Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

princenarnode

princenarnode Avatar Level 0 Comments: Untouched account
Offline
Send mail to princenarnode Block princenarnode Invite princenarnode to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:6/10/2012
Last Login:11/06/2013
Location:Canada
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 4 total,  123 ,  127
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:77
FJ Points:-1

latest user's comments

#232 - I realize not all theists are on a witch hunt foe athiests. I'…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/05/2013 on Dissing with bible quotes 0
User avatar #234 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
I understand what you mean. but you're going to face ignorance everywhere you go. Yeah, I don't think there has ever been a mass tragedy because of an atheist. But it's not really fair to group all religions together like that. I'm christian, so I can't speak for the muslims, or the minutely small group of them who are extremists.
#229 - at least the worst a 'bad' atheist like me will ever do is put…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/05/2013 on Dissing with bible quotes 0
User avatar #231 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
except for the fact that you didn't put ideas out there. I talked about everyone getting along, and you have to go and dick up the place. and I don't know where you live, but I can tell you I live in the "bible built" south, and there are no "atheist hunts." in fact, nobody gives a fuck. and thats the way it should be. if your family doesn't want to accept you if you're an atheist, that's a problem with your family, not their religion. you can be a theist and still have atheist family members. I do. and no, I am not referring to anyone "making fun of god" but how come it is ok for atheists to mock someone for their beliefs, but if that person starts talking about their beliefs you're all like "wah wah wah they forced their beliefs on me! wah!" I've seen it far too many times in person, there were a bunch of those atheist kids at my school who were only atheist because they thought it gave them an extra 20 IQ points and made them seem cool and edgy.

once again, not all atheists and theists are like that, but there are some dicks out there.
User avatar #232 - princenarnode (09/05/2013) [-]
I realize not all theists are on a witch hunt foe athiests. I'm saying it does happen though, where people are forced to believe what their family believes. More so in in 3rd world countries. Just because people are nice where you live doesnt mean its like that everywhere. I was saying the absolute worst an athiest will ever do is talk, or insult you, or protest. The worst a theist can or will do is much worse.
User avatar #234 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
I understand what you mean. but you're going to face ignorance everywhere you go. Yeah, I don't think there has ever been a mass tragedy because of an atheist. But it's not really fair to group all religions together like that. I'm christian, so I can't speak for the muslims, or the minutely small group of them who are extremists.
#183 - Wow is that a joke. Atheists do not force their beliefs on any…  [+] (5 new replies) 09/05/2013 on Dissing with bible quotes 0
User avatar #228 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you one of the "bad" atheists.
User avatar #229 - princenarnode (09/05/2013) [-]
at least the worst a 'bad' atheist like me will ever do is put my ideas out there. The worst a theist will do is fly planes into buildings, or ruin a whole society with ignorance.
User avatar #231 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
except for the fact that you didn't put ideas out there. I talked about everyone getting along, and you have to go and dick up the place. and I don't know where you live, but I can tell you I live in the "bible built" south, and there are no "atheist hunts." in fact, nobody gives a fuck. and thats the way it should be. if your family doesn't want to accept you if you're an atheist, that's a problem with your family, not their religion. you can be a theist and still have atheist family members. I do. and no, I am not referring to anyone "making fun of god" but how come it is ok for atheists to mock someone for their beliefs, but if that person starts talking about their beliefs you're all like "wah wah wah they forced their beliefs on me! wah!" I've seen it far too many times in person, there were a bunch of those atheist kids at my school who were only atheist because they thought it gave them an extra 20 IQ points and made them seem cool and edgy.

once again, not all atheists and theists are like that, but there are some dicks out there.
User avatar #232 - princenarnode (09/05/2013) [-]
I realize not all theists are on a witch hunt foe athiests. I'm saying it does happen though, where people are forced to believe what their family believes. More so in in 3rd world countries. Just because people are nice where you live doesnt mean its like that everywhere. I was saying the absolute worst an athiest will ever do is talk, or insult you, or protest. The worst a theist can or will do is much worse.
User avatar #234 - karson (09/05/2013) [-]
I understand what you mean. but you're going to face ignorance everywhere you go. Yeah, I don't think there has ever been a mass tragedy because of an atheist. But it's not really fair to group all religions together like that. I'm christian, so I can't speak for the muslims, or the minutely small group of them who are extremists.
#168 - They talk **** about the teacher who doesn't exis… 09/02/2013 on yep 0
#7 - Or it could have been written that way because who ever wrote …  [+] (21 new replies) 09/02/2013 on yep +17
User avatar #8 - adu (09/02/2013) [-]
The Bible isn't a science book, it was never written as such. Figurative language is often used, especially in the old testament and throughout Jesus' parables.
User avatar #9 - numbersixtyseven (09/02/2013) [-]
And who's going to tell us which bits were figurative and which bits factually happened? The writers? No, they dead. You? Nah, you didn't write it. The pope? Might as well, but still not the writer. Then again, WBC and the likes read the same book and claim rather different things.
User avatar #12 - adu (09/02/2013) [-]
I think you missed the part about archaeology. There is evidence to back up events that occur in the Bible.
User avatar #47 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
No, they don't.
6 Day Creation: Never happend
Noahs flood: never happend
Exodus of the Jews: never happend
King David: never existed
Solomon: not real
aso, aso.
But Jesus is generally considerd to have lived, although there is just one source, not even a contemporary one that mentions that there is a cult named Christians whose name comes from a guy named Christ who was wrongfully executed, in jut one sentence.
Or so Tacitus wrote at least.

So, what exactly are these events you talk about?
#149 - merloxbeard (09/02/2013) [-]
Dude.... I don't care who you are atheist, Christian, Islamic, Jewish, pagan or whatever, The Exodus of Jews DID happen, science has explained all 7 of the miracles, scientists wouldn't just waste their time explaining something that never happened. King David DID exist. Same as Solomon."
User avatar #151 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
King Davids historicity is actually not supported by any conclusive historic sources, and it is generally doubted by most historians today. The word Davidian Dynasty seems to have come from dawidium = Military leader, not David.
And the exodus of the Jews did not happen as described in the Bible.
There: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Historicity
Just look it up on wikipedia at least.
And there is no evidence for solomons existance:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon#Historicity_of_Solomon
At least check wikipedia and the web first.
And read a real history book by real historians from time to time.
Didn't you ever have History classes in your school? They should have coverd that shit.
User avatar #55 - kokkodellrrisch (09/02/2013) [-]
The flood could have actually happened, the burckle crater could have been formed by a giant comet or meteorite and could have caused a giant tsunami, many religions that started in the middle east , around the mediterrean sea and Asia have a myth that there's a giant flood and in some myths they had to build a giant ark, like in the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible. There's also a lot of gelogical evidence for this, archaelogists have found seashells and fish fossils in mountainous areas.
User avatar #59 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
The flood didn't happen, archeology and geology disproved it.
And do you even have a basic understanding of geology?
Fossilized seashels are found on mountians, but just because plate tectonics cause parts of the continent that used to be coverd by water to rise up and form mountains over hundreds of millions of years.
#132 - aceonfire (09/02/2013) [-]
they did actually prove that a massive flood occurred in the middle east during "biblical times." Archaeological findings include a large trade boat found on a mountain in Turkey. I don't think that it really is "Noah's Ark" or that there even was a Noah's Ark to begin with; however, it is logical to believe that there was massive flooding and many middle easterners thought that the entire world was experiencing the same event. Source: news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100428-noahs-ark-found-in-turkey-science-religion-culture/
User avatar #136 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
Hahaha.
They have supposedly found the "Ark" over a dozen times now.
And all previous times it turned out to be a fake.
So, stay in your 19th century and enjoy yout american education.
So good bye, I don't argue with scientifically illiterate people.
#138 - aceonfire (09/02/2013) [-]
My point is not that they found the ark. Its that a trade boat was thousands of feet above the nearest body of water.
User avatar #143 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
I mean it says it right there in your articles that the wood is to young, meaning that it, like the dozens of other discoveries of the ark, is a fake.
At least read the article.
User avatar #140 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
Do you even do math?
Do you have any Idea how much water it would take to raise the sea level by thousands of feet?
It is simply not possible.
Check your sources.
I think it turned out to be a fake.
#147 - aceonfire (09/02/2013) [-]
The source is National Geographic. They do dispute its claims of being "Noah's Ark" but the discovery of the boat itself is legitimate. And mountains can increase in size after thousands of years. Like I said, I don't think it is Noah's Ark, or that the ark even existed. And as for the age of the wood, that argument is only concerning whether or not the Ark even existed. Which I repeat for the fifth time now, I do not believe to be true. Scientifically speaking, it is not illogical to believe that a massive flood brought the trade boat to its current location, in which over thousands of years the mountains rose due to being on a fault-line.
User avatar #150 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
Nonvolcanic mountains DON'T rise by thousands of feet within 6 Thousand years.
And read it up further, it turned out that the wood they found turned out to be a fake.
#152 - aceonfire (09/02/2013) [-]
They dated the wood at 4,600 years. It was not found fake, just way too young to be the wood used on the Ark. And to be honest I am unaware of mountain growth rates, but I know that volcanic mountains are not the only mountains to increase in height, and that the tallest mountains currently are all created through upheaval, or plates pushed together in a way that also pushes them upward.
User avatar #155 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
Of course mountains grow in size, but over dozens or even hundreds of millions of years, mut not by thousands of feet within a couple of millenia.
And still: there could not have been water there, since would require more water than any flood could bring, in fact a couple of hundred or even thousand times more.
#157 - aceonfire (09/02/2013) [-]
what about a flood created by a massive tsunami? like kokkodellrrisch posted?
User avatar #160 - metalmind (09/02/2013) [-]
Well, the myths could easily orginate from the flooding of the persian gulf, a real event, in which the rising sea levels at the end of the last ice age lead to a flooding of the previously dry area.
Plus a meteorstrike of that magnitude would have wiped out cultures arround the globe, not forgeting to mention that there would be a fresh, giant impact crater somewhere or evidence for a giant meteor impact and a flood folowing it, but we know no such thing happend.
There were sophisticated cultures that lived through the supposed time of the flood and didn't notice anything.
A meteor strike that would have been large enough to cause such a giant flood wave would have caused a mass extinction event, and a wave of such force that it would have torn every boat to pieces, and killed most humans all over the world, both things that we know didn't happen.
#14 - anonymous (09/02/2013) [-]
No shit. It was written by people during those times and bullshit was muddled with actual events. You think they'll just make up random temples, cities, civilizations, historical figures, etc. rather than grab the existence of actual things, then proceed to write down the legends, rumors, and other folklore of the people?

Saving Private Ryan is based on an actual war and makes mention of actual people, doesn't make any of it real.
#421 - i never said or implied the aztecs were evil, and there was a … 05/08/2013 on Merica' 0
#416 - Cortés' contingent consisted of 11 ships carrying about 100 s…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/07/2013 on Merica' 0
User avatar #418 - Conquistador (05/08/2013) [-]
Lol, you still got numbers wrong. It seems like you're trying too hard by trying to google this shit. You're an even bigger idiot than I thought. He first showed up with 500 men. But Panfilo de Narvaez showed up with even more men. More than a thousand. And before he even reched Mexico, he hired more Spaniards. In his first couple of conflicts with Tenochtitlan, he fled the city to reach Tlaxcala, losing more than 800 men. By themselves, the spaniards still got their asses kicked. Then they got the other tribes to help them. We're talking about the total amount of spaniards who faught the Aztecs overall, not just at any one point in time. You're just changing shit up to seem like there were hardly any Spanish effort and making it seem like Aztecs were evil when it was mainly men women and children trying to defend their homes and their city. This is what happens when 12 year old canuck children think they're geniuses but don't know shit about the world and argue to someone else about THEIR own culture. Your "facts" are flawed. I suggest you kill yourself.
User avatar #421 - princenarnode (05/08/2013) [-]
i never said or implied the aztecs were evil, and there was a very minimal amount of Spanish troops... I don't think I'm a genius and at no point were my facts flawed, and this does not warrant me to kill myself.
#410 - my numbers were right going by the number of only spanish sold…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/07/2013 on Merica' 0
User avatar #414 - Conquistador (05/07/2013) [-]
Here you are changing shit again. You weren't right about 700 men. There were more than a thousand Spanish troops in total in Mexico at that time. Now you're missing the point of what I said. Under your legal system, stealing something DOESN'T make it yours. If you're caught, you're arrested and property is RETURNED to its RIGHTFUL owner. But whites aren't superior. Asians have on average a higher IQ. Natives are linked to Asians. And they didn't suck at combat. Disease weakened them. And as for actual skill, Europeans sucked. They just had weapons and technology that was good. But colonists used Native guerrilla warfare against the Brits to defeat them. But they still used European technology. None of my topics are off. They are all related to the subject matter. You're the one saying I'm racist and you're not when that wasn't even relevant at first. I brought up facts to lower your belief that the natives were easily beaten, sucked at combat, don't have a right to believe what we want, and that the US was built solely by the white people. And I'm also not a full blooded native, I'll admit. I'm a mestizo, or what your people may call "metis". I can't take criticism? It's you who can't take fact and it's credibility in reality.
User avatar #416 - princenarnode (05/07/2013) [-]
Cortés' contingent consisted of 11 ships carrying about 100 sailors, 530 soldiers (including 30 crossbowmen and 12 arquebusiers, an early form of a rifle), a doctor, several carpenters, at least eight women, a few hundred Cuban Natives and some Africans, both freedmen and slaves. Go fuck yourself, he did bribe more spanish troops sent to arrest him later on, if that is what you are referring to. But by that time he has lost men, and the number still didn't exceed 1000. His native allies numbered in the tens of thousands. They took over a city that had Aztec warriors numbering in the hundreds of thousands, despite the dwindling effects of the disease. You are wrong, my facts are straight and they take literally two seconds to look up. God you are such an ignorant twat.
User avatar #418 - Conquistador (05/08/2013) [-]
Lol, you still got numbers wrong. It seems like you're trying too hard by trying to google this shit. You're an even bigger idiot than I thought. He first showed up with 500 men. But Panfilo de Narvaez showed up with even more men. More than a thousand. And before he even reched Mexico, he hired more Spaniards. In his first couple of conflicts with Tenochtitlan, he fled the city to reach Tlaxcala, losing more than 800 men. By themselves, the spaniards still got their asses kicked. Then they got the other tribes to help them. We're talking about the total amount of spaniards who faught the Aztecs overall, not just at any one point in time. You're just changing shit up to seem like there were hardly any Spanish effort and making it seem like Aztecs were evil when it was mainly men women and children trying to defend their homes and their city. This is what happens when 12 year old canuck children think they're geniuses but don't know shit about the world and argue to someone else about THEIR own culture. Your "facts" are flawed. I suggest you kill yourself.
User avatar #421 - princenarnode (05/08/2013) [-]
i never said or implied the aztecs were evil, and there was a very minimal amount of Spanish troops... I don't think I'm a genius and at no point were my facts flawed, and this does not warrant me to kill myself.
#407 - well its hard to believe you when you say you know alot about …  [+] (6 new replies) 05/06/2013 on Merica' 0
User avatar #409 - Conquistador (05/07/2013) [-]
I'm incorrect? You couldn't even get the numbers right. And you couldn't even back up your own shit. So you play it off and say something else.

I never asked you too. You don't even respect the natives of your country. But I couldn't care less of what you think about me personally. I think if you as I think of most people on this site. I don't even see you as human. Just a waste of Earth's raw materials used on a insufficient form of life. So you think your people own it? So stealing someone else's belongings and calling it yours is okay? You SHARE that land with them. Lol, I don't give a fuck if you call me racist. I am racist. I have a right to be. I also believe in eugenics. Because based on science, it's completely logical. It is you who isn't understanding. After all, you change your shit up. I stay on topic.
User avatar #410 - princenarnode (05/07/2013) [-]
my numbers were right going by the number of only spanish soldiers. If by my people you mean the inhabitants of Canada (which includes natives) then yes we DO own this land. No one said stealing is ok, but if you steal something geuss what? ITS FUCKING YOURS BECAUSE YOU STOLE IT. That is why people steal things... If science supports racism then i guess that means whites are just superior, because they run everything. But the sad thing is I'm not even saying whites are superior, nor am i saying natives are lesser. I just said they sucked at combat, which they did. You're the one who brought up the disease, and all the other shit, and then I brought up cortes to back up my points to answer YOUR off topic remarks. In this whole conversation you have yet to address my original post as what it is and then claim I am off topic. You're just a butthurt native who can't take any criticism.
User avatar #414 - Conquistador (05/07/2013) [-]
Here you are changing shit again. You weren't right about 700 men. There were more than a thousand Spanish troops in total in Mexico at that time. Now you're missing the point of what I said. Under your legal system, stealing something DOESN'T make it yours. If you're caught, you're arrested and property is RETURNED to its RIGHTFUL owner. But whites aren't superior. Asians have on average a higher IQ. Natives are linked to Asians. And they didn't suck at combat. Disease weakened them. And as for actual skill, Europeans sucked. They just had weapons and technology that was good. But colonists used Native guerrilla warfare against the Brits to defeat them. But they still used European technology. None of my topics are off. They are all related to the subject matter. You're the one saying I'm racist and you're not when that wasn't even relevant at first. I brought up facts to lower your belief that the natives were easily beaten, sucked at combat, don't have a right to believe what we want, and that the US was built solely by the white people. And I'm also not a full blooded native, I'll admit. I'm a mestizo, or what your people may call "metis". I can't take criticism? It's you who can't take fact and it's credibility in reality.
User avatar #416 - princenarnode (05/07/2013) [-]
Cortés' contingent consisted of 11 ships carrying about 100 sailors, 530 soldiers (including 30 crossbowmen and 12 arquebusiers, an early form of a rifle), a doctor, several carpenters, at least eight women, a few hundred Cuban Natives and some Africans, both freedmen and slaves. Go fuck yourself, he did bribe more spanish troops sent to arrest him later on, if that is what you are referring to. But by that time he has lost men, and the number still didn't exceed 1000. His native allies numbered in the tens of thousands. They took over a city that had Aztec warriors numbering in the hundreds of thousands, despite the dwindling effects of the disease. You are wrong, my facts are straight and they take literally two seconds to look up. God you are such an ignorant twat.
User avatar #418 - Conquistador (05/08/2013) [-]
Lol, you still got numbers wrong. It seems like you're trying too hard by trying to google this shit. You're an even bigger idiot than I thought. He first showed up with 500 men. But Panfilo de Narvaez showed up with even more men. More than a thousand. And before he even reched Mexico, he hired more Spaniards. In his first couple of conflicts with Tenochtitlan, he fled the city to reach Tlaxcala, losing more than 800 men. By themselves, the spaniards still got their asses kicked. Then they got the other tribes to help them. We're talking about the total amount of spaniards who faught the Aztecs overall, not just at any one point in time. You're just changing shit up to seem like there were hardly any Spanish effort and making it seem like Aztecs were evil when it was mainly men women and children trying to defend their homes and their city. This is what happens when 12 year old canuck children think they're geniuses but don't know shit about the world and argue to someone else about THEIR own culture. Your "facts" are flawed. I suggest you kill yourself.
User avatar #421 - princenarnode (05/08/2013) [-]
i never said or implied the aztecs were evil, and there was a very minimal amount of Spanish troops... I don't think I'm a genius and at no point were my facts flawed, and this does not warrant me to kill myself.
#403 - Just because some Italian immigrants fought in foreign wars do…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/06/2013 on Merica' 0
User avatar #406 - Conquistador (05/06/2013) [-]
AHAHAHAHA! Hmm.. So showing generosity was a mistake? I guess so. But that proves you can't trust others, and that the spaniards were the real monsters. It was also a mistake for the Tlaxcala to join the spaniards, because that opened the gateway for the spanish niggers to kill even more native peoples. Even others that weren't Aztec. They even invaded the southern US and Central/South America. What a bunch of traitors. And if you haven't figured it out yet, I'm a Mexican. I have Aztec ancestry. And I carry this ideology because many Europeans still attack us. Spain mocks us and views us as inferior. Yes, the Aztecs conquered other people, but they didn't completely try to wipe them out. They became a state of their empire. Allowing them to participate in its progress. The spanish niggers killed and raped countless women and children, and enslaved anyone who is of Native descent, regardless of being Aztec or not. The Tlaxcala were never actually conquered by the Aztecs. They had their own state. They did go to war with them though. Yes, in modern atheistic and European religious views, sacrifice is viewed as "bad". But religion in general is bad. Christianity in the hands of Europeans being the worse. "hurr dey dun belib en jebus les invayd dem". Crusades ring any bells? I don't believe evil exists in nature, but by most definitions of it, Spaniards were definitely more "evil". I simply stick up for people of ANY native background and use "your own medicine" when people like you attack them. You sure as hell didn't explain your "point" in a neutral manner. I sense bullshit.

They have the right to believe what they want. They say so because of how badly they're treated. To once think this land has been your home for thousands of years only to have it taken away and be treated like shit while living in poor conditions is pretty demoralizing. They're trying to speak up. Europeans in modern Europe believe Europe belongs to them. They have a right to.
User avatar #407 - princenarnode (05/06/2013) [-]
well its hard to believe you when you say you know alot about your history when you can't even get facts about cortes straight.

Of course they have a right to believe what they want, our countries guarantee freedom of speech and thought. I sure as hell don't have to respect your beliefs, and I won't. This land never belonged to you. just because people of the same race owned it previously does not entitle you to it. This is why I call you a racist. What part of this do you not understand?
User avatar #409 - Conquistador (05/07/2013) [-]
I'm incorrect? You couldn't even get the numbers right. And you couldn't even back up your own shit. So you play it off and say something else.

I never asked you too. You don't even respect the natives of your country. But I couldn't care less of what you think about me personally. I think if you as I think of most people on this site. I don't even see you as human. Just a waste of Earth's raw materials used on a insufficient form of life. So you think your people own it? So stealing someone else's belongings and calling it yours is okay? You SHARE that land with them. Lol, I don't give a fuck if you call me racist. I am racist. I have a right to be. I also believe in eugenics. Because based on science, it's completely logical. It is you who isn't understanding. After all, you change your shit up. I stay on topic.
User avatar #410 - princenarnode (05/07/2013) [-]
my numbers were right going by the number of only spanish soldiers. If by my people you mean the inhabitants of Canada (which includes natives) then yes we DO own this land. No one said stealing is ok, but if you steal something geuss what? ITS FUCKING YOURS BECAUSE YOU STOLE IT. That is why people steal things... If science supports racism then i guess that means whites are just superior, because they run everything. But the sad thing is I'm not even saying whites are superior, nor am i saying natives are lesser. I just said they sucked at combat, which they did. You're the one who brought up the disease, and all the other shit, and then I brought up cortes to back up my points to answer YOUR off topic remarks. In this whole conversation you have yet to address my original post as what it is and then claim I am off topic. You're just a butthurt native who can't take any criticism.
User avatar #414 - Conquistador (05/07/2013) [-]
Here you are changing shit again. You weren't right about 700 men. There were more than a thousand Spanish troops in total in Mexico at that time. Now you're missing the point of what I said. Under your legal system, stealing something DOESN'T make it yours. If you're caught, you're arrested and property is RETURNED to its RIGHTFUL owner. But whites aren't superior. Asians have on average a higher IQ. Natives are linked to Asians. And they didn't suck at combat. Disease weakened them. And as for actual skill, Europeans sucked. They just had weapons and technology that was good. But colonists used Native guerrilla warfare against the Brits to defeat them. But they still used European technology. None of my topics are off. They are all related to the subject matter. You're the one saying I'm racist and you're not when that wasn't even relevant at first. I brought up facts to lower your belief that the natives were easily beaten, sucked at combat, don't have a right to believe what we want, and that the US was built solely by the white people. And I'm also not a full blooded native, I'll admit. I'm a mestizo, or what your people may call "metis". I can't take criticism? It's you who can't take fact and it's credibility in reality.
User avatar #416 - princenarnode (05/07/2013) [-]
Cortés' contingent consisted of 11 ships carrying about 100 sailors, 530 soldiers (including 30 crossbowmen and 12 arquebusiers, an early form of a rifle), a doctor, several carpenters, at least eight women, a few hundred Cuban Natives and some Africans, both freedmen and slaves. Go fuck yourself, he did bribe more spanish troops sent to arrest him later on, if that is what you are referring to. But by that time he has lost men, and the number still didn't exceed 1000. His native allies numbered in the tens of thousands. They took over a city that had Aztec warriors numbering in the hundreds of thousands, despite the dwindling effects of the disease. You are wrong, my facts are straight and they take literally two seconds to look up. God you are such an ignorant twat.
User avatar #418 - Conquistador (05/08/2013) [-]
Lol, you still got numbers wrong. It seems like you're trying too hard by trying to google this shit. You're an even bigger idiot than I thought. He first showed up with 500 men. But Panfilo de Narvaez showed up with even more men. More than a thousand. And before he even reched Mexico, he hired more Spaniards. In his first couple of conflicts with Tenochtitlan, he fled the city to reach Tlaxcala, losing more than 800 men. By themselves, the spaniards still got their asses kicked. Then they got the other tribes to help them. We're talking about the total amount of spaniards who faught the Aztecs overall, not just at any one point in time. You're just changing shit up to seem like there were hardly any Spanish effort and making it seem like Aztecs were evil when it was mainly men women and children trying to defend their homes and their city. This is what happens when 12 year old canuck children think they're geniuses but don't know shit about the world and argue to someone else about THEIR own culture. Your "facts" are flawed. I suggest you kill yourself.
User avatar #421 - princenarnode (05/08/2013) [-]
i never said or implied the aztecs were evil, and there was a very minimal amount of Spanish troops... I don't think I'm a genius and at no point were my facts flawed, and this does not warrant me to kill myself.
[ 77 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)