...What? That their claim of putting an alien in every episode is true?
You need to look up the definition of subliminal and then reevaluate your comment.

"Below the threshold of conscious perception"

just pointing out the fact that we see this all the time and i never even knew it... why so butthurt?

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.

Well if we assume that this is true... Then it's safe to say that we all came out of incest correct? Knowing what we know about incest today don't you think that the children born wouldn't have been able to survive in that time with all the physical strain that was needed in that time period? Wouldn't the extremely probable mental disease that they obtained from incest hinder them? And wouldn't there offspring have the high possibility of birth defects?

Technically yes but let me try to get back to you tomorrow on that. Its almost 2:30 here and i get up at 6 -_- you brought up some good points though

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.

So why does the bible name three children but not the others that are being assumed up in your original comment?

I personally don't know why the others werent named or why we don't know how many there were, but we do know they were there because of Genesis 5; theyre not totally assumed.

Well if we assume that this is true... Then it's safe to say that we all came out of incest correct? Knowing what we know about incest today don't you think that the children born wouldn't have been able to survive in that time with all the physical strain that was needed in that time period? Wouldn't the extremely probable mental disease that they obtained from incest hinder them? And wouldn't there offspring have the high possibility of birth defects?

Technically yes but let me try to get back to you tomorrow on that. Its almost 2:30 here and i get up at 6 -_- you brought up some good points though

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.

Then why is it the bible says that there where only three children... but then the bible fails to talk about the third Child and only focuses on Cain and Abel.

These are alot of assumptions with no evidence. (I really don't mean to sound antagonizing, I'm sorry if I come across as such)

It also named Seth, the third son, but later clarifies in Genesis 5:1-5 that he had more but didn't count or name all of them.

So why does the bible name three children but not the others that are being assumed up in your original comment?

I personally don't know why the others werent named or why we don't know how many there were, but we do know they were there because of Genesis 5; theyre not totally assumed.

Well if we assume that this is true... Then it's safe to say that we all came out of incest correct? Knowing what we know about incest today don't you think that the children born wouldn't have been able to survive in that time with all the physical strain that was needed in that time period? Wouldn't the extremely probable mental disease that they obtained from incest hinder them? And wouldn't there offspring have the high possibility of birth defects?

Technically yes but let me try to get back to you tomorrow on that. Its almost 2:30 here and i get up at 6 -_- you brought up some good points though

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.

Source:

www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com/who-was-cains-wife-does-this-contradict-the-creation-story/

Then why is it the bible says that there where only three children... but then the bible fails to talk about the third Child and only focuses on Cain and Abel.

These are alot of assumptions with no evidence. (I really don't mean to sound antagonizing, I'm sorry if I come across as such)

It also named Seth, the third son, but later clarifies in Genesis 5:1-5 that he had more but didn't count or name all of them.

So why does the bible name three children but not the others that are being assumed up in your original comment?

I personally don't know why the others werent named or why we don't know how many there were, but we do know they were there because of Genesis 5; theyre not totally assumed.

Well if we assume that this is true... Then it's safe to say that we all came out of incest correct? Knowing what we know about incest today don't you think that the children born wouldn't have been able to survive in that time with all the physical strain that was needed in that time period? Wouldn't the extremely probable mental disease that they obtained from incest hinder them? And wouldn't there offspring have the high possibility of birth defects?

Technically yes but let me try to get back to you tomorrow on that. Its almost 2:30 here and i get up at 6 -_- you brought up some good points though

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.

After Cain murdered his brother Abel, God sent him away and he ended up living east of Eden (Gen 4:16). This is where Cain met and married his wife and they bore a child named Enoch (Gen 4:17). At this same location, Cain built a city and we can assume that if he built an entire city, there must have been many other people living there already or at least nearby. Therefore, by the time Cain was an adult and was sent away by God, Adam and Eve must have had many other children and by simple addition and then multiplication, there could have been at least hundreds of descendants already having been spread out and multiplied around the areas of Eden. There is no doubt that Cain married a relative of his parents Adam and Eve but since Adam and Eve were blessed by God and they were fruitful and multiplied and their descendants spread out over the earth, there was no difficulty in Cain finding a wife at all. With life spans of over 900 years for the first human beings, this easily gave adequate time for multiple children and these dozens of generations of the children of Adam and Eve to have their children’s children who had children and so on. These children had children who became Adam and Eve’s grand children, great grandchildren, and on and on.

Source:

www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com/who-was-cains-wife-does-this-contradict-the-creation-story/

Then why is it the bible says that there where only three children... but then the bible fails to talk about the third Child and only focuses on Cain and Abel.

These are alot of assumptions with no evidence. (I really don't mean to sound antagonizing, I'm sorry if I come across as such)

It also named Seth, the third son, but later clarifies in Genesis 5:1-5 that he had more but didn't count or name all of them.

So why does the bible name three children but not the others that are being assumed up in your original comment?

I personally don't know why the others werent named or why we don't know how many there were, but we do know they were there because of Genesis 5; theyre not totally assumed.

Well if we assume that this is true... Then it's safe to say that we all came out of incest correct? Knowing what we know about incest today don't you think that the children born wouldn't have been able to survive in that time with all the physical strain that was needed in that time period? Wouldn't the extremely probable mental disease that they obtained from incest hinder them? And wouldn't there offspring have the high possibility of birth defects?

Technically yes but let me try to get back to you tomorrow on that. Its almost 2:30 here and i get up at 6 -_- you brought up some good points though

Thanks man :) I'll have more questions up by tomorrow to... I'm doing one every hour.