Here, have the full version

Except as i said before,the woman didn't had the time nor the liberty thanks to some mens being asses and then saying "it's a rule m'kay?" and we didn't seems to bother that much about it.So it was our role to hunt ,for example, and learn from trial and error.So we ,little by little,created rules,to do and not to do lists,etc...
Now you might say "but they could probably learn at time were they became a little more free!"Well they fucking did,but there was still the family pressure and all.
They were famous cafés and others places were intellectuals would go together to have a drink and discuss in the 17th century in France for example,at a time were money counted a little more than being born male or female.And guess what ? The managers of thoses were mostly females.
Problem is,if you wanted to join an university,you needed more of an education than making clothes and fast explanations from somes thinkers,and it's hard and time consuming to have to learn,manage a salon and educate your family
TL ; DR : We didn't gave them the possibility of trying in the domains were we invented a lot,and we didn't gave them education necessary for advanced domains
As for Leonardo,i stand by what i said :He made money by art first,since he took art class from verroccio in his early years and was kicked out for being too good,and made money from his various paintings and sculpturs,then his talent in drawing coupled with the free time,his absolute thirst of knowledge and Medici needs in ingeniery made him study math ,biology,etc...
Saying that Leonardo wasn't an Art master is literally saying that a big part of his life didn't happened.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci#Verrocchio.27s_workshop.2C_1466.E2.80.9376

Leonardo took art class and money from it,then he could study in his free time
For Newton,wikipedia says "From the ages of 12 through 17, he was educated at The King's School, Grantham (where his signature can still be seen upon a library window sill). He was removed from school, and by October 1659, he was to be found at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, where his mother, widowed by now for a second time, attempted to make a farmer of him. He hated farming.Henry Stokes, master at the King's School, persuaded his mother to send him back to school so that he might complete his education. This he did at the age of eighteen, achieving an admirable final report."

They had education,and they didn't had to educate kids or other things that were reserved to women.You couldn't have created a motor without knowledge of piston and other things.Womens clearly had enormous limitation,it's like asking someone with asthma to do a marathon without it's inhalerrobably possible,but with huge repercussions and failure possibility

Except as i said before,the woman didn't had the time nor the liberty thanks to some mens being asses and then saying "it's a rule m'kay?" and we didn't seems to bother that much about it.So it was our role to hunt ,for example, and learn from trial and error.So we ,little by little,created rules,to do and not to do lists,etc...
Now you might say "but they could probably learn at time were they became a little more free!"Well they fucking did,but there was still the family pressure and all.
They were famous cafés and others places were intellectuals would go together to have a drink and discuss in the 17th century in France for example,at a time were money counted a little more than being born male or female.And guess what ? The managers of thoses were mostly females.
Problem is,if you wanted to join an university,you needed more of an education than making clothes and fast explanations from somes thinkers,and it's hard and time consuming to have to learn,manage a salon and educate your family
TL ; DR : We didn't gave them the possibility of trying in the domains were we invented a lot,and we didn't gave them education necessary for advanced domains
As for Leonardo,i stand by what i said :He made money by art first,since he took art class from verroccio in his early years and was kicked out for being too good,and made money from his various paintings and sculpturs,then his talent in drawing coupled with the free time,his absolute thirst of knowledge and Medici needs in ingeniery made him study math ,biology,etc...
Saying that Leonardo wasn't an Art master is literally saying that a big part of his life didn't happened.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci#Verrocchio.27s_workshop.2C_1466.E2.80.9376

Leonardo took art class and money from it,then he could study in his free time
For Newton,wikipedia says "From the ages of 12 through 17, he was educated at The King's School, Grantham (where his signature can still be seen upon a library window sill). He was removed from school, and by October 1659, he was to be found at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, where his mother, widowed by now for a second time, attempted to make a farmer of him. He hated farming.Henry Stokes, master at the King's School, persuaded his mother to send him back to school so that he might complete his education. This he did at the age of eighteen, achieving an admirable final report."

They had education,and they didn't had to educate kids or other things that were reserved to women.You couldn't have created a motor without knowledge of piston and other things.Womens clearly had enormous limitation,it's like asking someone with asthma to do a marathon without it's inhalerrobably possible,but with huge repercussions and failure possibility

Except as i said before,the woman didn't had the time nor the liberty thanks to some mens being asses and then saying "it's a rule m'kay?" and we didn't seems to bother that much about it.So it was our role to hunt ,for example, and learn from trial and error.So we ,little by little,created rules,to do and not to do lists,etc...
Now you might say "but they could probably learn at time were they became a little more free!"Well they fucking did,but there was still the family pressure and all.
They were famous cafés and others places were intellectuals would go together to have a drink and discuss in the 17th century in France for example,at a time were money counted a little more than being born male or female.And guess what ? The managers of thoses were mostly females.
Problem is,if you wanted to join an university,you needed more of an education than making clothes and fast explanations from somes thinkers,and it's hard and time consuming to have to learn,manage a salon and educate your family
TL ; DR : We didn't gave them the possibility of trying in the domains were we invented a lot,and we didn't gave them education necessary for advanced domains
As for Leonardo,i stand by what i said :He made money by art first,since he took art class from verroccio in his early years and was kicked out for being too good,and made money from his various paintings and sculpturs,then his talent in drawing coupled with the free time,his absolute thirst of knowledge and Medici needs in ingeniery made him study math ,biology,etc...
Saying that Leonardo wasn't an Art master is literally saying that a big part of his life didn't happened.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci#Verrocchio.27s_workshop.2C_1466.E2.80.9376

I kindle a little hope deep inside my soul that one day fj will stop trying its hardest to ape /pol/ like a bunch of fucking 14 year olds and just post funnies. I CAN DREAM DAMN YOU

WE CAN DREAM DAMN IT!!


WE CAN DREAM...












we can dream...