I want to hear what you think

That picture just converted me, thanks Choobe!

Another ad-hominem attack and a non argument

Respond to my points and questions, stop avoiding them

I want to hear what you think

That picture just converted me, thanks Choobe!

It's not like someone sat down one day and said "species evolve over time, makes sense, it's logical" and that's it. There's a lot of evidence for evolution. Evolution doesn't hinge on "you can't disprove it!", it's just that everytime we find fossils, they support evolution, and you need only one thing that doesn't make sense to show up to disprove it like if we found fully evolved homo sapien remains on the time of our ancestors. .

And if the new theory with as much evidence as evolution, or showed that there was more to it than evolution, then yes, I would. But it would have some evidence backing it, not just "it could work like this, nothing says it didn't work like this".

Telling someone they're salty is not an argument

And twisting history to make Atheists look just as bad is also not an argument.

Atheists did not perform any cruel acts in history in the name of atheism, religious people commit cruel acts in the name of their religion, its simple as that

How is faith against all odds a good thing? Ever heard of the atheist 'community'? Family as in one man one woman? Are you a fundamental christian?

The theory argument is saying that evolution isn't valid because its just a 'theory' and is 'the same as believing in God'. Its common to be said from Religious people, and is not a real argument

Would you be so kind as to respond to everything I said? I really want to hear what you have to say about these things

TL;DR Ad-hominem attacks and non arguments make you look bad

Another ad-hominem attack and a non argument

Respond to my points and questions, stop avoiding them

I want to hear what you think

That picture just converted me, thanks Choobe!

Evolution is not "just a theory". Just because it isn't as readily appearent to the everyday man as gravity doesn't mean it's not proven. We placed birds on islands with a different food source and their beaks changed, we got dogs from wolves, we guided the creation of dog breeds. Evolution is logical, the most fit for survival survives and procreates, and small traits over time add up and create new species. Also; we have tons of fossils, just not a fully complete set, and no data has ever gone against what evolution predicts.

I know some evolution deniers say that they believe in "micro-evolution", like different dog breeds, but not "macro-evolution" where species chane, but macroevolution is the logical consequence of microevolution over time.

It's not like someone sat down one day and said "species evolve over time, makes sense, it's logical" and that's it. There's a lot of evidence for evolution. Evolution doesn't hinge on "you can't disprove it!", it's just that everytime we find fossils, they support evolution, and you need only one thing that doesn't make sense to show up to disprove it like if we found fully evolved homo sapien remains on the time of our ancestors. .

And if the new theory with as much evidence as evolution, or showed that there was more to it than evolution, then yes, I would. But it would have some evidence backing it, not just "it could work like this, nothing says it didn't work like this".

Got any real proof that we shove our disbelief down peoples throats? All those Christian schools indoctrinating children and the Christian run society must be NOTHING compared to what us evil atheists do

Oh and the "theory" argument, how original. Do you know the definition of a Scientific theory?

Telling someone they're salty is not an argument

And twisting history to make Atheists look just as bad is also not an argument.

Atheists did not perform any cruel acts in history in the name of atheism, religious people commit cruel acts in the name of their religion, its simple as that

How is faith against all odds a good thing? Ever heard of the atheist 'community'? Family as in one man one woman? Are you a fundamental christian?

The theory argument is saying that evolution isn't valid because its just a 'theory' and is 'the same as believing in God'. Its common to be said from Religious people, and is not a real argument

Would you be so kind as to respond to everything I said? I really want to hear what you have to say about these things

TL;DR Ad-hominem attacks and non arguments make you look bad

Another ad-hominem attack and a non argument

Respond to my points and questions, stop avoiding them

I want to hear what you think

That picture just converted me, thanks Choobe!

Well no, shitting on an atheist is like shitting on someone who believes in gravity

Where did the stereotype that atheists were loud and assertive about their "beliefs" come from?

Evolution is not "just a theory". Just because it isn't as readily appearent to the everyday man as gravity doesn't mean it's not proven. We placed birds on islands with a different food source and their beaks changed, we got dogs from wolves, we guided the creation of dog breeds. Evolution is logical, the most fit for survival survives and procreates, and small traits over time add up and create new species. Also; we have tons of fossils, just not a fully complete set, and no data has ever gone against what evolution predicts.

I know some evolution deniers say that they believe in "micro-evolution", like different dog breeds, but not "macro-evolution" where species chane, but macroevolution is the logical consequence of microevolution over time.

It's not like someone sat down one day and said "species evolve over time, makes sense, it's logical" and that's it. There's a lot of evidence for evolution. Evolution doesn't hinge on "you can't disprove it!", it's just that everytime we find fossils, they support evolution, and you need only one thing that doesn't make sense to show up to disprove it like if we found fully evolved homo sapien remains on the time of our ancestors. .

And if the new theory with as much evidence as evolution, or showed that there was more to it than evolution, then yes, I would. But it would have some evidence backing it, not just "it could work like this, nothing says it didn't work like this".

Got any real proof that we shove our disbelief down peoples throats? All those Christian schools indoctrinating children and the Christian run society must be NOTHING compared to what us evil atheists do

Oh and the "theory" argument, how original. Do you know the definition of a Scientific theory?

Telling someone they're salty is not an argument

And twisting history to make Atheists look just as bad is also not an argument.

Atheists did not perform any cruel acts in history in the name of atheism, religious people commit cruel acts in the name of their religion, its simple as that

How is faith against all odds a good thing? Ever heard of the atheist 'community'? Family as in one man one woman? Are you a fundamental christian?

The theory argument is saying that evolution isn't valid because its just a 'theory' and is 'the same as believing in God'. Its common to be said from Religious people, and is not a real argument

Would you be so kind as to respond to everything I said? I really want to hear what you have to say about these things

TL;DR Ad-hominem attacks and non arguments make you look bad

Another ad-hominem attack and a non argument

Respond to my points and questions, stop avoiding them

I want to hear what you think

That picture just converted me, thanks Choobe!

I live and work here so when I see this I can't help feeling shameful.

I dunno man, I like GR. I go to Ferris there, and it's nice.