so eating hospital potatoes is fine then, I guess

I merely stated one

There are many like Englishmen and Scots! Or Welshmen and Scots! Or Japanese and Scots! Or Scots and other Scots! Damn Scots! They ruined Scotland!

You're not much into history, are you?

Denmark and Sweden have had more wars, depending on how you count.

but did they have a hundred years war?

England had a claim to the throne.....Half of France didn't even like the French king and they prefered the Angevin empire.

yes i know how the war went and it's reasons. Henry V was the man

I said I cant think of many more. Meaning I knew some

I merely stated one

I didn't want to get too into it, but you get my thumbs and undying love (no homo) for nueroplasticity argument.

@Niglet, it isn't an opinion given that the burden of proof that it is genetic falls on the people claiming it.

Even some of the more obscure neuropathies have proven genetic links.

I shouldn't have to disprove unicorns in order to tell you they don't fucking exist you twat.

I can prove melanin content and genetic markers, if you can't prove gay but insist it's genetic that's your BELIEF.

Also I'd be very interested in how one can "hide" being black.

I have light skinned black people in my family who look white or Hispanic rather than black.

Key word being "every gay." Your link would only prove true to those who believe it's a choice.

When the social norms change as they always do, to gays being a 'common situation' those who may think it is a choice might, excuse my language 'fall into gayness', however the original gays the ones that this situation doesn't apply too have got either a genetic disorder... ETC.
I think that answers your question.

I didn't want to get too into it, but you get my thumbs and undying love (no homo) for nueroplasticity argument.

@Niglet, it isn't an opinion given that the burden of proof that it is genetic falls on the people claiming it.

Even some of the more obscure neuropathies have proven genetic links.

I shouldn't have to disprove unicorns in order to tell you they don't fucking exist you twat.

I can prove melanin content and genetic markers, if you can't prove gay but insist it's genetic that's your BELIEF.

Also I'd be very interested in how one can "hide" being black.

I have light skinned black people in my family who look white or Hispanic rather than black.

i agree with awidniglet. maybe that happens to some people but that doesn't explain the gay people who hate themselves for it and wish they could change.

i have a friend who came out as being gay but he grew up in a very strict catholic family and it was this huge ordeal and we didn't see him at school for like a week and when he did come back he was so changed. his parents had shaved his head and then he was sent to a pray the gay away place. he hated himself, i doubt he CHOSE that

If you actually read my comment you would see that it is possible for some, but not every gay person would apply necessarily.

but you can't seriously believe that every gay person just pretended to be gay until their brain actually believed it to be true. There isn't proof to that.

Answer to the later: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroplasticity

Last time I checked, being gay was no longer considered a mental defect

Answer to the later: Yes and no it depends on which scientific group you believe in, for some its a chemical in-balance, others a mental disorder, others still a genetic defect.

Key word being "every gay." Your link would only prove true to those who believe it's a choice.

When the social norms change as they always do, to gays being a 'common situation' those who may think it is a choice might, excuse my language 'fall into gayness', however the original gays the ones that this situation doesn't apply too have got either a genetic disorder... ETC.
I think that answers your question.

I didn't want to get too into it, but you get my thumbs and undying love (no homo) for nueroplasticity argument.

@Niglet, it isn't an opinion given that the burden of proof that it is genetic falls on the people claiming it.

Even some of the more obscure neuropathies have proven genetic links.

I shouldn't have to disprove unicorns in order to tell you they don't fucking exist you twat.

I can prove melanin content and genetic markers, if you can't prove gay but insist it's genetic that's your BELIEF.

Also I'd be very interested in how one can "hide" being black.

I have light skinned black people in my family who look white or Hispanic rather than black.

Maybe it's the case for some, but you can't seriously believe that every gay person just pretended to be gay until their brain actually believed it to be true. There isn't proof to that.
Last time I checked, being gay was no longer considered a mental defect

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroplasticity

i agree with awidniglet. maybe that happens to some people but that doesn't explain the gay people who hate themselves for it and wish they could change.

i have a friend who came out as being gay but he grew up in a very strict catholic family and it was this huge ordeal and we didn't see him at school for like a week and when he did come back he was so changed. his parents had shaved his head and then he was sent to a pray the gay away place. he hated himself, i doubt he CHOSE that

If you actually read my comment you would see that it is possible for some, but not every gay person would apply necessarily.

but you can't seriously believe that every gay person just pretended to be gay until their brain actually believed it to be true. There isn't proof to that.

Answer to the later: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroplasticity

Last time I checked, being gay was no longer considered a mental defect

Answer to the later: Yes and no it depends on which scientific group you believe in, for some its a chemical in-balance, others a mental disorder, others still a genetic defect.

Key word being "every gay." Your link would only prove true to those who believe it's a choice.

When the social norms change as they always do, to gays being a 'common situation' those who may think it is a choice might, excuse my language 'fall into gayness', however the original gays the ones that this situation doesn't apply too have got either a genetic disorder... ETC.
I think that answers your question.

I didn't want to get too into it, but you get my thumbs and undying love (no homo) for nueroplasticity argument.

@Niglet, it isn't an opinion given that the burden of proof that it is genetic falls on the people claiming it.

Even some of the more obscure neuropathies have proven genetic links.

I shouldn't have to disprove unicorns in order to tell you they don't fucking exist you twat.

I can prove melanin content and genetic markers, if you can't prove gay but insist it's genetic that's your BELIEF.

Also I'd be very interested in how one can "hide" being black.

I have light skinned black people in my family who look white or Hispanic rather than black.

You could also "act black" and be a wigger if you're white. It's still a matter of opinion whether it's a choice or not

The difference is a person cannot become black how ever if a person starts to act like something else psychologically it is a proven fact that the brain starts to believe in its self, EG gays. Many mental condition being like the above example.

Maybe it's the case for some, but you can't seriously believe that every gay person just pretended to be gay until their brain actually believed it to be true. There isn't proof to that.
Last time I checked, being gay was no longer considered a mental defect

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroplasticity

i agree with awidniglet. maybe that happens to some people but that doesn't explain the gay people who hate themselves for it and wish they could change.

i have a friend who came out as being gay but he grew up in a very strict catholic family and it was this huge ordeal and we didn't see him at school for like a week and when he did come back he was so changed. his parents had shaved his head and then he was sent to a pray the gay away place. he hated himself, i doubt he CHOSE that

If you actually read my comment you would see that it is possible for some, but not every gay person would apply necessarily.

but you can't seriously believe that every gay person just pretended to be gay until their brain actually believed it to be true. There isn't proof to that.

Answer to the later: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroplasticity

Last time I checked, being gay was no longer considered a mental defect

Answer to the later: Yes and no it depends on which scientific group you believe in, for some its a chemical in-balance, others a mental disorder, others still a genetic defect.

Key word being "every gay." Your link would only prove true to those who believe it's a choice.

When the social norms change as they always do, to gays being a 'common situation' those who may think it is a choice might, excuse my language 'fall into gayness', however the original gays the ones that this situation doesn't apply too have got either a genetic disorder... ETC.
I think that answers your question.

I didn't want to get too into it, but you get my thumbs and undying love (no homo) for nueroplasticity argument.

@Niglet, it isn't an opinion given that the burden of proof that it is genetic falls on the people claiming it.

Even some of the more obscure neuropathies have proven genetic links.

I shouldn't have to disprove unicorns in order to tell you they don't fucking exist you twat.

I can prove melanin content and genetic markers, if you can't prove gay but insist it's genetic that's your BELIEF.

Also I'd be very interested in how one can "hide" being black.

I have light skinned black people in my family who look white or Hispanic rather than black.