Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #9221 on Comments
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Send mail to scio
Invite scio to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 115 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress:
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
What people say about scio
At the party
Homosexuality is unnatural!!!
tumblr after dark
Curtis, Get down...
Hot stud makes...
The Next Stage Of...
you really ought...
When they ask why...
latest user's comments
- The snake
I wish i was creative
- The problem isn't that homosexuality in itself is a slippery s…
Probably because pedophilia
as you said
is morally wrong. Its just fearmongering and it is entirely a slipper slope fallacy.
Anyone who says "First gay marriage!? Whats next?? Pedophilia!?" is a bumbling retard
im not implying you said that, I'm inventing an imaginary dopey person
to play devil's advocate
then what about legalizing poligamy?
Polygamy in itself, I don't have a problem with. But pretty much every culture that has polygamy also has the whole "wives are not people. They are the husband's property," thing going. So then instead of a group of people consensually married to one another and loving one another in some combination, it's just some guy with eight wife-slaves
Because western society demonizes the practice and the societies that don't are extremely patriarchal in nature. Here we have laws to protect freedoms and prevent domestic abuse, here we have rights to separation and divorce, here we enforce laws against rape or violence. It's the reason Islam is a deadly force in the Middle East but so often a completely innert belief in the West. If consenting adults choose to have such a consenting relationship - that's their business and we simply need to adjust our system to account for and prevent abuse of such relationships.
The law is not a moral arbitrator, it exists to minimize suffering and keep order.
What do you mean it is morally wrong? They were born that way!!!!! We shouldn't discriminate against pedophiles that don't have a choice in who they are attracted to!
You are right in only one regard, the argument that gay marriage caused this is wrong. However, what caused this is to say that gay people don't have a choice in who they are attracted to. You can reduce them to their urges and animalistic desires. However, I will subscribe to choice every time because THEY ARE FUCKING HUMAN. Gay marriage is just a side effect of the main cause of this blurring of the lines. That is to say this, gay marriage doesn't add or detract from the problem. It is just there.
gay people are generally two consentent adults
pedophiles are sexually attracted to children who aren't even sexually mature, not mature enough to be sexually attracted by an adult. it is a one sided thing
What are you arguing? Are you arguing that gay people don't have a choice in who they are attracted to? You make no sense and your information is irrelevant to my argument. My argument is simple, pedophiles have a choice to be pedophiles. That simple.
oh, i just wanted to say why it's morally wrong. I see your point, but pedophiles are indeed generally born this way, it depends on the person really but sometime they give in to their desire, and sometime they don't.
So, you are saying they don't have a choice to be pedophiles?
No. The only choice they have is whether they act upon it and, if you actually read about what those articles and studies want, the choice to seek treatement.
So, you are saying they have NO CHOICE in who they are attracted to at all? Sounds kind of like an absolute.
I have a lot of choice in who I am attracted to. I find people who smoke unattractive, I find traps unattractive despite the fact that there are traps that look a lot like women, I find certain religious girls unattractive, I find unattractive girls attractive because they are good people, and I do not believe that gay people, and pedophiles don't have a choice. If I have a choice, they do too. Now, it might take them awhile to change their preferences. (in much the same way that a unattractive girl becomes attractive, it takes time) However, it is human to fight against your evil nature or nature in general. We all have that evil human nature and we fight against it on a daily basis.
They don't, that's an absolute truth. Just like you don't choose your attractions. Just as a depressive doesn't choose to fall. Just as a schizo does't choose to tweak. Just like one doesn't choose to be smart or dumb. Choice implies the concious ability for one to change, one that is distinctly absent in such subconcious events.
Do you make a conscious effort to say "damn, that girl is sexy?" No - she simply is to you. Your brain takes in aspects of her and, due to emergent behaviors of evolution, determines attraction based on those traits which produces pros or cons to survival.
Due to how much of social animals humans are, it's not merely physical traits but also include cultural ideals.
You don't choose to find people who smoke unattractive - you simply do. You don't find traps attractive because you simply don't. If you see a hideous woman you don't think about it first, there's an immediate reaction. It wasn't a concious choice, your brain is simply using evolutionary pressures and life experience to try to lead you to the best possible (and viable) mate so you can reproduce and be happy - and by extension live a long life. If you say you chose those things you are straight up lying or have simply deceived yourself into some delusion of freedom.
Pedophiles have a mental illness, their brain is physically not functioning correct and they are getting signals where not appropriate. But these unconcious faults do not define them as people - the actions one takes do. And the vast majority of these are honestly good people victimized by their biology (and/or just think that loli isn't an exhibition of pedophilia).
Hahaha, telling me I don't have a choice in who I am attracted to. Who made you god? Going around telling other people what they are attracted to, yep 10/10 fagboy. And are you seriously comparing schizophrenia to being a pedophile? I don't think pedophiles see things that aren't there. Even than, a schizophrenic still has the choice to do things based on what they see and hear. It is just that they are seeing and hearing things that aren't there. Also, just an fyi fuckboy, the reason I don't find girls who smoke attractive isn't because they don't look good, but because of their life choices. If that isn't a choice tell me what is fuckboy?
The fuck are you on about? I didn't tell you what you're attracted to, I explained how attraction works. It's not, but tangentially, even related to the conscious mind. That's not how the psychology of attraction works plain and simple.
You aren't even trying to contribute to discussion - you're simply throwing around ad-hominems and reducia ad absurdum. Schizophrenia is a disfunction of a certain manner and pedophilia a disfunction of another - but they both remain disfunctions none-the-less. And just as you said, a schizophrenic has choice as to how he behaves (and with therapy may overcome to some degree), a pedophile has choice as to how he handles himself after the attractions begin (and with therapy may overcome to some degree).
The only point of some contention you've made is that you are unattracted to women who smoke not based on physical attractions but on you're repulse of their lifestyle. But even that is a poor point, since there's a distinct difference between such a rational attraction. You
a women's legs enticing. You
to stay away from smokers because of the rational consequences it entails. One is a compulsion of the subconscious, the other is a choice of rational nature.
- ***emoji roll: **
Roll all pepes
- Welcome to the wheel of narratives. Todays crime invo…
Ohio state attacker
Your right and the left does stupid like no one else
- It used to be that way. We are celebrating it in Europe now, too
Meanwhile in Leafland
- Link seems to be broken. Try this instead:
unpopular gay puffin
129 Ft Drop in Newport Harbor
-When he only got one battleship left and you know exactly where it is
- It's funny how people always used this exact picture when tras…
id go gay for him.
You know, the fact that he went on Joe Rogan and instead of apologizing made up some bullshit to justify himself and even try to make himself the good guy - that is my issue. He actually used femnazi/SJW tactics there.
When the Trump tape came out and Trump actually apologized to the people - that was OK. People make mistakes all the time. You, me, everyone here, but there are people who will apologize and be humble and then there is Milo.
Another thing, that's personal for me, is that a gym is a no hate zone. Anybody making fun of someone there is a fucking bitch in my eyes.
People love to say "he is a provocateur, he does offensive stuff all the time!" but that's just not the point. Just like a someone using satire, they use their methods to make fun of something to draw attention to issues and open conversations regarding those.
When Milo made his little poll "feminism vs cancer" - which comes up like 50 times per interview - he wasn't a jerk for the sake of offending.
He drew attention to the fact that something must be wrong when people - even half jokingly - prefer cancer over feminism. Then he starts with logic and reason to debate this with feminists, how they making up shit, how it hurts people (he did the same thing for being overweight) and why it results in a decline of feminist.
That Milo, I really, really liked. The Milo that offends people, so that they start thinking.
What Milo did there (in the picture )was nothing like that. He humiliated somebody - the same kind of person he wanted to encourage to better himself - without any use for the person. He was a jerk because certain people who made him popular like him just being an asshole and posted it on twitter.
You can like him or not - that's your opinion but in my eyes he became a jerk with such a gigantic ego that he would never admit anything wrong and stopped doing what he did - offending but then debate with reasonable and true arguments.
Hey, if a person you thought was a good guy suddenly kicks a puppy to death you sort of re-evaluate your opinion of him. It wouldn't matter if someone was the greatest philanthropist in the world if he also happened to be a pedophile. People usually say we are judged by our actions but that is not quite right. We are judged by our
actions, no our best ones.
Right. But Milo didn't kick a puppy, he made fun of a fat person in an inappropriate location. If that's his worst action, then there isn't much to complain about.
- It was a reference to the Benghazi scandal Clinton was in…
Xathuc Wictorg Lomotsi
Lol. Right over my head. I'm a little drunk sorry
Show Comments (10)