuff and claiming you made it is ILLEGAL. However, can you see anything that would point out who the original creator is? If so, please, point it to me, and I will delete the content. Oh and one more thing. Did I say at any point that this was made by me? No. You were quick to assume that my sole purpose was simply post this and gather all the green thumbs, regardless of whether I found it funny myself. People can choose themselves which way to thumb it.

pinterest.com/emmadelfosse/this-makes-me-giggle/ <Pintrest poster

weknowmemes.com/2012/05/the-popup-book-of-phobias/ <The original, unedited picture

covalentnews.com/1098/pop-up-book-of-phobias-i-see-no-way-this-could-ever-go-wrong/ <Article about the exact picture you posted

And that is just the first page of google. I'm not going to hunt down every lead, but at least put some effort into looking up a source. We haven't seen everything- I won't refute that- but chances are, it has been seen before. You save yourself time by cross checking these things. Yes, C+H and Oatmeal is copyrighted, however their content that was submitted without thumbing was not cited for removal.

Pic related-ish, mostly about 4chan but some is relevant to my rebuttal.

We? You do understand that makes you sound like you're talking on behalf of the whole Funnyjunk? The chances that there are more people who haven't seen something are bigger than the chances that are more people who have. New people join this site on a daily basis, and there are people amongst them who have not explored some of the darker corners of the internet, and thus haven't seen some pictures other people have. All I am saying is that reposting is not bad, assuming that you provide people with the proper source and giving credit to the original creator. I didn't do that, so you're right to scold me on that, but requesting fresh and new OC all the time is damn near being an impossibility, considering that on the internet, hardly anything is new anymore. I do not wish to discuss this any further, since we cannot come up with a compromise that is pleasing for both of us. We're both right and wrong on this.

Oh and apologies on the grammar, still getting used to fast-typing with this Ipad.