Fuck niggers

Fuck whiteys
(I can use big words too!)

Touche.

Flat out murder is quite extreme, I'll admit, but I think if there is some $25,00 procedure that takes like 48 hours to have some disabled kid with
some detrimental brain impairment survive the first few days of his life, just avoid it altogether.

Also, I'd like to say I'm not the one thumbing you down, I try to avoid getting that petty when arguing with people on FJ.

I do strongly disagree with you. But it seems to be a point where it doesn't matter because neither of our stances will ever actually come to reality.

In any case, I kindof like my red thumbs. If you'll take notice I have quite a bit of them.

The internet changes people, it breeds hate for hate with hate. And as much as it can be a source of good, (see gay marriage,) it can also be a harbinger of blind hatred, (see religion, women & "feminism")

I see red thumbs as a way of telling myself that I refuse to change my own views to please, and conform to people I don't know.

Actually, this is a misconception that only applies to the top-of-the-top. Obsolescence is only true when the parts you have stop being able to do what they've done at a reasonable rate. This means it depends on the person using the machine. As technology does go forward it becomes more hardware heavy to do things such as read email or check the news. A computer from when facebook first came out would lag terribly trying to access facebook now. But a computer bought today for ~$500 should last 6-7 years, unless you're gaming.

I was going to correct you and say "a computer that came out when fb did would be fine"

Then I realised how long FB has been around... Pentium 4/ Pentium D days if I'm not mistaken. It'd do it.... but only just... and it'd need a nice clean OS with no junk in it.

Yeah, it's scary. It's like, "Wait thats not... Oh God I'm getting older..."

Somebody with cerebral palsy is not a tard. They are handicapped. It's totally different.

Okay, now I see where you're coming from I can explain what I meant. When I say tard, I'm talking about people with down syndrome
or some sort of mental disorder that inhibits their ability to do much beyond the most basic of human instincts. If someone can contribute,
whether it be physical labour or what have you, they are making up for the food, drink, space etc that they consume.

Think of it this way - someone loans an unemployed friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent. This friend then gets a job, and from then on is able to pay his own rent, and over time pay his friend back.

Then the first person loans another friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent, which he does, but he makes no effort to get a job
and continually relies on his friend to pay his rent for him. This means the first person is losing money, and his friend has
no way to pay it back. Soon this person is unable to pay his own rent, let alone his friend's, and so they both end up as poor bastards.

You do realize that people have varying levels of impairment even within the same handicap right?

There's no way of knowing exactly how deep these impairments are unless they are allowed to grow to adulthood. Meaning we can't know if someone is going to be useless until they actually are, and by that point it is wrong to kill them. (in fact it's wrong to kill them at anypoint.)

This idea of contributing to society is flawed in that society is flawed. I could go on and on about how materialistic society is, and how our value is defined by what material we contribute to society. (A mindset that absolutely appalls me)

In fact, most people born with crippling disabilities can be raised to function independently. Completely independently. It's just the problem that people don't know how to raise them right. Completely segregating them is going to turn them into a shell, but turning them loose is going to give them no chance.
Ultimately that's what I believe everyone should be given a chance. It doesn't matter how they were born. They should be given a chance. And if they end up not doing anything, oh well there are bigger wastes. *cough* the kardashians *cough* honey boo boo *cough*

Extinguishing that chance, and murdering them would turn us into inhumane monsters. And that's a world I hope to never see.

Flat out murder is quite extreme, I'll admit, but I think if there is some $25,00 procedure that takes like 48 hours to have some disabled kid with
some detrimental brain impairment survive the first few days of his life, just avoid it altogether.

Also, I'd like to say I'm not the one thumbing you down, I try to avoid getting that petty when arguing with people on FJ.

I do strongly disagree with you. But it seems to be a point where it doesn't matter because neither of our stances will ever actually come to reality.

In any case, I kindof like my red thumbs. If you'll take notice I have quite a bit of them.

The internet changes people, it breeds hate for hate with hate. And as much as it can be a source of good, (see gay marriage,) it can also be a harbinger of blind hatred, (see religion, women & "feminism")

I see red thumbs as a way of telling myself that I refuse to change my own views to please, and conform to people I don't know.

I'll admit that was poorly worded on my part, but I'm trying to get across that there is no benefit to keeping them alive.
Also, stop with the
>hurr
>durr
bullshit, I'm trying to have an intelligent discussion with you.

You textbook people as tards and diminish all value to their life.

call me a overlysensitive prick but I still believe human life has value. Regardless of how little.

I went to a program a while back, and the director there had cerebral polzy (Not sure how to spell that.) But he was born with it, and thus he didn't know any other kind of life, aside from the way people treated him differently. He is married now with two kids, he works and is the program director at a campsite that hosts many youth programs.

Imagine if he were to be classified as a "tard" and murdered at birth. You'd be snuffing out any chance he had of becoming something today. And if you were to kill "tards" as they become adults and still cannot contribute. Then it becomes cruel and inhuman.
For all you know the "tard" here was nothing but an asshole who was trying to play the fact that he had a disability. And I still don't believe being an asshole justifies being murdered.

Somebody with cerebral palsy is not a tard. They are handicapped. It's totally different.

Okay, now I see where you're coming from I can explain what I meant. When I say tard, I'm talking about people with down syndrome
or some sort of mental disorder that inhibits their ability to do much beyond the most basic of human instincts. If someone can contribute,
whether it be physical labour or what have you, they are making up for the food, drink, space etc that they consume.

Think of it this way - someone loans an unemployed friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent. This friend then gets a job, and from then on is able to pay his own rent, and over time pay his friend back.

Then the first person loans another friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent, which he does, but he makes no effort to get a job
and continually relies on his friend to pay his rent for him. This means the first person is losing money, and his friend has
no way to pay it back. Soon this person is unable to pay his own rent, let alone his friend's, and so they both end up as poor bastards.

You do realize that people have varying levels of impairment even within the same handicap right?

There's no way of knowing exactly how deep these impairments are unless they are allowed to grow to adulthood. Meaning we can't know if someone is going to be useless until they actually are, and by that point it is wrong to kill them. (in fact it's wrong to kill them at anypoint.)

This idea of contributing to society is flawed in that society is flawed. I could go on and on about how materialistic society is, and how our value is defined by what material we contribute to society. (A mindset that absolutely appalls me)

In fact, most people born with crippling disabilities can be raised to function independently. Completely independently. It's just the problem that people don't know how to raise them right. Completely segregating them is going to turn them into a shell, but turning them loose is going to give them no chance.
Ultimately that's what I believe everyone should be given a chance. It doesn't matter how they were born. They should be given a chance. And if they end up not doing anything, oh well there are bigger wastes. *cough* the kardashians *cough* honey boo boo *cough*

Extinguishing that chance, and murdering them would turn us into inhumane monsters. And that's a world I hope to never see.

Flat out murder is quite extreme, I'll admit, but I think if there is some $25,00 procedure that takes like 48 hours to have some disabled kid with
some detrimental brain impairment survive the first few days of his life, just avoid it altogether.

Also, I'd like to say I'm not the one thumbing you down, I try to avoid getting that petty when arguing with people on FJ.

I do strongly disagree with you. But it seems to be a point where it doesn't matter because neither of our stances will ever actually come to reality.

In any case, I kindof like my red thumbs. If you'll take notice I have quite a bit of them.

The internet changes people, it breeds hate for hate with hate. And as much as it can be a source of good, (see gay marriage,) it can also be a harbinger of blind hatred, (see religion, women & "feminism")

I see red thumbs as a way of telling myself that I refuse to change my own views to please, and conform to people I don't know.

Im not going to bring any "better than you" shit into this, but who is more valuable to the human race, A healthy, productive man/woman or a resource sucking, stupid, intolerably disgusting leech with nothing to offer but a few potato jokes?

>Not going to bring any better than you shit
>Brings better than you shit

3/10 jimmies mildly rustled

I'll admit that was poorly worded on my part, but I'm trying to get across that there is no benefit to keeping them alive.
Also, stop with the
>hurr
>durr
bullshit, I'm trying to have an intelligent discussion with you.

You textbook people as tards and diminish all value to their life.

call me a overlysensitive prick but I still believe human life has value. Regardless of how little.

I went to a program a while back, and the director there had cerebral polzy (Not sure how to spell that.) But he was born with it, and thus he didn't know any other kind of life, aside from the way people treated him differently. He is married now with two kids, he works and is the program director at a campsite that hosts many youth programs.

Imagine if he were to be classified as a "tard" and murdered at birth. You'd be snuffing out any chance he had of becoming something today. And if you were to kill "tards" as they become adults and still cannot contribute. Then it becomes cruel and inhuman.
For all you know the "tard" here was nothing but an asshole who was trying to play the fact that he had a disability. And I still don't believe being an asshole justifies being murdered.

Somebody with cerebral palsy is not a tard. They are handicapped. It's totally different.

Okay, now I see where you're coming from I can explain what I meant. When I say tard, I'm talking about people with down syndrome
or some sort of mental disorder that inhibits their ability to do much beyond the most basic of human instincts. If someone can contribute,
whether it be physical labour or what have you, they are making up for the food, drink, space etc that they consume.

Think of it this way - someone loans an unemployed friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent. This friend then gets a job, and from then on is able to pay his own rent, and over time pay his friend back.

Then the first person loans another friend a hundred bucks to pay his rent, which he does, but he makes no effort to get a job
and continually relies on his friend to pay his rent for him. This means the first person is losing money, and his friend has
no way to pay it back. Soon this person is unable to pay his own rent, let alone his friend's, and so they both end up as poor bastards.

You do realize that people have varying levels of impairment even within the same handicap right?

There's no way of knowing exactly how deep these impairments are unless they are allowed to grow to adulthood. Meaning we can't know if someone is going to be useless until they actually are, and by that point it is wrong to kill them. (in fact it's wrong to kill them at anypoint.)

This idea of contributing to society is flawed in that society is flawed. I could go on and on about how materialistic society is, and how our value is defined by what material we contribute to society. (A mindset that absolutely appalls me)

In fact, most people born with crippling disabilities can be raised to function independently. Completely independently. It's just the problem that people don't know how to raise them right. Completely segregating them is going to turn them into a shell, but turning them loose is going to give them no chance.
Ultimately that's what I believe everyone should be given a chance. It doesn't matter how they were born. They should be given a chance. And if they end up not doing anything, oh well there are bigger wastes. *cough* the kardashians *cough* honey boo boo *cough*

Extinguishing that chance, and murdering them would turn us into inhumane monsters. And that's a world I hope to never see.

Flat out murder is quite extreme, I'll admit, but I think if there is some $25,00 procedure that takes like 48 hours to have some disabled kid with
some detrimental brain impairment survive the first few days of his life, just avoid it altogether.

Also, I'd like to say I'm not the one thumbing you down, I try to avoid getting that petty when arguing with people on FJ.

I do strongly disagree with you. But it seems to be a point where it doesn't matter because neither of our stances will ever actually come to reality.

In any case, I kindof like my red thumbs. If you'll take notice I have quite a bit of them.

The internet changes people, it breeds hate for hate with hate. And as much as it can be a source of good, (see gay marriage,) it can also be a harbinger of blind hatred, (see religion, women & "feminism")

I see red thumbs as a way of telling myself that I refuse to change my own views to please, and conform to people I don't know.

No, it is I who should apologize. I truly do not understand what it is like to have my culture assimilated and destroyed. I understand your anger towards my statements, though I'd like to point out that what I previously said was not untrue. I should have been clearer, however. What I meant to say (and should have provided) is that I know of examples of great monetary compensation to Natives from the government. I am friends with one native family who is not required to pay taxes and receives up to $20,000 from the government each year. Though I know that not all cases are alike and not every Native American is compensated like this. You've made it clear that you don't care about the money, and I agree it can't make up for past wrongs, but it can't be denied that it is a gesture that is meant to help Natives survive in current society.

Moreover, I didn't mean to make it seem like I assumed you were American. I simply didn't know whether you were Canadian or American, and so I didn't want to offend by making it seem as though I assumed that the level of compensation was the same in both countries.

Furthermore, I never said that I approved of society's violent acts which ripped your culture from you. Perhaps I was unclear about this too. All I mean to say is that blending of culture is necessary if cultures are to live together. Blending of culture can be achieved by two cultures simply understanding each other and being willing to live amongst one another. I know that the government was not successful in blending our cultures because there exists so much hate between them today. I am a firm believer that tolerance of all cultures is key, and I hope that I did not come off as intolerant to you.

In any case, what I have said above are just side notes. I did not mean to offend and am sorry if you were insulted in any way. My views most likely seem insensitive, but they are based on the things I have seen, and not on prejudiced and ignorant misconceptions.

Good luck, my friend. May Talos guide you.

And I didn't need to invest millions into an ad campaign to do it! Hear that Bloomberg?

I must recede deep into a desolate mountain somewhere in the Himalayas to contemplate life itself...

Good luck, my friend. May Talos guide you.

>chosen undead
>not being a dick

Pick one cutie

fuck

Yeah....but imagine how many souls Dragonborn would drop.

only if the chosen undead decides to be a dick. He'd get way more souls in co-op. All those dragons and shit. Plus they could go kill everything in Lordran, AND Skyrim.

And there's way more stuff to kill in Skyrim

>chosen undead
>not being a dick

Pick one cutie

fuck