Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

ripgeckosncherios    

Rank #8644 on Comments
no avatar Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to ripgeckosncherios Block ripgeckosncherios Invite ripgeckosncherios to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/27/2013
Last Login:7/10/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#8644
Highest Content Rank:#11566
Highest Comment Rank:#1269
Content Thumbs: 2 total,  10 ,  8
Comment Thumbs: 2709 total,  3558 ,  849
Content Level Progress: 13.55% (8/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 37% (37/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1658
Total Comments Made:1765
FJ Points:2480

latest user's comments

#20 - another objection. You use height of skull and thickness of ba…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/05/2014 on pretty cool 0
#26 - therebemoose (05/05/2014) [-]
Objection! Thickness of the note correlates to HEIGHT. The number of notes within the column correlates to DEPTH. The number of notes in a row correlate to WIDTH.
#49 - ripgeckosncherios (05/07/2014) [-]
I assumed height from the height of a usual skull, not the height of the sculpture, since I can not imagine taht sculpture being 25 centimeters high/ an average skull to be 15 centimeters deep.
maybe im wrong on that tho
#94 - yes, just because you are on funnyjunk doesn't mean you can't …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/05/2014 on everyone on tumblr be like 0
User avatar #95 - turtletroll (05/05/2014) [-]
I'm a full grown web surfer and I dont need no anon
#91 - nothing you are saying is bad per se, but do you expect people…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/05/2014 on everyone on tumblr be like 0
User avatar #93 - turtletroll (05/05/2014) [-]
I'm fed up of all these SITEISTS telling me about what websites I can go on.
#94 - ripgeckosncherios (05/05/2014) [-]
yes, just because you are on funnyjunk doesn't mean you can't visit 9gag.
Also not everyone on tumblr is 12 years old
User avatar #95 - turtletroll (05/05/2014) [-]
I'm a full grown web surfer and I dont need no anon
#115 - No ragrets? 05/05/2014 on Discovering a new Fetish +1
#79 - Italy looks weird, South Africa looks a bit weird, North Ameri… 05/05/2014 on He is too stronk +4
#96 - Comment deleted 05/03/2014 on inconcievable +1
#95 - Comment deleted 05/03/2014 on inconcievable +1
#7 - I know it sucks, and I think it should be changed in some way,… 05/02/2014 on Read Description 0
#2 - duoQ, when you are losing, one of you quits, the other gets 30…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Read Description 0
#6 - holcomb (05/02/2014) [-]
But I'm sorry a company as smart as Riot has to know some ways to counteract abuse in this system there are ways to make it fair for everyone, and prevent abuse. My whole point is there is little/no punishment for people who just ragequit a game at this point in time when it completely ruins the game. I have won my fair share of 4v5's so it is still possible to win i understand that. But there are ways to be able to prevent these people from staying in the community, and keeping their attitude.
#5 - holcomb (05/02/2014) [-]
At most these players could only do this once and the leaver would still receive full LP/mmr loss. So it would hardly even be worth the time and the effort just to save 5 LP. This is for the player who happens to have an unlucky streak (me this week) and receive 5+ afk's in a matter of 25~ games. Don't get me wrong I do understand this happens to everyone, but i have had more then 5 afk's in my past 25 games, and only had one game where someone on the other team had afk'd.
#7 - ripgeckosncherios (05/02/2014) [-]
I know it sucks, and I think it should be changed in some way, but we need to understand Riots standpoint: Changes are risks, as it is now if you play enough games you get a mathematical advantage from dces, if you never dc
#57 - well your gif already answers that question, doesnt it 05/01/2014 on fucking GENIOUS +1
#24 - so many references  [+] (1 new reply) 05/01/2014 on Skrillex 0
User avatar #25 - EnergizierAnon (05/02/2014) [-]
we need to go deeper. Referenception.
#15 - they are lagrer than orcas? 'Cause I am pretty sure that those…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/30/2014 on Dolphin. +1
#16 - dadadadavis (04/30/2014) [-]
Thank you for the correction. Orcas are in fact larger than belugas and are also dolphins. SO my information was incorrect to a point. What i should have said was average. so in a lump of all species they are in between. And no need to be sorry. Knowledge is just knowledge that is ment to be refined and corrected. Nobody knows everything
#11 - at least afaik, and i am no expert  [+] (3 new replies) 04/30/2014 on Dolphin. +1
#12 - dadadadavis (04/30/2014) [-]
It resembles a dolphin but the beluga is actually the smallest whale. What separates the two is the fact that the beluga is in the Genus Monodontidae. And more recent genetic evidence shows dolphins are in the genus Delphinidae. Belugas also lack a dorsal fin and are between the sizes of the largest known dolphin species and the smaller of the whale species. Their 7 neck vertebra are not fused together so they do not have to turn their whole bodies to look left and right. But it is a common misconception that they are in fact a dolphin.

TL;DR Sciency mumbo jumbo as proof that a beluga is not a dolphin
#15 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
they are lagrer than orcas? 'Cause I am pretty sure that those are Dolphins.
But anyway, sorry then, but it seems like it is a common misconception so we can forgive OP
#16 - dadadadavis (04/30/2014) [-]
Thank you for the correction. Orcas are in fact larger than belugas and are also dolphins. SO my information was incorrect to a point. What i should have said was average. so in a lump of all species they are in between. And no need to be sorry. Knowledge is just knowledge that is ment to be refined and corrected. Nobody knows everything
#10 - okay, this might be hard to you, but a beluga whale is actuall…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/30/2014 on Dolphin. 0
#11 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
at least afaik, and i am no expert
#12 - dadadadavis (04/30/2014) [-]
It resembles a dolphin but the beluga is actually the smallest whale. What separates the two is the fact that the beluga is in the Genus Monodontidae. And more recent genetic evidence shows dolphins are in the genus Delphinidae. Belugas also lack a dorsal fin and are between the sizes of the largest known dolphin species and the smaller of the whale species. Their 7 neck vertebra are not fused together so they do not have to turn their whole bodies to look left and right. But it is a common misconception that they are in fact a dolphin.

TL;DR Sciency mumbo jumbo as proof that a beluga is not a dolphin
#15 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
they are lagrer than orcas? 'Cause I am pretty sure that those are Dolphins.
But anyway, sorry then, but it seems like it is a common misconception so we can forgive OP
#16 - dadadadavis (04/30/2014) [-]
Thank you for the correction. Orcas are in fact larger than belugas and are also dolphins. SO my information was incorrect to a point. What i should have said was average. so in a lump of all species they are in between. And no need to be sorry. Knowledge is just knowledge that is ment to be refined and corrected. Nobody knows everything
#9 - I kind of feel like"they" also do the stuff displaye… 04/30/2014 on haha black people 0
#5 - back to the future reference? Haven't seen teh movie in ages  [+] (3 new replies) 04/30/2014 on Skrillex +2
User avatar #7 - EnergizierAnon (04/30/2014) [-]
naa man, this is a family guy reference, which in turn was a reference to back to the future.
#24 - ripgeckosncherios (05/01/2014) [-]
so many references
User avatar #25 - EnergizierAnon (05/02/2014) [-]
we need to go deeper. Referenception.
#93 - As others pointed out: sorrelation is not causation 04/30/2014 on How horrible 0
#57 - or was that sarcasm? 04/30/2014 on This site sucks 0
#56 - that does not seem to be the general option, since he is 83 th…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/30/2014 on This site sucks 0
#57 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
or was that sarcasm?
#35 - We don't need fat anymore, definiately with you there. But at … 04/27/2014 on ... 0
#30 - the theory itself is true. meaning SOME scientists think that …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/27/2014 on ... +1
User avatar #33 - strifethethird (04/27/2014) [-]
Fat is good, that's why we have it, it gives us energy when we don't have food, and it keeps us warm since humans have lost like 99% of our body hair unlike other Apes.
The only thing now is that we don't really need it, before it was because humans hunted and you don't always get the food you need from hunting. now i can go to the store to buy what ever i want. i also see it as a way of saying that you were healthy, you know the fatter one got more food and is stronger, but now we don't really need it, unless you live a primitive lifestyle in some isolated forest somewhere. It also kept us warm in the winter when all we wore were loincloths.
That Theory has some truth to it, but saying that we should still be fat, because thousands of years ago our ancestors were fat is pretty stupid, it's like saying that we shouldn't live in houses because thousands of years ago our ancestors lived in caves.

i weigh about 240 (overweight) and i think who ever posted that is a dumbass who is to lazy to get off their fat ass and excersise and finds excuses not too.
#35 - ripgeckosncherios (04/27/2014) [-]
We don't need fat anymore, definiately with you there. But at the same time we don't NEED to be skinny, so as long as the person doesn't glorify being fat and/or can't stand up on their own, then I am fine with them
#3 - ? 04/27/2014 on Israel 0
#18 - It is only 1800 years old afaik, still a valid point (old … 04/27/2014 on Spoiler +1
#17 - there is some hilarious **** in it, especially in… 04/27/2014 on Spoiler 0
#28 - whats wrong with a kindle? not saying there is nothing wrong w…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/27/2014 on This site sucks +2
#52 - nospyonme (04/27/2014) [-]
There is nothing wrong with it
#56 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
that does not seem to be the general option, since he is 83 thumbs in the positive
#57 - ripgeckosncherios (04/30/2014) [-]
or was that sarcasm?
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 85 / Total items point value: 85

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#3 - redfummer (07/07/2014) [-]
youre a ****** troll
please stop stealing oxygen
#4 to #3 - ripgeckosncherios (07/07/2014) [-]
well that is kind of rude
what are you referring to exactly?
#1 - anonymous (02/17/2014) [-]
what is he talking about.
#2 to #1 - ripgeckosncherios (02/17/2014) [-]
what is who talking about?
 Friends (0)