Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

schmitty    

Rank #908 on Comments
schmitty Avatar Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Offline
Send mail to schmitty Block schmitty Invite schmitty to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:12/19/2009
Last Login:7/10/2014
Location:Florida
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#908
Highest Content Rank:#5051
Highest Comment Rank:#638
Content Thumbs: 1341 total,  1667 ,  326
Comment Thumbs: 21875 total,  26817 ,  4942
Content Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 9.1% (91/1000)
Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:1
Content Views:71201
Times Content Favorited:98 times
Total Comments Made:5225
FJ Points:22778
Favorite Tags: game (6) | the (5) | You (5) | Just (4) | Lost (4)

latest user's comments

#89 - I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say some…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" 0
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#70 - You should look up Daniel Tosh. 05/26/2014 on Fuck Linda! 0
#3 - Doesn't make me wrong or you not a ****** .  [+] (1 new reply) 05/26/2014 on mayoroftownsville's profile 0
#4 - mayoroftownsville (05/26/2014) [-]
Whatever you say, buddy
#1 - ****** .  [+] (3 new replies) 05/26/2014 on mayoroftownsville's profile 0
#2 - mayoroftownsville (05/26/2014) [-]
I thoroughly disagree with your stance throughout that entire argument. That's what we have the thumbs for, bucko.
User avatar #3 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Doesn't make me wrong or you not a faggot.
#4 - mayoroftownsville (05/26/2014) [-]
Whatever you say, buddy
#50 - Picture 05/26/2014 on schmitty's profile 0
#33 - I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possibl…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" -4
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#30 - klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +1
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
#29 - I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's n…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" -5
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#24 - I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besid…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" -1
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#22 - Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you c…  [+] (11 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +1
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#18 - I'm not arguing that Harry didn't ask to be put in Gryffindor,…  [+] (17 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +2
#75 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Coming up with a "dumb ass theory" is pretty much the foundation of modern science, if you hate people trying to understand phemona and creating a hypothesis explaining these, then i cant really agree with you. The mere fact that the theory exists is proof that there was adequate "proof", or factors supporting its birth. It is within the scope of reason that a hat capable of speach, in a world with magic, is able to sense a persons desires, and/or have a conversation with the person within their head. The point of a theory is that you try to either prove or disprove it untill it is commonly acepted or debunked.
User avatar #89 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say something is possible, with no evidence to say it is, just because there's no evidence saying it's not possible isn't at all part of the scientific method. I understand how the scientific method works, but this isn't it.
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#27 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is no evidence against the fact, and it could very well be true. It probably isn't, but could be. And here you are saying it is impossible because it isn't proven.
User avatar #20 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't mentioned, however it isn't not mentioned either. I agree that theory is stupid though
User avatar #22 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you can assume its true, that's a logical fallacy. A lack of evidence to something doesn't prove the contrary. If Rowling wanted to imply that everyone in Gryffindor asked to be placed there she would've made it much more overt than a simple conversation between Harry and the sorting hat.
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#15 - How is it implied at all? He's actually speaking to him and al…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +19
User avatar #65 - choobe (05/26/2014) [-]
Well, in the book you actually don't heard what the hat said to the others. You only heard what house they got in.

I know I know, the book people are annoying when discussing the movie, but in this case, I think it's legit, since the books are "the canon".
User avatar #16 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
In the books it said the that the sorting hats voice appeared in his mind, books trump movie. Also, calm the fuck down, don't get so worked up on some minor details
User avatar #18 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not arguing that Harry didn't ask to be put in Gryffindor, that's a known fact. The others, however, didn't ask. They were placed there. I'm not worked up, I just hate when people obsessed with something come up with these dumb ass theories with no real evidence. In neither the book, nor the movies, did Ron or Hermione ask to be put in Gryffindor. To assume otherwise just to satisfy some bizarre fantasy is just ridiculous.
#75 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Coming up with a "dumb ass theory" is pretty much the foundation of modern science, if you hate people trying to understand phemona and creating a hypothesis explaining these, then i cant really agree with you. The mere fact that the theory exists is proof that there was adequate "proof", or factors supporting its birth. It is within the scope of reason that a hat capable of speach, in a world with magic, is able to sense a persons desires, and/or have a conversation with the person within their head. The point of a theory is that you try to either prove or disprove it untill it is commonly acepted or debunked.
User avatar #89 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say something is possible, with no evidence to say it is, just because there's no evidence saying it's not possible isn't at all part of the scientific method. I understand how the scientific method works, but this isn't it.
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#27 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is no evidence against the fact, and it could very well be true. It probably isn't, but could be. And here you are saying it is impossible because it isn't proven.
User avatar #20 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't mentioned, however it isn't not mentioned either. I agree that theory is stupid though
User avatar #22 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you can assume its true, that's a logical fallacy. A lack of evidence to something doesn't prove the contrary. If Rowling wanted to imply that everyone in Gryffindor asked to be placed there she would've made it much more overt than a simple conversation between Harry and the sorting hat.
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#12 - The exact scenes where Ron and Hermione put the sorting hat on…  [+] (22 new replies) 05/26/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +4
User avatar #13 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's heavily implied that Harry's conversation with the Sorting hat only happened within his mind. Therefore, since we never heard the conversations or lack thereof with the Sorting hat, we have no idea if the requested to be in Gryffindor or not
#15 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
How is it implied at all? He's actually speaking to him and also the sorting hat barely even touched, if at all, Hermione's head before putting her in Gryffindor. When the hat was placed on Ron's head it said "A Weasley, I know just what to do with you. Gryffindor!" How the hell could that possibly be misconstrued as asking to be put in Gryffindor? Are you just trolling or are you actually that retarded?
User avatar #65 - choobe (05/26/2014) [-]
Well, in the book you actually don't heard what the hat said to the others. You only heard what house they got in.

I know I know, the book people are annoying when discussing the movie, but in this case, I think it's legit, since the books are "the canon".
User avatar #16 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
In the books it said the that the sorting hats voice appeared in his mind, books trump movie. Also, calm the fuck down, don't get so worked up on some minor details
User avatar #18 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not arguing that Harry didn't ask to be put in Gryffindor, that's a known fact. The others, however, didn't ask. They were placed there. I'm not worked up, I just hate when people obsessed with something come up with these dumb ass theories with no real evidence. In neither the book, nor the movies, did Ron or Hermione ask to be put in Gryffindor. To assume otherwise just to satisfy some bizarre fantasy is just ridiculous.
#75 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Coming up with a "dumb ass theory" is pretty much the foundation of modern science, if you hate people trying to understand phemona and creating a hypothesis explaining these, then i cant really agree with you. The mere fact that the theory exists is proof that there was adequate "proof", or factors supporting its birth. It is within the scope of reason that a hat capable of speach, in a world with magic, is able to sense a persons desires, and/or have a conversation with the person within their head. The point of a theory is that you try to either prove or disprove it untill it is commonly acepted or debunked.
User avatar #89 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say something is possible, with no evidence to say it is, just because there's no evidence saying it's not possible isn't at all part of the scientific method. I understand how the scientific method works, but this isn't it.
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#27 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is no evidence against the fact, and it could very well be true. It probably isn't, but could be. And here you are saying it is impossible because it isn't proven.
User avatar #20 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't mentioned, however it isn't not mentioned either. I agree that theory is stupid though
User avatar #22 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you can assume its true, that's a logical fallacy. A lack of evidence to something doesn't prove the contrary. If Rowling wanted to imply that everyone in Gryffindor asked to be placed there she would've made it much more overt than a simple conversation between Harry and the sorting hat.
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#10 - Considering I've all of the books, including the first one mor…  [+] (25 new replies) 05/25/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +2
#11 - jimthesquirrelking (05/25/2014) [-]
It has never been shown or written about the specific instances where Ron or Hermoine put on the sorting hat. They could have talked to it and no one would be the wiser
#72 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
that's not true, I am pretty sure than Hermione confirmed that the hat wanted to put her in Ravenclaw in the 5th book. She came up with the coin trick to get people to know when the next DA meeting would be, and a Ravenclaw guy says since she is so smart, she should be put in Ravenclaw, and she reply that the hat WANTED to put her in Ravenclaw. There might be some facts I mix up, but I am most certainly sure that she at some point says that.
#12 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
The exact scenes where Ron and Hermione put the sorting hat on are both shown in the movie, and detailed in the book.
User avatar #13 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's heavily implied that Harry's conversation with the Sorting hat only happened within his mind. Therefore, since we never heard the conversations or lack thereof with the Sorting hat, we have no idea if the requested to be in Gryffindor or not
#15 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
How is it implied at all? He's actually speaking to him and also the sorting hat barely even touched, if at all, Hermione's head before putting her in Gryffindor. When the hat was placed on Ron's head it said "A Weasley, I know just what to do with you. Gryffindor!" How the hell could that possibly be misconstrued as asking to be put in Gryffindor? Are you just trolling or are you actually that retarded?
User avatar #65 - choobe (05/26/2014) [-]
Well, in the book you actually don't heard what the hat said to the others. You only heard what house they got in.

I know I know, the book people are annoying when discussing the movie, but in this case, I think it's legit, since the books are "the canon".
User avatar #16 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
In the books it said the that the sorting hats voice appeared in his mind, books trump movie. Also, calm the fuck down, don't get so worked up on some minor details
User avatar #18 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not arguing that Harry didn't ask to be put in Gryffindor, that's a known fact. The others, however, didn't ask. They were placed there. I'm not worked up, I just hate when people obsessed with something come up with these dumb ass theories with no real evidence. In neither the book, nor the movies, did Ron or Hermione ask to be put in Gryffindor. To assume otherwise just to satisfy some bizarre fantasy is just ridiculous.
#75 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Coming up with a "dumb ass theory" is pretty much the foundation of modern science, if you hate people trying to understand phemona and creating a hypothesis explaining these, then i cant really agree with you. The mere fact that the theory exists is proof that there was adequate "proof", or factors supporting its birth. It is within the scope of reason that a hat capable of speach, in a world with magic, is able to sense a persons desires, and/or have a conversation with the person within their head. The point of a theory is that you try to either prove or disprove it untill it is commonly acepted or debunked.
User avatar #89 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say something is possible, with no evidence to say it is, just because there's no evidence saying it's not possible isn't at all part of the scientific method. I understand how the scientific method works, but this isn't it.
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#27 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is no evidence against the fact, and it could very well be true. It probably isn't, but could be. And here you are saying it is impossible because it isn't proven.
User avatar #20 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't mentioned, however it isn't not mentioned either. I agree that theory is stupid though
User avatar #22 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you can assume its true, that's a logical fallacy. A lack of evidence to something doesn't prove the contrary. If Rowling wanted to imply that everyone in Gryffindor asked to be placed there she would've made it much more overt than a simple conversation between Harry and the sorting hat.
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#8 - Except for the fact that neither Hermione nor Ron asked to be …  [+] (28 new replies) 05/25/2014 on Yet, no one said "get out" +9
#34 - lazragoon (05/26/2014) [-]
schmitty jimthesquirrelking

To prove everyone wrong:

JK Rowling released on Pottermore that Hermione was the closest to a hatstall anyone has ever been since McGonnagal and Flitwick. It spent a long time deciding between Ravenclaw, and Gryffindor.

If Hermione had asked to be in Gryffindor, it would react the same way it did with Harry
"lol k"

Ron, I'm pretty sure, was sorted into Gryff immediately, or with short delay. This was on account of his brothers long history of Gryffindor. Ron both subconsciously and consciously wanted to live up to his brothers, and the hat placed him there.

All of this is subjective, as we don't know the true powers or knowledge of the hat. It reads our thoughts and memories, and probably takes those and makes the decision, not just him randomly screaming one of four houses.
User avatar #9 - jimthesquirrelking (05/25/2014) [-]
you have no way of knowing that
User avatar #10 - schmitty (05/25/2014) [-]
Considering I've all of the books, including the first one more than once, and have also seen all of the movies more than once, yes, I believe I do have a way of knowing that.
#11 - jimthesquirrelking (05/25/2014) [-]
It has never been shown or written about the specific instances where Ron or Hermoine put on the sorting hat. They could have talked to it and no one would be the wiser
#72 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
that's not true, I am pretty sure than Hermione confirmed that the hat wanted to put her in Ravenclaw in the 5th book. She came up with the coin trick to get people to know when the next DA meeting would be, and a Ravenclaw guy says since she is so smart, she should be put in Ravenclaw, and she reply that the hat WANTED to put her in Ravenclaw. There might be some facts I mix up, but I am most certainly sure that she at some point says that.
#12 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
The exact scenes where Ron and Hermione put the sorting hat on are both shown in the movie, and detailed in the book.
User avatar #13 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's heavily implied that Harry's conversation with the Sorting hat only happened within his mind. Therefore, since we never heard the conversations or lack thereof with the Sorting hat, we have no idea if the requested to be in Gryffindor or not
#15 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
How is it implied at all? He's actually speaking to him and also the sorting hat barely even touched, if at all, Hermione's head before putting her in Gryffindor. When the hat was placed on Ron's head it said "A Weasley, I know just what to do with you. Gryffindor!" How the hell could that possibly be misconstrued as asking to be put in Gryffindor? Are you just trolling or are you actually that retarded?
User avatar #65 - choobe (05/26/2014) [-]
Well, in the book you actually don't heard what the hat said to the others. You only heard what house they got in.

I know I know, the book people are annoying when discussing the movie, but in this case, I think it's legit, since the books are "the canon".
User avatar #16 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
In the books it said the that the sorting hats voice appeared in his mind, books trump movie. Also, calm the fuck down, don't get so worked up on some minor details
User avatar #18 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not arguing that Harry didn't ask to be put in Gryffindor, that's a known fact. The others, however, didn't ask. They were placed there. I'm not worked up, I just hate when people obsessed with something come up with these dumb ass theories with no real evidence. In neither the book, nor the movies, did Ron or Hermione ask to be put in Gryffindor. To assume otherwise just to satisfy some bizarre fantasy is just ridiculous.
#75 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Coming up with a "dumb ass theory" is pretty much the foundation of modern science, if you hate people trying to understand phemona and creating a hypothesis explaining these, then i cant really agree with you. The mere fact that the theory exists is proof that there was adequate "proof", or factors supporting its birth. It is within the scope of reason that a hat capable of speach, in a world with magic, is able to sense a persons desires, and/or have a conversation with the person within their head. The point of a theory is that you try to either prove or disprove it untill it is commonly acepted or debunked.
User avatar #89 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm not saying all theories are stupid. But to simply say something is possible, with no evidence to say it is, just because there's no evidence saying it's not possible isn't at all part of the scientific method. I understand how the scientific method works, but this isn't it.
#90 - lebrew (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah i might have generalized my arguement a bit, but i presonally think there was sufficient background to come up with this theory, especially considering how misplaced Hermione is, her being the epitome of ravenclaw knowitallism.
#27 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is no evidence against the fact, and it could very well be true. It probably isn't, but could be. And here you are saying it is impossible because it isn't proven.
User avatar #20 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't mentioned, however it isn't not mentioned either. I agree that theory is stupid though
User avatar #22 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
Just because something isn't mentioned doesn't mean that you can assume its true, that's a logical fallacy. A lack of evidence to something doesn't prove the contrary. If Rowling wanted to imply that everyone in Gryffindor asked to be placed there she would've made it much more overt than a simple conversation between Harry and the sorting hat.
User avatar #23 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It's a theory, and i never said I believe its true, i was just disagreeing with your assertion that its impossible
User avatar #25 - klaes (05/26/2014) [-]
To be fair, it was never said that Harry didn't want a kinky anal threesome with Ron and Voldemort, so that isn't impossible either I guess.
User avatar #26 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
That's significantly less likely though
User avatar #30 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
klaes' theory holds just as much value as yours.
User avatar #32 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
It isn't my theory and fuck yeah it could have happened, who honestly gives a shit?
User avatar #24 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it didn't happen. Besides, you points for them having asked the sorting hat to be in Gryffindor were completely ridiculous and unfounded. One conversation a conspiracy does not make.
User avatar #28 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
I'm saying it was possible, nothing more, not even that it was likely or that this theory isn't anything more than Tumblr bullshit.
User avatar #29 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't saying it was impossible before, but I am now. It's not possible that they asked, otherwise it would have been in the books. Ron didn't need to ask because the hat put him in Gryffindor because he's a Weasley and Hermione was put in there before the sorting hat even had time to be on her head. Hermione didn't have time, nor the will, nor the desire to ask to be in Gryffindor and Ron had no need to ask to be in Gryffindor. As I said earlier, it's a logical fallacy to assume that just because you think there isn't evidence explicitly stating something didn't happen that it must have happened. i have evidence to support my claim, whereas all you have is the desire to say that it's possible that it happened and the logical fallacy of assuming that because the books don't say it didn't happen it clearly must have.
User avatar #31 - jimthesquirrelking (05/26/2014) [-]
Your evidence is paltry, who is to say that the sorting hat doesn't communicate very rapidly possibly allowing a conversation with Hermoine, when does it mention Ron's heritage in the books. Quit using the phrase logical fallacy to describe arguments yo don't agree with. and for the last damn time I AM NOT SAYING IT HAPPENED, you're the one who has his head wedged firmly up his ass that anything not stated in the books is completely and utterly impossible. In conclusion, I'm tired of this, you are stupid, goodbye and congrats on your internet victory
#33 - schmitty (05/26/2014) [-]
I know you're not saying it happened, you're that it's possible, and it's not. It's a fictional story, therefore the only evidence of anything happening or not happening is going to be in the books. It didn't say that it happened or that it was possible that it could have happened, thus we can know that it didn't happen, nor is it possible to have happened. Me using the phrase "logical fallacy" and disagreeing with your "case" are not the same thing. I disagree with your viewpoint AND it's a logical fallacy. You're the dip shit who thinks that anything is possible as long nothing exists in the universe to say that it didn't happen or isn't possible. The books also don't say that Harry didn't go back in tie and masturbate all over his parents dead bodies, cumming a glorious amount of semen all over the room before prancing around while waving rainbow ribbons before going further back in time to stop Voldemort from killing his parents only to shoot them both in the head with an AK-47 either. But I highly doubt you would argue that it's possible that he did do it.
#84 - anonymous (05/26/2014) [-]
But do the books tell whenever anyone takes a shit?
Just because it's not mentioned, doesn't mean that it didn't happen. There are MANY books that have "hidden" things within them.
#23 - Sounds like you have a sexy family. 05/25/2014 on respect my cultures 0
#5 - Comment deleted 05/24/2014 on Horry Sheet! +6
#2 - Picture 05/24/2014 on Ooops +1
#30 - Just another reason he should kill himself. 05/23/2014 on ylyl thread. 0
#1 - How is that a math fail? What if they are intending to say tha… 05/23/2014 on math fail 0
#9 - Mirrors are silver. They're pieces of glass with a highly refl… 05/22/2014 on What color are mirrors? 0
#8 - Well considering its and American comic about an alien that li…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/22/2014 on Superman is a jerk +28
#31 - dontread (05/23/2014) [-]
meh i think its cause his whole schlick is "Protector of the World"

While we got people like Spiderman and batman and flash and GreenLantern etc.
with their cities and areas.

I mean green lanterns govern space too and they even showed that in that one movie that came out a while ago

Superman? Always shown only being in America you know.

Least IronMan went out of the country sometimes in his movies.
#44 - angelious (05/23/2014) [-]
in comics supermans daily routine is flying around the world and space helping everybody and everything.


i think i might be able to find a scanlation of a miniseries comic where they show supermans daily life where he first saves people from bank robbery helps suicidal kids,helps people trapped inside a mountain in canada,helps russian astronauts whose space shuttle malfunctioned and generally just goes around saving people.


also should be noted that while supes lives in america most of his big time opponents are by far more worse than what any other superhero faces(maybe with the exception of green lantern,spectre,phantom stranger,constantine and doctor fate..) and actually pose threat not only to earth but to the entire universe
#90 - dontread (05/24/2014) [-]
im talking about the movies

Im aware superman does all that stuff in the comics and more

he often goes into space as well

But im talking about the movies.
#92 - angelious (05/24/2014) [-]
in the movie he does fly around the world aswell.


and im pretty sure zod threatherned the entire earth. its just based on america since thats where superman lives
#7 - We've had 2, yes, but what about a 3rd Reich? 05/22/2014 on The North +1
#18 - Actually a woman's period ego is probably more fragile. Ask a … 05/22/2014 on Reddit -3
#13 - ...something happened to it. 05/21/2014 on Perfect apple pie +9
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2050

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #54 to #53 - schmitty (06/25/2014) [-]
Who the **** are you? ****** .
User avatar #55 to #54 - soundofwinter (06/25/2014) [-]
You thumbed my content that said

"If you thumb this I will write **** you on your profile"
#51 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
That guy was right. You're a scumbag.
#46 - drhard (06/10/2013) [-]
You got proven wrong in the most epic way, so you went back and thumbed down every comment there, how cute.
User avatar #47 to #46 - schmitty (06/10/2013) [-]
What makes you think I went and thumbed everything down? Why would I thumb down the people who weren't even talking to me? That just makes no sense. And I still stand by what I said about the Lumia being a better phone. You claimed you can do all of those things with the S4, but will you? If you're not going to do all of those things then what's the point of the device being able to do it?
User avatar #48 to #47 - drhard (06/10/2013) [-]
You were the only person that had a notification to take them back to that comment string, therefore the only one that will.

And ya, I will do all those things, so with pretty much anyone, thats why they get smart phones. The GS4 is superior to the 920 is every single way, hardware, software, and any other way.
User avatar #45 - theschmidt (06/01/2013) [-]
My last name is "Schmidt"

It doesn't bother me when I see your name...
User avatar #41 - Syncronicity (09/24/2012) [-]
My last name is Schmitt.
It bothers me when I see your name...
User avatar #42 to #41 - schmitty (09/24/2012) [-]
Do you see my name around FJ a lot?
User avatar #44 to #43 - schmitty (09/27/2012) [-]
My last name is Smith, but schmitty was my nickname in high school on the football team.
#39 - anonymous (05/01/2012) [-]
Thank you for knowing grammar. You and I know grammar very well. I thumbed up all those comments for you.
User avatar #40 to #39 - schmitty (05/02/2012) [-]
Thank you, its good to know not everyone on FJ is a complete idiot.
#29 - SonicTeam (03/06/2012) [-]
Thanks for the add Schmitty.
So whatever you wanna do to me, go for it.
User avatar #30 to #29 - schmitty (03/06/2012) [-]
just a quick question, why does your profile say youre a male but your description calls you a female?
User avatar #31 to #30 - SonicTeam (03/07/2012) [-]
I am a guy. The description is just a story.
#32 to #31 - schmitty (03/07/2012) [-]
aww man, you got me all excited and everything lol
User avatar #33 to #32 - SonicTeam (03/07/2012) [-]
Lets just say if I was a girl, what were your intentions with me?
User avatar #34 to #33 - schmitty (03/07/2012) [-]
well, piercings are a pretty big turn on for me so that would be awesome if a girl had her vag pierced.
User avatar #35 to #34 - SonicTeam (03/07/2012) [-]
HAHAHA! Sorry to let you down bro. I'm sure you'll find that girl on the NSFW page
User avatar #36 to #35 - schmitty (03/07/2012) [-]
every now and then one pops up lol but it sucks because im on a government computer and government internet so NSFW on here is pretty much the only porn i can access lol
User avatar #37 to #36 - SonicTeam (03/07/2012) [-]
LOL what are you doing looking at NSFW porn on a Gov't computer?
#38 to #37 - schmitty (03/07/2012) [-]
whatever the **** i want
Comment has been flagged   Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply
#26 - tehlulzbringer (12/18/2011) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 12/29/2013
User avatar #28 to #26 - schmitty (12/19/2011) [-]
THAT. IS. AWESOME.
#27 to #26 - tehlulzbringer (12/18/2011) [-]
Also this
Also this
User avatar #20 - suomijoe (10/19/2011) [-]
SAME LAST NAME OMG
User avatar #21 to #20 - schmitty (10/19/2011) [-]
smith? its a pretty common name
User avatar #22 to #21 - suomijoe (10/19/2011) [-]
but its german :D
User avatar #23 to #22 - schmitty (10/19/2011) [-]
smith? how is that german? i think you mean schmidt.
User avatar #24 to #23 - suomijoe (10/19/2011) [-]
I mean Schmitty because that is my last name, which is the German Smith
User avatar #25 to #24 - schmitty (10/19/2011) [-]
oh ok, makes sense now
User avatar #12 - uppercasename (05/14/2011) [-]
dont worry , i thumbed up 50 cent
User avatar #16 to #15 - uppercasename (05/15/2011) [-]
ur black right?
User avatar #17 to #16 - schmitty (05/15/2011) [-]
nope.
User avatar #18 to #17 - uppercasename (05/15/2011) [-]
so how u hear about lolipopp lol
User avatar #19 to #18 - schmitty (05/15/2011) [-]
i like rap lol
#4 - bobJML (03/17/2011) [-]
Hey.
Hey.
User avatar #13 to #4 - uppercasename (05/14/2011) [-]
do the CREP
User avatar #14 to #13 - bobJML (05/14/2011) [-]
NO!
User avatar #5 to #4 - schmitty (03/17/2011) [-]
hi
User avatar #6 to #5 - bobJML (03/17/2011) [-]
What's up?
User avatar #7 to #6 - schmitty (03/17/2011) [-]
chillin. do i know you?
#8 to #7 - bobJML (03/17/2011) [-]
...no...
User avatar #9 to #8 - schmitty (03/18/2011) [-]
oh ok, just wondering
User avatar #10 to #9 - bobJML (03/18/2011) [-]
I mean now you do.
User avatar #11 to #10 - schmitty (03/18/2011) [-]
well yea, NOW i do.
User avatar #1 - SeanHere (06/19/2010) [-]
haha my teacher was an old man who lectured us the whole period then gave us the work like 4 mins b4 the bell rang, i just said **** it i aint doin it, wat a dumb old man.
User avatar #2 to #1 - schmitty (06/19/2010) [-]
yea, my teachers were always annoying old women. they would have read some gay ass story in our literature books and then have us answer the questions for hw, i never did them. either one.
User avatar #3 to #2 - SeanHere (06/19/2010) [-]
jeez teachers are retarded some times, my best teacher was for health, he just made us laugh the whole period, it was like stand up comedy every day, best class ever. wish i could take it again =/
 Friends (0)