Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

pkrbarmoviea    

Rank #53414 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 0 Comments: Untouched account
Offline
Send mail to pkrbarmoviea Block pkrbarmoviea Invite pkrbarmoviea to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/06/2013
Last Login:11/29/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 5 total,  1 ,  6
Comment Thumbs: 10 total,  166 ,  156
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -1 Content: Sort of disliked → Level 0 Content: Untouched account
Comment Level Progress: 23.63% (13/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:1
Content Views:275
Total Comments Made:235
FJ Points:-7

latest user's comments

#123 - I don't understand why people thumbed us both down on some com… 11/03/2013 on america 0
#65 - Thank you, brother. Peace to your country. 11/03/2013 on Definitely the blanket 0
#36 - Are you serious? It... It was a joke. Maybe I wasn't explicit … 11/02/2013 on Best Era Ever +8
#33 - It's a cave painting, you ******* idiot.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/02/2013 on Best Era Ever +17
#34 - superblade has deleted their comment.
#36 - pkrbarmoviea (11/02/2013) [-]
Are you serious? It... It was a joke. Maybe I wasn't explicit enough. Sorry.
#60 - Haha. Well then... I guess you're right. But nonetheless his d…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/02/2013 on america -2
#67 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Yeah, I was deeply saddened when he passed away.



<- It looked like this.
#123 - pkrbarmoviea (11/03/2013) [-]
I don't understand why people thumbed us both down on some comments—without even daring to speak up against us or anything. Is it because people generally hate Carlin on funnyjunk? Or is it because I said he was conceited?
#57 - I hope it was just a role he would step in when on-stage. But …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/02/2013 on america -3
User avatar #58 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Well i dont think so, becuase I've seen alot of his political debates. Which, while he was classy, he was always get direct with something he felt was bs or being "prettied up".

Still, in Carlins younger years he was MUCH more light hearted and silly. The "place for my stuff" and "dogs vs cats" skits he did were both classics that had no hint of cynic to be found. I think he just became an old man. ;P
#60 - pkrbarmoviea (11/02/2013) [-]
Haha. Well then... I guess you're right. But nonetheless his directness and cynicism, he still is able to make me chuckle on almost any topic. Was, I mean. R.I.P.
#67 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Yeah, I was deeply saddened when he passed away.



<- It looked like this.
#123 - pkrbarmoviea (11/03/2013) [-]
I don't understand why people thumbed us both down on some comments—without even daring to speak up against us or anything. Is it because people generally hate Carlin on funnyjunk? Or is it because I said he was conceited?
#53 - George Carlin was a fine man, but a little too conceited for my taste.  [+] (7 new replies) 11/02/2013 on america -1
User avatar #55 - calawesome (11/02/2013) [-]
have to agree with there. RIP though.
User avatar #54 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Old folks get that way, The whole Respect your elders thing. Comes from indulging older people who are bitter and blunt but feel entitled to that directness because of their experiences.
#57 - pkrbarmoviea (11/02/2013) [-]
I hope it was just a role he would step in when on-stage. But perhaps you're right.
User avatar #58 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Well i dont think so, becuase I've seen alot of his political debates. Which, while he was classy, he was always get direct with something he felt was bs or being "prettied up".

Still, in Carlins younger years he was MUCH more light hearted and silly. The "place for my stuff" and "dogs vs cats" skits he did were both classics that had no hint of cynic to be found. I think he just became an old man. ;P
#60 - pkrbarmoviea (11/02/2013) [-]
Haha. Well then... I guess you're right. But nonetheless his directness and cynicism, he still is able to make me chuckle on almost any topic. Was, I mean. R.I.P.
#67 - rprzombie (11/02/2013) [-]
Yeah, I was deeply saddened when he passed away.



<- It looked like this.
#123 - pkrbarmoviea (11/03/2013) [-]
I don't understand why people thumbed us both down on some comments—without even daring to speak up against us or anything. Is it because people generally hate Carlin on funnyjunk? Or is it because I said he was conceited?
#43 - What the **** is that *********** font?  [+] (2 new replies) 11/02/2013 on Definitely the blanket +4
#53 - creepyunclebob (11/02/2013) [-]
I just read that comment and closed the tab, but then it sank in and I started laughing so I came back to thumb.
#65 - pkrbarmoviea (11/03/2013) [-]
Thank you, brother. Peace to your country.
#144 - You are clever and original. 10/29/2013 on subway story +1
#120 - For some quite obvious reason indeed. 10/26/2013 on Real Archer Training 0
#59 - You mean: Why not go out of your way to make sure that people …  [+] (4 new replies) 10/21/2013 on How to paint a guitar 0
User avatar #62 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i just know so ( ͡° U ͡°)
User avatar #105 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Love you 2 motherduck ( ͡° U ͡°)
#108 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
#106 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
<3
#55 - Wherefore?  [+] (6 new replies) 10/21/2013 on How to paint a guitar 0
User avatar #58 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Well why not.. ( ͡° U ͡°)
#59 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
You mean: Why not go out of your way to make sure that people do not thumb you up? Seems a bit idiotic, is all.
User avatar #62 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i just know so ( ͡° U ͡°)
User avatar #105 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Love you 2 motherduck ( ͡° U ͡°)
#108 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
#106 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
<3
#53 - But why didn't you get any thumbs?  [+] (8 new replies) 10/21/2013 on How to paint a guitar 0
User avatar #54 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i said to not thumb me up.
#55 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
Wherefore?
User avatar #58 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Well why not.. ( ͡° U ͡°)
#59 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
You mean: Why not go out of your way to make sure that people do not thumb you up? Seems a bit idiotic, is all.
User avatar #62 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i just know so ( ͡° U ͡°)
User avatar #105 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Love you 2 motherduck ( ͡° U ͡°)
#108 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
#106 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
<3
#51 - That was really funny.  [+] (10 new replies) 10/21/2013 on How to paint a guitar +1
#52 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
ikr
#53 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
But why didn't you get any thumbs?
User avatar #54 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i said to not thumb me up.
#55 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
Wherefore?
User avatar #58 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Well why not.. ( ͡° U ͡°)
#59 - pkrbarmoviea (10/21/2013) [-]
You mean: Why not go out of your way to make sure that people do not thumb you up? Seems a bit idiotic, is all.
User avatar #62 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Because i just know so ( ͡° U ͡°)
User avatar #105 - takemythumb (10/21/2013) [-]
Love you 2 motherduck ( ͡° U ͡°)
#108 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
#106 - motherduck (10/21/2013) [-]
<3
#676 - P.S: Cute euphemism, "give up". 10/18/2013 on Feels, man.. 0
#674 - Stalking you? You are a total idiot and you know nothing of sc…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/18/2013 on Feels, man.. 0
#677 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
Thank god. Good riddance.
#672 - Well, well. I haven't realized. You're still an idiot. I haven…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/18/2013 on Feels, man.. 0
#673 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
Nah, I kinda gave up since it's really just arguing at a brick wall. You don't know the first thing about actual debates, and now you're stalking me. I'd rather come here to actually look at funny pictures, not waste my time with some idiot.
#676 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
P.S: Cute euphemism, "give up".
#674 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Stalking you? You are a total idiot and you know nothing of science. I will not answer any further.
#677 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
Thank god. Good riddance.
#660 - You are a ******* idiot...  [+] (6 new replies) 10/18/2013 on Feels, man.. 0
#667 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
And now because you're all butthurt over losing an argument on the internet, you're going around to all my posts and attempting to insult me? I really hope you didn't realize it was the same guy you were 'debating' with when you posted that.

You're pathetic.
#672 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Well, well. I haven't realized. You're still an idiot. I haven't lost one argument on the internet against you, you fucking retard; but since I have just evaluated your intelligence (based on your sense of humor and our previous "debate"), I do not really want to continue debating. I replied in our other "debate" though, if you're still interested.
#673 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
Nah, I kinda gave up since it's really just arguing at a brick wall. You don't know the first thing about actual debates, and now you're stalking me. I'd rather come here to actually look at funny pictures, not waste my time with some idiot.
#676 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
P.S: Cute euphemism, "give up".
#674 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Stalking you? You are a total idiot and you know nothing of science. I will not answer any further.
#677 - endospore (10/18/2013) [-]
Thank god. Good riddance.
#321 - Your arguments are fallacious. I did not only point out your g… 10/18/2013 on Description 0
#315 - The basic 'principals'? Yeah, sure, I'm the one who is below t…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/17/2013 on Description 0
#316 - endospore (10/17/2013) [-]
My god, you are easily the stupidest person I think I've ever had to deal with. I've given you point after point of evidence backing me up and your only argument so far has been "lol nope, I'm right! Take my word for it!" Like I said, please actually try to come up with a single supporting piece of evidence before coming back.

Also, when a side can't do anything but point out grammatical flaws, you know that side has lost the argument, so thank you for essentially admitting defeat not only by doing that, but again, by also not giving me a single source, piece of evidence, definition (and no, telling me to go look it up myself doesn't count), example, or anything else to back up a single claim you've made. If you're a troll, you're not a bad one, but if you're actually trying to argue this point, I really hope you're not hoping to go into any scientific field in the future since you have utterly failed to grasp even entry level scientific concepts.
#321 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Your arguments are fallacious. I did not only point out your grammatical errors, anyone who would read my comment would agree with me on that point.

No, I did not just say "lol nope, I'm right [...]", I took pains over telling why you were wrong and pointing out where exactly you made your mistake(s). Go read my comment again... Oh, but wait; that's not a good argument, is it now?

Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You should know the definition of what induction is. Especially if you are debating any scientific topic! I do not have to give you any definition or sources (your sources support my view more than yours, by the way...).

Ah... The demagogy. "If you're a troll, you're not bad one". I hope you notice how low exactly you had to stoop. You are a disgrace to the human species. I think you should either reread my comments and argue your point anew (by this account also apologizing for being a fucking idiot or a close-minded liar), or shut up and never comment back again.

P.S: Please do not repeat your "you're doing nothing but saying that you're right" argument. Even a down syndrome affected child would see that my comments are too long, concise and content-full to be subscribed to this fault. Don't even fucking try.

P.P.S: Use of profanity and semi-comical phrases such as "Even a down syndrome affected child..." are not clear indexes of 'troll-ness'. Do not even think of using this in your next comment.

*sigh*

Because, you know... I just assume there will be one.
#21 - Haha! 10/16/2013 on Niggers can't into building 0
#300 - Okay... And now you have to "prove" the existence of…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/16/2013 on Description 0
#303 - endospore (10/16/2013) [-]
How do you try and prove something? You figure out what to do to disprove it. That's the null hypothesis. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis because you clearly have never heard of this base scientific concept)

This is why psychology is considered a soft science ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science ) because its hypotheses are not testable, or in other words, there is no way to disprove them.

Where in the world did you get the idea that testing a hypothesis is to 'make sure it works' every time? Let me hit you with an example. I lock my door and then start my car. Based on what you say, if I do this every day, that's enough to prove that locking my door and starting my car are related. That's completely retarded. The way to actually test this hypothesis (Locking my door enables my car to start) is to come up with the null hypothesis (which is what will DISprove this) and see if it still works. The null hypothesis here is 'if I don't lock my door, my car will not start.' I don't lock my door and my car starts. Therefore, my hypothesis is disproven. That's how science works. You don't stupidly do the same thing over and over again and see if it keeps working.

Also, you keep telling me to come up with a real argument when you've done nothing of the sort. I've now given you four different sources backing me up with not a single one saying anything about oyu being right. Please come up with a single source that says something that agrees with you or come up with some argument other than you going 'nope, I'm right.' Right now I'm pretty convinced you're below ten years old if you don't understand the basic principals of how science works.
#315 - pkrbarmoviea (10/17/2013) [-]
The basic 'principals'? Yeah, sure, I'm the one who is below ten years old. Also, what you just described (with the car) is called logic. It's scientific only to the extent of it being an analysis of how some things come in relation in our world. You seem to have a very simplistic and liberal understanding of what science is.

I never wrote it had to work every time, you imbecile! I chose my words carefully so you could understand them; "many times over", that's what I wrote. Go search up what induction is and its relation to science.

As I see it, it is a rock or a hard place for you right now; either you are a fucking liar and had to stoop that low to distort my words to portray me as being stupid or erroneous, or you are simply too stupid to even read a comment on funnyjunk.

I'll be charitable and await calmly that you search up what 'induction' means, and that you come back and apologize for being an idiot. Until then, good bye.
#316 - endospore (10/17/2013) [-]
My god, you are easily the stupidest person I think I've ever had to deal with. I've given you point after point of evidence backing me up and your only argument so far has been "lol nope, I'm right! Take my word for it!" Like I said, please actually try to come up with a single supporting piece of evidence before coming back.

Also, when a side can't do anything but point out grammatical flaws, you know that side has lost the argument, so thank you for essentially admitting defeat not only by doing that, but again, by also not giving me a single source, piece of evidence, definition (and no, telling me to go look it up myself doesn't count), example, or anything else to back up a single claim you've made. If you're a troll, you're not a bad one, but if you're actually trying to argue this point, I really hope you're not hoping to go into any scientific field in the future since you have utterly failed to grasp even entry level scientific concepts.
#321 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Your arguments are fallacious. I did not only point out your grammatical errors, anyone who would read my comment would agree with me on that point.

No, I did not just say "lol nope, I'm right [...]", I took pains over telling why you were wrong and pointing out where exactly you made your mistake(s). Go read my comment again... Oh, but wait; that's not a good argument, is it now?

Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You should know the definition of what induction is. Especially if you are debating any scientific topic! I do not have to give you any definition or sources (your sources support my view more than yours, by the way...).

Ah... The demagogy. "If you're a troll, you're not bad one". I hope you notice how low exactly you had to stoop. You are a disgrace to the human species. I think you should either reread my comments and argue your point anew (by this account also apologizing for being a fucking idiot or a close-minded liar), or shut up and never comment back again.

P.S: Please do not repeat your "you're doing nothing but saying that you're right" argument. Even a down syndrome affected child would see that my comments are too long, concise and content-full to be subscribed to this fault. Don't even fucking try.

P.P.S: Use of profanity and semi-comical phrases such as "Even a down syndrome affected child..." are not clear indexes of 'troll-ness'. Do not even think of using this in your next comment.

*sigh*

Because, you know... I just assume there will be one.
#1 - Romans rule(d)!  [+] (2 new replies) 10/16/2013 on Niggers can't into building 0
#2 - schnizel (10/16/2013) [-]
Never forget.
#21 - pkrbarmoviea (10/16/2013) [-]
Haha!
#238 - You're probably ******* retarded, but I'll try to…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/16/2013 on Description 0
#295 - endospore (10/16/2013) [-]
Literally everything you said there is wrong. I'm going to assume you haven't even taken a middle school level science class if you don't know that the entire basis of science is the ability to disprove hypotheses.

From google searching 'science definition:'
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

and wikipedia:
Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.

Key words and phrases:
Physical and natural world (God is part of neither)
Testable
observation and experiment
#300 - pkrbarmoviea (10/16/2013) [-]
Okay... And now you have to "prove" the existence of a supernatural world. You still have the exact same problem. Your sources (although trite ones) gave the definition of science as being an inductive activity, as I said earlier. To test a hypothesis is not to try and disprove it, but to prove that it can work many times over (induction). I'm pretty sure you are trolling me; no serious person could say such stupid things with such earnestness. Unless you come up with a good argument—that actually attempts to defeat one of my points!—, do not respond.
#303 - endospore (10/16/2013) [-]
How do you try and prove something? You figure out what to do to disprove it. That's the null hypothesis. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis because you clearly have never heard of this base scientific concept)

This is why psychology is considered a soft science ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science ) because its hypotheses are not testable, or in other words, there is no way to disprove them.

Where in the world did you get the idea that testing a hypothesis is to 'make sure it works' every time? Let me hit you with an example. I lock my door and then start my car. Based on what you say, if I do this every day, that's enough to prove that locking my door and starting my car are related. That's completely retarded. The way to actually test this hypothesis (Locking my door enables my car to start) is to come up with the null hypothesis (which is what will DISprove this) and see if it still works. The null hypothesis here is 'if I don't lock my door, my car will not start.' I don't lock my door and my car starts. Therefore, my hypothesis is disproven. That's how science works. You don't stupidly do the same thing over and over again and see if it keeps working.

Also, you keep telling me to come up with a real argument when you've done nothing of the sort. I've now given you four different sources backing me up with not a single one saying anything about oyu being right. Please come up with a single source that says something that agrees with you or come up with some argument other than you going 'nope, I'm right.' Right now I'm pretty convinced you're below ten years old if you don't understand the basic principals of how science works.
#315 - pkrbarmoviea (10/17/2013) [-]
The basic 'principals'? Yeah, sure, I'm the one who is below ten years old. Also, what you just described (with the car) is called logic. It's scientific only to the extent of it being an analysis of how some things come in relation in our world. You seem to have a very simplistic and liberal understanding of what science is.

I never wrote it had to work every time, you imbecile! I chose my words carefully so you could understand them; "many times over", that's what I wrote. Go search up what induction is and its relation to science.

As I see it, it is a rock or a hard place for you right now; either you are a fucking liar and had to stoop that low to distort my words to portray me as being stupid or erroneous, or you are simply too stupid to even read a comment on funnyjunk.

I'll be charitable and await calmly that you search up what 'induction' means, and that you come back and apologize for being an idiot. Until then, good bye.
#316 - endospore (10/17/2013) [-]
My god, you are easily the stupidest person I think I've ever had to deal with. I've given you point after point of evidence backing me up and your only argument so far has been "lol nope, I'm right! Take my word for it!" Like I said, please actually try to come up with a single supporting piece of evidence before coming back.

Also, when a side can't do anything but point out grammatical flaws, you know that side has lost the argument, so thank you for essentially admitting defeat not only by doing that, but again, by also not giving me a single source, piece of evidence, definition (and no, telling me to go look it up myself doesn't count), example, or anything else to back up a single claim you've made. If you're a troll, you're not a bad one, but if you're actually trying to argue this point, I really hope you're not hoping to go into any scientific field in the future since you have utterly failed to grasp even entry level scientific concepts.
#321 - pkrbarmoviea (10/18/2013) [-]
Your arguments are fallacious. I did not only point out your grammatical errors, anyone who would read my comment would agree with me on that point.

No, I did not just say "lol nope, I'm right [...]", I took pains over telling why you were wrong and pointing out where exactly you made your mistake(s). Go read my comment again... Oh, but wait; that's not a good argument, is it now?

Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You should know the definition of what induction is. Especially if you are debating any scientific topic! I do not have to give you any definition or sources (your sources support my view more than yours, by the way...).

Ah... The demagogy. "If you're a troll, you're not bad one". I hope you notice how low exactly you had to stoop. You are a disgrace to the human species. I think you should either reread my comments and argue your point anew (by this account also apologizing for being a fucking idiot or a close-minded liar), or shut up and never comment back again.

P.S: Please do not repeat your "you're doing nothing but saying that you're right" argument. Even a down syndrome affected child would see that my comments are too long, concise and content-full to be subscribed to this fault. Don't even fucking try.

P.P.S: Use of profanity and semi-comical phrases such as "Even a down syndrome affected child..." are not clear indexes of 'troll-ness'. Do not even think of using this in your next comment.

*sigh*

Because, you know... I just assume there will be one.
#80 - Why did I type "too" when, in fact, I wanted to type…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/15/2013 on Hold mah baby 0
User avatar #107 - psychoticcaleb (10/15/2013) [-]
It is Satan's asshole.
User avatar #160 - markipliergame (10/15/2013) [-]
reading that in your font color was pretty badass
User avatar #161 - psychoticcaleb (10/15/2013) [-]
Why thank you,you beautiful cunt you.
[ 235 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)