Upload
Login or register

razorwind

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:10/15/2011
Stats
Comment Ranking:#3701
Highest Content Rank:#14238
Highest Comment Rank:#3700
Content Thumbs: 109 total,  141 ,  32
Comment Thumbs: 1642 total,  1895 ,  253
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 10 Content: New Here → Level 11 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 26% (26/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:9484
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:610
FJ Points:1750

latest user's comments

#29 - This **** head. Not because sad backstory or anything, but bec…  [+] (1 reply) 11/29/2016 on I cri evritim.. +1
User avatar
#49 - gibusernamepls (11/29/2016) [-]
Paarl is worse
Something about the lighting and the lock on just makes him really annyoing to fight imo
#18 - Alex Jones is a gift from god.  [+] (1 reply) 11/26/2016 on Alex Jones maymays -1
#19 - anon (11/26/2016) [-]
So is cancer, if you believe that gods cause everything.
#28 - I was talking about two different games. Dark souls II didn…  [+] (1 reply) 11/25/2016 on If the shoe fits 0
User avatar
#29 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
Uh, so?

And i don't understand why a game that is actually a sequal is "Muh-'stalgia" as opposed to dark souls 2, which could easily be not part of the series.
#26 - Dark souls III's PvP is pretty ******* ******. Dark souls II's…  [+] (3 replies) 11/25/2016 on If the shoe fits 0
User avatar
#27 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
"Poise in II worked and there was there with no fixes needed"

"With the exception of a wepaons that eventually got patched"
Hopefully you see the issue there

The only "Muh-'stalgia" is the you projecting
User avatar
#28 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
I was talking about two different games. Dark souls II didn't need a patch in order for it to work correctly. It was already in the game and worked fine.

In BLOODBORNE the rifle spear eventually got fixed and is kinda the only one I remember being fixed because it had a combo that was OP.
And really? You didn't see the "Muh-'Stalgia"? You literally went to Anor Londo. Soul of Cinder was Gwyn, but unparriable. Firelink fucking Shrine?!?!?!
User avatar
#29 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
Uh, so?

And i don't understand why a game that is actually a sequal is "Muh-'stalgia" as opposed to dark souls 2, which could easily be not part of the series.
#11 - With both spell boosting rings, and sage ring +2.  [+] (1 reply) 11/25/2016 on If the shoe fits 0
User avatar
#25 - krando (11/25/2016) [-]
true. still good tho
#6 - Dark souls III is not the best Souls-like game, it's not even …  [+] (16 replies) 11/24/2016 on If the shoe fits +4
User avatar
#22 - grimsho (11/25/2016) [-]
These all seem like just pvp complaints.
User avatar
#19 - catfishy (11/25/2016) [-]
I will agree 3 is not the best,
I hate how faith and magic got butt fucked to oblivion and i miss duel wielding so much, other
things like infusions are pointless now and like you said too many quality weapons.

I think back to DS1 and i remember all the builds i made on my own and they all worked but
in DS3 you might as well get the biggest UGS you can and smack things with it, why even
try anything else.
User avatar
#18 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
Quality issue stems all the way from DS1, probably Demon Souls but i wouldn't know. Dark Souls 3 poise is currently a better version of DS2's.
You know both of these items were fixed but still complain about them.

3 games in and spellcasting isn't properly balanced.

Also all your problems are enitrely based off PvP, and duels specifically. In a PvE based game. Y'know, that part that dark souls 2 sucked dirty dick at.

And yet you say bloodbourne is better while it has the shittiest PvP out of 5 games.
User avatar
#26 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
Dark souls III's PvP is pretty fucking shitty. Dark souls II's was way better, because things were more balanced other than hexes. Poise in II actually worked and was there with no fixes needed. And not all of my complaints are only PvP, poise is still a thing in PvE. When I get stumbled by a fucking rat of all things while wearing heavy armor and wielding an UGS (Y'know, the things that are supposed to have poise?) it's not better. Also, duels is pretty much end-game content. What the fuck else am I supposed to do when I've done a fuck-ton of builds going through the game 20 fucking times? Story in Dark souls III was just piggy-backing off of "Muh-'stalgia" from Dark souls I. Bloodborne was a completely different story, while yes, having shit PvP, was more balanced (with the exception of a wepaons that eventually got patched) and yes had an even more limited selection of weapons, but they were all unique and most of them counted as two weapons. And if Dark souls is mainly a PvE based game, why are invasions a major mechanic? And again, most of the weapons being quality isn't only a complaint for PvP. It gets stale when quality builds are pretty much the best thing you can do (other than bleed because it's ridiculously OP). Even in BB you weren't forced to do quality.
User avatar
#27 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
"Poise in II worked and there was there with no fixes needed"

"With the exception of a wepaons that eventually got patched"
Hopefully you see the issue there

The only "Muh-'stalgia" is the you projecting
User avatar
#28 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
I was talking about two different games. Dark souls II didn't need a patch in order for it to work correctly. It was already in the game and worked fine.

In BLOODBORNE the rifle spear eventually got fixed and is kinda the only one I remember being fixed because it had a combo that was OP.
And really? You didn't see the "Muh-'Stalgia"? You literally went to Anor Londo. Soul of Cinder was Gwyn, but unparriable. Firelink fucking Shrine?!?!?!
User avatar
#29 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
Uh, so?

And i don't understand why a game that is actually a sequal is "Muh-'stalgia" as opposed to dark souls 2, which could easily be not part of the series.
User avatar
#14 - beefkakes (11/25/2016) [-]
I enjoyed Dark Souls 3 a lot when I first played it because it was something new and refreshing since I didn't have a ps4 to play bloodborne and I wanted new souls experience. Now that I think about it, I feel like Dark Souls 3 is pretty weak. Maybe even weaker. I originally gave that to Dark Souls 2, but now that I think about it, even if it might be nostalgia, I feel like Dark Souls 2 is tons better than 3.

Dark Souls 3, now that I think about it, felt nothing more than a fan service to the players. It feels like they updated the graphics and physics a bit with Dark Souls 1 and made an expansion and called it a day. Everything is pretty much all the same. Same shields, weapons, and armour sets. Same movesets for things like rapiers and spears and backstabs and ripostes. Same damn recycled sounds from Dark Souls 1. Hardly anything from 2 was in there. Barely a mention to Dark Souls 2 besides a few items and paintings that show it happened. Everything was completely ripped from Dark Souls 1 and placed into Dark Souls 3 to appeal to nostalgia.

The DLC didn't do any favours either. Weapons with crazy movesets that will eventually be patched and thrown aside. An area that was so small that speed running it can take less than 5 minutes if you're quick enough. An entirely forgettable boss battle that was probably only dropped there to introduce the shitty arena. There's just too many things to count on why this DLC was so bad. The Friede boss fight barely makes up for it, and the shit that they pull with 3 consecutive boss fights was completely unneeded. The DLC barely adds any lore to the main game. Just a bit about the church, some stupid things about sulyvahn, and even more fan service call backs to dark souls 1. Really, after making Artorias of the Abyss, the Crowns DLC (even if the last one wasn't that great), and the absolutely perfect Old Hunters DLC, you'd think From wouldn't fuck up with this one. It actually should've been much better, considering how they improved with each new DLC, but instead we got 1 boss that was a Maria clone and that's it. There was almost no exploring at all since it was so small.

The story for the main game is also more spread thin than Dark Souls 2. At least in 2, you understand that time repeats itself, and the 4 great lord souls rose again, and that Manus, the dark soul, was split into fragments. In this game, it barely mentions that. We're supposed to kill 4 lords of cinder since they don't want to sit on the throne. These people have barely any connection to the 4 great lords, and then we fight a combination of all the people who've linked the fire, ending with gwyn himself. And that's it. This was supposed to be the final game in the series, was supposed to wrap up our story, but all we got was Fan Service for Dark Souls 1 and Berserk.

Now, the game itself is fine, though it would've been better if it was not a Dark Souls sequel, and more of a spin off of the series, or at the most a sequel to Demon's Souls. I guarantee you that the game would've been much more well received if it was connected to the Souls series. It played well and it was fun, but from all the lore and gameplay view, it was nothing but a fan service game that threw out the lore in favour of pleasing the fans.
User avatar
#21 - sirrawrsalot (11/25/2016) [-]
Dark Souls 3 is an actually sequal to Dark Souls 1, as opposedto Dark Souls 2 which is just some shit that went down in the same world. Which would be why Dark Souls 2 is hardly mentioned.

The DLC was short. But added tons of weapons to a game that had plenty of stale weapons. All of which were pretty unique. None of them are worthy for a nerf.

You talk about how each DLC was better then the last, yet Elfriede is just a "Maria-Clone"? I'm sure you see the issue there, also Friede is the best boss fight in the series, hands down.

Dark Souls 3 has similar areas at best, you say the lore was thrown for nostalgia, but all of the "nostalgia" is there to create the sense that you're somewhere you've been before, just at a different time.

And honestly if you expected the Dark Souls series to have a clear "explain everything" ending, I can see that as nothing more then wishful thinking that goes against everything that happened in dark souls 1 & 2. The ending is " The age of fire is over" everything else is what you believe.

I bought Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition the same day I bought Dark Souls 3, and honestly the first game is overrated. Nostalgia like this is toxic, kinda like that time that people couldn't accept that Undertale was better then Super Mario 64, a game many years it's junior.
#12 - drakatsu (11/25/2016) [-]
I actually agree. that's was the intention here; because dark souls 3 really doesn't feel like a souls game, but more like bloodborne with armor and shields.
and it's better than most souls-like anyway.
User avatar
#8 - bigfootluke (11/25/2016) [-]
Yo where did you get that image of demo-chan?
#10 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
And then I used part of this wallapaper.
#9 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
Original.
User avatar
#7 - krando (11/25/2016) [-]
faith is great at 60.
User avatar
#11 - razorwind (11/25/2016) [-]
With both spell boosting rings, and sage ring +2.
User avatar
#25 - krando (11/25/2016) [-]
true. still good tho
#9 - I got to about lvl 25 because I took really long breaks. Wish …  [+] (1 reply) 11/22/2016 on did you enjoy the weekend... 0
User avatar
#12 - funkyiestmonk (11/22/2016) [-]
the black Friday sale is on, so it's now down to 30