Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

reaganomix

Rank #10364 on Subscribers
reaganomix Avatar Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to reaganomix Block reaganomix Invite reaganomix to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/31/2011
Last Login:7/23/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 7408 total,  8918 ,  1510
Comment Thumbs: 2884 total,  3930 ,  1046
Content Level Progress: 8% (8/100)
Level 174 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 84% (84/100)
Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:7
Content Views:262314
Times Content Favorited:693 times
Total Comments Made:1025
FJ Points:10311
Favorite Tags: all (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#621 - I know why they are getting nukes, but Israel doesn't want to … 06/09/2012 on Disregard Earth, Live on Mars 0
#527 - Okay good, Iraq, they weren't a threat to us because of their …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/09/2012 on Disregard Earth, Live on Mars 0
#567 - anonymous (06/09/2012) [-]
Iran....so basically,ur saying that the US is Isreal's bitch?
iran was trying to get nuke tech, not for war but for power.
but even if its for war, whats the big deal? israel,america,china all have nukes.
so developing countries like iran cant have them? because of what?

if US had something to gain by attk any other country, they would.
why would they risk attking big countries like china?

User avatar #621 - reaganomix (06/09/2012) [-]
I know why they are getting nukes, but Israel doesn't want to hear any of it. And yes, we are Israel's bitch. 1/3 of our foreign aid goes to Israel and they are the third largest lobbying group in America. Iran has been a thorn in our side ever since they toppled the regime we established in 1953.

My original response has to do with what the annoyingasshole said. He said that we would invade any country that can progess, but this is clearly false when actually helped countries progress economically after World War II.

If the U.S. really wasn't Israel's bitch, we would be interrogating Israel about their nuclear weapons, which is estimated to be the third largest.

Israel - "We don't have any nuclear weapons, but we'll fire them off if we are attacked"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
#400 - Which country that I listed off did the U.S. invade? 06/09/2012 on Disregard Earth, Live on Mars 0
#374 - "who consider any nation who progress and manage to stand…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/09/2012 on Disregard Earth, Live on Mars 0
#511 - anonymous (06/09/2012) [-]
iran(only a maater of time) , iraq ,cuba
in other words,shut the fuck up amerifag
User avatar #527 - reaganomix (06/09/2012) [-]
Okay good, Iraq, they weren't a threat to us because of their progress, it is safe to say it had to do with oil. We did not see Iraq as a threat though which is what I was originally responding to

Cuba, we tried to topple a communist government, not because they progress very well, but because they were communist.

The reason we were consistently worried about the spread of communism is because it would have meant that we would have a smaller market in which we would trade with. If have of the world converted to Communism, that would mean there are fewer countries to buy and sell stuff with.

Iran, blame Israel for that shit, Israel doesn't want to go to war with Iran, they want us to go to war with Iran.

Now all the countries I named progress a lot farther than the countries you listed and we have never invaded them, completely going against what the annoyingasshole said.

Learn fucking history eurofag, your educational system is better than America's and you are still talking out of your ass.
#567 - anonymous (06/09/2012) [-]
Iran....so basically,ur saying that the US is Isreal's bitch?
iran was trying to get nuke tech, not for war but for power.
but even if its for war, whats the big deal? israel,america,china all have nukes.
so developing countries like iran cant have them? because of what?

if US had something to gain by attk any other country, they would.
why would they risk attking big countries like china?

User avatar #621 - reaganomix (06/09/2012) [-]
I know why they are getting nukes, but Israel doesn't want to hear any of it. And yes, we are Israel's bitch. 1/3 of our foreign aid goes to Israel and they are the third largest lobbying group in America. Iran has been a thorn in our side ever since they toppled the regime we established in 1953.

My original response has to do with what the annoyingasshole said. He said that we would invade any country that can progess, but this is clearly false when actually helped countries progress economically after World War II.

If the U.S. really wasn't Israel's bitch, we would be interrogating Israel about their nuclear weapons, which is estimated to be the third largest.

Israel - "We don't have any nuclear weapons, but we'll fire them off if we are attacked"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
#183 - Autistic minority =/= Majority 06/09/2012 on #BronyLogic -2
#8 - Picture 06/09/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +4
#63 - Picture 06/08/2012 on Republicans +11
#17146 - Picture 06/08/2012 on Social Board 0
#5724284 - /mlp/ 06/08/2012 on FJ Pony Thread +1
#16582 - Capitalism does not need to be tied to any sort of governmenta…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2012 on Social Board +1
User avatar #16590 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism is still relevant to what you asked me, it's ran off a a free-market economy.

As long as we're living in America (assuming you live in the US as well), we'll be taxed. What can we do about it? We're living in someone else's world. And by the time our teens generation is elderly, the retirement age will be higher than now, so we'll be living without the benefits longer than today's elderly people.
#16573 - Could individual not easily provide these things rather than r…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/08/2012 on Social Board +1
#16766 - blnelms has deleted their comment.
User avatar #16575 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Are we talking Capitalism or Anarchy? An today's society, no, we could not provide for ourselves because we're so used to getting everything handed to us through the government. A few hundred years ago? Sure.
User avatar #16582 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism does not need to be tied to any sort of governmental construct.

What is going to happen in the future when the government cannot be guaranteed to provide for us? Would we still want to be taxed when the government can't even provide us with what the elderly are provided today?
User avatar #16590 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism is still relevant to what you asked me, it's ran off a a free-market economy.

As long as we're living in America (assuming you live in the US as well), we'll be taxed. What can we do about it? We're living in someone else's world. And by the time our teens generation is elderly, the retirement age will be higher than now, so we'll be living without the benefits longer than today's elderly people.
#16564 - Tax us for what? I don't want to be taxed, you don't want…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/08/2012 on Social Board +1
User avatar #16566 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Schools, roads, military, national debt, medicare. We might not want to be taxed, but I'd say it's for the better.
#16573 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Could individual not easily provide these things rather than relying on a slow bureaucracy.

Aside from keeping citizens secure from coercion, why shouldn't individuals be responsible for these things than a government?
#16766 - blnelms has deleted their comment.
User avatar #16575 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Are we talking Capitalism or Anarchy? An today's society, no, we could not provide for ourselves because we're so used to getting everything handed to us through the government. A few hundred years ago? Sure.
User avatar #16582 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism does not need to be tied to any sort of governmental construct.

What is going to happen in the future when the government cannot be guaranteed to provide for us? Would we still want to be taxed when the government can't even provide us with what the elderly are provided today?
User avatar #16590 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism is still relevant to what you asked me, it's ran off a a free-market economy.

As long as we're living in America (assuming you live in the US as well), we'll be taxed. What can we do about it? We're living in someone else's world. And by the time our teens generation is elderly, the retirement age will be higher than now, so we'll be living without the benefits longer than today's elderly people.
#5722984 - Because Steam 06/08/2012 on FJ Pony Thread 0
#16559 - What role does government play?  [+] (9 new replies) 06/08/2012 on Social Board 0
User avatar #16560 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Making sure we get taxed.
#16564 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Tax us for what?
I don't want to be taxed, you don't want to be taxed.
User avatar #16566 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Schools, roads, military, national debt, medicare. We might not want to be taxed, but I'd say it's for the better.
#16573 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Could individual not easily provide these things rather than relying on a slow bureaucracy.

Aside from keeping citizens secure from coercion, why shouldn't individuals be responsible for these things than a government?
#16766 - blnelms has deleted their comment.
User avatar #16575 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Are we talking Capitalism or Anarchy? An today's society, no, we could not provide for ourselves because we're so used to getting everything handed to us through the government. A few hundred years ago? Sure.
User avatar #16582 - reaganomix (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism does not need to be tied to any sort of governmental construct.

What is going to happen in the future when the government cannot be guaranteed to provide for us? Would we still want to be taxed when the government can't even provide us with what the elderly are provided today?
User avatar #16590 - Mortspear (06/08/2012) [-]
Capitalism is still relevant to what you asked me, it's ran off a a free-market economy.

As long as we're living in America (assuming you live in the US as well), we'll be taxed. What can we do about it? We're living in someone else's world. And by the time our teens generation is elderly, the retirement age will be higher than now, so we'll be living without the benefits longer than today's elderly people.
#205 - The only reason he said something 4 years into his presidency …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/03/2012 on Obama +3
User avatar #236 - jrondeau (06/03/2012) [-]
Actually presidents who take up controversial issues just before elections tend to do worse than those who don't.
User avatar #210 - Sethorein (06/03/2012) [-]
I don't like liberals :(
#5538283 - Picture 06/03/2012 on FJ Pony Thread 0
#5527151 - Picture 06/02/2012 on FJ Pony Thread +1
#5526821 - Autistic minority =/= Majority.  [+] (2 new replies) 06/02/2012 on FJ Pony Thread 0
#5526849 - whoozy has deleted their comment.
#35615 - I know there is a browser version for free on the Minecraft website.  [+] (12 new replies) 06/02/2012 on Video Games Board - console... +1
User avatar #35619 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
I shall search for this
#35620 - iwastulisainthevid has deleted their comment.
User avatar #35629 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
I see, I've tried torrenting it but kind of gave up when it said 'error could not create the java virtual machine'
#35631 - iwastulisainthevid has deleted their comment.
User avatar #35635 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
Yeah I've just looked, but I can't afford £16 at the minute which sounds quite bad haha
#35636 - iwastulisainthevid has deleted their comment.
User avatar #35639 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
I'll do what I can, thanks man
User avatar #35653 - thesilence (06/02/2012) [-]
www.pcgamer.com/2011/04/19/download-the-minecraft-demo/

Theres a demo from PC gamer, not sure about the details but I think its on a timer. Theres also an official demo version which lasts for five in game days (about 40 minutes I think) coming out soon too.
User avatar #35654 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
Thanks a lot

God I love this board
#35656 - thesilence (06/02/2012) [-]
Haha this is my first time on it too. Seems like a pretty helpful place.
User avatar #35660 - arsecandle (06/02/2012) [-]
Yeah, I'm on quite a lot, there's no fucking around in this joint haha
#35642 - iwastulisainthevid has deleted their comment.
#4 - Picture 05/31/2012 on All of my why. +6
#974 - Aw yeah MS Paint 05/30/2012 on Word. +2
#145 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 05/30/2012 on Capitalism +2
#188 - repostsrepost (05/30/2012) [-]
epic username
#411 - The more I read the comments the more this quote applies.  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2012 on niggers are not humans +8
#413 - anonymous (05/27/2012) [-]
explane qote pls
User avatar #442 - schneidend (05/27/2012) [-]
The "[labeled] a racist today" bit probably refers in part to the fact that some radical nutjobs now consider standardized tests, including those for IQ, racially biased against non-whites. Apparently, holding everybody to the exact same standards is just another way "The Man" is keeping black folks down.
#250 - Picture 05/27/2012 on niggers are not humans +5
#19 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 05/26/2012 on Title +5
User avatar #23 - waffies (05/26/2012) [-]
Any clue what team Destiny is on nowadays?
User avatar #34 - rohze (05/26/2012) [-]
Destiny rejoined ROOT when it was revived by CaTZ

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 - AreyouSerious (07/17/2012) [-]
A brony that can put up a political argument is a friend in my book.
#1 - feelythefeel (04/11/2012) [-]
Comment virginity taken my good man.
Comment virginity taken my good man.
 Friends (0)