Rank #14161 on SubscribersLevel 259 Comments: Contaminated Win
OfflineSend mail to qazzuiop Block qazzuiop Invite qazzuiop to be your friend flag avatar
- Views: 98227Gay people or something
5921 304 Total: +5617
- Views: 96038facebook
5316 224 Total: +5092
- Views: 48610Youtube 101
3121 169 Total: +2952
- Views: 66175feels
3656 719 Total: +2937
- Views: 48143photobomb master
2828 109 Total: +2719
- Views: 64200ahaha Biritsh people
2134 204 Total: +1930
- Views: 1132Santorum showing his true colors.
10 4 Total: +6
- Views: 1182You seem confused
5 2 Total: +3
- Views: 715Hahaha wut?
7 4 Total: +3
- Views: 844Wbc gets it up the ass
6 4 Total: +2
- Views: 11768Wtf is wrong with people?
13 11 Total: +2
- Views: 655There is no RAAANNCCHH!
6 4 Total: +2
- Views: 1368House in the house
31 13 Total: +18
latest user's comments
|#23857 - American politics [+] (5 new replies)||02/17/2013 on Politics - politics news,...||+4|
#23875 - anonymous (02/17/2013) [-]
Despite what each sock may do, they still belong to the same puppetmaster. They are merely different methods of carrying out the same intentions.
|#22707 - yeah. This sums of Obama and Bush's terms in one fell swoop. [+] (5 new replies)||02/03/2013 on Politics - politics news,...||+6|
#22733 - Ruspanic (02/03/2013) [-]
Out of curiosity, could you point out the specific executive orders you have a problem with, or which ones you think constitute an overreach of executive power?
Seems to me like most of them have been pretty mundane and mostly harmless. Even the ones concerning guns.
#22735 - pebar (02/04/2013) [-]
The ones that say medical professionals have a say in who is banned from purchasing a firearm. According to the gun control act, only those who have been committed or who have been determined by a court to be mentally defective are restricted.
Simply saying, "this person could potentially be dangerous" and banning that person is just wrong. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty...
And it's more future executive orders that I'm worried about. Most of the time executive orders simply clarify laws that already exist. However the president still has the authority to bypass congress to make his own laws, assuming they don't get shot down. The executive branch is supposed to be the one that enforces current laws, not make new ones.
#22737 - Ruspanic (02/04/2013) [-]
I think medical professionals are better qualified than courts to determine whether a person is mentally ill or unstable. It's not a matter of innocent or guilty because having a mental disorder isn't a crime, but such people shouldn't be allowed to own firearms, just as the blind cannot get driver's licenses.
Your earlier post indicated that you don't like Obama's use of executive orders so far, and the image seems to compare them to royal decrees. It's fine and reasonable to be worried about the growth of presidential power in general, but I don't see that much of a basis for your strong disdain of Obama's executive orders.
(Using children for political gain is of course deplorable.)
|#119 - that is all.||01/26/2013 on My life||0|
|#21158 - Thanks to TARP we now have established that banks can do what …||01/13/2013 on Politics - politics news,...||+2|
|#251 - they should fight back and all show their tits. That'll show t…||01/06/2013 on Silly Feminists||+3|
|#57 - As much as I'm for gay marriage and all, is it really that i…||01/05/2013 on it should be legal||-2|
|#72 - it's like Stu from Rugrats mixed with the 10th Doctor.||01/02/2013 on Mutou Doesn't Fuck Around||+23|
|#74 - not enough 9th? [+] (1 new reply)||01/01/2013 on lol wut||0|
|#53 - this is anti-climactic [+] (3 new replies)||01/01/2013 on lol wut||+1|
|#47 - DALEKS DO NOT TRY. WE SUCCEED. [+] (6 new replies)||12/31/2012 on lol wut||0|