first of all, it was a typo, second of all, no, it's not faster, it has a lower clock speed and suffers from enormous software errors.
the 690, is in essence, the worst card on earth. it has more issues than any other card on the market.

I am aware that it's two 6970's, i own a 6990, this was the original concept the 7990 was built upon.

oh, here, have a chart, with bright colors and short words, you should be able to understand it.
www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Clock speeds are not the only factor.

Passmark is a joke. It is not a reliable benchmark. It has practically no SLI/crossfire support you smartass. So offcourse a double gpu will be slow.
Bring up numbers that make sense next time, like the video I linked you.

I am not spening my time anymore on an ignorant dumbfuck like you.
7990>690>Titan>780>680 It's just the way it is.

google the 690, lol. it's appaulling. NO-ONE owns one, and those that do, wouldnt advise anyone to buy one, the drivers are so fucking bad it barely runs any game at all, and most of them don't utilize the second core, an issue the 7990 suffers from, to a lesser extent.

Feel free to school me on dual-GPU cards once you've owned one for two years.

You are such an idiot. Many youtubers use one. The drivers do not suck since it's the fucking same as 2 680's in SLI.

watch this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sQLBv77s_8

feel free to explain to me why Nvidia are advising people against buying them, then.

The 7990 is not faster, despite being a dual CPU, it's actually less powerful than the 680.

They are advising against it if you're gaming at 1080p, because it's overkill.

*GPU. You dense motherfucker the 7990 consists of 2 7970's. One 7970 is on par with a 680. You're an idiot if you think that two 7970's are slower than a single 680. In fact, a 7990 is even faster than a 690 (which consists of 2 680's).

You don't know jack shit about computers. Plese stop thinking you know a lot about it.

first of all, it was a typo, second of all, no, it's not faster, it has a lower clock speed and suffers from enormous software errors.
the 690, is in essence, the worst card on earth. it has more issues than any other card on the market.

I am aware that it's two 6970's, i own a 6990, this was the original concept the 7990 was built upon.

oh, here, have a chart, with bright colors and short words, you should be able to understand it.
www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Clock speeds are not the only factor.

Passmark is a joke. It is not a reliable benchmark. It has practically no SLI/crossfire support you smartass. So offcourse a double gpu will be slow.
Bring up numbers that make sense next time, like the video I linked you.

I am not spening my time anymore on an ignorant dumbfuck like you.
7990>690>Titan>780>680 It's just the way it is.

google the 690, lol. it's appaulling. NO-ONE owns one, and those that do, wouldnt advise anyone to buy one, the drivers are so fucking bad it barely runs any game at all, and most of them don't utilize the second core, an issue the 7990 suffers from, to a lesser extent.

Feel free to school me on dual-GPU cards once you've owned one for two years.

You are such an idiot. Many youtubers use one. The drivers do not suck since it's the fucking same as 2 680's in SLI.

watch this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sQLBv77s_8

no, it will ONLY outperform that, if it's running on a TOP of the line Mobo/cpu config, xenon or above.
without these, the titan is bottlenecked, and runs sub-par, in-fact, with only a single core, the Gtx titan is one of the worst cards you can buy, "power-to-cost" wise.

once dual/tri SLI'd, however, it is very impressive, outperforming everything else, easily.

but, on many games, a single Titan actually performs worse than even the 7990

Any decent gpu is bottlenecked by a single core cpu. Bf3 won't even start on a single core.

No, a 3770k/4770k will be just fine, even a 2500k will not bottleneck the titan so far that it performs worse than a 680.

What the hell are you even thinking? If a cpu bottlenecks the titan, it will bottleneck the 680 too. So even in that case, no the titan would not be slower.

And of course a 7990 is faster, it's a dual gpu. Just stop, you obviously don't know your shit.

feel free to explain to me why Nvidia are advising people against buying them, then.

The 7990 is not faster, despite being a dual CPU, it's actually less powerful than the 680.

They are advising against it if you're gaming at 1080p, because it's overkill.

*GPU. You dense motherfucker the 7990 consists of 2 7970's. One 7970 is on par with a 680. You're an idiot if you think that two 7970's are slower than a single 680. In fact, a 7990 is even faster than a 690 (which consists of 2 680's).

You don't know jack shit about computers. Plese stop thinking you know a lot about it.

first of all, it was a typo, second of all, no, it's not faster, it has a lower clock speed and suffers from enormous software errors.
the 690, is in essence, the worst card on earth. it has more issues than any other card on the market.

I am aware that it's two 6970's, i own a 6990, this was the original concept the 7990 was built upon.

oh, here, have a chart, with bright colors and short words, you should be able to understand it.
www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Clock speeds are not the only factor.

Passmark is a joke. It is not a reliable benchmark. It has practically no SLI/crossfire support you smartass. So offcourse a double gpu will be slow.
Bring up numbers that make sense next time, like the video I linked you.

I am not spening my time anymore on an ignorant dumbfuck like you.
7990>690>Titan>780>680 It's just the way it is.

google the 690, lol. it's appaulling. NO-ONE owns one, and those that do, wouldnt advise anyone to buy one, the drivers are so fucking bad it barely runs any game at all, and most of them don't utilize the second core, an issue the 7990 suffers from, to a lesser extent.

Feel free to school me on dual-GPU cards once you've owned one for two years.

You are such an idiot. Many youtubers use one. The drivers do not suck since it's the fucking same as 2 680's in SLI.

watch this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sQLBv77s_8

I do agree though that a gtx 680 would have been more than sufficient. Since the demo probably was only at 1080p a gtx 670 would have been enough too.

Because just like the US Government, DJ 4DM1N is always watching.

If the creators name isn't Jimmy Rustle, there's something wrong.

I'm sorry, but what. the. fuck. is the point of archiving an image board... When you don't archive the fucking images? It's like taking a shit and cleaning up with a saw blade, what the fuck is the point.

no idea, it's pointless indeed, just wanted to share

If the creators name isn't Jimmy Rustle, there's something wrong.

Bill Gates bailed a long time ago.

Bill gates doesnt run that shit anymore.

[Witty reply to comment goes here]

[User claiming to have forgotten to log in goes here]

[user flaming anon for asian comment goes here]

[user rolling random picture goes here]

[comment with brackets goes here]

[Picture of SpongeBob saying "SOILED IT" goes here]

[Guy claiming 'he is so done' goes here]

[Navy seal copy pasta goes here]

Last light definitely polished up the AI and the gameplay, and the story is better too, but that fucking atmosphere, man...the story is still pretty cool, too, and it's just an awesome enough experience in of itself that it's more than worth playing despite is slight shortcomings

Great. Thanks, I'll try it when I find the time