x
Click to expand

rupok

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/14/2012
Last Login:3/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4269
Comment Ranking:#7610
Highest Content Rank:#1007
Highest Comment Rank:#3985
Content Thumbs: 5629 total,  6447 ,  818
Comment Thumbs: 1774 total,  2207 ,  433
Content Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 148 Content: Faptastic → Level 149 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:260033
Times Content Favorited:242 times
Total Comments Made:467
FJ Points:6423
Favorite Tags: Anime (2) | avatar (2) | legend of korra (2)

latest user's comments

#12 - its pokemon its never hard  [+] (4 new replies) 11/30/2014 on Gotta rek´em all +3
User avatar #16 - makotoitou (11/30/2014) [-]
Platnium nuzlocke
#45 - rupok (11/30/2014) [-]
those are custom rules buddy, I don't think he was talking about that.
User avatar #43 - jubbehhh (11/30/2014) [-]
Except that's not pokemon, that's an outside set of rules to play by.
You think that's hard?
Play the Faggote Challenge
1. Pick starter
2. Catch the first pokemon you find, name them Faggot
3. Only use False Swipe throughout entire game
4. Lose badly because Faggot
was a joke not an insult sorry love you bbckz
#14 - auesis (11/30/2014) [-]
Tell that to my Metapod.
#8 - Comment deleted 11/29/2014 on May He Not Be Forgotten 0
#4 - These ***** are annoying as **** , th… 11/29/2014 on Youtube Comments Make Me Laugh +12
#13 - so you are gay I am assuming?  [+] (2 new replies) 11/29/2014 on Description +3
User avatar #15 - iliekmennow (11/29/2014) [-]
no I'm a girl
#18 - hammythehamster (11/29/2014) [-]
rupok's FW
#6 - And his house got blown up and his friends are always targeted… 11/29/2014 on oh stark +8
#37 - Dude you should have gotten the most replies.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/28/2014 on Beeing a chick on funnyjunk +1
#103 - acocobar (11/28/2014) [-]
#1 - he forgot his pants tho.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/27/2014 on On my way 0
#2 - mxmagnus (11/27/2014) [-]
he doesn't need those to fuck your bitch.
#5 - boringdumbname (11/28/2014) [-]
#REKT
#18 - many of the character names are tied with american celebrities…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/27/2014 on Embarrassed Princess +17
#37 - tehavatar (11/28/2014) [-]
those are all black people
#45 - fabiform (11/28/2014) [-]
Nothing gets by you does it?
#17 - Comment deleted 11/27/2014 on Embarrassed Princess 0
#15 - zoe quins "game" was not a game it was a ****… 11/27/2014 on Female dev ignored by the... 0
#4 - wait its cancelled? I thought only that episode was gonna be l…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/23/2014 on Nicked 0
#23 - anonexplains (11/23/2014) [-]
It was just that episode. Nick cut the budget for the creators, so their only options were to fire people, or make a clip show/last time on Korra episode. They decided to do the clip show episode to save their employees jobs. The rest of the episodes will continue as normal.
User avatar #12 - sugoi (11/23/2014) [-]
This is because they had their budget cut forcing them to make a clipshow episode.
User avatar #10 - lyiat (11/23/2014) [-]
Well, it was after a fashion. It will no longer air on Nick, it's only being released online.
User avatar #5 - keitheespieces (11/23/2014) [-]
it's not cancelled
#8 - This is a European(especially British) stereotype.....  [+] (1 new reply) 11/22/2014 on America (fixed) 0
User avatar #10 - konradkurze (11/22/2014) [-]
hell i could do a british one but that'd take a fucking long post to show who they have attacked
#46 - InB4 rockstar getting sued for the resemblance lol. 11/19/2014 on PC Gaming Mustard Rice 0
#22 - Funny thing is that the only people that give a **** …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/16/2014 on . +26
#65 - anonexplains (11/16/2014) [-]
It's 'couldn't give two shits'.
#23 - anonexplains (11/16/2014) [-]
"I am a male and I don't care, so that means only women care"

Flawless logic there, bro.
#25 - anonexplains (11/16/2014) [-]
No, it's mostly women that care.
His argument is anecdotal, but this has been researched. Just do a google.
User avatar #59 - kalima (11/16/2014) [-]
Its rare that i see anon fuck up anon.
#59 - complained about **** . 11/15/2014 on Kek +1
#5 - I visit both regularly and have been noticing this trend here …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Sjw's are slowly taking... +1
User avatar #6 - icangetyoumad (11/15/2014) [-]
yeah but based admin will never let sjws take it over
White knights will always be here
but free speech = best speech
User avatar #8 - konradkurze (11/15/2014) [-]
the best free speech would be when admin bans SJWS to stop them infringing on what we say
User avatar #11 - icangetyoumad (11/15/2014) [-]
Ban them for talking?
Then that isn't free speech is it?

They have a right to open their worthless mouths

As much right we have to open our shitty mouths
User avatar #12 - konradkurze (11/15/2014) [-]
well then the only thing would be make OPs move their asses and delete sjw comments like gameboyadvance did

they may have a 'right' to speak but ops have rights to remove shit from their posts
#2 - I am not even kidding. Look at the top comments of the list of…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Sjw's are slowly taking... +3
#9 - anonexplains (11/15/2014) [-]
I think it's less because of white knighting and more because it's just easier to cherry pick the parts that probably are a bit exaggerated or purposefully misleading.

I mean really who is commenting on FJ and expecting to get pussy out of it
#4 - icangetyoumad (11/15/2014) [-]
Well if they were to move in here

id go to 8chan
#5 - rupok (11/15/2014) [-]
I visit both regularly and have been noticing this trend here past week or so.
User avatar #6 - icangetyoumad (11/15/2014) [-]
yeah but based admin will never let sjws take it over
White knights will always be here
but free speech = best speech
User avatar #8 - konradkurze (11/15/2014) [-]
the best free speech would be when admin bans SJWS to stop them infringing on what we say
User avatar #11 - icangetyoumad (11/15/2014) [-]
Ban them for talking?
Then that isn't free speech is it?

They have a right to open their worthless mouths

As much right we have to open our shitty mouths
User avatar #12 - konradkurze (11/15/2014) [-]
well then the only thing would be make OPs move their asses and delete sjw comments like gameboyadvance did

they may have a 'right' to speak but ops have rights to remove shit from their posts
#198 - This shirt was made by one of his female friends: 11/14/2014 on One small step for male... +2
#65 - he isn't a supporter. He probably one of those faggots that th… 11/10/2014 on IGF judge give games with... +1
#63 - This guy has a gf, he is the jacking off champ and he says he … 11/10/2014 on "Why don't you have a gf?" 0
#52 - she was "joking". Is all her tweets about wanting to… 11/10/2014 on IGF judge give games with... -1
#62 - so his whole speech about "you can criticse us we don't g… 11/09/2014 on Vivian James Is Kill 0
#44 - First of all never said it did. However if you look at what wa…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/09/2014 on My old account got banned... +1
User avatar #49 - smaaen (11/09/2014) [-]
There was a link to the "cp" in question.

Can sugar coat bullshit, but it doesn't make it candy. I don't know how explicit the image is though, nor do I care to find out - but from an administrative point of view, posting a link to the image containing CP is just the same, by splitting hairs that is.
#55 - oldaccountbanneded (11/09/2014) [-]
its not CP though and I posted it because people asked what picture the other user was banned for.
#30 - posting a link and posting on the site aren't the same thing.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/09/2014 on My old account got banned... +1
User avatar #32 - gamrgrl (11/09/2014) [-]
That would be following the letter of the law ,or in this case site rule, and not the intent. Which only works in a court of law, in a normal occurrence its up to admin to decide what violates the intent of his rule.

And I mean its not like it was mean spirited, he's just covering his ass from a legal standpoint. It could easily be argued that the picture depicts someone who is younger than an adult. And while I agree that simply drawing an image shouldn't be considered a crime, regardless of the content, and that suppression of art is, in it self, a suppression of the right to free speech, That is just how american courts view it. If you think that law is stupid right your congressman not admin, he doesn't make the law. But he does have to follow it. Drawn depicted images of children in sexually suggestive positions has ,in the past, been found to be child pornography in certain courts of law. And it's really not the kind of thing judges are open minded on. Posting a link to an image would be the exact same as posting it in this case, Because you are providing access to it , which would fall under distribution of child pornography.

Personally I totally see were Admin is coming from, Its not a matter of snuffing out an opinion its a matter of not getting into legal trouble over one stupid little picture. Thus the ban.
User avatar #31 - gamrgrl (11/09/2014) [-]
Apparently they are because banhammer. I'm pretty sure the point of the no cp rule is to prevent access to cp. If you want to argue whether or not that was cp or not is one thing, but the idea that posting a link to something illegal and just posting something illegal is sketchy.
#28 - Is the old admin back or some **** wtf? …  [+] (5 new replies) 11/09/2014 on My old account got banned... +4
User avatar #51 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (11/09/2014) [-]
I really, really doubt the ownership of this site has ever changed hands.

This event serves as evidence of it, as he's been pulling shit like this for years.
User avatar #42 - bjornkrage (11/09/2014) [-]
i don't think child porn counts as "free speech"
#44 - rupok (11/09/2014) [-]
First of all never said it did. However if you look at what was posted, it was vivian (who is not meant to be a child), in underwear but important parts was covered. There has been worse stuff posted and people got 1 day ban. Admin going nuts, he probably going through some shit irl and taking it out on ppl here. It was a drawing, not actual CP and she wasn't even naked.

User avatar #49 - smaaen (11/09/2014) [-]
There was a link to the "cp" in question.

Can sugar coat bullshit, but it doesn't make it candy. I don't know how explicit the image is though, nor do I care to find out - but from an administrative point of view, posting a link to the image containing CP is just the same, by splitting hairs that is.
#55 - oldaccountbanneded (11/09/2014) [-]
its not CP though and I posted it because people asked what picture the other user was banned for.

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - anonexplains (10/19/2014) [-]
Am gonna thumb down all of your comments cause you're a ******* pussy faggot
#2 to #1 - rupok (10/19/2014) [-]
k
 Friends (0)