Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

popeflatus    

Rank #173 on Content
no avatar Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius
Online
Send mail to popeflatus Block popeflatus Invite popeflatus to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/29/2012
Last Login:9/16/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#173
Comment Ranking:#4363
Highest Content Rank:#175
Highest Comment Rank:#3291
Content Thumbs: 13632 total,  14767 ,  1135
Comment Thumbs: 657 total,  1823 ,  1166
Content Level Progress: 39% (39/100)
Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 202 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 141 Comments: Faptastic → Level 142 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:572075
Times Content Favorited:921 times
Total Comments Made:1186
FJ Points:10545
Favorite Tags: Jesus (3) | hipster (2) | retard (2) | star wars (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 55829
    Thumbs Up 1714 Thumbs Down 108 Total: +1606
    Comments: 101
    Favorites: 88
    Uploaded: 07/27/14
    python strike python strike
  • Views: 38767
    Thumbs Up 1306 Thumbs Down 61 Total: +1245
    Comments: 83
    Favorites: 197
    Uploaded: 07/13/14
    magic mirror magic mirror
  • Views: 42169
    Thumbs Up 1207 Thumbs Down 72 Total: +1135
    Comments: 42
    Favorites: 34
    Uploaded: 07/17/14
    picard do a win picard do a win
  • Views: 36193
    Thumbs Up 1069 Thumbs Down 48 Total: +1021
    Comments: 42
    Favorites: 50
    Uploaded: 07/07/14
    Ah Sheet Ah Sheet
  • Views: 32244
    Thumbs Up 1021 Thumbs Down 63 Total: +958
    Comments: 70
    Favorites: 104
    Uploaded: 07/13/14
    halloween already halloween already
  • Views: 31596
    Thumbs Up 987 Thumbs Down 51 Total: +936
    Comments: 31
    Favorites: 58
    Uploaded: 07/07/14
    steve carrell iz fahnyman steve carrell iz fahnyman
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > [ 41 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#26 - None of that is true at all. The bible is false. 09/14/2014 on For mankind 0
#30 - Bible is ******** man.  [+] (2 new replies) 09/14/2014 on Homogays 0
User avatar #47 - haeckal (22 hours ago) [-]
Thank you for your input.
#37 - jackflak (23 hours ago) [-]
Just gonna reuse the OP's pic for your post.
#15 - Hi Orc! 09/13/2014 on popeflatus's profile 0
#276 - Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of sci… 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
#274 - What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#272 - When someone says that you have to do as I say or I will burn …  [+] (4 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #273 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Because I'm basing my decisions off of opinions and findings of people who have devoted their entire life to the interpretation of the text, with access to modern resources and revolutionary finds, rather than religious officials 600 years ago who were in the Church for power and money. If claiming misinterpretations is a cop out, how is it any better to use arguments against me based on corrupted ideas meant to generate more wealth back in the Dark Ages?
#274 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has shown that Adm and Eve never existed and that the flood spoken of in Genesis never happened. When science shows claims to be utterly false, an anecdote and an opinion mean nothing. If you think that now people are not using the bible to make money I must suggest that you open your eyes my friend. One only needs to look at the immense tax-free wealth of religion to baulk at that statement of yours.

User avatar #275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#268 - How am I hateful? Jesus said that the only way to heaven is th…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #269 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
First of all, it's not a threat. Secondly, the idea is that everyone, no matter how sinful, or despite what they believe in, according to the Christian faith, goes through Jesus and follows the same path as him to reach Heaven. This is one of those parts of the Bible that is very misinterpreted, much like the verse in the Quran that claims that all infidels must be eradicated.
#272 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
When someone says that you have to do as I say or I will burn you it is a threat, plain and simple. Saying that verses are misinterpreted is a total cop out. How can you prove that your understanding of the text is somehow superior to any other persons?
User avatar #273 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Because I'm basing my decisions off of opinions and findings of people who have devoted their entire life to the interpretation of the text, with access to modern resources and revolutionary finds, rather than religious officials 600 years ago who were in the Church for power and money. If claiming misinterpretations is a cop out, how is it any better to use arguments against me based on corrupted ideas meant to generate more wealth back in the Dark Ages?
#274 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
What opinions and findings are you talking about? Science has shown that Adm and Eve never existed and that the flood spoken of in Genesis never happened. When science shows claims to be utterly false, an anecdote and an opinion mean nothing. If you think that now people are not using the bible to make money I must suggest that you open your eyes my friend. One only needs to look at the immense tax-free wealth of religion to baulk at that statement of yours.

User avatar #275 - mrtwilightsparkle (09/13/2014) [-]
Alright, I'm giving up here. You're assuming that the "opinions and findings" of historians and theologians are nonexistent, yet you throw the "findings" of science at me which are also nonexistent. I never even implied that people were no longer using the Bible to make money. It's becoming more and more apparent that you're more interested in falsely justifying your judgmental attitude than to actually discuss anything.
#276 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
Science isn't an 'opinion'. You claim that the findings of science are 'nonexistent' which is baffling. Historians do not in general believe the bible to be true en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible and the opinions of theologians have no merit as they are unable to demonstrate their claims.

Everyone has some form of judgmental attitude but what matters is that claims are demonstrated.
#266 - If you don't want to listen to his tweets then you don't have … 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
#264 - If you listen to more of Gervais you'll understand why he does…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #265 - McFuckUp (09/13/2014) [-]
I've listened to him plenty. I understand why he doesn't believe in a god. That doesn't mean I care to read ten tweets a day about his atheism. I get just as annoyed when people won't shut up about God, but at least they have an excuse. Their doctrine tells them to not shut up about God.
#266 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
If you don't want to listen to his tweets then you don't have to.

If you claim that people have an excuse to not shut up about god if their religion commands it, then his excuse would be 'freedom of speech'.

If you have listened to what he says as you say then you would know he wants religion out of education and politics. His reason is more valid because there is no evidence that the religious stories are true and so should not enter into discussion about the fate of our species.
#262 - Which part doesn't make sense?  [+] (4 new replies) 09/13/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #263 - McFuckUp (09/13/2014) [-]
"He talks about god all the time so other people can see how stupid it is"
That sounds like a child's excuse to do something that he thinks would be socially unacceptable.
#264 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
If you listen to more of Gervais you'll understand why he doesn't believe in any gods. It could be argued that believing in magical entities based on ancient books is childish.
User avatar #265 - McFuckUp (09/13/2014) [-]
I've listened to him plenty. I understand why he doesn't believe in a god. That doesn't mean I care to read ten tweets a day about his atheism. I get just as annoyed when people won't shut up about God, but at least they have an excuse. Their doctrine tells them to not shut up about God.
#266 - popeflatus (09/13/2014) [-]
If you don't want to listen to his tweets then you don't have to.

If you claim that people have an excuse to not shut up about god if their religion commands it, then his excuse would be 'freedom of speech'.

If you have listened to what he says as you say then you would know he wants religion out of education and politics. His reason is more valid because there is no evidence that the religious stories are true and so should not enter into discussion about the fate of our species.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2050

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#14 - anonymous (08/29/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 983,467,360** KAHUNT!
#8 - anonymous (07/04/2014) [-]
kill yourself you god damn fat **** piece of ****
User avatar #2 - capslockrage (04/29/2014) [-]
you seem to be thumbing down a lot of my comments, butthurt much?
#9 to #2 - Orc (07/05/2014) [-]
Yeah, he's a ******* idiot. I was looking over some of his comments, and he's got to be 12ish. He tries to start **** where it doesn't need to be, and then he acts like a little bitch about it.
#15 to #9 - popeflatus ONLINE (09/13/2014) [-]
Hi Orc!
#11 to #9 - popeflatus ONLINE (07/08/2014) [-]
You're just butthurt because i schooled you in what Science was.
#13 to #11 - Orc (07/08/2014) [-]
Not really. lol
#12 to #11 - popeflatus ONLINE (07/08/2014) [-]
science*
User avatar #10 to #9 - capslockrage (07/05/2014) [-]
Oh well.
#3 to #2 - popeflatus ONLINE (04/29/2014) [-]
I thumb down that which I see as retarded.
#1 - anonymous (02/13/2014) [-]
 Friends (0)