Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

radtroll    

Rank #15096 on Comments
radtroll Avatar Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to radtroll Block radtroll Invite radtroll to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/25/2011
Last Login:5/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#15096
Highest Content Rank:#5565
Highest Comment Rank:#1810
Content Thumbs: 1245 total,  1531 ,  286
Comment Thumbs: 3748 total,  6335 ,  2587
Content Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:2
Content Views:62309
Times Content Favorited:69 times
Total Comments Made:1440
FJ Points:4925
Favorite Tags: Balls (2) | get (2) | of (2)

latest user's comments

#44 - dat machine gun though  [+] (5 new replies) 02/13/2014 on he's stealin' 0
User avatar #51 - steppeden (02/13/2014) [-]
*submachinegun

Do you even /k/?
User avatar #45 - acemcgunner (02/13/2014) [-]
nigga, dat car : dat hot rod...
User avatar #46 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
Wait ...
hold on ...

Nigger is he wearing a fedora?
#48 - acemcgunner (02/13/2014) [-]
now, who has swag, nigga?
#52 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
#89 - do you need me to ... uhm .... release your tension?  [+] (8 new replies) 02/13/2014 on North Korea +6
#92 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
YES. RIGHT. NOW.
#109 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
But it's too dense the tension is so high!
#533 - wimwam (02/13/2014) [-]
What is this sorcery?
#125 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
#127 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
Safety first, here take this, before it's too late
please be gentle ...
#334 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
Your ass is about to be as nonexistent as.... not existing... fuck it, bend over.
#746 - radtroll (02/15/2014) [-]
That will be 50$ plus 10$ for the finger in your ass
#748 - mrswagly (02/16/2014) [-]
I only have 2$
#53 - One does not simply stick it in the pooper with no warning, it… 02/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
#87 - " I would like to see citations" That resto…  [+] (10 new replies) 02/13/2014 on North Korea +66
User avatar #88 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
I would like to see citations. That do anything for ya? Cause I'm rock hard.
#89 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
do you need me to ... uhm .... release your tension?
#92 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
YES. RIGHT. NOW.
#109 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
But it's too dense the tension is so high!
#533 - wimwam (02/13/2014) [-]
What is this sorcery?
#125 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
#127 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
Safety first, here take this, before it's too late
please be gentle ...
#334 - mrswagly (02/13/2014) [-]
Your ass is about to be as nonexistent as.... not existing... fuck it, bend over.
#746 - radtroll (02/15/2014) [-]
That will be 50$ plus 10$ for the finger in your ass
#748 - mrswagly (02/16/2014) [-]
I only have 2$
#50 - since I was 5 we had a more than 36 cats and counting living n…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2014 on (untitled) +6
User avatar #52 - misfitxcreepx (02/13/2014) [-]
Yeah, but your girlfriend is agreeing to do it. What would happen when you just stick it in your stuck up girlfriends pooper without warning/consent? I'm sure it wouldn't go very well. haha. I very highly doubt this cat was like "Yeah man it's cool, squeeze me against the table until I can't breath and take some pictures, I don't mind" it was forced to do this and likely didn't want to do it.

But you're right, it is fun fucking with them! haha
User avatar #53 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
One does not simply stick it in the pooper with no warning, it's almost physically impossible, I tried
#28 - >implying she knows how to spell 02/13/2014 on U wot m8? +4
#12 - Picture 02/13/2014 on Yo Dawg I heard you like... +1
#40 - > implying that **** doesn't clean, feed, play…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/13/2014 on (untitled) +4
User avatar #47 - misfitxcreepx (02/13/2014) [-]
"Yes, your honor, I tortured the woman for 5 years and kept her locked up, but I also cleaned, fed, "played with," and took care of her, so it's all good!"
"Oh ok, my bad, you're free to go"

By the way, nothing yorker said implied she didn't do any of that stuff, he just said that the girl in the picture is (clearly) putting the cat in an uncomfortable position and possibly hurting it.
User avatar #50 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
since I was 5 we had a more than 36 cats and counting living naturally in the garden outside our house, I can assure you cats don't have an uncomfortable position, except when dangled from their back legs they would freak out.

plus, what's the fun in owning a cat if you don't twist it and squeeze it to uncomfortable positions, it's like your stuck up GF agrees to anal on your birthday, you know she might be "uncomfortable" but you just say fuck it, I've been nice to her all this time I earned the right to do this
User avatar #52 - misfitxcreepx (02/13/2014) [-]
Yeah, but your girlfriend is agreeing to do it. What would happen when you just stick it in your stuck up girlfriends pooper without warning/consent? I'm sure it wouldn't go very well. haha. I very highly doubt this cat was like "Yeah man it's cool, squeeze me against the table until I can't breath and take some pictures, I don't mind" it was forced to do this and likely didn't want to do it.

But you're right, it is fun fucking with them! haha
User avatar #53 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
One does not simply stick it in the pooper with no warning, it's almost physically impossible, I tried
User avatar #44 - yorker (02/13/2014) [-]
That's not what I think, and it's definitely not what I implied.

I meant in this instance. I never said anything that should make you think I am under the impression that this animal is neglected.
#70 - Comment deleted  [+] (6 new replies) 02/13/2014 on SCIENCE 0
#79 - Lainge Comment deleted by radtroll
#85 - bodox Comment deleted by radtroll
#91 - Lainge Comment deleted by radtroll
#92 - bodox Comment deleted by radtroll
#93 - Lainge Comment deleted by radtroll
#94 - bodox Comment deleted by radtroll
#40 - * insert racist black people stealing stuff joke here *  [+] (7 new replies) 02/13/2014 on he's stealin' +4
User avatar #43 - acemcgunner (02/13/2014) [-]
his swag is over 9000
User avatar #44 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
dat machine gun though
User avatar #51 - steppeden (02/13/2014) [-]
*submachinegun

Do you even /k/?
User avatar #45 - acemcgunner (02/13/2014) [-]
nigga, dat car : dat hot rod...
User avatar #46 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
Wait ...
hold on ...

Nigger is he wearing a fedora?
#48 - acemcgunner (02/13/2014) [-]
now, who has swag, nigga?
#52 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
#52 - Act normal, smile and be nice to her and treat her like nothin… 02/13/2014 on Sorry Travis it's mine now +4
#303 - I don't know who you are or where you came from but you know y…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/13/2014 on Oh Fuck Why +1
#305 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Hahaha I'm actuallly from Illinois US but it's a po dunk town between a corn field and a bean field.
#283 - a little bit of both, I have a thing for learning random …  [+] (3 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Oh Fuck Why +1
#293 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Oooh okay. See I like animals so i know a little bit of weird things. Like the clam has the largest penis in comparison to body size in the animal kingdom. I was just curious.
User avatar #303 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
I don't know who you are or where you came from but you know your penises lol

cornfucked Egypt, Iowa. or Egypt the middle east country?
#305 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Hahaha I'm actuallly from Illinois US but it's a po dunk town between a corn field and a bean field.
#203 - because unlike male circumcision, Female circumcision is point…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 0
User avatar #206 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
CONCLUSION
This article has addressed whether circumcision is legal, and has shown
that it is not. To summarize the law,
boys, like girls and adults, have
absolute rights under the common law to personal security an
d bodily integrity, and to freedom or the autonomy to make important and
irreversible decisions about their bodies that can be delayed, like
circumcision, for themselves.
It is unconstitutional to protect girls from
unnecessary genital cutting without ex
tending equal protection of the law to boys.
In addition, boys and girls are protected from circumcision by the
criminal child abuse statutes,tort law, and human rights law.
One therefore does not reach the argument that physicians have the right
to circumcise boys for religious, cultural, or personal reason, but if one did,
it does not pass the blush test. A physician’s legal duty is to provide
competent medical care to pediatric patients independent of their parents’
desires.
Thus, physicians can not take orders from parents to operate on
children for reasons having nothing to do with medicine. Parents’ religious
rights in turn are subordinate to their sons’ absolute rights to genital
integrity and autonomy,
User avatar #207 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
and parents cannot risk harming their children,
let alone actually harm them for religious reasons.
Furthermore,
physicians and parents have a legal duty to protect boys from
circumcision
User avatar #208 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]

This leaves the argument that circumcision is legally justified because it
is preventive medicine. As
the ethicist Margaret Somerville has written, it
is a common error to believe that this justifies circumcision. Amputating
any body part would have medical benefits but would violate the rights of
the child.Circumcision also does not benefit the vast
majority of boys or men at all
, (at best it reduces the risk of HIV during unsafe sex), and
any benefits can be achieved easily and more effectively without it.
The ethical and legal rule is that physicians cannot operate on healthy
children.
Amputations are legally justified only when medically
necessary to treat serious medical conditions,
after a diagnosis and
recommendation that the surgery is likely to be effective, cannot be
delayed, that its benefits will outweigh the risks and harm, and th
at all other efforts to treat the disease have failed.
Moreover, physicians and parents
would need to prove that the surgery is in the best interests of the child,
which includes proving that the child, if able, would have chosen the
surgery for himself.
Circumcision fails all of these tests. In short, under
any analysis, circumcision is illegal
User avatar #209 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
TIMMYWANKENOBI OUT PEACE, MOTHER FUCKERS !!
User avatar #205 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also the only thing you did was quote a debunked Jewish funded study that was completely rigged . If you are happy cut that's great, but the bottom line (if you had actually read the link) is no one has the right to cut anyone else it is a decision you have to make for yourself whither you personally feel violated or not, your body is your choice alone that's the law of the land.
User avatar #204 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf Read this whole thing slowly again you seem to have missed the entire thing.
#200 - if you cut your eyelids, you will damage your eyes and maybe l…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/13/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 -1
User avatar #201 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Execpt you could loose you fucking life as 117 boys in the us do every year ! and you loose nerve endings which make sex more pleasurable. You really need to read some medical journals and stuff because your ignorance is unbelievable.
#197 - OH you're one of those people who talk about the law, what law…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 -1
User avatar #199 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Stop and think for a minute the UN said it was okay against the UN Charter of Human rights only Because the Jews forced/bribed them too. Do you hear yourself you just said cutting a little girl is wrong therefore logically is cutting a boy in the same fashion not also wrong as it violates the same law and is immoral and wrong in the same way ? Read the Fucking UN Charter Asshole !! Also read the Equal Protection act and this link rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf
User avatar #203 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
because unlike male circumcision, Female circumcision is pointless and serves no purpose, and it is PROVEN to be dangerous and damaging.

1- You posted wrong information without reading it.
2- You are arguing about something you Never experienced, while I did personally, you insist on victimizing me, while I'm trying to make you understand I'm not a victim of anything.
3- Every single reply you posted contained fake information and lies, and you refuse to discuss the data that you were using to prove your point, instead you change the subject to laws and personal views.

I presented you with facts, both supported by scientific literature, and most importantly my own dick, but you still want to argue just for the sake of arguing, without considering the results of the same studies you posted yourself

This conversation is over, have a good day.
User avatar #206 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
CONCLUSION
This article has addressed whether circumcision is legal, and has shown
that it is not. To summarize the law,
boys, like girls and adults, have
absolute rights under the common law to personal security an
d bodily integrity, and to freedom or the autonomy to make important and
irreversible decisions about their bodies that can be delayed, like
circumcision, for themselves.
It is unconstitutional to protect girls from
unnecessary genital cutting without ex
tending equal protection of the law to boys.
In addition, boys and girls are protected from circumcision by the
criminal child abuse statutes,tort law, and human rights law.
One therefore does not reach the argument that physicians have the right
to circumcise boys for religious, cultural, or personal reason, but if one did,
it does not pass the blush test. A physician’s legal duty is to provide
competent medical care to pediatric patients independent of their parents’
desires.
Thus, physicians can not take orders from parents to operate on
children for reasons having nothing to do with medicine. Parents’ religious
rights in turn are subordinate to their sons’ absolute rights to genital
integrity and autonomy,
User avatar #207 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
and parents cannot risk harming their children,
let alone actually harm them for religious reasons.
Furthermore,
physicians and parents have a legal duty to protect boys from
circumcision
User avatar #208 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]

This leaves the argument that circumcision is legally justified because it
is preventive medicine. As
the ethicist Margaret Somerville has written, it
is a common error to believe that this justifies circumcision. Amputating
any body part would have medical benefits but would violate the rights of
the child.Circumcision also does not benefit the vast
majority of boys or men at all
, (at best it reduces the risk of HIV during unsafe sex), and
any benefits can be achieved easily and more effectively without it.
The ethical and legal rule is that physicians cannot operate on healthy
children.
Amputations are legally justified only when medically
necessary to treat serious medical conditions,
after a diagnosis and
recommendation that the surgery is likely to be effective, cannot be
delayed, that its benefits will outweigh the risks and harm, and th
at all other efforts to treat the disease have failed.
Moreover, physicians and parents
would need to prove that the surgery is in the best interests of the child,
which includes proving that the child, if able, would have chosen the
surgery for himself.
Circumcision fails all of these tests. In short, under
any analysis, circumcision is illegal
User avatar #209 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
TIMMYWANKENOBI OUT PEACE, MOTHER FUCKERS !!
User avatar #205 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also the only thing you did was quote a debunked Jewish funded study that was completely rigged . If you are happy cut that's great, but the bottom line (if you had actually read the link) is no one has the right to cut anyone else it is a decision you have to make for yourself whither you personally feel violated or not, your body is your choice alone that's the law of the land.
User avatar #204 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf Read this whole thing slowly again you seem to have missed the entire thing.
#220 - Well, most common sharks have two penises, each of the two pen…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Oh Fuck Why +4
#250 - skyelinesunrise (02/13/2014) [-]
Not only do they have two penises, instead of having a normal "head" at the end of their penis, many sharks have a sort of claw with sharp talons, that grab onto the inside of the female. Many sharks do actually only use one at a time, but some use both, and its akin to getting double fisted by freddy kreuger and wolverine.

For a more detailed insight on these horrifying monster penises (along with morbid/nsfw imagery) there is a fascinating series of livejournal posts by some guy with a disturbing interest in frightening animal genitalia, see dave-littler.livejournal.com/78709.html (the world's most terrifying penises tag at the bottom will filter the other articles)
#249 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Sooo.. I have to ask. Do you know this because you like learning about animals and the penis is part of animal, or do you like learning about penises and the animal is just attached?
User avatar #283 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
a little bit of both, I have a thing for learning random shit that never comes in handy
#293 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Oooh okay. See I like animals so i know a little bit of weird things. Like the clam has the largest penis in comparison to body size in the animal kingdom. I was just curious.
User avatar #303 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
I don't know who you are or where you came from but you know your penises lol

cornfucked Egypt, Iowa. or Egypt the middle east country?
#305 - Juggalofourtwenty (02/13/2014) [-]
Hahaha I'm actuallly from Illinois US but it's a po dunk town between a corn field and a bean field.
#235 - cjwers (02/13/2014) [-]
I have learned so much more than I ever wanted to know about dicks.
Thanks, I think
enjoy the picture
User avatar #224 - urinarytractinfect (02/13/2014) [-]
so the shark will have two big double pennetrating penises!! woohoo.
#195 - Don't give me that ******** , I only stated what i…  [+] (13 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 -1
User avatar #198 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also if another person cut your body without you permission is that not a crime. If you order someone to chop of your child's eye lids is that not abuse and a violation of their rights to body integrity ? you seem to think as long as you only amputate certain parts of another persons body without their permission it magically becomes moral and ethical and legal. It is not the case and never will be my body is my choice your body is your choice but a babies body doesn't belong to anyone but themselves just like a grown adult.
User avatar #200 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
if you cut your eyelids, you will damage your eyes and maybe lose his eyes sight.
if you amputate someone's leg off he will lose the ability to walk.

if you circumcise a newborn kid he loses ........ nothing that I can't think of, he just gains slight resistance to disease and have a better long term sex life, just like the study you posted stated clearly.
User avatar #201 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Execpt you could loose you fucking life as 117 boys in the us do every year ! and you loose nerve endings which make sex more pleasurable. You really need to read some medical journals and stuff because your ignorance is unbelievable.
User avatar #196 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Listen According to the Fucking Law you do not have the religious right to mutilate anyone but yourself and painfully cutting children male or female for non medical reasons is Immoral unethical and Illegal according to the UN and the Equal protection act and Civil rights laws as is the selling of foreskins which is prevalent in the US . Not to fucking mention over 1000 boys die needlessly from circumcisions complications every year world wide and over 9000 more are horribly maimed. educate yourself.
User avatar #197 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
OH you're one of those people who talk about the law, what law? who made this law?

Laws are different depending on where you are, why would you refer to law when you have a BRAIN that is working and can tell what's right and what's wrong.
Again, don't fuckin try to change the subjects, we are discussing the studies that you posted without reading, they are not even supporting your point.

And the UN fully supports male circumcision, here check for yourself :
www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp/story.asp?NewsID=39099&Cr=HIV&Cr1=AIDS#.UvwdcijyDIU

They banned FEMALE circumcision you fucking idiot, you should REALLY start reading before posting shit you don't know about
User avatar #199 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Stop and think for a minute the UN said it was okay against the UN Charter of Human rights only Because the Jews forced/bribed them too. Do you hear yourself you just said cutting a little girl is wrong therefore logically is cutting a boy in the same fashion not also wrong as it violates the same law and is immoral and wrong in the same way ? Read the Fucking UN Charter Asshole !! Also read the Equal Protection act and this link rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf
User avatar #203 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
because unlike male circumcision, Female circumcision is pointless and serves no purpose, and it is PROVEN to be dangerous and damaging.

1- You posted wrong information without reading it.
2- You are arguing about something you Never experienced, while I did personally, you insist on victimizing me, while I'm trying to make you understand I'm not a victim of anything.
3- Every single reply you posted contained fake information and lies, and you refuse to discuss the data that you were using to prove your point, instead you change the subject to laws and personal views.

I presented you with facts, both supported by scientific literature, and most importantly my own dick, but you still want to argue just for the sake of arguing, without considering the results of the same studies you posted yourself

This conversation is over, have a good day.
User avatar #206 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
CONCLUSION
This article has addressed whether circumcision is legal, and has shown
that it is not. To summarize the law,
boys, like girls and adults, have
absolute rights under the common law to personal security an
d bodily integrity, and to freedom or the autonomy to make important and
irreversible decisions about their bodies that can be delayed, like
circumcision, for themselves.
It is unconstitutional to protect girls from
unnecessary genital cutting without ex
tending equal protection of the law to boys.
In addition, boys and girls are protected from circumcision by the
criminal child abuse statutes,tort law, and human rights law.
One therefore does not reach the argument that physicians have the right
to circumcise boys for religious, cultural, or personal reason, but if one did,
it does not pass the blush test. A physician’s legal duty is to provide
competent medical care to pediatric patients independent of their parents’
desires.
Thus, physicians can not take orders from parents to operate on
children for reasons having nothing to do with medicine. Parents’ religious
rights in turn are subordinate to their sons’ absolute rights to genital
integrity and autonomy,
User avatar #207 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
and parents cannot risk harming their children,
let alone actually harm them for religious reasons.
Furthermore,
physicians and parents have a legal duty to protect boys from
circumcision
User avatar #208 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]

This leaves the argument that circumcision is legally justified because it
is preventive medicine. As
the ethicist Margaret Somerville has written, it
is a common error to believe that this justifies circumcision. Amputating
any body part would have medical benefits but would violate the rights of
the child.Circumcision also does not benefit the vast
majority of boys or men at all
, (at best it reduces the risk of HIV during unsafe sex), and
any benefits can be achieved easily and more effectively without it.
The ethical and legal rule is that physicians cannot operate on healthy
children.
Amputations are legally justified only when medically
necessary to treat serious medical conditions,
after a diagnosis and
recommendation that the surgery is likely to be effective, cannot be
delayed, that its benefits will outweigh the risks and harm, and th
at all other efforts to treat the disease have failed.
Moreover, physicians and parents
would need to prove that the surgery is in the best interests of the child,
which includes proving that the child, if able, would have chosen the
surgery for himself.
Circumcision fails all of these tests. In short, under
any analysis, circumcision is illegal
User avatar #209 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
TIMMYWANKENOBI OUT PEACE, MOTHER FUCKERS !!
User avatar #205 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also the only thing you did was quote a debunked Jewish funded study that was completely rigged . If you are happy cut that's great, but the bottom line (if you had actually read the link) is no one has the right to cut anyone else it is a decision you have to make for yourself whither you personally feel violated or not, your body is your choice alone that's the law of the land.
User avatar #204 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf Read this whole thing slowly again you seem to have missed the entire thing.
#182 - I have a first hand experience since I'm circumcised. but here…  [+] (15 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 0
User avatar #184 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
I have a shit load more link on my desktop but it is dead so I can't access them. The point I have made is there is no justifiable medical reason to violate male children's human.civil and medical rights in this way also it is illegal to sell foreskins yet hospitals still do it untouched by the law. It is an insidious evil that is eroding rights that should never have been denied.
User avatar #195 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
Don't give me that bullshit, I only stated what is said in YOUR links, which you never read.

on what point did you assume it's violating children's rights?
Me, 1.6 Billion Muslims, and 13.7 Million Jews disagree with your view, and assure you that it's perfectly fine, I never, not for a second in my entire life, felt abused, hurt, or any negative feelings at all related to being circumcised.

Just like any other guy, my dick and sex life is beyond fuckin important, I rather lose a limb or an eye than damage my dick in any way, my manhood, pride and joy .....etc .. you get the idea, so why the fuck would I -or any sane person- promote the idea of circumcision to other people and will have my children circumcised, if it could negatively affect their life? why would I want to hurt my own child? I have an amazing sex life and want my children to have the same or better.

and all that talk about losing sensitivity and all ... I don't have an issue with using condoms, while many guys say they can't feel anything while wearing one, I don't like them more than the next guy, but I still feel everything and orgasm normally, So if my glorious circumcised penis wasn't sensitive how can you explain this shit?

I don't care if you or anyone else believe me or not, and I honestly don't think it a big issue, it's a free world and people have different ideas, but shit is good and I'm glad I was circumcised, and I highly recommend it too. But when you call it child abuse, accusing parents of abusing their children, and most importantly, stick your nose in my sons' and family matters, I will never be ok with that and will be the first to tell you to go fuck yourself.
User avatar #198 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also if another person cut your body without you permission is that not a crime. If you order someone to chop of your child's eye lids is that not abuse and a violation of their rights to body integrity ? you seem to think as long as you only amputate certain parts of another persons body without their permission it magically becomes moral and ethical and legal. It is not the case and never will be my body is my choice your body is your choice but a babies body doesn't belong to anyone but themselves just like a grown adult.
User avatar #200 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
if you cut your eyelids, you will damage your eyes and maybe lose his eyes sight.
if you amputate someone's leg off he will lose the ability to walk.

if you circumcise a newborn kid he loses ........ nothing that I can't think of, he just gains slight resistance to disease and have a better long term sex life, just like the study you posted stated clearly.
User avatar #201 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Execpt you could loose you fucking life as 117 boys in the us do every year ! and you loose nerve endings which make sex more pleasurable. You really need to read some medical journals and stuff because your ignorance is unbelievable.
User avatar #196 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Listen According to the Fucking Law you do not have the religious right to mutilate anyone but yourself and painfully cutting children male or female for non medical reasons is Immoral unethical and Illegal according to the UN and the Equal protection act and Civil rights laws as is the selling of foreskins which is prevalent in the US . Not to fucking mention over 1000 boys die needlessly from circumcisions complications every year world wide and over 9000 more are horribly maimed. educate yourself.
User avatar #197 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
OH you're one of those people who talk about the law, what law? who made this law?

Laws are different depending on where you are, why would you refer to law when you have a BRAIN that is working and can tell what's right and what's wrong.
Again, don't fuckin try to change the subjects, we are discussing the studies that you posted without reading, they are not even supporting your point.

And the UN fully supports male circumcision, here check for yourself :
www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp/story.asp?NewsID=39099&Cr=HIV&Cr1=AIDS#.UvwdcijyDIU

They banned FEMALE circumcision you fucking idiot, you should REALLY start reading before posting shit you don't know about
User avatar #199 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Stop and think for a minute the UN said it was okay against the UN Charter of Human rights only Because the Jews forced/bribed them too. Do you hear yourself you just said cutting a little girl is wrong therefore logically is cutting a boy in the same fashion not also wrong as it violates the same law and is immoral and wrong in the same way ? Read the Fucking UN Charter Asshole !! Also read the Equal Protection act and this link rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf
User avatar #203 - radtroll (02/13/2014) [-]
because unlike male circumcision, Female circumcision is pointless and serves no purpose, and it is PROVEN to be dangerous and damaging.

1- You posted wrong information without reading it.
2- You are arguing about something you Never experienced, while I did personally, you insist on victimizing me, while I'm trying to make you understand I'm not a victim of anything.
3- Every single reply you posted contained fake information and lies, and you refuse to discuss the data that you were using to prove your point, instead you change the subject to laws and personal views.

I presented you with facts, both supported by scientific literature, and most importantly my own dick, but you still want to argue just for the sake of arguing, without considering the results of the same studies you posted yourself

This conversation is over, have a good day.
User avatar #206 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
CONCLUSION
This article has addressed whether circumcision is legal, and has shown
that it is not. To summarize the law,
boys, like girls and adults, have
absolute rights under the common law to personal security an
d bodily integrity, and to freedom or the autonomy to make important and
irreversible decisions about their bodies that can be delayed, like
circumcision, for themselves.
It is unconstitutional to protect girls from
unnecessary genital cutting without ex
tending equal protection of the law to boys.
In addition, boys and girls are protected from circumcision by the
criminal child abuse statutes,tort law, and human rights law.
One therefore does not reach the argument that physicians have the right
to circumcise boys for religious, cultural, or personal reason, but if one did,
it does not pass the blush test. A physician’s legal duty is to provide
competent medical care to pediatric patients independent of their parents’
desires.
Thus, physicians can not take orders from parents to operate on
children for reasons having nothing to do with medicine. Parents’ religious
rights in turn are subordinate to their sons’ absolute rights to genital
integrity and autonomy,
User avatar #207 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
and parents cannot risk harming their children,
let alone actually harm them for religious reasons.
Furthermore,
physicians and parents have a legal duty to protect boys from
circumcision
User avatar #208 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]

This leaves the argument that circumcision is legally justified because it
is preventive medicine. As
the ethicist Margaret Somerville has written, it
is a common error to believe that this justifies circumcision. Amputating
any body part would have medical benefits but would violate the rights of
the child.Circumcision also does not benefit the vast
majority of boys or men at all
, (at best it reduces the risk of HIV during unsafe sex), and
any benefits can be achieved easily and more effectively without it.
The ethical and legal rule is that physicians cannot operate on healthy
children.
Amputations are legally justified only when medically
necessary to treat serious medical conditions,
after a diagnosis and
recommendation that the surgery is likely to be effective, cannot be
delayed, that its benefits will outweigh the risks and harm, and th
at all other efforts to treat the disease have failed.
Moreover, physicians and parents
would need to prove that the surgery is in the best interests of the child,
which includes proving that the child, if able, would have chosen the
surgery for himself.
Circumcision fails all of these tests. In short, under
any analysis, circumcision is illegal
User avatar #209 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
TIMMYWANKENOBI OUT PEACE, MOTHER FUCKERS !!
User avatar #205 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
Also the only thing you did was quote a debunked Jewish funded study that was completely rigged . If you are happy cut that's great, but the bottom line (if you had actually read the link) is no one has the right to cut anyone else it is a decision you have to make for yourself whither you personally feel violated or not, your body is your choice alone that's the law of the land.
User avatar #204 - timmywankenobi (02/13/2014) [-]
rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf Read this whole thing slowly again you seem to have missed the entire thing.
#165 - Muslim here, we get circumcised at birth too, and why would it… 02/12/2014 on Jews did this Part 3 -1
#31 - I've been scrolling up and down trying to figure out why you … 02/12/2014 on Saudi Arebian masterrace -2
#91 - You are too progressive for those people, man 02/12/2014 on Not sure how to break it to... 0
#144 - more gay **** 02/12/2014 on Never complain +2
#137 - Picture 02/12/2014 on Saxophones +4
#5 - inject like to ********** man and you'll be tripp… 02/09/2014 on I did not see that coming -1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#3 - leneotroll **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - anonymous (07/17/2012) [-]
Eh yo nig. u is a stoopid ho lik 4 reeeeeel.
User avatar #2 to #1 - radtroll (07/18/2012) [-]
English ************ do you speak it ?

oh you are a ****** .... my bad
 Friends (0)