|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #15008 on CommentsLevel 224 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to residentblackman Block residentblackman Invite residentblackman to be your friend flag avatar
- Views: 27703What white girls look like when...
641 64 Total: +577
- Views: 15412Stallone's motivational story
304 57 Total: +247
- Views: 16483Hey Joe!
277 41 Total: +236
- Views: 14770A deep thought gone in a moment
240 19 Total: +221
- Views: 11668If you get furious about....
230 36 Total: +194
- Views: 14617Porn humor is best
187 22 Total: +165
- Views: 63174How I eat da pussy
1577 112 Total: +1465
- Views: 56305Knocked the fuck out!!
1107 66 Total: +1041
- Views: 4068Jaw Breaker
24 2 Total: +22
- Views: 2138No escape
12 1 Total: +11
latest user's comments
|#71 - What a fat ******* **** , maybe he sh…||02/23/2014 on I shouldn't be laughing....||-5|
|#113 - If tumblr SJWs hate men so much, why do they want to look like them???||02/15/2014 on Meanwhile on Tumblr||+1|
|#385 - It's not because corporations are greedy, it's because there a… [+] (6 new replies)||01/26/2014 on Good ol' U.S.A.||+1|
#397 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
No, it's both.
Regulations drive up the cost in certain aspects because you need to make sure the quality of the procedure and the supplies are up to par, but the corporations involved also mark up their prices quite a bit because obtaining maximum profit is their #1 concern.
In other words, the quality of the healthcare in the U.S. is probably better than Spain's on average, but also more expensive. The price could be brought down by getting rid of regulations, but that would also lower the quality. The price could also be brought down by regulating the prices set by corporations involved in healthcare, but that would cut into their profits.
#459 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
They don't have to raise their prices. Again, as I said earlier, prices are driven up by both factors. Corporations usually offer higher-quality products, especially here in the U.S. because of all the regulation, but the prices are driven way up by both the increased expense of regulation and the corporation's drive to maximize profit.
How is you hating communists relevant to this conversation? Government healthcare and communism are two very different things.
#473 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
First, you're oversimplifying communism. I don't support communism, but I also appreciate history and understand what communism was meant to do and why it didn't work.
Second, even if we follow your definition and say that communists like to cut corners and nationalize vital infrastructure, that's not what happened with healthcare reform in the U.S. It was an expensive program and it didn't nationalize healthcare. It only created a government plan and brought some new regulations on private insurers. The government competing with private industry is not the same as the government nationalizing a private industry.
Finally, even if we say that cutting corners and nationalizing vital infrastructure is what communists like to do, and even if we say that's what the government did, doing something that a group likes to do does not make you part of that group. Communism is a very specific economic theory, and the capitalism practiced here in the U.S. is extremely far from it.
#486 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
It doesn't work because it deprives enterprising men and women of the incentives needed to make any form of advancement. Why invent something if the State will take credit for it and leave you where you've always been? No incentive, no advancement.
Communism is not an economic theory, it has been proven to be impractical on a grand scale. Now Uncle Sam's inching closer and closer to it…
|#104 - Rattata has had enough of Arbok's ****||01/20/2014 on Survival of the fittest||+4|
|#292 - Never hit a lady, but there are certain requisites to be consi… [+] (1 new reply)||01/19/2014 on Double that Standard||+1|
#296 - zomaru (01/19/2014) [-]
I don't like the way you said that.
There may be times when a Gentleman deserves to be hit, If that situation arises and a lady smacks him then bu no right does either lose their standing.
Also, Women are not always weaker, but at the same time a hit thrown is rarely not deserved.
And, to take someone out seems unnecessary. If someone hits you and it was undeserved, hit them back with as much force. No more, no less. One does not need to get mad, only even.
|#303 - I disagree with both egalitarianism and feminism. It is imposs…||01/18/2014 on This is feminism||+4|
|#25 - ******* ******* puppies, I want 30 of them||01/10/2014 on fucking adorable||+2|
|#131 - gay||01/10/2014 on What do you like to play?||-6|
|#98 - damn OP, you're not just a ****** , you're a …||01/09/2014 on Read description||0|
|#42 - **residentblackman rolled a random image posted in comment #… [+] (1 new reply)||01/06/2014 on I Can't argue With That||-1|
Join Subscribe fitness