x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

redstonealchemist

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Age: 20
Youtube Channel: HotPocky
Steam Profile: RedstoneMage (i think)
Consoles Owned: DS lite, GBA, PC, PS2, PS3, xbox 360
Video Games Played: pokeymanz emerald, all of the DMC games, most harry potter games, tomb raider, saints row 4, 7 days to die, spore, warframe, amnesia, god of war 2, batman arkham asylum and city
X-box Gamertag: Sanuutch
PSN: i can't remember it
Interests: mlp, meinkraft, gaming, losing the game, meme-ing, writing
Date Signed Up:3/02/2013
Last Login:3/06/2015
Location:England
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#14193
Comment Ranking:#1218
Highest Content Rank:#4063
Highest Comment Rank:#882
Content Thumbs: 380 total,  655 ,  275
Comment Thumbs: 11207 total,  15334 ,  4127
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 31 Content: Peasant → Level 32 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 294 Comments: Post Master → Level 295 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:5
Content Views:72810
Times Content Favorited:40 times
Total Comments Made:8597
FJ Points:308
Favorite Tags: the (4) | a (2) | dumbass (2) | fag (2) | fapenning (2) | funny (2) | game (2) | i (2) | it (2) | its (2) | man (2) | nude (2) | nudes (2) | repost (2) | sorry (2) | steam (2) | still (2) | Stupid (2) | You (2)
i have trouble thinking INSIDE the box.

latest user's comments

#59 - sup ***** have we met?  [+] (7 new replies) 01/30/2015 on redstonealchemist's profile 0
User avatar #61 - keatontheghostfox (01/30/2015) [-]
If we haven't before we have now :p (think you replied to a comment I posted or something)
User avatar #62 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
k
#63 - keatontheghostfox (01/30/2015) [-]
Take this!
#64 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
User avatar #65 - keatontheghostfox (01/30/2015) [-]
That's a bold thing to say :p
#66 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
User avatar #60 - keatontheghostfox (01/30/2015) [-]
maybe
#69 - i found out the problem. apparently there's somethign wron…  [+] (11 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Math 0
User avatar #70 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
www.opera.com/
Just download it again.

Also, then it is most likely a setting for youtube. Still though, not having HTML5 support is BAD.
User avatar #71 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
it's the other way around apprently.
https is working perfectly fine, it's the flash that isn't.
apparently there is a setting that excludes all kinds of pop-ups, which includes YT fullscreen, but i can't find it.
i've tried DLing it again, but it's just some minor bug fixes that i probably won't even notice.
User avatar #72 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
My sentences meant "a setting for youtube" not "a youtube setting". Ofcourse it is in your browser setting then, it is most likely a typical "Do you allow 'youtube' do display in fullscreen?" where you pressed by mistake "deny".
User avatar #73 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
yeah, but i've searched through the settings upwards of a dozen times, nothing even comes close to that
User avatar #74 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset the user profile.
User avatar #75 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
the... the what?
User avatar #76 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset all the data the data that opera has stored.
User avatar #77 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i can't freaking believe it. the entire problem with WebGL was that i didn't have the hardware acceleration active.
and you fucking know what?
it was the problem with youtube not resizing properly when the video went to fullscreen.
every single fucking thing that went wrong was just because i had hardware acceleration deactivated.
User avatar #78 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
I have no idea why it was disabled for you.
User avatar #79 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i have 4gb ram and 250gb harddrive.
i try to save as much space as i can and i thought "hardware acceleration? i bet that would use more space!"
i see now that it's indisputably necessary to proper internet function.
User avatar #80 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Well ALWAYS USE HARDWARE ACCELERATION. It actually decreases RAM usage by making it closer to the metal.
#95 - ************ didn't even know about 'odou' meanin…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/30/2015 on Can I Join You Boys In The... +1
User avatar #96 - muthsera (01/30/2015) [-]
Otosan.
#297 - i at least understand that observing a subatmoic particle chan…  [+] (10 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Science Shit : Black Holes. 0
#301 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Indeed. My favorite thing is the whole "shells are representative of statistical probability" thing, because an electron COULD be there, or it could be over by Saturn, chillin. An electron from Pluto could be living in your asshole. Its great. Electrons: the subatomic giver of no fucks.
Them and free quarks.
Honestly it amazes me that chemically, anything at all gets done. The electrons could just nope out and tell your reaction to go fuck itself. But, it doesn't. Shit like that and quarks having the (statistically possible, but high improbable) ability to construct a fully formed Victorian era chair with the correct carbon dating inside of you in an instant, just because fuck you and what you think.


Crazy how nature do dat doe
User avatar #302 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
this, this fucking right here is why i want to do college chem and physics.
fucking YES!
no idea about free quarks though
thought: basis similar to radiation?
#303 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Not at all. Quarks are the particles that make up larger particles such as mesons, Hadrons, etc. Which in turn make up atoms and so on. Free quarks are these blocks (either rare or fucking everywhere. Depending on who you ask) ungrouped. Like finding O instead of 02. They have this habit of phasing in and out of existence because why the fuck not. There is speculation that they are actually moving on the timeline. This is going to be my specific area of study once its all said and done. Crazy little bastards.
User avatar #304 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
how does observing a free quark work? does it change how it behaves? this is fucking fascinating!
#306 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
And as far as the changes, we're not sure how to determine a "regular" set of behaviors yet, since we just (relatively) figured out there's like eight different kinds (called flavors, because reasons) and are starting to break open subatomic particles to see what quarks they're made of.
#307 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
well i can see easily why that would fascinate you to make it your expertise, imagine what we'll know once humanity have unlocked the behaviours of the quark flavours!
we might even begin to understand how the universe was born...
god damn.
#308 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
You know man, to be perfectly ho eat with you, and I know fj hates this, but the more I study quantum mechanics, the more I'm convinced it was a creators doing. Maybe not whole cloth, as is, but certainly designed, rules set, and paths plotted. Stuff at the atomic level and below gets too weird to not be for me. I mean, once you start working with electrons you're so deep in math its insanity. The father down the rabbit hole you go, the more complex it gets. Exponentially. But its all ordered chaos; our business is finding the rules. There isn't a thing yet that for certain cannot be mathematically defined; and since I'm not in the Pythagorean cult, I have to go the other way and instead of the numbers being divine, that the divine works with a logical intent, even if it is laberynthian.

Complex conjugate vector space
It even sounds mean, and that's the grass on top of the rabbit hole.
User avatar #311 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
i see what you mean.
with the way subatomic particles behave, and even the unknown logic behind quarks, it's very difficult to restrain from putting a man behind the curtain.
but science isn't finding the route to the conclusion, science is going along the path to wherever it may lead.
and maths (and certain features within science) are just a way to explain how we got onto that path and where it lead us.
before Einstein, who knew E=MC^2? before Newton, who knew calculus?
before science, who knew the world?
reality is imperceptibly complex and the laws that govern quarks permeate literally everything. the smaller we go, the more complex, but one day humanity will find the answer and everything would be obvious.
i hypothesise the things we already know aren't just laws that explain functions of the universe, i think they are features of the universe the best way we can describe them!
what's the difference between space and time? what's the difference between the fundamental forces of reality? what's the difference between electromagnetism and geomagnetism?
reality isn't a creation, it isn't a creator, it's just there and the biggest question asked by the wisest of us is the smallest question asked by the youngest:
Why?
#309 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Honest with*
#305 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Kind of like observing an electron, squared. You observe the effects of its effects of its effects and hope you figure out what's going on. Visual identification is by definition impossible because they're smaller than an electron.
#295 - i do understand quantum mechanics more than the average layman…  [+] (12 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Science Shit : Black Holes. +1
#296 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
To put it how my professer did, ahem..
"Okay, so two balls are speeding at each other in a vacuum. When they hit, which way is the one on the left spinning? Yes, you in the back. No, you can't, shut up.
Now that you people are done lying to me, because I gave you no data, imagine we have some. But now, imagine when you read it, it changes. No, not the whole thing. You read the position, and the diagram rearranges. Okay, that's how this is going to work. So sit down, strap in, because it's gonna get weird. And don't try to visualize during the math bit, I don't have time to clean your brain off the floor and I refuse to repeat my lecture. "
User avatar #297 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i at least understand that observing a subatmoic particle changes its state.
electrons in shells, the shells being nothing but an imaginary area where it's most likely to appear if you observe it. technically speaking depending on the test we could assume it's 'everywhere' in that area, but it's more accurate using a symbol to represent the unknown area.
i remember watching a video about looking at a prism through its rainbow through a method of intense magnification (i can't remember if it was a microscope or a telescope) and the result was seeing the rainbow in lines with specific black lines, these lines would be the electron configuration of the atoms within the prism and this method was used by a team of american women at some point in the last 200 years to categorise a truly vast number of stars, based sloely on their molecular shadows.
a truly fascinating subject.
#301 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Indeed. My favorite thing is the whole "shells are representative of statistical probability" thing, because an electron COULD be there, or it could be over by Saturn, chillin. An electron from Pluto could be living in your asshole. Its great. Electrons: the subatomic giver of no fucks.
Them and free quarks.
Honestly it amazes me that chemically, anything at all gets done. The electrons could just nope out and tell your reaction to go fuck itself. But, it doesn't. Shit like that and quarks having the (statistically possible, but high improbable) ability to construct a fully formed Victorian era chair with the correct carbon dating inside of you in an instant, just because fuck you and what you think.


Crazy how nature do dat doe
User avatar #302 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
this, this fucking right here is why i want to do college chem and physics.
fucking YES!
no idea about free quarks though
thought: basis similar to radiation?
#303 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Not at all. Quarks are the particles that make up larger particles such as mesons, Hadrons, etc. Which in turn make up atoms and so on. Free quarks are these blocks (either rare or fucking everywhere. Depending on who you ask) ungrouped. Like finding O instead of 02. They have this habit of phasing in and out of existence because why the fuck not. There is speculation that they are actually moving on the timeline. This is going to be my specific area of study once its all said and done. Crazy little bastards.
User avatar #304 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
how does observing a free quark work? does it change how it behaves? this is fucking fascinating!
#306 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
And as far as the changes, we're not sure how to determine a "regular" set of behaviors yet, since we just (relatively) figured out there's like eight different kinds (called flavors, because reasons) and are starting to break open subatomic particles to see what quarks they're made of.
#307 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
well i can see easily why that would fascinate you to make it your expertise, imagine what we'll know once humanity have unlocked the behaviours of the quark flavours!
we might even begin to understand how the universe was born...
god damn.
#308 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
You know man, to be perfectly ho eat with you, and I know fj hates this, but the more I study quantum mechanics, the more I'm convinced it was a creators doing. Maybe not whole cloth, as is, but certainly designed, rules set, and paths plotted. Stuff at the atomic level and below gets too weird to not be for me. I mean, once you start working with electrons you're so deep in math its insanity. The father down the rabbit hole you go, the more complex it gets. Exponentially. But its all ordered chaos; our business is finding the rules. There isn't a thing yet that for certain cannot be mathematically defined; and since I'm not in the Pythagorean cult, I have to go the other way and instead of the numbers being divine, that the divine works with a logical intent, even if it is laberynthian.

Complex conjugate vector space
It even sounds mean, and that's the grass on top of the rabbit hole.
User avatar #311 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
i see what you mean.
with the way subatomic particles behave, and even the unknown logic behind quarks, it's very difficult to restrain from putting a man behind the curtain.
but science isn't finding the route to the conclusion, science is going along the path to wherever it may lead.
and maths (and certain features within science) are just a way to explain how we got onto that path and where it lead us.
before Einstein, who knew E=MC^2? before Newton, who knew calculus?
before science, who knew the world?
reality is imperceptibly complex and the laws that govern quarks permeate literally everything. the smaller we go, the more complex, but one day humanity will find the answer and everything would be obvious.
i hypothesise the things we already know aren't just laws that explain functions of the universe, i think they are features of the universe the best way we can describe them!
what's the difference between space and time? what's the difference between the fundamental forces of reality? what's the difference between electromagnetism and geomagnetism?
reality isn't a creation, it isn't a creator, it's just there and the biggest question asked by the wisest of us is the smallest question asked by the youngest:
Why?
#309 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Honest with*
#305 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Kind of like observing an electron, squared. You observe the effects of its effects of its effects and hope you figure out what's going on. Visual identification is by definition impossible because they're smaller than an electron.
#67 - could that be why videos online don't like to fullscreen? (i c…  [+] (13 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Math 0
User avatar #68 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Dude, just upgrade your browser already. It is FREE so why would you stay on old software?
User avatar #69 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i found out the problem.
apparently there's somethign wrong with how my browser handles flash in fullscreen, so i'm using HTTPS for youtube videos.
also opera won't update and i can't even find the update settings.
User avatar #70 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
www.opera.com/
Just download it again.

Also, then it is most likely a setting for youtube. Still though, not having HTML5 support is BAD.
User avatar #71 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
it's the other way around apprently.
https is working perfectly fine, it's the flash that isn't.
apparently there is a setting that excludes all kinds of pop-ups, which includes YT fullscreen, but i can't find it.
i've tried DLing it again, but it's just some minor bug fixes that i probably won't even notice.
User avatar #72 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
My sentences meant "a setting for youtube" not "a youtube setting". Ofcourse it is in your browser setting then, it is most likely a typical "Do you allow 'youtube' do display in fullscreen?" where you pressed by mistake "deny".
User avatar #73 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
yeah, but i've searched through the settings upwards of a dozen times, nothing even comes close to that
User avatar #74 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset the user profile.
User avatar #75 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
the... the what?
User avatar #76 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset all the data the data that opera has stored.
User avatar #77 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i can't freaking believe it. the entire problem with WebGL was that i didn't have the hardware acceleration active.
and you fucking know what?
it was the problem with youtube not resizing properly when the video went to fullscreen.
every single fucking thing that went wrong was just because i had hardware acceleration deactivated.
User avatar #78 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
I have no idea why it was disabled for you.
User avatar #79 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i have 4gb ram and 250gb harddrive.
i try to save as much space as i can and i thought "hardware acceleration? i bet that would use more space!"
i see now that it's indisputably necessary to proper internet function.
User avatar #80 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Well ALWAYS USE HARDWARE ACCELERATION. It actually decreases RAM usage by making it closer to the metal.
#293 - thank you so much, i love learning! i'm going to have to l…  [+] (14 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Science Shit : Black Holes. +1
#294 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Yea, its pretty important to black hole theory. While youre at it, look into some of the quantum mechanics stuff. That's where my degree is. The universe loses its goddamned mind at the quantum level.
User avatar #295 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i do understand quantum mechanics more than the average layman, but i haven't had any formal education in it other than GCSE-level stuff (one down from college-level)
#296 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
To put it how my professer did, ahem..
"Okay, so two balls are speeding at each other in a vacuum. When they hit, which way is the one on the left spinning? Yes, you in the back. No, you can't, shut up.
Now that you people are done lying to me, because I gave you no data, imagine we have some. But now, imagine when you read it, it changes. No, not the whole thing. You read the position, and the diagram rearranges. Okay, that's how this is going to work. So sit down, strap in, because it's gonna get weird. And don't try to visualize during the math bit, I don't have time to clean your brain off the floor and I refuse to repeat my lecture. "
User avatar #297 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i at least understand that observing a subatmoic particle changes its state.
electrons in shells, the shells being nothing but an imaginary area where it's most likely to appear if you observe it. technically speaking depending on the test we could assume it's 'everywhere' in that area, but it's more accurate using a symbol to represent the unknown area.
i remember watching a video about looking at a prism through its rainbow through a method of intense magnification (i can't remember if it was a microscope or a telescope) and the result was seeing the rainbow in lines with specific black lines, these lines would be the electron configuration of the atoms within the prism and this method was used by a team of american women at some point in the last 200 years to categorise a truly vast number of stars, based sloely on their molecular shadows.
a truly fascinating subject.
#301 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Indeed. My favorite thing is the whole "shells are representative of statistical probability" thing, because an electron COULD be there, or it could be over by Saturn, chillin. An electron from Pluto could be living in your asshole. Its great. Electrons: the subatomic giver of no fucks.
Them and free quarks.
Honestly it amazes me that chemically, anything at all gets done. The electrons could just nope out and tell your reaction to go fuck itself. But, it doesn't. Shit like that and quarks having the (statistically possible, but high improbable) ability to construct a fully formed Victorian era chair with the correct carbon dating inside of you in an instant, just because fuck you and what you think.


Crazy how nature do dat doe
User avatar #302 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
this, this fucking right here is why i want to do college chem and physics.
fucking YES!
no idea about free quarks though
thought: basis similar to radiation?
#303 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Not at all. Quarks are the particles that make up larger particles such as mesons, Hadrons, etc. Which in turn make up atoms and so on. Free quarks are these blocks (either rare or fucking everywhere. Depending on who you ask) ungrouped. Like finding O instead of 02. They have this habit of phasing in and out of existence because why the fuck not. There is speculation that they are actually moving on the timeline. This is going to be my specific area of study once its all said and done. Crazy little bastards.
User avatar #304 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
how does observing a free quark work? does it change how it behaves? this is fucking fascinating!
#306 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
And as far as the changes, we're not sure how to determine a "regular" set of behaviors yet, since we just (relatively) figured out there's like eight different kinds (called flavors, because reasons) and are starting to break open subatomic particles to see what quarks they're made of.
#307 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
well i can see easily why that would fascinate you to make it your expertise, imagine what we'll know once humanity have unlocked the behaviours of the quark flavours!
we might even begin to understand how the universe was born...
god damn.
#308 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
You know man, to be perfectly ho eat with you, and I know fj hates this, but the more I study quantum mechanics, the more I'm convinced it was a creators doing. Maybe not whole cloth, as is, but certainly designed, rules set, and paths plotted. Stuff at the atomic level and below gets too weird to not be for me. I mean, once you start working with electrons you're so deep in math its insanity. The father down the rabbit hole you go, the more complex it gets. Exponentially. But its all ordered chaos; our business is finding the rules. There isn't a thing yet that for certain cannot be mathematically defined; and since I'm not in the Pythagorean cult, I have to go the other way and instead of the numbers being divine, that the divine works with a logical intent, even if it is laberynthian.

Complex conjugate vector space
It even sounds mean, and that's the grass on top of the rabbit hole.
User avatar #311 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
i see what you mean.
with the way subatomic particles behave, and even the unknown logic behind quarks, it's very difficult to restrain from putting a man behind the curtain.
but science isn't finding the route to the conclusion, science is going along the path to wherever it may lead.
and maths (and certain features within science) are just a way to explain how we got onto that path and where it lead us.
before Einstein, who knew E=MC^2? before Newton, who knew calculus?
before science, who knew the world?
reality is imperceptibly complex and the laws that govern quarks permeate literally everything. the smaller we go, the more complex, but one day humanity will find the answer and everything would be obvious.
i hypothesise the things we already know aren't just laws that explain functions of the universe, i think they are features of the universe the best way we can describe them!
what's the difference between space and time? what's the difference between the fundamental forces of reality? what's the difference between electromagnetism and geomagnetism?
reality isn't a creation, it isn't a creator, it's just there and the biggest question asked by the wisest of us is the smallest question asked by the youngest:
Why?
#309 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Honest with*
#305 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Kind of like observing an electron, squared. You observe the effects of its effects of its effects and hope you figure out what's going on. Visual identification is by definition impossible because they're smaller than an electron.
#184 - doc oc's sun machine, but bigger and it just compresses space …  [+] (16 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Science Shit : Black Holes. 0
#186 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
First, its not warping time, its warping relative perception of time. And the smaller the black hole, the faster it decays via hawking radiation, so no, your tiny tiny black hole, even if you theoretically could keep it tiny and stable, would decay pretty much instantly. That's why even though the LHC makes tiny black holes all the time, we're in no danger of an apocolypic class scenario there. Even one the size of earths mass wouldn't have a large enough event horizon and be decaying at a slow enough rate for an apoclyptic class scenario.
User avatar #293 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
thank you so much, i love learning!
i'm going to have to look for hawking radiation on youtube, i appreciate the help
#294 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Yea, its pretty important to black hole theory. While youre at it, look into some of the quantum mechanics stuff. That's where my degree is. The universe loses its goddamned mind at the quantum level.
User avatar #295 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i do understand quantum mechanics more than the average layman, but i haven't had any formal education in it other than GCSE-level stuff (one down from college-level)
#296 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
To put it how my professer did, ahem..
"Okay, so two balls are speeding at each other in a vacuum. When they hit, which way is the one on the left spinning? Yes, you in the back. No, you can't, shut up.
Now that you people are done lying to me, because I gave you no data, imagine we have some. But now, imagine when you read it, it changes. No, not the whole thing. You read the position, and the diagram rearranges. Okay, that's how this is going to work. So sit down, strap in, because it's gonna get weird. And don't try to visualize during the math bit, I don't have time to clean your brain off the floor and I refuse to repeat my lecture. "
User avatar #297 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i at least understand that observing a subatmoic particle changes its state.
electrons in shells, the shells being nothing but an imaginary area where it's most likely to appear if you observe it. technically speaking depending on the test we could assume it's 'everywhere' in that area, but it's more accurate using a symbol to represent the unknown area.
i remember watching a video about looking at a prism through its rainbow through a method of intense magnification (i can't remember if it was a microscope or a telescope) and the result was seeing the rainbow in lines with specific black lines, these lines would be the electron configuration of the atoms within the prism and this method was used by a team of american women at some point in the last 200 years to categorise a truly vast number of stars, based sloely on their molecular shadows.
a truly fascinating subject.
#301 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Indeed. My favorite thing is the whole "shells are representative of statistical probability" thing, because an electron COULD be there, or it could be over by Saturn, chillin. An electron from Pluto could be living in your asshole. Its great. Electrons: the subatomic giver of no fucks.
Them and free quarks.
Honestly it amazes me that chemically, anything at all gets done. The electrons could just nope out and tell your reaction to go fuck itself. But, it doesn't. Shit like that and quarks having the (statistically possible, but high improbable) ability to construct a fully formed Victorian era chair with the correct carbon dating inside of you in an instant, just because fuck you and what you think.


Crazy how nature do dat doe
User avatar #302 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
this, this fucking right here is why i want to do college chem and physics.
fucking YES!
no idea about free quarks though
thought: basis similar to radiation?
#303 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Not at all. Quarks are the particles that make up larger particles such as mesons, Hadrons, etc. Which in turn make up atoms and so on. Free quarks are these blocks (either rare or fucking everywhere. Depending on who you ask) ungrouped. Like finding O instead of 02. They have this habit of phasing in and out of existence because why the fuck not. There is speculation that they are actually moving on the timeline. This is going to be my specific area of study once its all said and done. Crazy little bastards.
User avatar #304 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
how does observing a free quark work? does it change how it behaves? this is fucking fascinating!
#306 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
And as far as the changes, we're not sure how to determine a "regular" set of behaviors yet, since we just (relatively) figured out there's like eight different kinds (called flavors, because reasons) and are starting to break open subatomic particles to see what quarks they're made of.
#307 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
well i can see easily why that would fascinate you to make it your expertise, imagine what we'll know once humanity have unlocked the behaviours of the quark flavours!
we might even begin to understand how the universe was born...
god damn.
#308 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
You know man, to be perfectly ho eat with you, and I know fj hates this, but the more I study quantum mechanics, the more I'm convinced it was a creators doing. Maybe not whole cloth, as is, but certainly designed, rules set, and paths plotted. Stuff at the atomic level and below gets too weird to not be for me. I mean, once you start working with electrons you're so deep in math its insanity. The father down the rabbit hole you go, the more complex it gets. Exponentially. But its all ordered chaos; our business is finding the rules. There isn't a thing yet that for certain cannot be mathematically defined; and since I'm not in the Pythagorean cult, I have to go the other way and instead of the numbers being divine, that the divine works with a logical intent, even if it is laberynthian.

Complex conjugate vector space
It even sounds mean, and that's the grass on top of the rabbit hole.
User avatar #311 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
i see what you mean.
with the way subatomic particles behave, and even the unknown logic behind quarks, it's very difficult to restrain from putting a man behind the curtain.
but science isn't finding the route to the conclusion, science is going along the path to wherever it may lead.
and maths (and certain features within science) are just a way to explain how we got onto that path and where it lead us.
before Einstein, who knew E=MC^2? before Newton, who knew calculus?
before science, who knew the world?
reality is imperceptibly complex and the laws that govern quarks permeate literally everything. the smaller we go, the more complex, but one day humanity will find the answer and everything would be obvious.
i hypothesise the things we already know aren't just laws that explain functions of the universe, i think they are features of the universe the best way we can describe them!
what's the difference between space and time? what's the difference between the fundamental forces of reality? what's the difference between electromagnetism and geomagnetism?
reality isn't a creation, it isn't a creator, it's just there and the biggest question asked by the wisest of us is the smallest question asked by the youngest:
Why?
#309 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Honest with*
#305 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Kind of like observing an electron, squared. You observe the effects of its effects of its effects and hope you figure out what's going on. Visual identification is by definition impossible because they're smaller than an electron.
#341 - Be one with your inner tard. *throws glitter in the air*  [+] (1 new reply) 01/30/2015 on Made this in FL Studio +1
User avatar #344 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
I can feel it....my inner tard. I have an urge to watch Fox News and buy stock in organic foods! I'm off to 9gag!
#334 - if caboose can do it, you can too although, he does have …  [+] (3 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Made this in FL Studio +1
#337 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
What makes you think I don't have tard strength?!
User avatar #341 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
Be one with your inner tard.
*throws glitter in the air*
User avatar #344 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
I can feel it....my inner tard. I have an urge to watch Fox News and buy stock in organic foods! I'm off to 9gag!
#321 - hey! that's- actually that's about right. i'm more sta… 01/30/2015 on Made this in FL Studio 0
#317 - maybe later, it's getting late. or early. it's 2 minutes into…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/30/2015 on Made this in FL Studio +1
#322 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
But.......but world....world domination....
#334 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
if caboose can do it, you can too
although, he does have tard strength...
#337 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
What makes you think I don't have tard strength?!
User avatar #341 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
Be one with your inner tard.
*throws glitter in the air*
User avatar #344 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
I can feel it....my inner tard. I have an urge to watch Fox News and buy stock in organic foods! I'm off to 9gag!
#313 - i have no idea why we were thumbed down. ****** …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/30/2015 on Made this in FL Studio +1
User avatar #316 - kwylabear (01/30/2015) [-]
Bahahaha. I would presume they disagreed with our opinions. Thank you.
#311 - with your video and my audio, we are unstoppable! MUAHAHAHA!  [+] (7 new replies) 01/29/2015 on Made this in FL Studio +3
#312 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
First FunnyJunk....then...THE WORLD!
#317 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
maybe later, it's getting late. or early. it's 2 minutes into the morning
#322 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
But.......but world....world domination....
#334 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
if caboose can do it, you can too
although, he does have tard strength...
#337 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
What makes you think I don't have tard strength?!
User avatar #341 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
Be one with your inner tard.
*throws glitter in the air*
User avatar #344 - mildlyangryrussian (01/30/2015) [-]
I can feel it....my inner tard. I have an urge to watch Fox News and buy stock in organic foods! I'm off to 9gag!
#302 - 20 seconds in: really impressed already 40 seconds in: nee… 01/29/2015 on Made this in FL Studio 0
#59 - **redstonealchemist used "*roll picture*"** **redstonealche… 01/29/2015 on When I ask if she came -1
#161 - sciencexplain if you have a warp drive operating on the hypoth…  [+] (18 new replies) 01/29/2015 on Science Shit : Black Holes. 0
#182 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
On the first one no, because you can't move at all away from the horizon , no matter how short the distance. Kind of like an asympotatal relationship. A frog who keeps hopping halfway to a wall will never touch the wall. The second, I'd need more info. I'm not sure I understand you.
User avatar #184 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
doc oc's sun machine, but bigger and it just compresses space within its boundaries, if there enough mass inside compressed into a small enough volume, it could be like making a black hole, but because of how spatial warping goes, it's basically creating false mass, or if i want to be silly "anti-mass" and that would create the black hole, yes, but for how long?
would it just explode if you forced it to resume normal spacetime? would it resume normal spacetime if you stop compressing it before it can stabilise through means of increasing mass? did i just come up with the second-coolest bomb ever?
#186 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
First, its not warping time, its warping relative perception of time. And the smaller the black hole, the faster it decays via hawking radiation, so no, your tiny tiny black hole, even if you theoretically could keep it tiny and stable, would decay pretty much instantly. That's why even though the LHC makes tiny black holes all the time, we're in no danger of an apocolypic class scenario there. Even one the size of earths mass wouldn't have a large enough event horizon and be decaying at a slow enough rate for an apoclyptic class scenario.
User avatar #293 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
thank you so much, i love learning!
i'm going to have to look for hawking radiation on youtube, i appreciate the help
#294 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Yea, its pretty important to black hole theory. While youre at it, look into some of the quantum mechanics stuff. That's where my degree is. The universe loses its goddamned mind at the quantum level.
User avatar #295 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i do understand quantum mechanics more than the average layman, but i haven't had any formal education in it other than GCSE-level stuff (one down from college-level)
#296 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
To put it how my professer did, ahem..
"Okay, so two balls are speeding at each other in a vacuum. When they hit, which way is the one on the left spinning? Yes, you in the back. No, you can't, shut up.
Now that you people are done lying to me, because I gave you no data, imagine we have some. But now, imagine when you read it, it changes. No, not the whole thing. You read the position, and the diagram rearranges. Okay, that's how this is going to work. So sit down, strap in, because it's gonna get weird. And don't try to visualize during the math bit, I don't have time to clean your brain off the floor and I refuse to repeat my lecture. "
User avatar #297 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i at least understand that observing a subatmoic particle changes its state.
electrons in shells, the shells being nothing but an imaginary area where it's most likely to appear if you observe it. technically speaking depending on the test we could assume it's 'everywhere' in that area, but it's more accurate using a symbol to represent the unknown area.
i remember watching a video about looking at a prism through its rainbow through a method of intense magnification (i can't remember if it was a microscope or a telescope) and the result was seeing the rainbow in lines with specific black lines, these lines would be the electron configuration of the atoms within the prism and this method was used by a team of american women at some point in the last 200 years to categorise a truly vast number of stars, based sloely on their molecular shadows.
a truly fascinating subject.
#301 - fresighto (01/30/2015) [-]
Indeed. My favorite thing is the whole "shells are representative of statistical probability" thing, because an electron COULD be there, or it could be over by Saturn, chillin. An electron from Pluto could be living in your asshole. Its great. Electrons: the subatomic giver of no fucks.
Them and free quarks.
Honestly it amazes me that chemically, anything at all gets done. The electrons could just nope out and tell your reaction to go fuck itself. But, it doesn't. Shit like that and quarks having the (statistically possible, but high improbable) ability to construct a fully formed Victorian era chair with the correct carbon dating inside of you in an instant, just because fuck you and what you think.


Crazy how nature do dat doe
User avatar #302 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
this, this fucking right here is why i want to do college chem and physics.
fucking YES!
no idea about free quarks though
thought: basis similar to radiation?
#303 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Not at all. Quarks are the particles that make up larger particles such as mesons, Hadrons, etc. Which in turn make up atoms and so on. Free quarks are these blocks (either rare or fucking everywhere. Depending on who you ask) ungrouped. Like finding O instead of 02. They have this habit of phasing in and out of existence because why the fuck not. There is speculation that they are actually moving on the timeline. This is going to be my specific area of study once its all said and done. Crazy little bastards.
User avatar #304 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
how does observing a free quark work? does it change how it behaves? this is fucking fascinating!
#306 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
And as far as the changes, we're not sure how to determine a "regular" set of behaviors yet, since we just (relatively) figured out there's like eight different kinds (called flavors, because reasons) and are starting to break open subatomic particles to see what quarks they're made of.
#307 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
well i can see easily why that would fascinate you to make it your expertise, imagine what we'll know once humanity have unlocked the behaviours of the quark flavours!
we might even begin to understand how the universe was born...
god damn.
#308 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
You know man, to be perfectly ho eat with you, and I know fj hates this, but the more I study quantum mechanics, the more I'm convinced it was a creators doing. Maybe not whole cloth, as is, but certainly designed, rules set, and paths plotted. Stuff at the atomic level and below gets too weird to not be for me. I mean, once you start working with electrons you're so deep in math its insanity. The father down the rabbit hole you go, the more complex it gets. Exponentially. But its all ordered chaos; our business is finding the rules. There isn't a thing yet that for certain cannot be mathematically defined; and since I'm not in the Pythagorean cult, I have to go the other way and instead of the numbers being divine, that the divine works with a logical intent, even if it is laberynthian.

Complex conjugate vector space
It even sounds mean, and that's the grass on top of the rabbit hole.
User avatar #311 - redstonealchemist (01/31/2015) [-]
i see what you mean.
with the way subatomic particles behave, and even the unknown logic behind quarks, it's very difficult to restrain from putting a man behind the curtain.
but science isn't finding the route to the conclusion, science is going along the path to wherever it may lead.
and maths (and certain features within science) are just a way to explain how we got onto that path and where it lead us.
before Einstein, who knew E=MC^2? before Newton, who knew calculus?
before science, who knew the world?
reality is imperceptibly complex and the laws that govern quarks permeate literally everything. the smaller we go, the more complex, but one day humanity will find the answer and everything would be obvious.
i hypothesise the things we already know aren't just laws that explain functions of the universe, i think they are features of the universe the best way we can describe them!
what's the difference between space and time? what's the difference between the fundamental forces of reality? what's the difference between electromagnetism and geomagnetism?
reality isn't a creation, it isn't a creator, it's just there and the biggest question asked by the wisest of us is the smallest question asked by the youngest:
Why?
#309 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Honest with*
#305 - fresighto (01/31/2015) [-]
Kind of like observing an electron, squared. You observe the effects of its effects of its effects and hope you figure out what's going on. Visual identification is by definition impossible because they're smaller than an electron.
#130 - bubmaster is right. xiaolin showdown is basically a differ… 01/29/2015 on rEmemeber this +1
#62 - "So is that hair- don't , honey. mm-hm!" -Sassy … 01/29/2015 on The Queen of Sass +3
#41 - when life gives you melons, you either have dyslexia or they'r… 01/29/2015 on When people try to cheer me up +4
#230 - what's worse is that it's implied that getting a BJ costs 2/3r…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2015 on Blowey Joey 0
#303 - theycallmesatan (01/30/2015) [-]
**theycallmesatan used "*roll picture*"**
**theycallmesatan rolled image** doesnt matter, still had the blowey joey
#220 - just reading that made me feel dirty. not good dirty… 01/29/2015 on Blowey Joey +2
#154 - yes, if only we had a place on earth with an eternal thunder s…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2015 on Science Facts 0
User avatar #159 - mrselfdestruct (01/29/2015) [-]
reminds me of the thunder plains in FFX
#63 - i've got opera version 27-something, or however it works  [+] (15 new replies) 01/29/2015 on Math 0
User avatar #64 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Well, either change WB or update it. Not supporting HTML5 properly and WebGL in this day and era is just ridiculous. Even mobile browsers do.
User avatar #67 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
could that be why videos online don't like to fullscreen? (i can only see 3/4 of the video)
User avatar #68 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Dude, just upgrade your browser already. It is FREE so why would you stay on old software?
User avatar #69 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i found out the problem.
apparently there's somethign wrong with how my browser handles flash in fullscreen, so i'm using HTTPS for youtube videos.
also opera won't update and i can't even find the update settings.
User avatar #70 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
www.opera.com/
Just download it again.

Also, then it is most likely a setting for youtube. Still though, not having HTML5 support is BAD.
User avatar #71 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
it's the other way around apprently.
https is working perfectly fine, it's the flash that isn't.
apparently there is a setting that excludes all kinds of pop-ups, which includes YT fullscreen, but i can't find it.
i've tried DLing it again, but it's just some minor bug fixes that i probably won't even notice.
User avatar #72 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
My sentences meant "a setting for youtube" not "a youtube setting". Ofcourse it is in your browser setting then, it is most likely a typical "Do you allow 'youtube' do display in fullscreen?" where you pressed by mistake "deny".
User avatar #73 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
yeah, but i've searched through the settings upwards of a dozen times, nothing even comes close to that
User avatar #74 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset the user profile.
User avatar #75 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
the... the what?
User avatar #76 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Reset all the data the data that opera has stored.
User avatar #77 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i can't freaking believe it. the entire problem with WebGL was that i didn't have the hardware acceleration active.
and you fucking know what?
it was the problem with youtube not resizing properly when the video went to fullscreen.
every single fucking thing that went wrong was just because i had hardware acceleration deactivated.
User avatar #78 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
I have no idea why it was disabled for you.
User avatar #79 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
i have 4gb ram and 250gb harddrive.
i try to save as much space as i can and i thought "hardware acceleration? i bet that would use more space!"
i see now that it's indisputably necessary to proper internet function.
User avatar #80 - dorg (01/30/2015) [-]
Well ALWAYS USE HARDWARE ACCELERATION. It actually decreases RAM usage by making it closer to the metal.
#109 - well if you're used to taking shrooms, it won't be too bad. … 01/29/2015 on Drugs 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #58 - keatontheghostfox ONLINE (01/30/2015) [-]
hi
User avatar #59 to #58 - redstonealchemist (01/30/2015) [-]
sup *****
have we met?
User avatar #61 to #59 - keatontheghostfox ONLINE (01/30/2015) [-]
If we haven't before we have now :p (think you replied to a comment I posted or something)
#63 to #62 - keatontheghostfox ONLINE (01/30/2015) [-]
Take this!
Take this!
User avatar #65 to #64 - keatontheghostfox ONLINE (01/30/2015) [-]
That's a bold thing to say :p
User avatar #60 to #59 - keatontheghostfox ONLINE (01/30/2015) [-]
maybe
#46 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/20/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#48 to #47 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/20/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#50 to #49 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/20/2014) [-]
how many cat gifs you got?
how many cat gifs you got?
#51 to #50 - redstonealchemist (10/21/2014) [-]
a few...
a few...
User avatar #52 to #51 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/21/2014) [-]
i have 400
#53 to #52 - redstonealchemist (10/21/2014) [-]
holy 						*******					 						****					.   
my entire reaction folder is barely double that (porn not included)
holy ******* **** .
my entire reaction folder is barely double that (porn not included)
#54 to #53 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/21/2014) [-]
yea i have a lot i have been working on it for over a year now
yea i have a lot i have been working on it for over a year now
#56 to #55 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE (10/21/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#57 to #56 - redstonealchemist (10/21/2014) [-]
you ginger! i have that one
User avatar #41 - gugek ONLINE (09/23/2014) [-]
I hope you're having a fantastic morning. Have a great day today friend.
User avatar #42 to #41 - redstonealchemist (09/23/2014) [-]
i don't know who you are and i don't know what you look like, but i will find you and i will hug you.
#43 to #42 - gugek ONLINE (09/23/2014) [-]
This is me, hugs are appreciated.
User avatar #26 to #23 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
thanks for the offer, but i'm probably not your type
User avatar #33 to #26 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
I'm not asking for consent
User avatar #35 to #33 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
but that's rape.
User avatar #36 to #35 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
nobody will believe you
User avatar #37 to #36 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
what if i want it?
User avatar #38 to #37 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
That's disgusting!
User avatar #39 to #38 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
if it disgusts you, then you won't rape me
User avatar #40 to #39 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
consent is the disgusting part
User avatar #22 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
A
User avatar #25 to #24 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
C'ing what's up?
User avatar #27 to #25 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
Don't know why we're doing this
User avatar #28 to #27 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
Eet's because I'm bored.

Wanted to say hello.
User avatar #29 to #28 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
Frankly your cheating is bothersome
User avatar #30 to #29 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
Go on and blame it on me, this is hard.
User avatar #32 to #31 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
Incredibly.
User avatar #34 to #32 - redstonealchemist (06/20/2014) [-]
Just wondering; how good are you in english literature?
User avatar #18 - luluwho ONLINE (04/04/2014) [-]
I only deleted your comment to protect you from any more down thumbs.
User avatar #20 to #18 - redstonealchemist (04/04/2014) [-]
not sure why my comment was getting reds, it is legit my friend irl, he lives like half a mile away from me
User avatar #21 to #20 - luluwho ONLINE (04/04/2014) [-]
NP I think a troll gang may have just gone thru, it happens.
#14 - minibeep (03/05/2014) [-]
you are a weeaboo
User avatar #15 to #14 - redstonealchemist (03/05/2014) [-]
your face is a weeaboo
#16 to #15 - minibeep (03/05/2014) [-]
said the weeaboo
User avatar #17 to #16 - redstonealchemist (03/05/2014) [-]
well it's not like i have a waifu or anything b-baka!
User avatar #11 to #10 - redstonealchemist (08/29/2013) [-]
why would you get in trouble for that? i've seen far worse get away with it on this site. i've POSTED far worse than this and got away with it on this site
User avatar #12 to #11 - snakefire (08/29/2013) [-]
Mods are gay.
User avatar #13 to #12 - redstonealchemist (08/29/2013) [-]
one of the admins was a brony, op is a fag, mods are gay and there is usually a mountain of dicks in the **** section.
is there a truly straight person on this site at all? lol
 Friends (0)