Level 110 Comments: Funny Junkie
OfflineSend mail to rangeryan Block rangeryan Invite rangeryan to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||1/26/2012|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Comment Thumbs:||163 total, 405 , 242|
|Content Level Progress:|| 6.77% (4/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 60% (3/5) |
Level 110 Comments: Funny Junkie → Level 111 Comments: Funny Junkie
|Total Comments Made:||269|
latest user's comments
|#215 - *anon from before forgot to login* trust me i don't think… [+] (1 new reply)||10/05/2012 on Political Debate 2012||0|
|#56 - Picture||09/20/2012 on ...and he didn't even aim||+1|
|#231 - still i know it works for you but do you have mexico at your a…||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||0|
|#219 - 1. we would have a much higher rate of criminal activity, the …||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||+1|
|#217 - why do you keep going on about it and just defend your side of… [+] (1 new reply)||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||-1|
|#216 - better?||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||0|
|#214 - Comment deleted||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||0|
|#213 - Comment deleted [+] (3 new replies)||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||0|
#226 - tkfourtwoone (08/16/2012) [-]
Dude, it's been much more than "one time" and clearly more than "a good person harmed". Examples above.
And it isn't just my country. Most of the EU has this policy, and it's working out just fine.
During a riot A WHOLE BUNCH of bystanders would be hurt if the rioters have firearms. Without them, some water cannons and tear gas along with baton sticks are enough to subdue some violent idiots.
#219 - rangeryan (08/16/2012) [-]
2. it would be going against the constitution to take it away and the supreme court which is set to uphold the constitution would never go with it.
3. just be cause your country can use that method doesn't mean it would work for every country. in our country a lot of bystanders would be hurt look at riots in similar countries people have firearms to PROTECT themselves, if they didn't only criminals and law enforcement would. there are a lot more criminals to law enforcers and police aren't always there so they would be late most of the time to find a body or more waiting for them.
so before you go blabing your mouth saying oooh guns are bad just because one time a good person is harmed. Then saying no one should have them is complete bullshit.
3rd times a charm
|#204 - lol just because im afraid for your brain i will [+] (1 new reply)||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||0|
|#203 - no I'm not a badass neither am i white trash i know what I am… [+] (3 new replies)||08/16/2012 on Gunlaw !||-2|
#207 - anon (08/16/2012) [-]
Because you can't use English beyond the range of a nine year old and it makes the pro-gun side of the argument look worse for having you on it.