I don't like neck tattoos. It's the the same for me, when a woman gets a tattoo on her foot.

cause they are ugly and its on of the best parts of a woman

tbh almost every part of a woman is considered erotic. i think its much to do with what you have experienced with women in your life. feet are quite common nothing wrong with that

wow i guess you won this debate with your sharp wit

You two:

When I see a woman with neck tattoos, I become a master debater.

Welcome to FJ, where we often act exactly like the people we hate. But it's cool when we do it cause we're right.

straight bros don't hug each other.

As much as I love Armstrong, that scene's infinitely more homoerotic.

I can say the same thing to you.

I'm not holding it against you if you like it. I'm just sticking by my personal opinion that the video is autistic.

I can say the same thing to you.

You can't really prove anything in this world.

I was referring to Jesus, the apostles, Jeremiah and other prophets and historical figures.

All just a bunch of dudes who wanted people to live more selfless, noble lives. Their existence or alleged goodness doesn't really point to Christian mythology being in any way factual.

You can't really prove anything in this world.

nah my wife can handle that

But he only fights you when you do the wrong thing

Hey, they attacked ME. It was self-defense. 300 or so cases of self-defense. I'm sure it'll pass in court.

the only way to fight sans is on the genocide route, the only way to get on the genocide route is to go out of your way to kill shit including papyrus who doesn't even attack you in the route.

I always wondered what would happen if when on the Pacifist run he asks you if you want to fight him at the stand near the telescope and you try to attack him.

He startled me, so I stabbed him.

The character wasn't a furry and he didn't run through the game like sonic the hedgehog

You're right, the sprite is fixed, because it's a game and Toby Fox is not programming the game equivalent of the holo-deck. But, Frisk can pretty much be whatever you want. Who cares.

In any case, Frisk dodges bone lasers and infinite storms of javelins. I mean, the little shit's pretty fast.

I'm not holding it against you if you like it. I'm just sticking by my personal opinion that the video is autistic.

I can say the same thing to you.

Now that I agree with.
The actor was awesome and fit the role perfectly. It was the writing for the character I enjoyed less. (story-wise. His lines were also awesome)

Yeah. As said it was a weak argument at best.
Either way, a good movie despite my thoughts on Loki.
Not a... bad villain, just not as godly good as most fans makes him out to be.

I think he was awesome in part because Tom Hiddleston is a really great actor for the part.

Now that I agree with.
The actor was awesome and fit the role perfectly. It was the writing for the character I enjoyed less. (story-wise. His lines were also awesome)

I doubt the Hulk could defeat Thor, at least in the movie-verse.
They are shown, to some extend, to be pretty equal in battle.
Hulk got the brute strength.
Thor can fly and has his hammer as well as strategy rather than mindless charging.
I can't argue against the drop pod cage, other than saying we have no evidence it could kill Loki or Thor. All we got was Nick saying it could kill Loki, which might have been a bluff at best. Weak argument, but the best I could come up with.

Thor was pretty eager to get out of there and not find out, so let's assume he would have at least been brutally maimed or crippled, if not dead.

Yeah. As said it was a weak argument at best.
Either way, a good movie despite my thoughts on Loki.
Not a... bad villain, just not as godly good as most fans makes him out to be.

I think he was awesome in part because Tom Hiddleston is a really great actor for the part.

Now that I agree with.
The actor was awesome and fit the role perfectly. It was the writing for the character I enjoyed less. (story-wise. His lines were also awesome)

But they weren't even close to killing each other. Yes. Iron Man and Thor duked it out for a few minutes without any major injuries and Iron Man and Captain America had a bit of a cock-fight, but that was the most of it all. He did more damage to SHIELD than he did to the Avengers.
At worst he was, partly, the cause of the Hulk being released, but even then none of the avengers came close to dying from that little episode.

I guess it might just be me, who was not really impressed by Loki personally. I honestly thought Ultron was a much bigger threat to the world than Loki came close to.

Well, yeah, it was the sequel. They had to step up their game.

But, Thor was nearly killed by the drop pod cage, and might have been killed by Hulk if things had gone worse.

All in all, it was a pretty good plan. But, family movie, heroes gotta win. It's understandable.

I doubt the Hulk could defeat Thor, at least in the movie-verse.
They are shown, to some extend, to be pretty equal in battle.
Hulk got the brute strength.
Thor can fly and has his hammer as well as strategy rather than mindless charging.
I can't argue against the drop pod cage, other than saying we have no evidence it could kill Loki or Thor. All we got was Nick saying it could kill Loki, which might have been a bluff at best. Weak argument, but the best I could come up with.

Thor was pretty eager to get out of there and not find out, so let's assume he would have at least been brutally maimed or crippled, if not dead.

Yeah. As said it was a weak argument at best.
Either way, a good movie despite my thoughts on Loki.
Not a... bad villain, just not as godly good as most fans makes him out to be.

I think he was awesome in part because Tom Hiddleston is a really great actor for the part.

Now that I agree with.
The actor was awesome and fit the role perfectly. It was the writing for the character I enjoyed less. (story-wise. His lines were also awesome)