Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

pizzapastasaurous    

Rank #13311 on Comments
pizzapastasaurous Avatar Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Online
Send mail to pizzapastasaurous Block pizzapastasaurous Invite pizzapastasaurous to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:6/25/2011
Last Login:7/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13311
Highest Content Rank:#12972
Highest Comment Rank:#2988
Content Thumbs: 85 total,  165 ,  80
Comment Thumbs: 1295 total,  2263 ,  968
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:3212
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:946
FJ Points:1372

latest user's comments

#5 - Haha I live their gimme a minute ima find t on Google maps. By…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/06/2012 on Not sure +1
#8 - Ryuketsu (02/06/2012) [-]
I lived on jersey island for 3 years. miss it so much there.
User avatar #10 - pizzapastasaurous (02/06/2012) [-]
Funny how we are completely opposite, I loath this island I can not wait to be rid of it.
#15 - Ryuketsu (02/06/2012) [-]
I worked at HMV for like 2 years. I'm amerifat so anywhere over there i loved lol
User avatar #6 - pizzapastasaurous (02/06/2012) [-]
Saint Saviours Road. You'll find it look down the street I think its on the right going down the road due east.
User avatar #7 - pizzapastasaurous (02/06/2012) [-]
Edit: Its now called Kids lounge because of that very reason.
#10 - 5'11 At 15 years old here, thank god all the males in my famil…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/06/2012 on short Scumbag DNA comp 0
User avatar #167 - zhaffy (02/06/2012) [-]
You lucky son of a gun .
#1 - Failed wet dream. 02/06/2012 on my odd dream for the morbid... +23
#2 - Picture 02/05/2012 on I'm so sorry for this. 0
#6 - Eh im the exact same at school. Keep walking people. Keep… 02/03/2012 on Listen +5
#1 - I would break up with him too, silly vegans, bacon is always a…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/25/2012 on Derpina comic! +4
User avatar #3 - wtaf (01/25/2012) [-]
That's what I've been trying to tell people, but noooo.
And thank you! (I happen to be a madam)
#56 - Someone that sees the truth! The world needs nothing less than… 01/11/2012 on Please Read 0
#8 - Thanks. 01/10/2012 on Saints Row: The Third... 0
#4 - No hes not. Im talking about the 1980s I think female singer.  [+] (1 new reply) 01/09/2012 on Saints Row: The Third... 0
#5 - erikths (01/09/2012) [-]
Search for I need a hero on spotify, and its the first song by Andrew spencer. It is the same song as in saints row.
#1 - All I have to say.  [+] (2 new replies) 01/09/2012 on BET +1
#3 - littlebigfox (01/09/2012) [-]
#2 - littlebigfox (01/09/2012) [-]
Let's be sameRon Paul haters... : )
#2 - Please tell the artist I NEED to listen to that right now.  [+] (5 new replies) 01/09/2012 on Saints Row: The Third... 0
User avatar #6 - JNAtheDUDE (01/09/2012) [-]
Bonnie Tyler's "Holding Out for a Hero"
User avatar #8 - pizzapastasaurous (01/10/2012) [-]
Thanks.
#3 - erikths (01/09/2012) [-]
Andrew Spencer is the name of the Artist
User avatar #4 - pizzapastasaurous (01/09/2012) [-]
No hes not. Im talking about the 1980s I think female singer.
#5 - erikths (01/09/2012) [-]
Search for I need a hero on spotify, and its the first song by Andrew spencer. It is the same song as in saints row.
#1 - This guys to poor to afford shoe laces, :( awww, lets give him… 01/09/2012 on 'Dat Feel +6
#1 - Retoast 01/05/2012 on Which seat can I take? 0
#111 - Am I the only one that would have broken every single bone in …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/03/2012 on So much feel +48
User avatar #353 - sheiladikshit (01/03/2012) [-]
I FOUND MY MOM GIVIN ME SOMETHING AFTER 3 DAYS
I FOUND LETTERS IN THIS BASKET CASE
I PUNCHED MY MOM IN THE FACE
NOW I OWN MY DAD'S LONELY PLACE

User avatar #119 - nightauditor (01/03/2012) [-]
Its hard enough to resist when she behaves normal.....

KIDDING.

But yeah, that sucked pretty bad in that situation. I would probably never speak to her again.
#5 - No vitamin water for me :(. 01/02/2012 on Tard Stories 7 +29
#1 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 01/01/2012 on badass samurai +1
User avatar #3 - DeeJayBee (01/01/2012) [-]
i love these kind of gifs, never seen that one before so cheers
#1 - Full speech please. 01/01/2012 on Mind Blowing 0
#12 - I thoughly enjoy debates like this, but no studies sadly. But …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/01/2012 on Stop Animal Violence -2
User avatar #13 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
That doesn't disprove my assertion. I'm saying that because we agreed to this set of morals created by man, we must follow them. That's why in countries outside of the US there are different moral rulings. They are not less moral by an objective stance, they simply created their own set of morals and had all of their citizens agree to follow them.
#10 - Im not a fan of Ararchy of which you thought I was, I believe …  [+] (3 new replies) 01/01/2012 on Stop Animal Violence -2
User avatar #11 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
Yup, and it is immoral to needlessly slaughter animals. We have set that up as a social construct. Yes, you can say morals are defined by the individual but regardless in order to be a citizen you must accept the constitution and that constitution clearly outlines what is considered immoral by society. Also, if you're religious there are divinely revealed morals, one of which rules against the abuse of animals. I actually did a study on biblical views on slaughter and use/abuse of animals :D
User avatar #12 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
I thoughly enjoy debates like this, but no studies sadly. But surely the constitution is a construct made by a man ? And if you believe in a god/s then EVERY god in history has used a man as a prophet etc.. therefore we can undoubtly say that EVERY moral or belief was governed by a man at one time or another.
User avatar #13 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
That doesn't disprove my assertion. I'm saying that because we agreed to this set of morals created by man, we must follow them. That's why in countries outside of the US there are different moral rulings. They are not less moral by an objective stance, they simply created their own set of morals and had all of their citizens agree to follow them.
#1 - Just put it out of its misery haha 01/01/2012 on Worlds Saddest Horse 0
#8 - Those thing are only 'negative points' because someone somewhe…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/01/2012 on Stop Animal Violence -3
User avatar #9 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
it's not a matter of good and evil. It's a matter of someone who is stronger immediately has the ability to do whatever he wants. It's symbolizes the deterioration of society because the only people with any measure of power will be as intelligent as the guys on jersey shore. Why bother reading when you'll just get the shit beat out of you. Better to only focus on becoming tougher. Life will become isolated, brutish, and short. We became a dominant species by creating laws. By defining right and wrong through the method of greatest good done for the most amount of people. By defining good as positive benefits we typically look at quality of life as an indicator. A man living under police protection has a much better quality of life than someone living in anarchy. I could go on for hours on this train of thought. All you need to know is that if anarchy was instated (as I'm sure you wish it would) then life would become a lot worse for everyone. Yes in the first week when the looting is happening and rich fatcats lose their lives to the horde we'll all be happy. But as time goes on there will be no regulation of good and services. We'll most likely return to a bartering system and a large degree of the population will simply die out because they will not be able to provide any essential services in this new world.
User avatar #10 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
Im not a fan of Ararchy of which you thought I was, I believe in a system of early fuedilism like the times of Alfred the great, you make a valid points, but on a different subject, this discussion was based and the possiple moral points on domestic animal slaughter. :)
User avatar #11 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
Yup, and it is immoral to needlessly slaughter animals. We have set that up as a social construct. Yes, you can say morals are defined by the individual but regardless in order to be a citizen you must accept the constitution and that constitution clearly outlines what is considered immoral by society. Also, if you're religious there are divinely revealed morals, one of which rules against the abuse of animals. I actually did a study on biblical views on slaughter and use/abuse of animals :D
User avatar #12 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
I thoughly enjoy debates like this, but no studies sadly. But surely the constitution is a construct made by a man ? And if you believe in a god/s then EVERY god in history has used a man as a prophet etc.. therefore we can undoubtly say that EVERY moral or belief was governed by a man at one time or another.
User avatar #13 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
That doesn't disprove my assertion. I'm saying that because we agreed to this set of morals created by man, we must follow them. That's why in countries outside of the US there are different moral rulings. They are not less moral by an objective stance, they simply created their own set of morals and had all of their citizens agree to follow them.
#1 - Im not fond of dubstep :( but some are alright, granted. 12/31/2011 on That twat +2
#5 - How is geting beaten by your parents or killng an animal …  [+] (7 new replies) 12/31/2011 on Stop Animal Violence -1
User avatar #7 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
but remember, we live by a set of standards and morals :) If we live by jungle law that would mean the abolishment of law and government. Survival of the fittest. The jock at the gym could murder you and steal your house. Would you really want that kind of world?
User avatar #8 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
Those thing are only 'negative points' because someone somewhere made up what is right or wrong, good and evil are opinions and therefore are non-existent.
User avatar #9 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
it's not a matter of good and evil. It's a matter of someone who is stronger immediately has the ability to do whatever he wants. It's symbolizes the deterioration of society because the only people with any measure of power will be as intelligent as the guys on jersey shore. Why bother reading when you'll just get the shit beat out of you. Better to only focus on becoming tougher. Life will become isolated, brutish, and short. We became a dominant species by creating laws. By defining right and wrong through the method of greatest good done for the most amount of people. By defining good as positive benefits we typically look at quality of life as an indicator. A man living under police protection has a much better quality of life than someone living in anarchy. I could go on for hours on this train of thought. All you need to know is that if anarchy was instated (as I'm sure you wish it would) then life would become a lot worse for everyone. Yes in the first week when the looting is happening and rich fatcats lose their lives to the horde we'll all be happy. But as time goes on there will be no regulation of good and services. We'll most likely return to a bartering system and a large degree of the population will simply die out because they will not be able to provide any essential services in this new world.
User avatar #10 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
Im not a fan of Ararchy of which you thought I was, I believe in a system of early fuedilism like the times of Alfred the great, you make a valid points, but on a different subject, this discussion was based and the possiple moral points on domestic animal slaughter. :)
User avatar #11 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
Yup, and it is immoral to needlessly slaughter animals. We have set that up as a social construct. Yes, you can say morals are defined by the individual but regardless in order to be a citizen you must accept the constitution and that constitution clearly outlines what is considered immoral by society. Also, if you're religious there are divinely revealed morals, one of which rules against the abuse of animals. I actually did a study on biblical views on slaughter and use/abuse of animals :D
User avatar #12 - pizzapastasaurous (01/01/2012) [-]
I thoughly enjoy debates like this, but no studies sadly. But surely the constitution is a construct made by a man ? And if you believe in a god/s then EVERY god in history has used a man as a prophet etc.. therefore we can undoubtly say that EVERY moral or belief was governed by a man at one time or another.
User avatar #13 - Sethorein (01/01/2012) [-]
That doesn't disprove my assertion. I'm saying that because we agreed to this set of morals created by man, we must follow them. That's why in countries outside of the US there are different moral rulings. They are not less moral by an objective stance, they simply created their own set of morals and had all of their citizens agree to follow them.
#2 - Like noa. 12/31/2011 on 4chan you so silly +1
#3 - Why dont you use the internet you are currently on RIGHT now.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/31/2011 on Bieber takedown 0
User avatar #4 - dirtyhornets (12/31/2011) [-]
i know, i was asking him if he did good sir.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
 Friends (0)