you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

for you!

you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

for you!

you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

Fluttershy dump?

Fluttershy dump.

for you!

you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

Eeeyup

ohhhhh, and thank you for the RD pics

here have this, that face earned it

Fluttershy dump?

Fluttershy dump.

for you!

you see that [-] symbol at the top of the thread anon? click it you wont have to see any of it

Fucking homophobes.

Weird. I've never heard any of those before lol.

yeah, for awhile here in Tennessee there was a law that said it was illegal to have gay anal sex, but straight anal was legal

Fucking homophobes.

Oh! So if I spend hours in my mother's basement to play a single level, I can hang with the hardcore gamers just like you? Oh boy!

And again you are confusing 'hard' and 'old' as synonyms for 'good'.

But I'll give you this: games that are difficult tend to keep people on longer, mostly for their own pride. I've beaten Dead Space 1 & 2 on Impossible and Zealot, respectively. I spent days getting A Monument To All Your Sins on Reach. I collected all 100 feathers on Assassin's Creed II. I've put in time and effort, sorry for not being born in '93 or '94, sorry for being too well off to have a Playstation 2 then an Xbox 360 instead of an NES then SNES.

Enough arguing over how much effort each game should take, because when it comes down to it? We have different reasons to play, but in the end, that's what we're doing. Playing.

ahhh, I love the gentle bashing in each of your comments.
whats even better you actual mention some hardcore games finally, i said nothing of age with difficulty in my last comment so again goes without basis.
and agreed we play different games for different reasons. it's not like I said no new games can be hardcore games because i have played some good hard hardcore games on newer systems. It's just you were claiming that; one game you haven't even touched, one you've played probably little of, and one which you've probably only played one of the series, were not hard core. Which I disagree with.

Like U.N Squadron?

:3

Pew pew pew.
-Mega Crush-
-Fwoooosh-

I never actually played that game, being that our SNES was the least used of our systems. So we had fewer games for it. but from what I've seen of it, It looks like a fun game.

:3

>implying you aren't 12 years old
Oh, and I guess you are the sole person on this planet who can judge whether or not a game is 'hardcore'.
Some games are hard, which is why they have difficulty levels, because not everyone wants to spend 7 hours on a single level, because they want to have fun with the game they paid for, not obsess over how hard it is just so they can have hollow bragging rights.
And then some games are hard to beat solely because they are shitty, not because of the player's lack of skill.

I'm not saying I'm the only one who can judge, but your definition of hardcore was that of today's youth shallow and lacking. Sorry not quite 12 attending university this year. To call a game "hardcore" is an amazing right for a game to get, so only the best, hard games should get it. if you want "fun" games hardcore isn't the place to look. Hardcore is entirely about bragging rights and HARD work. if you don't want to put in the time you can't hang with hardcore gamers.

Oh! So if I spend hours in my mother's basement to play a single level, I can hang with the hardcore gamers just like you? Oh boy!

And again you are confusing 'hard' and 'old' as synonyms for 'good'.

But I'll give you this: games that are difficult tend to keep people on longer, mostly for their own pride. I've beaten Dead Space 1 & 2 on Impossible and Zealot, respectively. I spent days getting A Monument To All Your Sins on Reach. I collected all 100 feathers on Assassin's Creed II. I've put in time and effort, sorry for not being born in '93 or '94, sorry for being too well off to have a Playstation 2 then an Xbox 360 instead of an NES then SNES.

Enough arguing over how much effort each game should take, because when it comes down to it? We have different reasons to play, but in the end, that's what we're doing. Playing.

ahhh, I love the gentle bashing in each of your comments.
whats even better you actual mention some hardcore games finally, i said nothing of age with difficulty in my last comment so again goes without basis.
and agreed we play different games for different reasons. it's not like I said no new games can be hardcore games because i have played some good hard hardcore games on newer systems. It's just you were claiming that; one game you haven't even touched, one you've played probably little of, and one which you've probably only played one of the series, were not hard core. Which I disagree with.

Like U.N Squadron?

:3

Pew pew pew.
-Mega Crush-
-Fwoooosh-

I never actually played that game, being that our SNES was the least used of our systems. So we had fewer games for it. but from what I've seen of it, It looks like a fun game.

:3

Yeah, I played the old mario games, not the legend of zelda ones. Wasn't that hard, especially when I found the warp pipe, breezed through the last level (sarcasm), and kicked Bowser's ass to Kingdom Come.
Is this the part where you tell me I can't talk about games because I haven't played Legend of Zelda 2? Like I said, old doesn't mean good.
And let's define 'Hardcore', shall we? Hardcore is, in my book, a game that one plays for hours on end, not necessarily because it's hard. games nowadays can be called hardcore because people want to level up.

Hardcore in "hardcore gamers" and "hardcore games" meant different things. These are console games. Why are you looking for your definition of hardcore games in them? Stay on your PC.

NO, now's the time i say you can't say what games are genuinely hard,
and by your logic of hardcore every semipopular MMO that exists is "hardcore"

the title of true "hardcore" goes to games that you spend hours on, struggle, and ultimately beat it, or get beat by it.
not the newfag "hardcore" of today's youth

>implying you aren't 12 years old
Oh, and I guess you are the sole person on this planet who can judge whether or not a game is 'hardcore'.
Some games are hard, which is why they have difficulty levels, because not everyone wants to spend 7 hours on a single level, because they want to have fun with the game they paid for, not obsess over how hard it is just so they can have hollow bragging rights.
And then some games are hard to beat solely because they are shitty, not because of the player's lack of skill.

I'm not saying I'm the only one who can judge, but your definition of hardcore was that of today's youth shallow and lacking. Sorry not quite 12 attending university this year. To call a game "hardcore" is an amazing right for a game to get, so only the best, hard games should get it. if you want "fun" games hardcore isn't the place to look. Hardcore is entirely about bragging rights and HARD work. if you don't want to put in the time you can't hang with hardcore gamers.

Oh! So if I spend hours in my mother's basement to play a single level, I can hang with the hardcore gamers just like you? Oh boy!

And again you are confusing 'hard' and 'old' as synonyms for 'good'.

But I'll give you this: games that are difficult tend to keep people on longer, mostly for their own pride. I've beaten Dead Space 1 & 2 on Impossible and Zealot, respectively. I spent days getting A Monument To All Your Sins on Reach. I collected all 100 feathers on Assassin's Creed II. I've put in time and effort, sorry for not being born in '93 or '94, sorry for being too well off to have a Playstation 2 then an Xbox 360 instead of an NES then SNES.

Enough arguing over how much effort each game should take, because when it comes down to it? We have different reasons to play, but in the end, that's what we're doing. Playing.

ahhh, I love the gentle bashing in each of your comments.
whats even better you actual mention some hardcore games finally, i said nothing of age with difficulty in my last comment so again goes without basis.
and agreed we play different games for different reasons. it's not like I said no new games can be hardcore games because i have played some good hard hardcore games on newer systems. It's just you were claiming that; one game you haven't even touched, one you've played probably little of, and one which you've probably only played one of the series, were not hard core. Which I disagree with.

Like U.N Squadron?

:3

Pew pew pew.
-Mega Crush-
-Fwoooosh-

I never actually played that game, being that our SNES was the least used of our systems. So we had fewer games for it. but from what I've seen of it, It looks like a fun game.

:3

>Genuinely difficult
Bullshit, Mario games aren't difficult, neither is Legend of Zelda. And being made first makes them hardcore? If that's the case, then ET for the NES and Superman 64 for the N64 were hardcore games too.
Just because it's old school doesn't mean it's good.

have you played The Legend of Zelda, The legend of zelda 2, or the old marios games?
probably not seeing as Zelda 2 is literally one of the hardest console games in existence

Yeah, I played the old mario games, not the legend of zelda ones. Wasn't that hard, especially when I found the warp pipe, breezed through the last level (sarcasm), and kicked Bowser's ass to Kingdom Come.
Is this the part where you tell me I can't talk about games because I haven't played Legend of Zelda 2? Like I said, old doesn't mean good.
And let's define 'Hardcore', shall we? Hardcore is, in my book, a game that one plays for hours on end, not necessarily because it's hard. games nowadays can be called hardcore because people want to level up.

Hardcore in "hardcore gamers" and "hardcore games" meant different things. These are console games. Why are you looking for your definition of hardcore games in them? Stay on your PC.

NO, now's the time i say you can't say what games are genuinely hard,
and by your logic of hardcore every semipopular MMO that exists is "hardcore"

the title of true "hardcore" goes to games that you spend hours on, struggle, and ultimately beat it, or get beat by it.
not the newfag "hardcore" of today's youth

>implying you aren't 12 years old
Oh, and I guess you are the sole person on this planet who can judge whether or not a game is 'hardcore'.
Some games are hard, which is why they have difficulty levels, because not everyone wants to spend 7 hours on a single level, because they want to have fun with the game they paid for, not obsess over how hard it is just so they can have hollow bragging rights.
And then some games are hard to beat solely because they are shitty, not because of the player's lack of skill.

I'm not saying I'm the only one who can judge, but your definition of hardcore was that of today's youth shallow and lacking. Sorry not quite 12 attending university this year. To call a game "hardcore" is an amazing right for a game to get, so only the best, hard games should get it. if you want "fun" games hardcore isn't the place to look. Hardcore is entirely about bragging rights and HARD work. if you don't want to put in the time you can't hang with hardcore gamers.

Oh! So if I spend hours in my mother's basement to play a single level, I can hang with the hardcore gamers just like you? Oh boy!

And again you are confusing 'hard' and 'old' as synonyms for 'good'.

But I'll give you this: games that are difficult tend to keep people on longer, mostly for their own pride. I've beaten Dead Space 1 & 2 on Impossible and Zealot, respectively. I spent days getting A Monument To All Your Sins on Reach. I collected all 100 feathers on Assassin's Creed II. I've put in time and effort, sorry for not being born in '93 or '94, sorry for being too well off to have a Playstation 2 then an Xbox 360 instead of an NES then SNES.

Enough arguing over how much effort each game should take, because when it comes down to it? We have different reasons to play, but in the end, that's what we're doing. Playing.

ahhh, I love the gentle bashing in each of your comments.
whats even better you actual mention some hardcore games finally, i said nothing of age with difficulty in my last comment so again goes without basis.
and agreed we play different games for different reasons. it's not like I said no new games can be hardcore games because i have played some good hard hardcore games on newer systems. It's just you were claiming that; one game you haven't even touched, one you've played probably little of, and one which you've probably only played one of the series, were not hard core. Which I disagree with.

Like U.N Squadron?

:3

Pew pew pew.
-Mega Crush-
-Fwoooosh-

I never actually played that game, being that our SNES was the least used of our systems. So we had fewer games for it. but from what I've seen of it, It looks like a fun game.

:3

>implying liking a shooter means being a cod fanboy
>implying Mario and LoZ are hardcore games

well Metroid isn't technically a shooter its a platformer, whereas Metroid prime is a shooter series.

and yes Old School games that were genuinely difficult and made before the title of "hardcore games" are generally considered Hardcore games.

>Genuinely difficult
Bullshit, Mario games aren't difficult, neither is Legend of Zelda. And being made first makes them hardcore? If that's the case, then ET for the NES and Superman 64 for the N64 were hardcore games too.
Just because it's old school doesn't mean it's good.

have you played The Legend of Zelda, The legend of zelda 2, or the old marios games?
probably not seeing as Zelda 2 is literally one of the hardest console games in existence

Yeah, I played the old mario games, not the legend of zelda ones. Wasn't that hard, especially when I found the warp pipe, breezed through the last level (sarcasm), and kicked Bowser's ass to Kingdom Come.
Is this the part where you tell me I can't talk about games because I haven't played Legend of Zelda 2? Like I said, old doesn't mean good.
And let's define 'Hardcore', shall we? Hardcore is, in my book, a game that one plays for hours on end, not necessarily because it's hard. games nowadays can be called hardcore because people want to level up.

Hardcore in "hardcore gamers" and "hardcore games" meant different things. These are console games. Why are you looking for your definition of hardcore games in them? Stay on your PC.

NO, now's the time i say you can't say what games are genuinely hard,
and by your logic of hardcore every semipopular MMO that exists is "hardcore"

the title of true "hardcore" goes to games that you spend hours on, struggle, and ultimately beat it, or get beat by it.
not the newfag "hardcore" of today's youth

>implying you aren't 12 years old
Oh, and I guess you are the sole person on this planet who can judge whether or not a game is 'hardcore'.
Some games are hard, which is why they have difficulty levels, because not everyone wants to spend 7 hours on a single level, because they want to have fun with the game they paid for, not obsess over how hard it is just so they can have hollow bragging rights.
And then some games are hard to beat solely because they are shitty, not because of the player's lack of skill.

I'm not saying I'm the only one who can judge, but your definition of hardcore was that of today's youth shallow and lacking. Sorry not quite 12 attending university this year. To call a game "hardcore" is an amazing right for a game to get, so only the best, hard games should get it. if you want "fun" games hardcore isn't the place to look. Hardcore is entirely about bragging rights and HARD work. if you don't want to put in the time you can't hang with hardcore gamers.

Oh! So if I spend hours in my mother's basement to play a single level, I can hang with the hardcore gamers just like you? Oh boy!

And again you are confusing 'hard' and 'old' as synonyms for 'good'.

But I'll give you this: games that are difficult tend to keep people on longer, mostly for their own pride. I've beaten Dead Space 1 & 2 on Impossible and Zealot, respectively. I spent days getting A Monument To All Your Sins on Reach. I collected all 100 feathers on Assassin's Creed II. I've put in time and effort, sorry for not being born in '93 or '94, sorry for being too well off to have a Playstation 2 then an Xbox 360 instead of an NES then SNES.

Enough arguing over how much effort each game should take, because when it comes down to it? We have different reasons to play, but in the end, that's what we're doing. Playing.

ahhh, I love the gentle bashing in each of your comments.
whats even better you actual mention some hardcore games finally, i said nothing of age with difficulty in my last comment so again goes without basis.
and agreed we play different games for different reasons. it's not like I said no new games can be hardcore games because i have played some good hard hardcore games on newer systems. It's just you were claiming that; one game you haven't even touched, one you've played probably little of, and one which you've probably only played one of the series, were not hard core. Which I disagree with.

Like U.N Squadron?

:3

Pew pew pew.
-Mega Crush-
-Fwoooosh-

I never actually played that game, being that our SNES was the least used of our systems. So we had fewer games for it. but from what I've seen of it, It looks like a fun game.

:3

Peek a boo!!!!!!!!!!

why thank you!