x
Click to expand

robertelee

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 79
Consoles Owned: ps1 ps2 ps3
Video Games Played: gta pretty much all of them
Interests: automotive
Date Signed Up:8/29/2012
Last Login:5/22/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6844
Comment Ranking:#2751
Highest Content Rank:#4342
Highest Comment Rank:#545
Content Thumbs: 4277 total,  5003 ,  726
Comment Thumbs: 10713 total,  13692 ,  2979
Content Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 142 Content: Faptastic → Level 143 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 291 Comments: Post Master → Level 292 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:5
Content Views:280484
Times Content Favorited:6 times
Total Comments Made:4133
FJ Points:14127

latest user's comments

#9 - charger hellcat 2.90 0-60 standard vette 3.8 z06 3.3 …  [+] (9 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Corvette 0
User avatar #11 - capslockrage (12/16/2014) [-]
>implying 0-60 is all that matters

You know cars can have a higher 0-60 than one car, but have a slower top speed right?

Clearly you don't know what you're talking about
#34 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
yea but it gets it on the big end too
User avatar #42 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Yes though the vette does indeed have a higher top speed.
User avatar #43 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
only becaused the charger is gorverned at i believe 145
User avatar #46 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
And the vette can do 200
User avatar #49 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
thats a zr1
top speed on a base model is somewhere around 118
besides if you want to go that fast you can pick up a gsxr 1000 with a programmer and do 245 if you really need to go that fast
User avatar #50 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
It's not around 118 lol..... base models can actually do around 200, I have driven one that was straight off the lot with nothing done to it, I was doing 180 without even trying
User avatar #51 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Besides I have my 94 supra, has $35k into it, can do 215 before she starts to shake
User avatar #18 - partnerintroll (12/17/2014) [-]
good chance it reaches a comparable top speed, considering the big ass engine
#71 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right +1
#72 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I agree. I don't fall into Republican or Democrat for that reason. Republicans have some good principles but bring their stupid religion into it too often. Democrats are too busy trying to marginalize everyone who actually does want to work so those that don't can survive. Trust me. I work 52 hours a week to keep life flowing and it pisses me off when there are news stories from people here who've never worked and live off of their four kids and the government.

User avatar #73 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
im not one to choose a side as well
i like some of both sides of it
but choose to go with the lesser of the two evils
#75 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I'd have to say that's the democrats to be honest... I mean, when's the last time a democratic present started a war? Hell, without Bush, we'd likely not be in fiscal crisis... I'd rather pay a bit to the poor than kill the masses.

I don't like doing either but, y'know...
User avatar #203 - commontroll (12/16/2014) [-]
"When's the last time a Democratic President started a war?"

Somebody's forgotten about Ol' Barry Boy starting up Gulf War 3, Oilrific Boogaloo: the Electrening. Or all the Syria bombings and shit. Or randomly sending troops to "Fight Ebola!"

Presidents start wars, and both parties love doing it, it's just the Democrats like to say "we were forced into it!" while the Republicans accept the fact that they chose to go to war.
User avatar #77 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
really
you do realize that Clinton had both bin laden and Hussian and let them go and paid of the groups to keep them from a strike prior to the whole 911 attacks
#78 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
You do realize that Al Qaeda was originally a U.S. funded organization used to commit acts we wouldn't during the cold war? We had no reason to go into those countries and start shit. None at all.
User avatar #79 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
ya i know i got that
but if we quit going into was with one hand around our balls and the other behind our back then we wouldnt be challenged near as often
now im not saying go to war
im saying dont go over there and fuck off billions of dollars
go in get shit done get the fuck out period
#68 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (9 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right 0
#69 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Haven't we had enough people with imaginary friends in office? Fuck the constitution. The fact that our country isstill based on that dated garbage is a load of shit.
#71 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
ill agree with you on that
but i dont think i should be responsible for paying for millions of people who are not willing to work for themselves
put a real psycho in there and let things straighten themselves out
#72 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I agree. I don't fall into Republican or Democrat for that reason. Republicans have some good principles but bring their stupid religion into it too often. Democrats are too busy trying to marginalize everyone who actually does want to work so those that don't can survive. Trust me. I work 52 hours a week to keep life flowing and it pisses me off when there are news stories from people here who've never worked and live off of their four kids and the government.

User avatar #73 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
im not one to choose a side as well
i like some of both sides of it
but choose to go with the lesser of the two evils
#75 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I'd have to say that's the democrats to be honest... I mean, when's the last time a democratic present started a war? Hell, without Bush, we'd likely not be in fiscal crisis... I'd rather pay a bit to the poor than kill the masses.

I don't like doing either but, y'know...
User avatar #203 - commontroll (12/16/2014) [-]
"When's the last time a Democratic President started a war?"

Somebody's forgotten about Ol' Barry Boy starting up Gulf War 3, Oilrific Boogaloo: the Electrening. Or all the Syria bombings and shit. Or randomly sending troops to "Fight Ebola!"

Presidents start wars, and both parties love doing it, it's just the Democrats like to say "we were forced into it!" while the Republicans accept the fact that they chose to go to war.
User avatar #77 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
really
you do realize that Clinton had both bin laden and Hussian and let them go and paid of the groups to keep them from a strike prior to the whole 911 attacks
#78 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
You do realize that Al Qaeda was originally a U.S. funded organization used to commit acts we wouldn't during the cold war? We had no reason to go into those countries and start shit. None at all.
User avatar #79 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
ya i know i got that
but if we quit going into was with one hand around our balls and the other behind our back then we wouldnt be challenged near as often
now im not saying go to war
im saying dont go over there and fuck off billions of dollars
go in get shit done get the fuck out period
#65 - it was supposed to say balls my bad 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right 0
#64 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right 0
#66 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Nope, white guy. I can see the racist end of it but homophobe? Eh, no.
#68 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
the homophobe part of rick perry is just religious semantics but that is protected under the constitution as well
#69 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Haven't we had enough people with imaginary friends in office? Fuck the constitution. The fact that our country isstill based on that dated garbage is a load of shit.
#71 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
ill agree with you on that
but i dont think i should be responsible for paying for millions of people who are not willing to work for themselves
put a real psycho in there and let things straighten themselves out
#72 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I agree. I don't fall into Republican or Democrat for that reason. Republicans have some good principles but bring their stupid religion into it too often. Democrats are too busy trying to marginalize everyone who actually does want to work so those that don't can survive. Trust me. I work 52 hours a week to keep life flowing and it pisses me off when there are news stories from people here who've never worked and live off of their four kids and the government.

User avatar #73 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
im not one to choose a side as well
i like some of both sides of it
but choose to go with the lesser of the two evils
#75 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I'd have to say that's the democrats to be honest... I mean, when's the last time a democratic present started a war? Hell, without Bush, we'd likely not be in fiscal crisis... I'd rather pay a bit to the poor than kill the masses.

I don't like doing either but, y'know...
User avatar #203 - commontroll (12/16/2014) [-]
"When's the last time a Democratic President started a war?"

Somebody's forgotten about Ol' Barry Boy starting up Gulf War 3, Oilrific Boogaloo: the Electrening. Or all the Syria bombings and shit. Or randomly sending troops to "Fight Ebola!"

Presidents start wars, and both parties love doing it, it's just the Democrats like to say "we were forced into it!" while the Republicans accept the fact that they chose to go to war.
User avatar #77 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
really
you do realize that Clinton had both bin laden and Hussian and let them go and paid of the groups to keep them from a strike prior to the whole 911 attacks
#78 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
You do realize that Al Qaeda was originally a U.S. funded organization used to commit acts we wouldn't during the cold war? We had no reason to go into those countries and start shit. None at all.
User avatar #79 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
ya i know i got that
but if we quit going into was with one hand around our balls and the other behind our back then we wouldnt be challenged near as often
now im not saying go to war
im saying dont go over there and fuck off billions of dollars
go in get shit done get the fuck out period
#7 - Picture  [+] (11 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Corvette 0
User avatar #52 - thespecialone (12/19/2014) [-]
not bad, but still...
User avatar #9 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
charger hellcat 2.90 0-60
standard vette 3.8
z06 3.3
zr1 2.95
and notice that i said charger not challenger
challenger hellcat 2.87
User avatar #11 - capslockrage (12/16/2014) [-]
>implying 0-60 is all that matters

You know cars can have a higher 0-60 than one car, but have a slower top speed right?

Clearly you don't know what you're talking about
#34 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
yea but it gets it on the big end too
User avatar #42 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Yes though the vette does indeed have a higher top speed.
User avatar #43 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
only becaused the charger is gorverned at i believe 145
User avatar #46 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
And the vette can do 200
User avatar #49 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
thats a zr1
top speed on a base model is somewhere around 118
besides if you want to go that fast you can pick up a gsxr 1000 with a programmer and do 245 if you really need to go that fast
User avatar #50 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
It's not around 118 lol..... base models can actually do around 200, I have driven one that was straight off the lot with nothing done to it, I was doing 180 without even trying
User avatar #51 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Besides I have my 94 supra, has $35k into it, can do 215 before she starts to shake
User avatar #18 - partnerintroll (12/17/2014) [-]
good chance it reaches a comparable top speed, considering the big ass engine
#61 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (13 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right -3
#63 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
... What?
#64 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
you must be a minority as well
#66 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Nope, white guy. I can see the racist end of it but homophobe? Eh, no.
#68 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
the homophobe part of rick perry is just religious semantics but that is protected under the constitution as well
#69 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Haven't we had enough people with imaginary friends in office? Fuck the constitution. The fact that our country isstill based on that dated garbage is a load of shit.
#71 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
ill agree with you on that
but i dont think i should be responsible for paying for millions of people who are not willing to work for themselves
put a real psycho in there and let things straighten themselves out
#72 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I agree. I don't fall into Republican or Democrat for that reason. Republicans have some good principles but bring their stupid religion into it too often. Democrats are too busy trying to marginalize everyone who actually does want to work so those that don't can survive. Trust me. I work 52 hours a week to keep life flowing and it pisses me off when there are news stories from people here who've never worked and live off of their four kids and the government.

User avatar #73 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
im not one to choose a side as well
i like some of both sides of it
but choose to go with the lesser of the two evils
#75 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I'd have to say that's the democrats to be honest... I mean, when's the last time a democratic present started a war? Hell, without Bush, we'd likely not be in fiscal crisis... I'd rather pay a bit to the poor than kill the masses.

I don't like doing either but, y'know...
User avatar #203 - commontroll (12/16/2014) [-]
"When's the last time a Democratic President started a war?"

Somebody's forgotten about Ol' Barry Boy starting up Gulf War 3, Oilrific Boogaloo: the Electrening. Or all the Syria bombings and shit. Or randomly sending troops to "Fight Ebola!"

Presidents start wars, and both parties love doing it, it's just the Democrats like to say "we were forced into it!" while the Republicans accept the fact that they chose to go to war.
User avatar #77 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
really
you do realize that Clinton had both bin laden and Hussian and let them go and paid of the groups to keep them from a strike prior to the whole 911 attacks
#78 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
You do realize that Al Qaeda was originally a U.S. funded organization used to commit acts we wouldn't during the cold war? We had no reason to go into those countries and start shit. None at all.
User avatar #79 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
ya i know i got that
but if we quit going into was with one hand around our balls and the other behind our back then we wouldnt be challenged near as often
now im not saying go to war
im saying dont go over there and fuck off billions of dollars
go in get shit done get the fuck out period
#60 - thats where ron paul comes in to reign in the insanity  [+] (2 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right 0
User avatar #93 - damping (12/16/2014) [-]
You mean add more insanity? Gonna throw in Palin as secretary of state?
User avatar #295 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
sure we can do that
#4 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i… 12/16/2014 on Mens Rights Activist Part II +2
#1 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i… 12/16/2014 on Joshua David Evans +4
#89 - oh it dosent work anymore 12/16/2014 on Macklemore 0
#88 - *roll 9*  [+] (1 new reply) 12/16/2014 on Macklemore 0
User avatar #89 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
oh it dosent work anymore
#87 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Macklemore 0
User avatar #88 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
*roll 9*
User avatar #89 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
oh it dosent work anymore
#3 - Picture 12/16/2014 on niglets in training 0
#3 - this needs to be the 2016 republican ticket rick perr…  [+] (28 new replies) 12/16/2014 on This white guy got it right +15
#293 - exsequor (12/17/2014) [-]
Yeah....no. No one should have to vote for a stupid fuck like Rick Perry to be VP in order to support Ron Paul. Gary Johnson and Ron Paul should be on a ticket together.
User avatar #139 - fiveblackmen (12/16/2014) [-]
Was it Rick Perry that said he would make contraceptives illegal if elected president?
#131 - anonymous (12/16/2014) [-]
Yea the only problem with that is Rick Perry is dumb as a fucking rock. Paul yea, he's good but dear lord Perry?
#86 - apurpleliger (12/16/2014) [-]
I can dig it. Rick Perry may not word to good, but he's done a great job protecting liberties in Texas. There's a reason so many companies have their headquarters here.
#280 - anonymous (12/17/2014) [-]
He also slashes funds to schools at the drop of a Fucking hat, man.
#281 - apurpleliger (12/17/2014) [-]
He also has to deal with BISD
#244 - earldibblesjr (12/16/2014) [-]
*too
User avatar #65 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
it was supposed to say balls

my bad
#55 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Give a racist homophobe the ball? Given his disposition, that would probably not even be in his best interest.
#61 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
we already have a racist homophobe in there now
#63 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
... What?
#64 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
you must be a minority as well
#66 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Nope, white guy. I can see the racist end of it but homophobe? Eh, no.
#68 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
the homophobe part of rick perry is just religious semantics but that is protected under the constitution as well
#69 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
Haven't we had enough people with imaginary friends in office? Fuck the constitution. The fact that our country isstill based on that dated garbage is a load of shit.
#71 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
ill agree with you on that
but i dont think i should be responsible for paying for millions of people who are not willing to work for themselves
put a real psycho in there and let things straighten themselves out
#72 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I agree. I don't fall into Republican or Democrat for that reason. Republicans have some good principles but bring their stupid religion into it too often. Democrats are too busy trying to marginalize everyone who actually does want to work so those that don't can survive. Trust me. I work 52 hours a week to keep life flowing and it pisses me off when there are news stories from people here who've never worked and live off of their four kids and the government.

User avatar #73 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
im not one to choose a side as well
i like some of both sides of it
but choose to go with the lesser of the two evils
#75 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
I'd have to say that's the democrats to be honest... I mean, when's the last time a democratic present started a war? Hell, without Bush, we'd likely not be in fiscal crisis... I'd rather pay a bit to the poor than kill the masses.

I don't like doing either but, y'know...
User avatar #203 - commontroll (12/16/2014) [-]
"When's the last time a Democratic President started a war?"

Somebody's forgotten about Ol' Barry Boy starting up Gulf War 3, Oilrific Boogaloo: the Electrening. Or all the Syria bombings and shit. Or randomly sending troops to "Fight Ebola!"

Presidents start wars, and both parties love doing it, it's just the Democrats like to say "we were forced into it!" while the Republicans accept the fact that they chose to go to war.
User avatar #77 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
really
you do realize that Clinton had both bin laden and Hussian and let them go and paid of the groups to keep them from a strike prior to the whole 911 attacks
#78 - zeedeveel (12/16/2014) [-]
You do realize that Al Qaeda was originally a U.S. funded organization used to commit acts we wouldn't during the cold war? We had no reason to go into those countries and start shit. None at all.
User avatar #79 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
ya i know i got that
but if we quit going into was with one hand around our balls and the other behind our back then we wouldnt be challenged near as often
now im not saying go to war
im saying dont go over there and fuck off billions of dollars
go in get shit done get the fuck out period
#28 - Indoknight (12/16/2014) [-]
>rick perry
User avatar #60 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
thats where ron paul comes in to reign in the insanity
User avatar #93 - damping (12/16/2014) [-]
You mean add more insanity? Gonna throw in Palin as secretary of state?
User avatar #295 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
sure we can do that
#23 - anonymous (12/16/2014) [-]
Rick Perry? Really?
#11 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/16/2014 on Damage GF on the cheap +3
#13 - mentalhealthguy (12/16/2014) [-]
#7 - he brought me here and here i shall remain 12/16/2014 on Post the person who showed... +1
#2 - too sorry  [+] (1 new reply) 12/16/2014 on Corvette 0
#4 - lastone (12/16/2014) [-]
i like you. we should be friends. with benifits like driving that car
#1 - can out run that bitch and carry the kids two  [+] (25 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Corvette +5
User avatar #19 - thebobinito (12/17/2014) [-]
But you'd rather by the two-seater Dodge Challenger Hellcat, who needs extra seats?
User avatar #24 - fukkentyranitar (12/17/2014) [-]
They're both 4-5 passenger. It would be pretty stupid to make a 2 ton vehicle that can't even carry 4 people.
User avatar #29 - thebobinito (12/17/2014) [-]
You wouldn't think it's stupid with 707 horses under the hood.
User avatar #32 - fukkentyranitar (12/17/2014) [-]
Not so much stupid. Worthless would be more fitting. Good thing the hellcats aren't worthless though.
User avatar #33 - thebobinito (12/17/2014) [-]
I'm not going to lie, I will buy one of these if I ever get enough money, I love muscle cars and both look stunning.
User avatar #35 - fukkentyranitar (12/17/2014) [-]
I'd pick the Charger for looks alone. Imagine a Charger hellcat pulling up to a high rise building in Toronto or New York.
User avatar #36 - thebobinito (12/17/2014) [-]
I don't live in America so I couldn't dream of it But in the U.K, if you had one, it would most definitely turn a lot of heads and attraction that a lot of supercars.
User avatar #47 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
In the U.S I see them everywhere, like a couple a day.
#13 - anonymous (12/16/2014) [-]
Or do what i did and drop an LS1 into a CTS and put a twin turbo on it, 0-100km in 2.4 seconds, 280kmph top speed, and its a nice looking cadillac instead of a trashed musclecar, and wont break the bank, only put 20k into mine in total.
User avatar #14 - onehandclap (12/16/2014) [-]
you put an LS1 in a CTS? Why not just buy a CTS-V?
User avatar #6 - thespecialone (12/16/2014) [-]
lol, that's just some car with a big-ass engine in it.
if you can prove me otherwise, please do not accepting any dragraces
User avatar #52 - thespecialone (12/19/2014) [-]
not bad, but still...
User avatar #9 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
charger hellcat 2.90 0-60
standard vette 3.8
z06 3.3
zr1 2.95
and notice that i said charger not challenger
challenger hellcat 2.87
User avatar #11 - capslockrage (12/16/2014) [-]
>implying 0-60 is all that matters

You know cars can have a higher 0-60 than one car, but have a slower top speed right?

Clearly you don't know what you're talking about
#34 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
**robertelee used "*roll picture*"**
**robertelee rolled image**
yea but it gets it on the big end too
User avatar #42 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Yes though the vette does indeed have a higher top speed.
User avatar #43 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
only becaused the charger is gorverned at i believe 145
User avatar #46 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
And the vette can do 200
User avatar #49 - robertelee (12/17/2014) [-]
thats a zr1
top speed on a base model is somewhere around 118
besides if you want to go that fast you can pick up a gsxr 1000 with a programmer and do 245 if you really need to go that fast
User avatar #50 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
It's not around 118 lol..... base models can actually do around 200, I have driven one that was straight off the lot with nothing done to it, I was doing 180 without even trying
User avatar #51 - capslockrage (12/17/2014) [-]
Besides I have my 94 supra, has $35k into it, can do 215 before she starts to shake
User avatar #18 - partnerintroll (12/17/2014) [-]
good chance it reaches a comparable top speed, considering the big ass engine
User avatar #2 - robertelee (12/16/2014) [-]
too

sorry
#4 - lastone (12/16/2014) [-]
i like you. we should be friends. with benifits like driving that car
#3 - pretty sure thats steven segal  [+] (1 new reply) 12/16/2014 on Combined GIF compilation +59
#4 - godof (12/16/2014) [-]
I was just trying to see if you were paying attention hahahaha I fucked up
#5 - Comment deleted 12/15/2014 on only black media +1
#4 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 12/15/2014 on only black media +1
#6 - whitegamedeveloper Comment deleted by robertelee
#5 - robertelee Comment deleted by robertelee
#2 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2014 on Important +2
User avatar #3 - hasinvadedyou (12/15/2014) [-]
yeah if a man were dressed/sitting like that it would be considered ugly
#132 - got a 74 super beetle with a Porsche engine in it does that count 12/15/2014 on scienceeeee 0
#16 - **robertelee used "*roll picture*"** **robertelee rolled i… 12/14/2014 on scienceeeee -2

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)