Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:1/10/2012
Last Login:6/22/2014
Comment Thumbs: 69 total,  74 ,  5
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 19 Comments: New Here → Level 20 Comments: Peasant
Total Comments Made:5
FJ Points:69

latest user's comments

#116 - Just here to spread knowledge... 1. Old testament rul…  [+] (1 reply) 11/25/2013 on Sums it up pretty well... +4
#131 - kaywillwo (11/25/2013) [-]
Homosexuality is in 1 Corinthians 6:9, actually. New Testament mentions it too.
#197 - Actually, the dropping of the atomic bombs saved more Japanese…  [+] (10 replies) 09/12/2012 on So true.... -1
User avatar
#201 - thewalruss (09/12/2012) [-]
And...? If the war had continued, only the soldiers would have died... because the japanese have and had a war code (Did they attack civilians?). You, monsters, in the other hand, you attacked 80,000 innocent people.
#214 - ruhroe (09/12/2012) [-]
Please read about the war... Even the civilians were attacking US soldiers when we went there. If they didn't win against us, they would kill themselves so they wouldn't become prisoners of war, which would ruin their "honor" and they were raised to believe that Americans are savage brutes.

Wars effect civilians no matter what. What do you think would have been a better idea? Remember that if we kept on attacking them, they would keep attacking us and not surrender until they were all gone. If we didn't force them to surrender, they would have kept on attacking us which would cause more harm. The bombs created a knockout blow which allowed them to surrender with minimal casualties.
#207 - largenintimidating (09/12/2012) [-]
Did the Japanese attack civilians?

Look up the Rape of Nanjing. Now multiply that by most of the Chinese Coast and the Pacific.
User avatar
#206 - bossauce (09/12/2012) [-]
So losing far more than 80,000 American and Japanese soldiers would be better?
User avatar
#208 - thewalruss (09/12/2012) [-]
If they were soldiers... yep. A child life worths more than the soul of 10,000 soldiers.
User avatar
#211 - bossauce (09/12/2012) [-]
A soldiers life is just as valuable as anyone else's
User avatar
#217 - thewalruss (09/12/2012) [-]
Then, why should you have an army? Aren't they there to protect the innocent? To die is part of being a soldier. They are trained for that. They fight to prevent us to do it. They fight for us. When a soldier kills a child, you know somethings is really wrong with his mind and his values.
User avatar
#224 - bossauce (09/12/2012) [-]
So you're saying that a soldiers' job is to die for us?
The bombs were dropped to prevent the deaths of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, which are still people, and deserve to live just as much as anyone
User avatar
#226 - thewalruss (09/12/2012) [-]
Okey, then why should you have an army?
User avatar
#228 - thewalruss (09/12/2012) [-]
I said: They fight for us. IsnĀ“t that true? They are trained to kill other soldiers. Untrue? then why did they kill childs???
#5 - Climax, Michigan. I've been there. I've also been to Hell and back.  [+] (2 replies) 06/10/2012 on heading to +62
#47 - yeahbuddyforever (06/11/2012) [-]
User avatar
#42 - commiecomrade (06/11/2012) [-]
I live in PA so I'm very close to Middlesex.