Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

rkdisme    

Rank #23679 on Comments
no avatar Level 211 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to rkdisme Block rkdisme Invite rkdisme to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/29/2010
Last Login:11/21/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#23679
Highest Content Rank:#11373
Highest Comment Rank:#6430
Content Thumbs: 112 total,  210 ,  98
Comment Thumbs: 1184 total,  1414 ,  230
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 11 Content: New Here → Level 12 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 44% (22/50)
Level 211 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:6338
Times Content Favorited:18 times
Total Comments Made:507
FJ Points:1363
Favorite Tags: a (2) | black (2) | i (2) | ops (2) | rkdisme (2)

latest user's comments

#19 - again, not our problem. It's a problem of the past.  [+] (12 new replies) 03/22/2011 on 2009 called 0
User avatar #20 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
but if time travel was never invented we would of never sent that atom back... and if we never sent that atom back it would of never changed the fact that we sent it back..... And it will keep going forever and ever. Thus why it's impossible bro.
#21 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nothing is impossible. Especially if you can send an atom back in time
#23 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*face palm*
#24 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nigga alert, Code black at the front gate
#27 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
You couldn't realize that it is a never ending loop. You're now embarrassing yourself.
#28 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
You are saying that the one atom might make backward time travel impossible. The chances of that happening are 1 in googolplex.
User avatar #29 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
1 in googleplex. Did i ever say likely? NOPE
#30 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Then we can dismiss your claim entirely. Good game.
User avatar #32 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
One in googleplex =/= impossible.
#33 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
one in googleplex == negligible. We have more chance to be hit by a gamma ray burst than of that happening.
#34 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*shrug* what ever helps you feel better bro.
#35 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
This usually does the trick
#17 - It's not our problem if that **** ***** …  [+] (14 new replies) 03/22/2011 on 2009 called 0
User avatar #18 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
....But that single atom could change the fact that time travel was ever invented...
#19 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
again, not our problem. It's a problem of the past.
User avatar #20 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
but if time travel was never invented we would of never sent that atom back... and if we never sent that atom back it would of never changed the fact that we sent it back..... And it will keep going forever and ever. Thus why it's impossible bro.
#21 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nothing is impossible. Especially if you can send an atom back in time
#23 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*face palm*
#24 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nigga alert, Code black at the front gate
#27 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
You couldn't realize that it is a never ending loop. You're now embarrassing yourself.
#28 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
You are saying that the one atom might make backward time travel impossible. The chances of that happening are 1 in googolplex.
User avatar #29 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
1 in googleplex. Did i ever say likely? NOPE
#30 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Then we can dismiss your claim entirely. Good game.
User avatar #32 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
One in googleplex =/= impossible.
#33 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
one in googleplex == negligible. We have more chance to be hit by a gamma ray burst than of that happening.
#34 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*shrug* what ever helps you feel better bro.
#35 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
This usually does the trick
#41 - And you could tell them you did 100 jumping jacks in a 2 piece bikini  [+] (2 new replies) 03/22/2011 on Elephants look good in top... +22
#52 - minkeymonkey has deleted their comment.
User avatar #135 - gagelovesyou (03/22/2011) [-]
yes
#15 - Not for human beings, but for single atoms it is possible. But…  [+] (16 new replies) 03/22/2011 on 2009 called 0
User avatar #16 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
Moving that single atom back in time could alter..... Yeah you get where this is going.
#17 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
It's not our problem if that shit fucks things up. We can't do anything if it's in the past so it's OK.
User avatar #18 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
....But that single atom could change the fact that time travel was ever invented...
#19 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
again, not our problem. It's a problem of the past.
User avatar #20 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
but if time travel was never invented we would of never sent that atom back... and if we never sent that atom back it would of never changed the fact that we sent it back..... And it will keep going forever and ever. Thus why it's impossible bro.
#21 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nothing is impossible. Especially if you can send an atom back in time
#23 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*face palm*
#24 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nigga alert, Code black at the front gate
#27 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
You couldn't realize that it is a never ending loop. You're now embarrassing yourself.
#28 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
You are saying that the one atom might make backward time travel impossible. The chances of that happening are 1 in googolplex.
User avatar #29 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
1 in googleplex. Did i ever say likely? NOPE
#30 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Then we can dismiss your claim entirely. Good game.
User avatar #32 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
One in googleplex =/= impossible.
#33 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
one in googleplex == negligible. We have more chance to be hit by a gamma ray burst than of that happening.
#34 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*shrug* what ever helps you feel better bro.
#35 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
This usually does the trick
#13 - The fact that you still exist means that you didn't ***…  [+] (18 new replies) 03/22/2011 on 2009 called 0
#14 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
It's a never ending loop. Thus why time travel is impossible.
#15 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Not for human beings, but for single atoms it is possible. But only back in time. I forgot where I read up on that, but travel back in time for atoms is possible.
User avatar #16 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
Moving that single atom back in time could alter..... Yeah you get where this is going.
#17 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
It's not our problem if that shit fucks things up. We can't do anything if it's in the past so it's OK.
User avatar #18 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
....But that single atom could change the fact that time travel was ever invented...
#19 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
again, not our problem. It's a problem of the past.
User avatar #20 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
but if time travel was never invented we would of never sent that atom back... and if we never sent that atom back it would of never changed the fact that we sent it back..... And it will keep going forever and ever. Thus why it's impossible bro.
#21 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nothing is impossible. Especially if you can send an atom back in time
#23 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*face palm*
#24 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Nigga alert, Code black at the front gate
#27 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
You couldn't realize that it is a never ending loop. You're now embarrassing yourself.
#28 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
You are saying that the one atom might make backward time travel impossible. The chances of that happening are 1 in googolplex.
User avatar #29 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
1 in googleplex. Did i ever say likely? NOPE
#30 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
Then we can dismiss your claim entirely. Good game.
User avatar #32 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
One in googleplex =/= impossible.
#33 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
one in googleplex == negligible. We have more chance to be hit by a gamma ray burst than of that happening.
#34 - TuccessfulSroll (03/22/2011) [-]
*shrug* what ever helps you feel better bro.
#35 - rkdisme (03/22/2011) [-]
This usually does the trick
#32 - Picture 03/22/2011 on PARTY HARD +1
#723 - That wasn't mine, just saying that I've seen it before. 03/21/2011 on WoW Racist 0
#297 - Picture 03/18/2011 on Leveling up +3
#295 - I call ******** , lets test your theory: x=…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/18/2011 on Leveling up +3
User avatar #296 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
5*6 = 30, 30*7 = 210, 210 - 168 = 42. CHECK EM!
#297 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
#293 - Well, they have made a ******** of them, so I gue…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/18/2011 on Leveling up +2
User avatar #294 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
The answer is 42. Doesn't matter what the question is.

Solve for X? X = 42. Every time.
#295 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
I call bullshit, lets test your theory:

x= 5*6*7-168
User avatar #296 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
5*6 = 30, 30*7 = 210, 210 - 168 = 42. CHECK EM!
#297 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
#291 - Sure it does. Charmander was nice, Charmilion was a ***…  [+] (6 new replies) 03/18/2011 on Leveling up +3
User avatar #292 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
But so was charizard...

Evolution doesn't make poke'mon go from mean to nice and back to mean. Ever.
#293 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
Well, they have made a shitload of them, so I guess the world will never know.
User avatar #294 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
The answer is 42. Doesn't matter what the question is.

Solve for X? X = 42. Every time.
#295 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
I call bullshit, lets test your theory:

x= 5*6*7-168
User avatar #296 - satanisthesavior (03/18/2011) [-]
5*6 = 30, 30*7 = 210, 210 - 168 = 42. CHECK EM!
#297 - rkdisme (03/18/2011) [-]
#507 - Comment deleted 03/18/2011 on Husband win! 0
#506 - **rkdisme rolls 24** You write "Every person to like thi… 03/18/2011 on Husband win! +2
#505 - **rkdisme rolls 28** You write "Every person to like th… 03/18/2011 on Husband win! +1
#453 - Bitch closed her account. 03/17/2011 on The Bible 0
#3 - that's pretty cool, a thumb for your find 03/15/2011 on Pokemon New Vegas 0
#27 - I miss WoW. I gave up on the game about 3 years ago, right aft… 03/12/2011 on WoW is some serious fucking... +1
#11 - Chris Brown feeling fabulous! 03/06/2011 on True +1
#418 - Comment deleted 03/06/2011 on Fail Roll 0
#13 - Comment deleted 03/03/2011 on Fast Food 0
#196 - **rkdisme rolls 17** never gonna get some dubs, keep trying … 03/03/2011 on Double Fail -1
#452 - Or a super boob. Everybody loves the superboob 03/03/2011 on boobs? 0
#192 - Comment deleted 03/03/2011 on Double Fail 0
#182 - **rkdisme rolls 47** if dubs you're not a faggot 03/03/2011 on Double Fail -1
#424 - Yours looks a lot like owl eyes (OYO)  [+] (3 new replies) 03/03/2011 on boobs? 0
User avatar #428 - herpaderpaderp (03/03/2011) [-]
PEPPERONI NIPS
User avatar #441 - panapper (03/03/2011) [-]
because i cant post an image in my comments on my post for some reason, type triple tits in google, should be a hot chick in a red shirt, with 3 tits lol post it as a comment and say 3 tits are better then 2. thumbs will rain upon you.
#452 - rkdisme (03/03/2011) [-]
Or a super boob. Everybody loves the superboob
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)