sequel
Rank #222 on Content
Online
Send mail to sequel Block sequel Invite sequel to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | female |
| Age: | 115 |
| Date Signed Up: | 8/27/2013 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| Location: | AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #222 |
| Comment Ranking: | #235 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #22 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #85 |
| Content Thumbs: | 117342 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 25471 |
| Content Level Progress: | 84.7% (847/1000) Level 300 Content: Lord Of Laughs → Level 301 Content: Lord Of Laughs |
| Comment Level Progress: | 73.5% (735/1000) Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs |
| Subscribers: | 20 |
| Content Views: | 8096805 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 8116 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 3898 |
| FJ Points: | 121705 |
| Favorite Tags: | Polandball (141) | reddit (12) | russia (12) | spy (9) | kebab (8) | Japan (7) | canada (6) | countryball (6) | eu (6) | germany (6) | not OC (6) | poland (6) | sweden (6) | 4Chan (5) | Finland (5) | Olympics (5) | us (5) | You (5) | Cars (4) | crashes (4) |
I lied about being an ancient woman. Also I post polandball.
latest user's comments
| #103 - Guys what's the difference between bisexual and pansexual? … [+] (50 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +59 |
| #457 -
iiiclownbabyiii (9 hours ago) [-] Pansexuals are attracted to ladyboys and boyladies(people going out of their way to be something that they're not either by surgery or crossdressing and identifying as the wrong gender)---like Futas and men and women. Bisexuals are only attracted to men and women regardless of femininity or masculinity---no futas or guys with vaginas(traps [crossdressers] are still fair game for the bisexual ONLY IF the said trap considers his/herself the correct gender that he/she was born with. Like how dragqueens dress in men's clothing after crossdressing or a dragking would do the same. For traps, the crossdressing activity is just a facade and does not necessarily mean that the crossdresser is actively trying to be the opposite gender---they just like to play the role for lengths of time). There is a show called "Transparent" about a guy wanting to become a woman, but he just crossdresses because he hasn't gotten the gender-changing surgery. A bisexual would not be attracted to "her" because that guy is the wrong gender. Similar to how a gay man would find him unattractive because he's actively trying to become a woman which the gay man is not attracted to. Personally, I hate telling people that I'm bisexual because it's hard to explain clearly. tl;dr v v v So, if I see a 10/10 girl and ask her for her number, but her name is "Ron", she immediately becomes a 0/10 for me because she's a "guy". But, if she says that her name is "Ronnie, but Ron only on the weekends", then she remains a 10/10 because she's still a woman; she just engages in trap behavior which doesn't take away from her "femaleness". A pansexual would find that woman a 10/10 regardless of what her name is, even if it was Ron instead of Ronnie. #436 -
djmaryhikineet (10 hours ago) [-] Pansexual by default of the term means everything, they can be attracted to anything or everything. By case wise it's multable fetishs one has. I think I'm Pansexual b/c I have multable things I'm into though not all at once as I end up changing what I'm attracted to the most every day pretty much mostly based on what porn I have seen as late. And I have way to many waifus b/c of it i always thought that bi sexual was a capability to have a physical relationship with either gender, but pansexual was someone who can have an emotional relationship with either gender Pansexuality is about romantic interest and not sexual attraction. Personally I find it very silly that there are not distinctions made here. A pansexual won't care about appereance and will look for an emotional connection when picking a partner. Where as a lot of people take into account their sexual attraction to their partner first. You won't hear a pansexual make the comment "God look at those abs" when checking out a potentional mate, where as someone bisexual is attracted to features of both sexes. This doesn't mean that pansexuals don't have a sexual preference, they just don't take it into account when picking a partner. Personally I consider myself straight and feel attracted to girls mostly, but if the girl I love turns out to be a transexual I won't give a shit. Does this make me bisexual? Not really I still feel sexually attracted to girls, yet I'm dating a guy. So it make me more of a pansexual. #400 -
anon (12 hours ago) [-] say..you have a wife..and you love her more then anyone in the world, you love her so much, she is the only one for you, you don't even look at other girls anymore. At that point you are no longer attracted to women, you are atrackted to 1 single person. If you think about some hypothethical situation..like..if you could never have sex with her would you still love her? or..if she suddenly turned out to be a guy.. wouldyou still love her? If the answer is yes, then you are not attracted to a gender, but to a person. even if you aren't sexually attracted to her, you still love her..it's just a matter of seeing those things as seperate concepts #389 -
lampmountaindew (12 hours ago) [-] as a bisexual male myself i have this to say: pansexualism came along because every 12 year old started being "bisexual" and being bi wasnt edgy enough anymore. If I remember correctly, pansexuals are physically attracted to things based on own feelings rather than physical attributes. Bi are attracted to either gender, pan people aren't attracted to gender features, but rather regardless of gender. I legitimately am pansexual (or, at least, pansexual as I understand it), so here's my expanation: Pansexuality is where you can POTENTIALLY feel attraction to anyone, or anything; regardless of gender, age, race, species, being alive or dead, being an unthinking object, or even actually existing altogether. Pansexuals can (though that doesn't guarantee they will) feel sexual attraction to literally anything, so they base any relationships off of personality above all else. I, personally, have gotten sexually aroused from a damned brick wall before... I don't even know how that happened; i was calling the wall sexy every time I saw it as a joke and then at some point it was actually sexy...? TL;DR: Pansexuals are Bisexuals who happen to have far too fucking many fetishes, which eventually renders sexual arousal meaningless to them because said arousal can pretty much happen at will by that point. Bisexual means you're into men and women. Pansexual means you're into trannies and stuff too. pansexuals can also be attracted to inanimate objects, and animals. pansexual is basically "if i like something, i can fuck it" good rule of thumb is "a pansexual can be attracted to a pan" Pansexual is a special snowflake term that originally meant they'll fuck anything, but they made it about loving people who who they are and not their looks or gender. In other words, they're bisexual, but aren't superficial and everyone needs to know they're not superficial because they're Vagan Crossfitting Vapers. Bisexual is a term to describe people who like either sexes, male or female. Not sure how they feel about transgendered people, but I'm pretty sure most of DTF if that's their fetish, the same way straight people can be cool with trannies. (Dudes who became chicks with fuctioning vags, not chicks with dicks in this case. That's another fetish altogether. ) #326 -
anon (15 hours ago) [-] What you asked about the spectrum for bisexuals is this, even if they like a feminine guy or a masculine woman it doesn't make them more "more pansexual." If they have girl parts and identify as a girl regardless of what they look like they're still considered girls. Like butch lesbians. Still women but society might consider them to be more masculine in appearance due to short hair or clothing choices. However, there are obviously bisexuals who are into women more or men more, and thats fine to have a preference and still falls under the category of bisexual. Additionally there are bisexuals who might have interest in people who identify as neither sex or both or are androgynous in their identity and sometimes their parts (like they don't have tits but they have a vagina) but are not trans, but if im not mistaken I believe those people might just call themselves sexually fluid, or insist that it doesn't matter what label they use because if you were trying to get to know them and asked they shouldn't have a problem explaining it. And if they do and you haven't maybe asked too soon (upon encounter) then they can fuck themselves and clearly need to calm down. Bisexuals are attracted to both men and women. Pansexuals are attracted to people regardless of sex. So yes they are the same thing. pansexuals can be attracted to inanimate objects, and animals, as well though #320 -
anon (15 hours ago) [-] Bi-sexual here to explain what I know. Okay, generally bisexuals are into females and males only, and it doesn't matter if the girl is boyish or a tom boy, she identifies as a girl and has all the equipment that goes with that. Same even if they're with feminine boys. Pansexuals are different because pansexuality has more to do with being attracted mostly to someone's personality, like their attractiveness is definitely second on the list of importance. Additionally because of the focus on personality, they usually have no problem being attracted to trans people or androgynous people or any other kind of people. Not to say that they can't experience attraction because everyone is different so maybe they also find androgynous people really hot. So their deal is they're down with everyone that they're attracted to regardless of gender identity because it's not really important to attractiveness to them. #319 -
moroboss (16 hours ago) [-] **moroboss used "*roll picture*"** **moroboss rolled image** As much as i see people saying pan= attracted to anyone/thing to my knowledge it was more that pan is attracted to a personality or a person rather than a gender e.g. not " i'm attracted to blond women" but rather "i'm attracted to (enter personality type) people" or "i'm attracted to people i have things in common with" or some shit i dunno If you like more specific terms for tomboys and cuntboys you can use androgionus which describe a human being with mixed gender feature (It was defined by Plato trought one of his stories, here you can find more -> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgyny ) Yhea anyway I would say that I'm some kind of pansexual since I think that I can be romantically attracted by everyone (humans), yet I'm more into females or androginous females/males, so I think pansexuality referred to sexual arousement should be use only if you really would like to fuck anyone, anything else you can refer to it as tastes. #297 -
hikakiller (16 hours ago) [-] It's not hard. Bisexual is male or female, if you're attracted to them. If you're attracted to a girl that looks a little guyish, you wouldn't force yourself not to be attracted, and it doesn't make you gay. Most bisexuals I know have a preference, men or women. Pansexuals can just be attracted to anyone, regardless of whether they're straight, bi, gay, transsexual, etc. Source: I dated a few pansexual girls, so i guess that counts? #298 -
hikakiller (16 hours ago) [-] In addition, I'd like to state that pansexual doesn't mean they find everyone attractive. That's crazy. But, they are capable of finding everyone attractive. #296 -
anon (16 hours ago) [-] I think the distinction is stupid. Transgender is such a catch all word, then bisexual can include people who are romantically attracted to other people in ways than their sex. Pansexuell don´t care and would in theory like to try anything out. Bi-sexuel People feel attracted to both male and female sex. pansexuals are POTENTIALLY attracted to everyone. someone who's straight won't ever be attracted to anyone if they have the wrong sexual features, ja feel? Bisexuality is along the same lines...I'm bi and I couldn't tell you for sure, I don't know anyone who says they're pansexual. #249 -
Kingsly (18 hours ago) [-] From my understanding, bisexuals are [generally] into men and women, trans individuals included. Pansexuals are also this, but need the modifier to feel special. Tumblr has fights between pan saying bi are trans exclusionary because they don't fit the standard male/female dichotomy, and bi saying pan is exclusionary because they don't count trans people as their preferred gender. Personally I call myself bi and am generally interested in men, women, and traps. Cboys aren't really what I'm looking for. There's also a much deeper thing here of what specifically defines a trap vs trans etc. but I won't go into that here unless someone wishes to read it. #185 -
anon (20 hours ago) [-] I always though of pansexual as more of a 'If I want to have sex with it I will,' not as a 'I will fuck everything.' #148 -
themightylute (20 hours ago) [-] Well Freud Said that a Pansexual was some one attracted not to everyone, but to everyTHING. According ta him Pansexuals are attracted to everything from the queen of england to a tree covered in moss. Apparantly Freud came up with the term pansexuals so i'd guess he'd know So thats the difference. Way ta go Freud, you mad mad lunatic #213 -
dislikinator (19 hours ago) [-] It doesn't even have to stop with objects. A problematic one, for example, is people who are sexually attracted to violence. I see pansexuality as some sort of 'hyper-fetishism'. It's a fetish to the point where the human is no longer required in the fetish to fully turn you on. For instance, someone can have a mermaid fetish, but if that mermaid can be 100% fish and that person just desires to fuck a large tuna, it's pansexuality. Correct me if I'm wrong on this one. pansexuals are attracted to literally anything and everything. freudian pansexuals, i.e. the actual pansexual Pansexuals do not have their personal attraction limited by any category. They can potentially find transgendered or cisgendered people attractive of either sex. Bisexuals do not find transgendered people sexually attractive, but can still be attracted to either sex as long as that's the gender they identify as. #120 -
anon (20 hours ago) [-] While I get you are trying to be informative, please don't use the term cisgendered like it is an actual thing. It doesn't fuckin exist, and it gives the idea that being trans is just as regular as being "cis". "Cis" in fact stands for "normal", as in for "almost everyone feels like the sex he or she born as, being trans is not the norm". The rest of the comment may be right, I'm neither of those, thanks for your input. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender Idk why you're so upset that a technical term exists beyond "normal", but just so you know it is a real thing and not just invented by modern progressives, even if it is the only option that isn't technically a mental illness. #181 -
anon (20 hours ago) [-] Because people often form their definitions of words by context rather than vocabulary. "Cisgendered" and "Cissexual" and whatever wikipedia refers to them as is a certain way your body's functions don't deviate from that of a healthy human being. Refer to >>#171 Constantly using the word in the manner it's used right now makes it sound as something negative. I have yet to find the word "Cis" used outside of context of Star Wars, and hate towards the healthy standard (see Cis Scum). The word can exist, but the way it spreads is toxic at it's current state. #208 -
subtard (19 hours ago) [-] Cis isn't a prefix for normal. It's a prefix for meaning "same" or "same side". It's actually a chemistry prefix for pointing out if two ligands are on the same side of a molecule or across (trans) from each other. So the etymology of cisgender comes form the fact that your mental gender and physical sex are the same, not that they're normal or healthy. As for using cisgendered as an insult, I don't think it really happens outside of small corners of the internet filled with 15 year old girls. I'm sure they'll realize they're wrong once they grow out of the phase that they're in. We all said stupid stuff when we were young. | ||
| #90 - Hey that makes sense to me. I was getting gender and sexuality… [+] (1 new reply) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +4 |
| #344 -
anon (15 hours ago) [-] I'm really excited that you just wanted to learn... Thanks, man, for being so open-minded. | ||
| #88 - IM A NOSE! | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +1 |
| #87 - Nice try, but everyone knows you're actually a skeleton. [+] (1 new reply) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| well i mean i have a skeleton. but only my skull is out. I'm like shadow Demon from Dota 2. | ||
| #86 - I think it might get too complicated for important things that… [+] (4 new replies) | 21 hours ago on The Facts | 0 |
| | ||
| #83 - Like at least 5 times daily. | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +2 |
| #82 - I thought the times had changed. | 21 hours ago on The Facts | +1 |
| #45 - Thanks anon. [+] (5 new replies) | 23 hours ago on The Facts | +23 |
| | ||
| #140 - close but no | 01/11/2016 on the more you know | 0 |
| #67 - **sequel used "*roll 1, cah answer*"** **sequel rolls Splug… | 01/11/2016 on 5/7 dragons | +1 |
| #218 - I've also read the #1 comment on the content on imgur. | 01/11/2016 on scotty | +1 |
| #112 - I heard it's easier than Chinese. | 01/11/2016 on /a/non on learning Japanese | 0 |
| #8 - Okay, but did you check the description? [+] (1 new reply) | 01/11/2016 on The Facts | +5 |
| | ||
| #7 - Damn I was hoping people would be smart to check the DESCRIPTI… [+] (12 new replies) | 01/11/2016 on The Facts | +213 |
| #431 -
anon (10 hours ago) [-] Then ask a question, don't post something that seems like it's made to shit all over stuff that's personally important to people like people love doing here on FJ. I mean, stop and consider how you'd feel if something that was vitally important to you and colored/affected every thing in your life was consistently laughed at, brushed aside, dismissed, or attacked angrily by caustic persons without any experience in the subject? Then you get online, and find something posted that looks similar to this, only it seems to be denouncing that thing that's at the core of all of your problems and understandings and beliefs. All internet anonymity pretense aside, can you honestly say you wouldn't feel offended or put out? FJ loves doing attacking and insulting people who don't fit in with their views of normality, so it's hard to see it as anything else with content like that, Sequel. If I meet anyone who calls themself a Trigender Pyrofox, I would like them to show me the THIRD gender, and where the tail is. Then I'll take them around back and beat them so hard they can have all the time in the world to enjoy their "artistic liberty" as they enjoy a coma. #93 -
BruceLeroy (21 hours ago) [-] Sex is the biological male or female, as determined by the presence of xx or xy chromosome pairs. There are actual chromosomal disorders, such as Turners syndrome, where there are missing or extra chromosomes, and this can create an androgynous appearance. Generally, though, the word 'sex' refers to a binary male or female. Gender refers to socially constructed ideas about what sorts of behaviors represent a certain gender. In our society, we have two genders, masculine and feminine, and have expectations for each gender. For example, sports are supposedly masculine, while dolls are feminine, even though there is nothing biologically preventing a boy from liking dolls, and vice versa. These are just ideas created by society over many generations, and change along with other cultural and social changes. Gender IS a social construct, sex is biological. Humans have two sexes, but some cultures do have more than two genders. Some plains Indians back in the day had a third gender, which consisted of biological males who chose to take on the roles of females, and who could even be married to other men, yet they would not be considered to be 'men pretending to be women', there is just a third category or "gender" for that. I'm not defending all the people who are attention whoring by claiming fake genders, but I must defend the position that gender fluidity does exist, even though some people misuse that concept. I hope this clears up something (though I probably made it more confusing). I have a BA in Anthropology from NC State, so I"m not just speaking out my ass here. Quick note for future posts: if you really want somebody to read something, people are more likely to read a stickied comment than a description. THANKS FOR POINTING THIS OUT IN THE COMMENTS. i DON'T READ THE DESCRIPTION EVER. woops caps... I'm not retyping shit. #16 -
notwalkingwaffles (01/11/2016) [-] **notwalkingwaffles used "*roll picture*"** **notwalkingwaffles rolled image** Pic related. It's my gender. There's a reason you need a thorough mental checkup before you get a sex change operation (at least in Denmark). It's because if you cannot distinguish between fantasy and reality, it's called a psychosis, and only in a very few cases is the best treatment to adapt reality to fantasy. Transgendered people who genuinely believe they are a(n) [X] trapped in the body of a [Y] are literally mentally ill. I believe, however, that most of them just want to feel special and progressive - the desire for the latter without a doubt being a manifestation of how much information is available to them about people who did great things. I say it depends on who. I know a girl and a guy who both went into sex change. From kindergarten we knew the girls really wasn't a girl, by the way she was, by the way she saw herself, etc.. As for the guy, he was in is mid 20s when he decided to change sex. it was that or the rope, he couldn't live anymore with the feeling of being a girl but seing a guy every time he looked in the mirror | ||
| #14 - Then clearly I was hacked. but on a more seriou… | 01/11/2016 on Finland | 0 |
| #12 - I should say the same thing. [+] (2 new replies) | 01/11/2016 on Finland | 0 |
| #99 - You do if you ever get near a SJW. | 01/10/2016 on Handy guide for everyone.. | 0 |
| #22 - Ah, you seek ********** . | 01/10/2016 on Super hero sex lives | +49 |
| #14 - Picture | 01/10/2016 on my average day. | +2 |
| #72 - People who have been harassed by people sarcastically calling … [+] (1 new reply) | 01/10/2016 on social experiment | 0 |
| Even if that happened, she doesn't automatically gain the right to be hateful to others. I've also had shit like that said to me, but I got over it because I'm an adult. :/ | ||
| #53 - Picture | 01/09/2016 on Unreal Disrespect | +7 |
| #60 - >> #9 **** me. | 01/09/2016 on could be me | +1 |
| #59 - Wait.. that would mean she's a criminal. >>#9 [+] (1 new reply) | 01/09/2016 on could be me | 0 |
| #58 - Yes. | 01/09/2016 on could be me | +3 |
| #1308 - Picture | 01/09/2016 on MEMES falling from the sky! | +4 |
Latest users (1): sequel, anonymous(3).
Anonymous comments allowed.
58 comments displayed.
You should really get back to reposting polandball
The front page feels awkward without it
The front page feels awkward without it
it was not in the slightest of ass because literally everything you know is lie
#25 to #24
-
sequel ONLINE (01/02/2014) [-]
**sequel rolled a random image posted in comment #7237725 at Safe For Work Random Board **
Something along the lines of this. That's why it's gone.
Something along the lines of this. That's why it's gone.
Do you just post the poland ball comics because you enjoy looking at the ********** going on in the comments? You're kinda like a dementor feeding on pain, despair and red thumbs...
#17 to #16
-
sequel ONLINE (11/24/2013) [-]
I think you mean annoyance, nationalism and green thumbs.
But seriously the only ********** I saw on the Polandball comics that I posted were the ones about the War of 1812.
I like hearing the comments about the comics, people sometimes say some pretty informative stuff on these comics like how exaggerated or spot on these can be, additional info or otherwise silly stuff.
But seriously the only ********** I saw on the Polandball comics that I posted were the ones about the War of 1812.
I like hearing the comments about the comics, people sometimes say some pretty informative stuff on these comics like how exaggerated or spot on these can be, additional info or otherwise silly stuff.
Don't take me seriously it's cool that you are posting these.
You're right about the informative stuff which people post. It makes you realize just how much of a multicultural
community funnyjunk really is. It's interesting to see the different viewpoints and what people have been taught in their countries. How an American may be taught one thing about the revolutionary war and a Brit another.
You're right about the informative stuff which people post. It makes you realize just how much of a multicultural
community funnyjunk really is. It's interesting to see the different viewpoints and what people have been taught in their countries. How an American may be taught one thing about the revolutionary war and a Brit another.
#19 to #18
-
sequel ONLINE (11/24/2013) [-]
Oh alright, just that I'm beginning to notice the growing about of people getting tired of Polandball and I have to agree that there has been a lot of Polandball on the frontpage (always at least 1 - 2 at anytime).
At first I started posting them because I found a lot that was found no where in FunnyJunk, and the Polandball channel was pretty empty. (I wanted to make a giant storage of at least decent Polandball comics that is separated from the crappy ones.) Since others are posting them as well, I mainly post the comics to distract myself a little.
At first I started posting them because I found a lot that was found no where in FunnyJunk, and the Polandball channel was pretty empty. (I wanted to make a giant storage of at least decent Polandball comics that is separated from the crappy ones.) Since others are posting them as well, I mainly post the comics to distract myself a little.
**sequel rolled a random comment #4503926 posted by donor at Click an item and pick it up ** :
wat.
**donor rolls 4,875**
wat.
